-
[QUOTE=SmoociApp;2036196]We are getting close to launching the app companions will use to work on our system. At the moment we are part operating manually, but with this app we will be able to allow freelancers onboard. To complete the sign up on the app companions will need to use a government ID to verify their age. Primarily this is to make sure that all companions are of legal age, but it's possible we could also use this info to check ages on profiles.[/QUOTE]Good luck. This is going to make or break your service, and has potential to make you [I]the[/I] online source for P4 P in Thailand.
Kudos for bringing prices escort prices from astronomical "only mugs (businessmen) use this semi-scam" down to "sort of, maybe, somewhat acceptable if you squint". However, for most mongers, 2000-3000 baht for a quickie is still way too much given what oily massage parlors like Tulip offer for 1900-2100 range (multiple pops, A+, PSE), and there are literally hundreds of "massage parlors" offering the crappy old 2000 baht quickie.
If you can get a few dozen freelancers onboard in the 1000-2000 baht per session price range, customer numbers could potentially skyrocket as well, attracting new ladies and so on. In a huge positive feedback loop.
-
Sounds good, but what is the law on procuration in Thailand?
-
[QUOTE=DaddySan;2036739]Sounds good, but what is the law on procuration in Thailand?[/QUOTE]In practice, the rule is that police or the army (or both) will have to start getting their payoffs at some point.
What do you think all the "bar" and "massage parlor" owners are doing?
-
[QUOTE=PoohKeyLover;2026713]I read that Yuko on Smooci looks better in person than in pictures.[/QUOTE]I can not confirm, that Yuko looks better in person than in pictures. Actually she looks much younger and more slim on the pictures than in real. The data says, that she is 29. I think, she is much older and around 40.
Anyway she is a friendly lady and did, what she offered.
-
Smooci
In Bangkok for a few days and was looking for trouble on Saturday night. I was running an errand near Soi Cobwoy, hit Crazy House around 9 pm. Some hot girls, but the one I liked were being swarmed by old Japanese dudes, so I took off. I am sick of the bullshit in Bacara, so I poked my head into Thermae on the way to the Nana Sky Train stop. Weird scene, I was way too sober to deal with that, although there were some cute girls in there. Headed down to Patpong for a change of pace, went to Club Electric Blue, got smashed and failed to convince any to the good looking girls in there to go with me long time. The bar fine was 1200 baht, which also sort of put me off. So, having basically blown a wad of money in gogos all over town and at serious risk of blue balls, what was I do do?
Booked Vanida on Smooci. I had used Smooci before when I booked Emma a few weeks ago, so while I am at it, I will review them both. Both were excellent, but very different.
Emma is probably 28 or so, amazing skinny body, and a pretty face, but perhaps not quite as pretty as she appears in the pics. On the other hand, she is an absolute sex machine, PSE all the way. She has me doing her while she squatted on a chair, lay on her back and had me mouth fuck her while standing by the bed, she whipped out a vibrator and asked me if I could use it on her. The absolute works. I did not ask about anal, as it is not my thing, but she did tell me she does not do threesome with other girls, which is disappointing. Anyway, she was amazing, I will book her again for sure. 4000 baht for 2 hours.
That said, in my desperation to bust a nut, she was not on Smooci, so I picked Vanida, who was also amazing, but more GFE. As somebody else has pointed out, her pics are slightly airbrushed, and her skin has some slight acne scarring, but nothing too dramatic. She has a very pretty face, has not had a kids, is really slim, is pretty tight downstairs. She has bolt ONS, but there are not that big so they compliment her figure well. Compared to Emma, Vanida has a prettier face, but I might give Emma the nod on the body, as she is a bit taller and I think she does yoga. Anyway, both of them are gorgeous. Vanida is not nearly as sexually aggressive as Emma, it took a little while to get her warmed up. Once she got going though, she seemed really into it, was happy to pretty much do anything I wanted. It was much more GFE, but it was nonetheless fantastic. She is a really sweet and funny girl, it was great to spend a few hours with her. I will book her again for sure. 4200 for 2 hours.
Interestingly, I originally wanted to book Vanida for a longer period of time, as 6 hours was about 6000 baht, but 2 hours was 4200, so I thought, what the hell. However, they sent me a confirmation email that said "6 hours (2 shots). WTF? What the hell was I going to do with her for 4 more hours, play Parcheesi? I cancelled and rebooked for a 2 hour slot.
-
[QUOTE=JudeBright;2038299]I do not think so. If I booked for 2 hours, I would like the girl to stay for at lest 1 and half hours. If you allow that happen, the girl will try to finished in a hurry and will ruin my mood and enjoyment.
Jb.[/QUOTE]Is there no option for unlimited shots on smooci? I've personally never seen it, but have seen it on several of the direct agency sites.
-
Thanks both those girls on my to do list so been waiting for reviews.
Now got figure out if these others are worth their smooci rating / photos:
Patty.
Gita.
Mandy.
Mena.
[QUOTE=Gonzo88;2038154]In Bangkok for a few days and was looking for trouble on Saturday night. I was running an errand near Soi Cobwoy, hit Crazy House around 9 pm. Some hot girls, but the one I liked were being swarmed by old Japanese dudes, so I took off. I am sick of the bullshit in Bacara, so I poked my head into Thermae on the way to the Nana Sky Train stop. Weird scene, I was way too sober to deal with that, although there were some cute girls in there. Headed down to Patpong for a change of pace, went to Club Electric Blue, got smashed and failed to convince any to the good looking girls in there to go with me long time. The bar fine was 1200 baht, which also sort of put me off. So, having basically blown a wad of money in gogos all over town and at serious risk of blue balls, what was I do do?
Booked Vanida on Smooci. I had used Smooci before when I booked Emma a few weeks ago, so while I am at it, I will review them both. Both were excellent, but very different.
Emma is probably 28 or so, amazing skinny body, and a pretty face, but perhaps not quite as pretty as she appears in the pics. On the other hand, she is an absolute sex machine, PSE all the way. She has me doing her while she squatted on a chair, lay on her back and had me mouth fuck her while standing by the bed, she whipped out a vibrator and asked me if I could use it on her. The absolute works. I did not ask about anal, as it is not my thing, but she did tell me she does not do threesome with other girls, which is disappointing..[/QUOTE]
-
Next Uber
[QUOTE=SmoociApp;2036196]We are getting close to launching the app companions will use to work on our system. At the moment we are part operating manually, but with this app we will be able to allow freelancers onboard. To complete the sign up on the app companions will need to use a government ID to verify their age. Primarily this is to make sure that all companions are of legal age, but it's possible we could also use this info to check ages on profiles.[/QUOTE]Well it will be something which will compete Wechat and free apps out there but with a revenue for you and reliability for customers.
-
Smooci (update)
Following on from a post from yesterday, I wanted to update my report, as I provided a very positive and potentially incorrect review of Emma. Also, I saw Mayu off Smooci, who was reserved but great.
I saw Emma again, as my first impression of her was really great. I was pretty hungover, so perhaps this hurt the chemistry somewhat, because I did not have nearly as good a time as my first meeting with her. First of all, I remembered her as being very hot with a great skinny body and estimated her age at about 28. When I saw her yesterday, she was not looking quite so good. OutsI would certainly guess her age is well over 30. She mentioned that she has worked in the Nana gogos for 5 years, so she clearly has a lot of miles on her. She also has put on a bit of weight, and her face is nice, but not nearly as hot as I remember. She has some skin damage on her face, and looks ok, but she is certainly not a knockout. She is a really sexual, horny person, and is still quite wild, but I really wasn't feeling it frankly. Anyway, my report from my earlier meeting was really positive, and I did not want people to be misled.
Earlier today I saw Mayu from Smooci. Really classy girl, nice skinny body, very pretty face, just like the photos on the website. She was initially pretty shy, said she had only been with the agency for 3 week. I think she only works with the agency part time, as she said she has a few other jobs. Anyway, once she relaxed a little bit, she was friendly and good service, nothing too crazy or wild. She had a few restrictions on what she wanted to do / have done to her, and it wasn't really a GFE experience, in that it was a little cold, but it certainly was not PSE either. I am not trying to be negative, as she is hot, friendly and pretty willing, and I would probably repeat, but she is new to the game, so there is a slight reluctance or shyness to her performance.
-
"Cherry no more"!
I busted my "Smooci cherry" this past week and was very pleased over all with both the lady and certainly the service. I saw Naris, and she was a good way to start 4 fun days in BKK. I will admit that the same issues that have been discussed on this forum ad nauseam were evident. The only real issue for me was the accuracy of the photos. Yes it was her, but to be polite, the photographer and the editor worked a bit of digital magic. Her personality and sexual aptitude more than made up for any perceived physical lacking. She has never had children, but was involved in a pretty bad car accident that resulted in some permanent scarring on her abdomen if that bothers you (quite frankly, I didn't even notice after about 2 minutes into the session). She has awesome oral skills and does something with a light touch of her nails while delivering a well practiced oral lovemaking that I had never experienced before, but will try again.
About the way the service operates, well I can say I was very impressed and for sure will use them again. I liked the customer service and also the "track the ladies progress" feature. I need to let them know I would have to meet her in the lobby since she needed a room key to get to my floor and they were online with chat and it was not a problem. I was also pleased to find out that the special items I requested were passed on the lady. She didn't have one of them and forgot the other in a rush not to be late. It was really nice that she arrived on time and in a great mood.
I am looking forward to my next opportunity to enjoy their service. Can't wait to see what happens when the FL's or private ladies are admitted.
Sky.
-
Delayed response
[QUOTE=Gonzo88;2038591]Following on from a post from yesterday, I wanted to update my report, as I provided a very positive and potentially incorrect review of Emma. Also, I saw Mayu off Smooci, who was reserved but great.
I saw Emma again, as my first impression of her was really great. I was pretty hungover, so perhaps this hurt the chemistry somewhat, because I did not have nearly as good a time as my first meeting with her. First of all, I remembered her as being very hot with a great skinny body and estimated her age at about 28. When I saw her yesterday, she was not looking quite so good. OutsI would certainly guess her age is well over 30. She mentioned that she has worked in the Nana gogos for 5 years, so she clearly has a lot of miles on her. She also has put on a bit of weight, and her face is nice, but not nearly as hot as I remember. She has some skin damage on her face, and looks ok, but she is certainly not a knockout. She is a really sexual, horny person, and is still quite wild, but I really wasn't feeling it frankly. Anyway, my report from my earlier meeting was really positive, and I did not want people to be misled.[/QUOTE]I may be better if customers do not rate the escorts immediately after the session. I did this but subsequently decided I had over rated the girl when I was still in the heat off the moment. Pherhaps Smooci should send a reminder the day after the session to get the customer to send in his rating. The ratings may be more realistic this way. If photos are way out of date, but otherwise good, they should be rejected.
-
[QUOTE=Gonzo88;2038154]... I did not ask about anal, as it is not my thing, but she did tell me she does not do threesome with other girls, which is disappointing. ....[/QUOTE]The [URL]smooci.com[/URL] website lists all the services each lady is willing to provide.
I looked at the profile of every lady there a few days ago, and I found only 3 ladies who provided A-level service. A-level probably means anal.
Some ladies do threesomes. And this service is listed as 'Couples' in the lady's profile at the website. Which means that you need to bring your own lady, if you want to have a threesome.
-
[QUOTE=WarmStone25;2038778]I may be better if customers do not rate the escorts immediately after the session. I did this but subsequently decided I had over rated the girl when I was still in the heat off the moment. Pherhaps Smooci should send a reminder the day after the session to get the customer to send in his rating. The ratings may be more realistic this way. If photos are way out of date, but otherwise good, they should be rejected.[/QUOTE]The fact that your moment was full of heat says something good about the lady.
The problem with doing it from memory is that people's memory changes over time. The longer you wait, the less accurate your rating will be.
[URL]https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/am-i-right/201307/your-memory-isnt-what-you-think-it-is[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=WarmStone25;2038778]I may be better if customers do not rate the escorts immediately after the session. I did this but subsequently decided I had over rated the girl when I was still in the heat off the moment. Pherhaps Smooci should send a reminder the day after the session to get the customer to send in his rating. The ratings may be more realistic this way. If photos are way out of date, but otherwise good, they should be rejected.[/QUOTE]Of course, that issue would primarily be a factor for the customers who either didn't know or read the Smooci Star Rating Guidelines or chose to utterly ignore them and rate on a personal and therefore unknown (to other customers) standard.
The Smooci Star Rating Guidelines are rather specific about the standard being based on whether or not the girl's photos were accurate and whether or not she actually provided a requested service listed on her profile.
Not sure how many days of thought and consideration must be given to whether or not the girl actually provided a BBBJ+CIM, for example. But if the standard is based on whatever "heat" means to a particlar customer, then it would definitely apply.
Unfortunately.
-
Mena
[QUOTE=Vrsabien;2038477]Thanks both those girls on my to do list so been waiting for reviews.
Now got figure out if these others are worth their smooci rating / photos:
Patty.
Gita.
Mandy.
Mena.[/QUOTE]Have you by chance gotten any feedback or experience with Mena by now?