Trump was the weakest defender of America democracy and national security in history
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2861209]"Did he mention that Joe Biden is not the president of any of those countries, that America was actively at war on foreign soil for every minute of every hour of Trump's so-called presidency and that more Americans were killed in that foreign conflict on Trump's watch than have been killed in any foreign conflict on Biden's watch?
Yep. Thanks, Joe."
Weakness attracts aggression.
Thank Dirty Joe.
He's way too busy shuffling all his stolen loot, and directing the DOJ to protect the junkie.
Hopefully Jordan gets the gavel and impeaches the "Dirty shit stain" already![/QUOTE]BTW, in addition to America being actively engaged in a ground war on foreign soil for every minute of every hour of Trump's so called presidency even after he weakly surrendered 100% to every Taliban demand and timetable, did that idiot Repub Senator also mention that the seat of democracy was invaded by a violent, cop-attacking, cop-killing and murderous mob of anti-America, America-hating Terrorists right in the USA on January 6, 2021?
Now, I know your beloved Repubs have forever been afflicted with a peculiar form of selective amnesia, but as I recall your "strong" lord and savior was so-called potus on January 6, 2021 and not Joe Biden, right?
Please remind us what "strength" Trump projected and demonstrated to prevent America from being attacked by a violent mob of anti-America, America-hating terrorists right on American soil, in fact the soil on which the seat of American democracy resides, in order to overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy?
1 photos
Winger and MSM love those outlier polls
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2861291]"Did he mention that Joe Biden is not the president of any of those countries, that America was actively at war on foreign soil for every minute of every hour of Trump's so-called presidency and that more Americans were killed in that foreign conflict on Trump's watch than have been killed in any foreign conflict on Biden's watch?
Yep. Thanks, Joe. "
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/survey-trump-biden/2023/10/18/id/1138831/[/URL][/QUOTE]As of this writing, even the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP Consensus of Polls shows the trend heading in the opposite direction of a couple of recent outlier polls, that CNBC poll being one of them. See the screenshot below. Trump's statistically tied momentary lead over Biden has evaporated to an actual tie:
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2024/president/us/general-election-trump-vs-biden-7383.html[/URL]
Also, you're so happy that somebody's money is paying for your access to NYT articles, but I don't recall you posting a link to this one 2-3 weeks ago:
[B]Americans Are Down on Biden. Why Does His Party Keep Winning Elections?
Despite a flood of negative polls for Democrats, the party has delivered a string of strong results in special elections, which can be a useful gauge of the national political environment.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/us/politics/democrats-special-elections-biden.html[/URL]
Sept. 26,2023.
[QUOTE]For nearly two years, poll after poll has found Americans in a sour mood about President Biden, uneasy about the economy and eager for younger leaders of the country.
And yet when voters have actually cast ballots, Democrats have delivered strong results in special elections the sort of contests that attract little attention but can serve as a useful gauge for voter enthusiasm.
In special elections this year for state legislative offices, Democrats have exceeded Mr. Bidens performance in the 2020 presidential election in 21 of 27 races, topping his showing by an average of seven percentage points, according to a study conducted by the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, the partys campaign arm for state legislative races.
Those results, combined with an 11-point triumph for a liberal State Supreme Court candidate in Wisconsin this spring and a 14-point defeat of an Ohio ballot referendum this summer in a contest widely viewed as a proxy battle over abortion rights, run counter to months of public opinion polling that has found Mr. Biden to be deeply unpopular heading into his re-election bid next year.
Taken together, these results suggest that the favorable political environment for Democrats since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade has endured through much of 2023. Democratic officials have said since the summer of 2022, when the ruling came down, that abortion is both a powerful motivator for the partys voters and the topic most likely to persuade moderate Republicans to vote for Democratic candidates.[/QUOTE]Now, this begs the questions, why are Dem respondents to these polls like that CNBC poll so "down" on Biden, yet at crunch time in the Midterms and so many special elections since will come out in huge numbers to vote for his Party candidates, defying what they say in the polls and apparently not really blaming him or his Party for the fact that a subway token no longer costs a nickle and, most important, how does their polling sentiment pertain to what they will actually do when faced with a Trump vs Biden ballot in 2024.
As a lifelong since age 18 registered Democrat, I feel fairly confident to hazard an informed opinion on that. But I am just curious to know if you or anyone else here has an explanation for that phenomenon.
Thanks Dirty Joe and Nutty Nancy
[URL]https://dailystormer.in/jewish-yellen-says-us-can-easily-afford-two-jewish-wars/[/URL]
[URL]https://dailystormer.in/putin-counteroffensive-has-totally-failed/[/URL]
Didn't Nutty Nancy and the house Dems help torpedo McCarthy LMAOOOOOO.
Maybe they should all vote for Jordan Thursday LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
Guns don't kill people. People kill people
Darn it Desade.
I was starting to like you after your previous post. Now you are defending the Catholic Church cult that hides and protect its male employees that prey on children. Many of these male employees may be gay or straight, but the issue is sexual exploitation of those they have tasked with mentoring and nurturing. That church cult has caused untold misery worldwide, as have most other religious cults. You have evidence that all or most gay men are pedophiles?
Guns don't kill people, bullets do.
Now the guns make the bullets go real fast. And it is the speed behind of the mass of the bullet that really causes the damage when it hits you. The only good gun control that I believe in is the ability to make those bullets go exactly where you want them to go.
From the guy with his head in the sand
[QUOTE=Spidy;2859100]And it hasn't. But I know your hoping, praying and betting for one.
How does that economist joke go? Something like, [i]"Two (2) economists are arguing about whether, but neither of them looks out the window." [/i] Economists get it wrong all the time and have been getting it wrong for years.
But hey...we have good ol' Elvis 2008, ISG mongerer, to tell us everything we need to know about the economy. Your tell it to your Repub, chums, who might be buy it. I'm NOT!
Elvis, don't over think it! Bidenomics (and the economy) are doing just fine, [b]perhaps try sticking your head out the window. [/b](...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]Do numbers mean anything to you?
[URL]https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/02/in...-a-record-high[/URL]#text=Interest%20 costs%20 represented%20 about%208,spends%20 on%20 income%20 security%20 programs.
Net interest payments on the national debt rose from $352 billion in 2021 to $475 billion in 2022. As of August 2023 it costs $808 billion to maintain the debt, which is 15% of the total federal spending.
You don't have your head out the window. Your head is up your ass.
I feel like doing the Jonny Carson Carnac bit. The answer is it is Trump's fault.
The question: how do Tooms and Spidy account for the massive explosion in interest payments on the debt?
Your ignorance is breathtaking
"Please explain?
And if it's not too much to ask, please provide evidence to support your claims / hypothesis.
Thanks!
P.S. : Yes a robust explanation (preferably in your own words and coherent sentences, if possible) would be extremely helpful. And yes, supporting links are also welcomed. ".
No hypothesis necessary, every cocksucking priest that raped a little boy was GAY not straight.
How many raped the little girls? ZERO, why? You might ask why is that, because they are fucking GAY.
I went to a Catholic grammar school (and high school and university) there were plenty of girls for them to rape.
Of course not all priests were gay, but if they were GAY they were sure to be raping the little boys, whilst the hetero ones were not raping anyone.
Res ipsa loquitur.
I rest my case.