This fits best for this thread IMO
Watch this, fits best for this thread IMO. Sound on for better effect.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/CdslN34FWtN/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=[/URL]
Just bad Repub luck and wild coincidence then. For 100 years.
[QUOTE=JustTK;2707507]No, and I am not going to waste my time to research it either since I would find a report that shows the underlying global factors are more important (WW1, WW2, new tech, global pandemic etc), and you will just show me another report that you think is more important. So why not just show me that report and save me time? After all, its your claim. Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evicdence.[/QUOTE]Well, if every major economic downturn and massive jobs destruction and none of the extended economic expansions and historic jobs creation of the past 100 years happened under Repub Captains while all of the extended economic expansion and historic jobs creation and none of the major economic downturns and jobs destruction happened under Dem Captains but you reject the conclusion that Repub Captain stewardship is simply inherently crap because it must have been external forces that made it so over and over and over again, then I guess those god damned Repub Captains have just been most unlucky bastards for the past 100 years with no end to their bad luck in sight while those god blessed Dem Captains have been pulling almost nothing but lucky cards for those same 100 years.
Amazing.
Place your bets and cast your votes accordingly, folks.
Once again you miss the point
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2707622]God, you are fucking stupid. Most cases of monkey pox were missed early on, and only a dolt like you would point to a statement saying likely and suggests means anything. And you are so stupid you do not get the difference between monkey pox and RSV.
RSV hits sick infants dumb ass. When political hacks like you make diseases political, all that matters is Covid. So never mind all the people dropping dead with fentanyl and the kids on ventilators with RSV, that country did a great job as long as the Covid numbers were low.
It was proven masks do not work, the vaccines effectiveness was vastly over stated, and lockdowns hurt more than they helped, but you dumb Dems want to blame Trump so badly for the pandemic, you make up things that would have worked.
With you dumb Dems, the death count with Covid is one million deaths caused by Trump, none by Biden, none by Fauci, and none by the Chinese, and all the issues / side effects with the vaccines, masks, and lockdowns do not count either. That is Dem math..[/QUOTE]Get off the "you dumb Dems want to blame Trump so badly for the pandemic" bullshit. We blame tRUMP for fucking up the US response to the pandemic. Did SARS-Cov-2 originate in China? Yes. Who was the fucking genius who pulled out US scientists from China who [B]may[/B] have made a difference early on? Ahhh, yes, Cheeto Tweeto did that. Dr. Fauci didn't do it. Democrats didn't do it. Hair Furor made that decision. What a moron.
The worst part of COVID is that idiots like you still believe the bullshit that he tried to foist off on the public. Like "It will all go away once the weather gets warmer". Like "We have 15 cases but it will soon be zero". Like "I'm not going to wear a mask. " Like "It is a Democrat hoax". Even when the Orange Buffoon tried to tell his supporters to get vaccinated, they boo'ed him. Talk about stupid!
When you are stupid as you are, you simply can't help yourself. You have no idea how science works which is evidenced by the crap you consider as "evidence".
Like "all the issues / side effects with the vaccines"? Really. Like what, a sore arm? Headaches? Big fucking deal. Yes, some side effects are serious. Like anaphylaxis but it only occurs 2 to 5 times in a million vaccine shots. And blood clots occur with about the same frequency. Ooooh, ooooh, ooooh let's get all worked up about something that occurs in 0. 000005 of all vaccinations. Is that what you're talking about? Does every idiot like you expect the vaccine to be free from any side effects at all. The simple facts that [B]no vaccine ever[/B] has had zero side effects doesn't make any difference to you. No sir! Here's a study that looked at COVID vaccine side effects worldwide. A person of normal intelligence should be able to read and understand the study in about 15 minutes. It will undoubtedly take you all day because all of the bigly words. But I doubt that you will bother to read the study because you might actually learn something. I doubt it, but hope springs eternal! [URL]https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/global-covid-19-vaccine-summary-side-effects[/URL]#Potential-side-effects-per-vaccine.
And somehow you conveniently forget who was in charge when the vaccines were developed. Who was that? Ahhhh yes, your boy Cheeto Tweeto! If the vaccines are as ineffective as you claim, blame him. He was the one who got them developed. But what's worse, virtually every construction contract ever written (and your boy Donnie the Dumbass was a construction guy) contained "failure to perform" language. If the Mango Mussolini was as smart as he said he was (and as smart as you claim he is), why did he not include that language in the vaccine contracts? The only logical conclusion is that he was a moron for letting the vaccine manufacturers pull the wool over his eyes.
Ok, I'll save you the time by posting these links again here
[QUOTE=JustTK;2707507]No, and I am not going to waste my time to research it either since I would find a report that shows the underlying global factors are more important (WW1, WW2, new tech, global pandemic etc), and you will just show me another report that you think is more important. So why not just show me that report and save me time? After all, its your claim. Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evicdence.[/QUOTE]I believe 100 years of data is a goodly amount and plenty to identify a modern pattern. Additionally, 100 years ago was about the time the Federal Reserve was on the job doing what it has been mandated to do under every president ever since and WWI was no longer wreaking economic havoc around the globe.
I suppose we might start with this one. I mean, to make sure you'll know when the "Captain" Presidents of each Party were in office for everything else that follows over the past 100 years:
[B]List of Presidents of the United States[/B]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States[/URL]
Let me know if and where you see a pattern of growing Unemployment Rates, sometimes into the double digits for many, many consecutive months in a row as they did under Reagan, the skyrocketing ones under Bush2 and Trump, etc under any presidents other than Republican Presidents. This chart only goes back to 1948, not as far back as 100 years. But we can fill in the blanks on what the skyrocketing Unemployment Rate must have looked like under Repub Herbert Hoover vs the dramatic decline in it under FDR, can't we?
[B]Unemployment Rate Table By Month:[/B]
[URL]http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000[/URL]
Again, let me know if and where you see Repubs besting Dems on the Jobs Creation front over the past 100 years rather than underperforming horribly:
[B]Jobs Created During Presidential Terms:[/B]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms[/URL]
Again, let me know if and where you see major economic contractions under Dems over the past 100 years rather than under Repubs as well as impressive prolonged periods of growth uninterrupted by a major Recession under Repubs instead of Dems for that same 100 years:
[B]US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions[/B]
[URL]https://www.nber.org/research/data/us-business-cycle-expansions-and-contractions[/URL]
This week we find out who paid for hundreds of gangmembers to come attack the Capital
As a retired accountant I agree:
Always follow the money.
I expect to make a good sum betting on a well deserved finish for TrumpShit.