-
[QUOTE=Optimist;1916004]Citizen Kate and Pistons. You are both correct. If you combine your views we get to the real situation. On major issues the national government politicians and their representatives set direction through the Council of Europe. The Commission then makes proposals to the bureaucrats in the Commission, which then have to be approved by the directly elected European Parliament.
Checks and balances.[/QUOTE]How did you know my real name's Kate?
-
[QUOTE=CitizenKane;1916009]How did you know my real name's Kate?[/QUOTE]Wonders of predictive text LOL.
-
[QUOTE=CitizenKane;1915936]It doesn't matter how successful or not the Scandinavian / Nordic model is; what makes you think the EU won't enforce it regardless? It's not like the people of Europe will have any say in this. It's the politically correct bureaucrats in Brussels who decide.[/QUOTE]No it's the wymmyns. And indirectly the men who never stand up for their rights.
-
[QUOTE=XXL;1916030]No it's the wymmyns. And indirectly the men who never stand up for their rights.[/QUOTE]And how do the wymmyns do that? Via lobbyist groups straight to the European Commission.
-
[QUOTE=CitizenKane;1916117]And how do the wymmyns do that? Via lobbyist groups straight to the European Commission.[/QUOTE]Are you serious? Did you miss the whole global feminist movement where parts of it went too far? Sure they should have equal rights, but not more rights than men. And the idea of such policits as we are discussing comes from the ideas of women being superior to men.
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;1916151]Are you serious? Did you miss the whole global feminist movement where parts of it went too far? Sure they should have equal rights, but not more rights than men. And the idea of such policits as we are discussing comes from the ideas of women being superior to men.[/QUOTE]What are you on about? My point was there are feminist groups who lobby the EU attempting to ban prostitution in EU states.
[URL]http://www.womenlobby.org/Members-of-the-European-Parliament[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;1915973]No, it is the sovereign countries who decides. The EU politicians does not have anything more than an advisory role in this situation. The same can be said about Amnesty International's opposite take on it.[/QUOTE]Indeed, regulating prostitution is not within the scope of the EU.
-
Citizen Kane. Thanks for the link. Amazingly level of clichthe nonthought. They support women's rights to choose as long as they don't choose prostitution. They say women's choices are not valid as they are not equal (this is really ignorant: in a capitalist economy where labour is exchanged for money, all employment is based on unequal power relationships). They conflate trafficking with prostitution. These politicians clearly have severe I. Q. and emotional deficiencies: this is ok for ordinary mortals but not for those who seek and wield power over us.
At least the outcome of the Artemis raid is a setback for these people as all their arguments have been judged to be false in the case of Artemis
-
[QUOTE=CitizenKane;1916178]What are you on about? My point was there are feminist groups who lobby the EU attempting to ban prostitution in EU states.
[URL]http://www.womenlobby.org/Members-of-the-European-Parliament[/URL][/QUOTE]From reading the statements of those women, my brain capacitor just overheated, and my mind needs a rest. Also a book could be written with all the remarks that could be made against them.
But have they even considerred how many men there are that would kill to get paid for having sex with women?
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;1916361]From reading the statements of those women, my brain capacitor just overheated, and my mind needs a rest. Also a book could be written with all the remarks that could be made against them.[/QUOTE]Such books have been written, albeit often in the form of internet blogs and Youtube vids, but you can't really argue with the gynocracy. They don't care about logic, they repeat lies. Where will it end? When the money runs out? With civilization collapse? Will there be a turning of the worm in the mainstream male community?
[QUOTE=Pistons;1916361]But have they even considerred how many men there are that would kill to get paid for having sex with women?[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately not many such men. Otherwise Society would have to stop destroying men's lives. Men are sheep.
-
[QUOTE=Optimist;1914551]Anyone got any idea how to find old reports from particular members. I know you can click on their name and get an option to see that person's forum posts, but that only shows maybe about 300 posts. What about the rest?[/QUOTE]Further to what Craiova said, and apologies if you already know this, but you can click on a thread which you know that someone posts regularly in and then click on the 'thread tools' twisty button near the top (just above the first post). Then click on 'show printable version' then click on 'Show 1000 posts posts from this thread on one page'. Then click on each page in turn and do Ctrl+F to bring up the search box. Then type in that person's user name and use the down arrow to find each time that the person's name has been referred to on that page of 1000 posts. Then on to the next page.
-
[QUOTE=CitizenKane;1915980]At the entrance to the Visitors Centre of the European Parliament, there is a plaque with these words:
"National sovereignty is the root cause of the most crying evils of our times... The only final remedy for this evil is the federal union of the peoples. ".
Most EU governments (but not peoples) are all for "ever closer union". The EU bureaucrats (politicians are elected) will have more than an advisory role.[/QUOTE]Nothing is more closer than having sex, BBBJ and related sexual activities, so all EU states should legalize FKK LOL.
-
Okok, this topic is one I have never seen on this forum, yet to me it is actually just as important as the BBBJ / CBJ discussion and deffinately more important than the condom width discussion:
TWO OUT OF THREE FKK GIRLS ARE CLUELESS AS TO HOW TO PUT ON A CONDOM!
Ok, I've been to some FKK's more than others, but in every club it seems to be the same, girls who has been in the room hundreads or thousands of times with men have absolutely no idea how to 'roll on a condom' properly!
So I have to ask you other punters here, do you ever try to teach these girls how to take them on? Because I sometimes feel like I'm doing an innovating job when telling the girls that they do it wrong. And this is so important for me that I don't care one second if they feel I am being rude 'when trying to know better'.
I remember we learnt how to 'roll on a condom' properly at 6th grade in primary school. How come they don't teach these things in Romania?
Because I am getting a bit sick of the current trend of:
- Stretching the condom.
- Then wrapping it on the dick as if it was some airtight meal.
- Then having the condom full of air all the time, because that's what happens unless you 'roll it on'.
- Then having the condom move on the skin while fucking.
- Then having to change the useless condom mid fuck.
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;1919322]TWO OUT OF THREE FKK GIRLS ARE CLUELESS AS TO HOW TO PUT ON A CONDOM! ...
- Stretching the condom.
- Then having the condom full of air all the time, because that's what happens unless you 'roll it on'.
- Then having the condom move on the skin while fucking.
[/QUOTE]Go Sagami! They're such a hassle to put on that the girl will ask you to put it on yourself. They're not stretchable. They're so inherently tight that no space is left for air. They're so tight and sticky that they stay put on your skin, acting like a second skin. In fact they have so many "disadvantages" that they are simply great! The closest you can get to going bareback!
-
[QUOTE=XXL;1919353]Go Sagami! They're such a hassle to put on that the girl will ask you to put it on yourself. They're not stretchable. They're so inherently tight that no space is left for air. They're so tight and sticky that they stay put on your skin, acting like a second skin. In fact they have so many "disadvantages" that they are simply great! The closest you can get to going bareback![/QUOTE]Aha, is that right?
I commented that size L Sagami is too tight on width for me, but OK for length. Maybe you are right, Sagami supposed to be tight on width because it supposed to act as second skin. ? Is this the fact or assumption?