Or was it Newsmax? Breitbart?
[QUOTE=Questner;2899990]There are other opinions on the 'fiery' speech:
[URL]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/8/dr-carole-lieberman-forensic-psychiatrist-sees-sig/[/URL]
Where's Elder Justice Initiative?[/QUOTE]LOL. I'm guessing most of the article titles that nobody heard of and had absolutely nothing to do with the purpose of Trump's Fed Appointee Powell's hearing rattled off by numbskull Repub Senator Kennedy in your previous post link originated at The Washington Times or similar too, right?
So is our conclusion supposed to be that even a drugged up, senile, decrepit, mentally incapacitated old Dem is more lucid, better informed, more truthful, more competent, capable, coherent and certainly more effective in producing positive results for America than any Repub potus in the past 100 years or more and especially way, way more than the most popular and beloved (among Repubs) Repub candidate opposing him today?
Well, if just a few bucks worth of that miracle drug Biden supposedly was given also contributed to his producing one of the greatest and strongest American economies in history while $2+ Trillion American tax dollars upfront and an estimated $1. 5 Trillion added to the deficit every 10 years for Trump's one and only economic "stimulus" legislation that produced at least a million fewer jobs with it than without it and, at that, still only managed to place his 3 "best" years prior to Trump's Pandemic at #8 out of the 12 most recent presidents' economies, I say go ahead and mix those tablets into Joe's ice cream scoops every now and then.
The Elephant in the room, ...that is Trump!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2899902] You douches blather on about rule of law. How about shoplifting in San Francisco? That is fine with you douches. How about a rich Indian family who flies into Mexicali, pays the drug cartels thousands, crosses the border illegally and then calls 911 for an emergency to come pick them up? Oh yeah, fuck that rule of law. Fuck the taxpayers who are paying for 911 services. We are looking at potential future Democratic voters. That and only that as we have seen is more important than any so called law. [/QUOTE]
Well you just can't please everyone! Look, is SF no longer a "blue" city?
[b]San Francisco 'can no longer be called progressive city...[/b]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/media/san-francisco-no-longer-called-progressive-city-newspaper-declares-law-order-measures-pass[/URL]
As for SF, I'd thought you'd be happy [i]([b]ie.[/b] you know, like Trump's two fisted, hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously happy[/b]...kkkk!)[/i], with the "anti-woke" laws that just passed, it seems to me SF, is addressing and tackling some of it's problems and not running away from them, because Trump tells them "...when and how high to jump".
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2899902] I don't know WTF you are talking about with some border bill. There were executive orders in place that had this mess under control and as I showed, Biden rescinded them like on day one of his presidency. [/QUOTE]
Yes the border bill, the one with bipartisan support in the Senate (when I said it passed, I misspoke). The same one that had everything Repubs, wanted for US Border Security. The very same one,
[b]Biden shamed Repubs with,[/b] in his brilliant SOTU speech. The very same one, Trump ordered the House Repubs to put the kibosh on, where it was basically DOA in the House!
[b]Donald Trump brags about his efforts to scuttle bipartisan border deal[/b]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/27/trump-border-biden/[/URL]
Yes, that border bill, [b]the one Trump put the kibosh on![/b]
Yes, the same border, Repub Sen. Katie Britt, was being disingenuous about and malodorously implied, her sex-trafficking sob story happened during Biden's term.
[b]Was Trump supporter Katie Britt caught in whopping lie about graphic sex trafficking story?[/b]
[i]See inset video by journalist, Jonathan M. Katz[/i]
[URL]https://www.nj.com/news/2024/03/was-sen-katie-britt-caught-in-whopping-lie-about-graphic-sex-trafficking-story.html[/URL]
As for the rest of your incoherent and blabbering rant, if you choose to willfully [b]overlook[/b] and [b]ignore[/b] the rather large elephant in the room, that is Trump, well that's on you.
You Repubs, may [b]cowardly[/b] turn a blind-eye and are often blinded to Trumps malignant, crazy, destructive, malicious and pernicious behavior and thuggin' influence, the rest of us see the wanna be fascist dictator, for what he truly represents, is nothing short of insidious.
Repub Sen. Katie Britt, border lies..BUSTED!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899998][b]Shocker.[/b] It turns out that new Ruby Red MAGA Repub Senator from Ruby Red Repub Alabama who gave that weepy, whiny, GOP response to Dem Joe Biden's terrific SOTU Address is a flat out LIAR.
Shocking, I know.
That story she told in detail about some young girl being repeatedly gang raped in the USA by drug runners let in by evil Joe Biden that she has repeatedly told and told again with relish in her internationally televised GOP response? Yeah, it happened in Mevico while Ruby Red Repub GW Bush was so-called president.
Joe Biden was not the President at that time. He wasn't even Vice President at that time.
[B]Katie Britt Used Decades-Old Example of Rapes in Mexico as Republican Attack on Biden Border Policy.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2024-03-09/republican-senator-used-decades-old-example-of-rapes-in-mexico-to-attack-biden-border-policies[/URL]
I am sure Fux News will insist she appear on one of their top-rated prime time lie-fests to apologize to the World, America and specifically Joe Biden for repeating that favorite Ruby Red MAGA Lie in her GOP response the other night. Lolol.[/QUOTE] "Shocker", that more Repubs are being disingenuous and misrepresenting the truth, on such big issues like border security...yeah don't say! (...kkkk!)
[b]Was Trump supporter Katie Britt caught in whopping lie about graphic sex trafficking story?[/b]
[i]See inset video by journalist, Jonathan M. Katz, who broke the story.[/i]
[URL]https://www.nj.com/news/2024/03/was-sen-katie-britt-caught-in-whopping-lie-about-graphic-sex-trafficking-story.html[/URL]
Once again, even with something as important as a SOTU Rebuttal, Repubs are being disingenuous, insincere and spreading misinformation, to the American people, knowing full well, [b][i]"...a lie travels half-way around the world, before the truth can get it boots on!"[/i][/b]
We'll see about any forthcoming retraction, on FOXY Muse or any other right-wing propaganda outlet....but I would hold my breath!
I Am Lion, Hear Me Roar...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899927]No doubt about it; after Trump's economic and national security policies, stewardship and lies converted a likely easily manageable endemic confined to one region in China into the historic deadly, worldwide economy Crashing, Supply-Chain collapsing, millions upon millions of jobs-destroying, Hyper Inflation-triggering Pandemic it became, Joe Biden's Great Dem Recovery has produced the Strongest Economy in the World.
According to Ultra Winger Fux News Economic Expert, Stephen Moore, in agreement with Joe Biden himself:
[B]Stephen Moore Agrees With Biden, US Economy Best In The World[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/03/stephen-moore-agrees-pres-biden-us-economy[/URL]
[i]"...The facts, figures, and numbers are so strong that [b]even these idiots[/b] can't deny that the [u]US economy is roaring under President Biden.[/u]"[/i]
[/QUOTE] Great Post! The more great economic news to report, the less Repubs will have to campaign on.
Let me be so bold, as to also extend those undeniable, factual and truthful reporting, w/r to yet another glowing report on the US economy under President Joe Biden, to our [i]Russian "useful idiots"[/i] and so called [i]Repub ISG "economists",[/i] and say that the US economy is not just okay, tepid, or mah...[b]it is indeed R.O.A.R.I.N.G.!!![/b]
[LIST]Not to add more insult to injury, but more great news. The Feb 2024, US job numbers are better than expected, coming in with [b]275K added:[/b] [URL]https://www.cnn.com/business/live-news/jobs-report-february-03-08-24/index.html[/URL][/LIST]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900281]...on FOXY Muse or any other right-wing propaganda outlet....but I would hold my breath! [/QUOTE] [b]Correction:[/b] Should have read: "...but I [b]wouldn't[/b] hold my breath!"
Aren't words, more meaningful?
[QUOTE=Questner;2900263][URL]https://www.heritage.org/press/oversight-project-sues-department-justice-records-used-hur-report[/URL]
The President's "aliases include Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters and JRB Ware" Is it?
[URL]https://spectator.org/grumpy-old-man-mumbles-state-of-the-union/[/URL] No comments here.
[URL]https://www.theamericanconservative.com/bidens-state-of-the-union-was-a-declaration-of-war/[/URL]
I would say that the President has deep personal conflict of interest with respect to Ukraine and this conflict of interest costs everyone dearly.[/QUOTE] Uhh?
To what or to whom does any of this part of your post address?
Is it answering to past questions, I asked of you? Or someone else? Or just new business you're wanting to address?
[QUOTE=Questner;2900263]Well, I perceive bold text and capitalization both as shouting which is rude and patronizing to a reader, as if any reader can't follow or comprehend the whole text of the article. [/QUOTE]
Therein lies the artistry of the post. Granted, a writer's stylistic queues, my not suit everyone, but do that which makes you an individual. Or NOT!
Listen, there are many things ISGers, can point to that are REALLY and truly rude, [u]least of which[/u] is the odd word or two, that is [b]bolded[/b], CAPITALIZED, [i]italicized[/i], or [u]underlined.[/u] for effect, when writing.
Point and case, in your recent post for instance, you didn't include my quote (or anyone else's) in your post, to whom your criticisms, explanations, or comments are directed toward. This can also be seen as [b]rude.[/b] Not to mention very confusing to readers.
Also leaves the reader confused as to whom or to what some of the other comments, links and articles, in your post are addressing. Or perhaps just lazy posting, where it's left up to the reader to figure these things out for themselves?
Personally, I tend to focus on the [u]actual WORDS[/u] that are being said, by the writer of the post. Consider the rest as [b]"a poetic license"[/b] or colorful way, to draw the reader in, as writers have done before me, for eons.
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2900270][b]That's Common.[/b] The posters that pepper off a long list of questions are the ones that desperately want to debate, but can't. [/QUOTE] Yes, very common indeed! My fav. the post with ONLY a single link to some video/article "debate" counter argument.
There The Repubs Go Again
Classic Repubs will say anything, do anything, lie, cheat and steal to make cuts to Social Security, Medicare and other now revered positive legislative accomplishments for the American people that Dems proposed, fought for and passed (but which Repubs never have) in order to shift American taxpayer dollars from funding those magnificent quality of life for everyone achievements into the pockets of their favorite political donor class wealthiest, top income margins and corporate CEOs.
Repubs always have and always will.
[B]There you go again: Lessons from previous US debates[/B]
[URL]https://www.ft.com/content/15e746b6-81ce-11e6-8e50-8ec15fb462f4[/URL]
[QUOTE]
Reagans other famous one-liner from the debate was, [b]There you go again, which he said in response to Mr Carters accusation that Reagan wanted to eliminate Medicare.[/b] After that, There you go again became Reagans signature rejoinder to his critics.[/QUOTE][B]Reagan Budget Means Drastic Cuts In Medicare and Medicaid Programs.
Fifth of Nation Is Affected Reagan Budget Means Drastic Surgery for Medicare, Medicai.
Aug. 20, 1981[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/08/21/reagan-budget-means-drastic-cuts-in-medicare-and-medicaid-programs/5c74d19a-dfdc-4c57-924f-feb27dc78f9c/[/URL]
[B]Republican lawmakers push back after Biden says GOP wants to cut Social Security, Medicare: 'Dishonest move'[/B]
[URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/republican-lawmakers-push-back-biden-says-gop-wants-cut-social-security-medicare[/URL]
[B]Trump says he's willing to cut entitlements to shrink the $23 trillion national debt.
March 12, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/trump-cut-funding-entitlements-social-security-medicare-national-debt-reelection-2020-3-1028972301[/URL]
[B]Trump on Social Security, Medicare cuts: There is a lot you can do.
March 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4523816-trump-social-security-medicare-cuts-there-is-a-lot-you-can-do/[/URL]
Biden and his Dem Senate has China squealing. Trump never did and never will.
Add this to Trump's 37+ times he went limp dick on Russia, trying not only to reverse the imposition of sanctions against Russia for invading Georgia and Crimea and its unprecedented election interference to help Trump win but to actually reward Russia for it and you can see as clear as day why Russia and "Make sure I win" China loves Trump and dreads the idea of Four More Years of Biden.
[B]'The decoupling's really in full force': expert warns of more USA Curbs on China.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/12/-us-curbs-on-china-to-rise-with-decoupling-in-full-force-expert-warns.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]In October 2022, the U.S. introduced rules aimed at blocking Chinas access to high-tech semiconductor chips and chip-manufacturing equipment amid concerns that China could use them for military purposes.
A year later, the U.S. said it was going to introduce more restrictions to close gaps that arose after 2022′s restrictions on AI chip exports went into effect.
"If it (U.S.) persistently monopolizes the high end of the value chain, and keeps China at the low end, where is fairness and competition?" Wang said.[/QUOTE]
'Tis nobler to debate or NOT to debate?
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2900270]That's Common. The posters that pepper off a long list of questions are the ones that desperately want to debate, but can't.
[/QUOTE]
I have to say, when you're right, you're right! And you're soooo RIGHT!
It does bears repeating! That when guys come here, to flex their [b]"debating muscle(s)"[/b] and CANNOT, it's [u]nothing new[/u] and as you've aptly said...it's VERY COMMON!. Must have seen it a several hundred times!
But of course, there are those that then (often angrily and in frustration), naturally turn and grab the [i][b]"lowest hanging fruit"[/b][/i], that they can find and post it, as some form of "argument" or "counterpoint" to their so called idea of "debating". (NOTE: Often taking things out of context, to suit their [u][i]boorish narrative[/i][/u])
This sophomoric attempt to flex whatever remaining shred of a so called rebuttal, they can muster, is soooo very reminiscent of the recent [b]Repubs SOTU Rebuttal[/b], that was widely panned,
mocked, ridiculed, SNL'd and even punk'd, clowned, (to some seen as) [i]"creepy"[/i] and scorned as [i]"cringeworthy"[/i] by her own fellow Republican colleagues. An historical low and one of the worst rebuttals in recent history.
[b]Katie Britt State of the Union Rebuttal Torched by Republicans[/b]
[URL]https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/katie-britt-sotu-rebuttal-torched-republicans-1234983528/[/URL]
[b]"Parody-Level Terrible": Even Republicans Are Panning Katie Britt's...[/b]
[URL]https://www.vanityfair.com/news/katie-britt-state-of-the-union-rebuttal[/URL]
Perhaps, they'd ALL do better, if they did a "tag-team-up" with [b]ChatGPT AI[/b], to write their [u]nonsensical[/u] rebuttals? But then again, they'd probably fuck that up too! (...kkkk!)