-
[QUOTE=WarmStone25;2078677]I found pictures of Oli from when I booked her on Facebook under Smooci. I have to admit, I am not really sure now. The recent pictures that I saw could be her, with different photos, and clothes, and hair.
There is only one thing for it. I will be in Bangkok in November and if Oli is on Smooci I will get a date with her to settle this matter. I will report in due course.[/QUOTE]I think it is the same Oli as before but, as you say, with a different hair style (color is lighter now in these pics), different look with the new clothes and glamour posing. One way to find out before booking is if you can get a reply from her that her preferred nickname is "Poppy", then that is the same Oli as before.
-
Smooci question
I'm in BKK soon and very interested in trying this app to book an escort.
Are the prices correct?
I've selected 6 hour booking and been quoted prices considerably lower than stated on agency website.
Basically I'm asking what is the catch? Seems too good.
-
Smooci deals?
I've read on other fora that the virtual middleman function of Smooci somehow lowers the rates, but I haven't tried an agency or a Smooci yet so can't confirm.
I are commend you eniiy that six hour (booking and follow up with a detailed FR.
[QUOTE=ThailandBound;2078890]I'm in BKK soon and very interested in trying this app to book an escort.
Are the prices correct?
I've selected 6 hour booking and been quoted prices considerably lower than stated on agency website.
Basically I'm asking what is the catch? Seems too good.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=AngeloDeath;2074386]One of the reviews which he posted is a review which I wrote on Smooci so I think he is 100% legit. Also it's disappointing reading Noey's reviews, was really hoping to book her when I get to Bangkok in 2 weeks.[/QUOTE]Noey is horrible. I tried her as well. She said no to almost everything and complained after 7 minutes of banging. The only positive was that she arrived in time, early even.
-
I certainly will make a FR in November.
I've tried a few agencies (absolute angels twice and gold) already, all worked out fine. The last one I had was actually Mayumi from the smooci app.
The agency was an easy process from initial email to getting that call from reception. 5 k for 2 hours or 10-12 k for 24 hours.
[QUOTE=Chacal60;2079091]I've read on other fora that the virtual middleman function of Smooci somehow lowers the rates, but I haven't tried an agency or a Smooci yet so can't confirm.
I are commend you eniiy that six hour (booking and follow up with a detailed FR.[/QUOTE]
-
Prices are correct
Tried Emma last night for 3 hours (Will post FR in a day).
Prices are definitely correct. What you see is what you pay. Girls are same too, though the pics may be old or photo-shopped (please RTTF before booking someone). However, saw that agency pages had much more options than Smooci, though at higher price point. Maybe the ones not getting enough demand at agency page are put here. Allows them to target larger set of people, at lower price, without diluting the price on their page. Plus Smooci provides VAS like tracking etc.
Safe mongering,
LC.
[QUOTE=ThailandBound;2078890]I'm in BKK soon and very interested in trying this app to book an escort.
Are the prices correct?
I've selected 6 hour booking and been quoted prices considerably lower than stated on agency website.
Basically I'm asking what is the catch? Seems too good.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Chacal60;2079091]I've read on other fora that the virtual middleman function of Smooci somehow lowers the rates, but I haven't tried an agency or a Smooci yet so can't confirm.
I are commend you eniiy that six hour (booking and follow up with a detailed FR.[/QUOTE]LOL, does how they operate affect the way we cum or the whole session? I guess that is not important. Or maybe to you is.
-
Read the reports
[QUOTE=ThailandBound;2078890]I'm in BKK soon and very interested in trying this app to book an escort.
Are the prices correct?
I've selected 6 hour booking and been quoted prices considerably lower than stated on agency website.
Basically I'm asking what is the catch? Seems too good.[/QUOTE]I tried Smooci on my last visit to Bangkok. I did not see any catch. The girls in the photos turned up at my room at the required time. Both were a few years older than stated, otherwise ok. Best to take Premium membership and read all the reports. The prices were as stated on the Smooci website.
-
[QUOTE=Ixgzca;2079113]Noey is horrible. I tried her as well. She said no to almost everything and complained after 7 minutes of banging. The only positive was that she arrived in time, early even.[/QUOTE]According to the Smooci website, Noey is only 20 years old. Which means that she isn't yet that experienced.
Some guys like young, inexperienced women like her. But you need to be realistic about it and play her pussy the right way. Or else it won't go well for you and her.
If you want to have a porn-stud experience and really nail the hot chick with your dick, then I'd say that experienced ladies in their 30's are best for that.
Not every lady is best for every kind of experience. You need to know what you want and choose the lady accordingly.
Noey actually has a good rating of 4.1 on the Smooci website. And don't think this is guys lying about her. This is just guys who wanted something different from her, something that she was good at giving them.
-
[QUOTE=Dan7373;2079298]According to the Smooci website, Noey is only 20 years old. Which means that she isn't yet that experienced.
Some guys like young, inexperienced women like her. But you need to be realistic about it and play her pussy the right way. Or else it won't go well for you and her.
If you want to have a porn-stud experience and really nail the hot chick with your dick, then I'd say that experienced ladies in their 30's are best for that.
Not every lady is best for every kind of experience. You need to know what you want and choose the lady accordingly.
Noey actually has a good rating of 4.1 on the Smooci website. And don't think this is guys lying about her. This is just guys who wanted something different from her, something that she was good at giving them.[/QUOTE]With all due respect, I completely disagree. First of all, a 4.1 Star rating on Smooci probably isn't good at all with regard to the issue of the girl delivering the services listed on her profile and likely doesn't reflect anything positive about what she is "giving" customers. Even the owner of Smooci has said he would stick to girls with 4.5 Star ratings or greater to better ensure accuracy on the services listed on their profiles. Considering the way Smooci handles their Star ratings, that girl could easily float to a small fraction on either side of a 4 Star rating on the strength of her youngish age alone, having virtually nothing to do with whether or not she has ever delivered half of the services she lists on her profile to any customer. Where the poster made his mistake, assuming the girl's actual delivery of the services she listed on her profile were important to him and it sure sounds like it is, was in choosing a girl with less than a 4. 5 Star rating, imo.
But, again, considering the way Smooci handles its Star rating system on its own site, it would be easy for a customer to make that mistake and assume a 4.1 Star rating is a good rating as far as delivery of services is concerned rather than her getting that rating simply because the girl is young, cute, punctual, presents a good first impression, has a wonderful personal story to tell about cheating drunk Thai boyfriends, how much she prefers farangs, must take care of her sick grandmother and a whole host of other issues having nothing whatsoever to do with her actually delivering the services listed on her profile. One would only know about Smooci's own recommendation on that issue if he reads these message boards thoroughly.
Second, a Thai girl who has the BALLS to approach and walk into a strange hotel to meet a man she's never laid eyes on for sex without even a mamasan or a drink server around to oversee, manage or protect her is definitely not "inexperienced" in any way, shape or form no matter what her age. And if it is true that such a girl shows up prepared NOT to even provide half the services she knowingly listed on her profile and/or balk at the pathetically simple task of merely laying there with her legs open for 7 minutes on the shrewdly calculated assumption that she can shrug off and deflect whatever fallout for such behavior would ensue from this farang stranger, then we're talking about a hardcore scammer, period, and not a delicate flower of a tender age too young to be expected to handle life and sex in the big city.
-
[QUOTE=Dan7373;2079298]According to the Smooci website, Noey is only 20 years old. Which means that she isn't yet that experienced.
Some guys like young, inexperienced women like her. But you need to be realistic about it and play her pussy the right way. Or else it won't go well for you and her.
If you want to have a porn-stud experience and really nail the hot chick with your dick, then I'd say that experienced ladies in their 30's are best for that.
Not every lady is best for every kind of experience. You need to know what you want and choose the lady accordingly.
Noey actually has a good rating of 4.1 on the Smooci website. And don't think this is guys lying about her. This is just guys who wanted something different from her, something that she was good at giving them.[/QUOTE]Same sentiment.
Some specified guys wanted some extra service which the girls don't provide, and the guys will penalise her for that.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2079472]With all due respect, I completely disagree. First of all, a 4.1 Star rating on Smooci probably isn't good at all with regard to the issue of the girl delivering the services listed on her profile and likely doesn't reflect anything positive about what she is "giving" customers. Even the owner of Smooci has said he would stick to girls with 4.5 Star ratings or greater to better ensure accuracy on the services listed on their profiles. Considering the way Smooci handles their Star ratings, that girl could easily float to a small fraction on either side of a 4 Star rating on the strength of her youngish age alone, having virtually nothing to do with whether or not she has ever delivered half of the services she lists on her profile to any customer ever. Where the poster made his mistake, assuming the girl's actual delivery of the services she listed on her profile were important to him and it sure sounds like it is, was in choosing a girl with less than a 4. 5 Star rating, imo.
But, again, considering the way Smooci handles its Star rating on its own site, it would be easy for a customer to make that mistake and assume a 4.1 Star rating is a good rating as far as delivery of services is concerned rather than her getting that rating simply because the girl is young, cute, punctual, presents a good first impression, has a wonderful personal story to tell about cheating drunk Thai boyfriends, how much she prefers farangs, must take care of her sick grandmother and a whole host of other issues having nothing whatsoever to do with her actually delivering the services listed on her profile..[/QUOTE]Not yet a consumer of a said product but comment on the product. LOLx.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2079472]With all due respect, I completely disagree. First of all, a 4.1 Star rating on Smooci probably isn't good at all with regard to the issue of the girl delivering the services listed on her profile and likely doesn't reflect anything positive about what she is "giving" customers. Even the owner of Smooci has said he would stick to girls with 4.5 Star ratings or greater to better ensure accuracy on the services listed on their profiles. Considering the way Smooci handles their Star ratings, that girl could easily float to a small fraction on either side of a 4 Star rating on the strength of her youngish age alone, having virtually nothing to do with whether or not she has ever delivered half of the services she lists on her profile to any customer. Where the poster made his mistake, assuming the girl's actual delivery of the services she listed on her profile were important to him and it sure sounds like it is, was in choosing a girl with less than a 4. 5 Star rating, imo.
But, again, considering the way Smooci handles its Star rating system on its own site, it would be easy for a customer to make that mistake and assume a 4.1 Star rating is a good rating as far as delivery of services is concerned rather than her getting that rating simply because the girl is young, cute, punctual, presents a good first impression, has a wonderful personal story to tell about cheating drunk Thai boyfriends, how much she prefers farangs, must take care of her sick grandmother and a whole host of other issues having nothing whatsoever to do with her actually delivering the services listed on her profile. One would only know about Smooci's own recommendation on that issue if he reads these message boards thoroughly..[/QUOTE]Well said.
I think that there is some sort of misconceived notion of what smooci is.
All the app is doing is providing customers with a more convenient way to order up escorts and to potentially separate the best from the rest of a fairly limited pool but mostly in regards to accuracy of pics. It doesn't guarantee anything related to the services and looks of the ladies nor does it change the realities of the industry. The ratings are all provided by the users and as we know all too well YMMV.
-
[QUOTE=GrandaddyPerp;2079496]Well said.
I think that there is some sort of misconceived notion of what smooci is.
All the app is doing is providing customers with a more convenient way to order up escorts and to potentially separate the best from the rest of a fairly limited pool but mostly in regards to accuracy of pics. It doesn't guarantee anything related to the services and looks of the ladies nor does it change the realities of the industry. The ratings are all provided by the users and as we know all too well YMMV.[/QUOTE]Exactly.
There is also another point to take in consideration. I've used smooci five times and I've given a rate each times. The next day, the girl's rate was different than her rate prior to my booking with each girls. That means that my rating had a real influence on the girl's global rate.
Now I'm regularly looking at smooci and I see a lot of girls with rates that doesn't change at all, some of these girls are the ones that I've met earlier. I see these girls available many times, disappear for some hours then reappear on smooci. I cannot believe that these girls are never chosen by any customer. So my conclusion is that a lot of customer do not even bother giving a rate after their session. As you said the rating helps to separate the providers in two categories: girls below 4.2 only for adventurous guys and girls over 4.2 that seems to be the best ones but we still have no guarantee that they will perform well or that their pic is accurate or not.
-
Guys,
I need some help. Most of the girls on Smooci seem to be bad or reluctant at DFK from my experience. I am a premium member and most reviews don't really tell you if the girl is good or bad at DFK. Can anyone with prior experience with smooci girls point me in the direction of some girls who are good at DFK??