-
1 photos
Al-salaam aleikum Sayyid Pistons.
[QUOTE=Pistons;2301385]
The escapism related to travelling, is also helping the brain become more creative:
[URL]https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/03/for-a-more-creative-brain-travel/388135/[/URL]
I suppose however that going back to the same destinations over and over, can be repetitive. And in that sense, it is easy to fall back on negativity. I like to think of this as being isolated as opposed to exploration. But how do we define mongering as explorations? Is new girls, or new lineups the same as exploration? Or how about a new club? Is finding a non Romanian girl enough? How about an Italian, or a Spanish? (Pun intended). Or does a monger need to travel to a new continent?
[/QUOTE]Now you're talking! Mr Cane knows about the benefits of continent-hopping. For my part I have effectively been in exile from Germany since the 2017 Anti-Prostitution Laws. I feel exactly like Stefan Zweig but with less Jewish stuff and more hookers. But maybe the kick in the seat of the pants that Chancellor Merkel gave me was just what I needed to get out and feed my [I]Wanderlust[/I]. You too, you are not too late. To give you some motivation, see the attached image. (By the way, can I take a poll on whether they are real or silicone? She swore she was all-natural and they felt real, but don't let that sway your opinion if you hate my guts.).
I'm not sure who first made the point -- was it McAdonis or SockPuppetUpHosAss? -- but jet-powered mongering really broadens the mind and widens a man's social contacts to other cultures. As a hobby it sure beats trainspotting and baseball cards! If we picture the world as a collection of closed-minded tribes, what great forces break down the barriers between those tribes? (1) Trade / money (2) Sex (3) [CARLSAGANVOICE] Man's indomitable restlessness and will to explore [/CARLSAGANVOICE]. Sex alone causes us guys to overcome our prejudices and have interactions with women that we otherwise would have dismissed as too vapid to deal with. Conversely money causes beautiful women to talk to men that [I]they[/I] would never have considered, leading them to learn and change their minds in many cases. But without sex and money, we would all stay in our comfort zones: the guys stuck in sweaty Star Trek conventions and the girls in beads and bracelets festivals. In fact that probably describes a lot of American small towns, each side going mad on opioids while vaguely feeling they are lacking something in their lives.
P.S. It's not called escapism if you actually escape. Free your dick and your mind will follow.
-
[QUOTE=Jmioffe;2301660]This is something I'm wrestling with at the moment too. I've been a lot of beautiful women, but I think the main danger with this hobby that I hadn't realized is not that it threatens your health (with STIs) or morals -- but it's jeopardized my human development. I've had a lot of superficial relationships, nothing unpleasant, but there are days I feel jealous of friends and acquaintances who have been with fewer, less attractive women, but have developed that deep bond that takes years to mature.
Meanwhile, I've cavorted with SPs, but as you note, the hobby is time-consuming and secretive, so it's hard to develop that connection with even other people who you don't want to have sex with.
Thank you for posting this.[/QUOTE]I think one can develop as human without human connection to woman you have sex with.
For instance, you have human connection with your mother perhaps, or maybe sister or aunt or your female good friends or females colleague that you often dine / take a drink with etc. , and you do not have sex with these people, yet they inspire you to develop as human and take your point of views on life to different level.
So if you have that human connection or development part with friends, there is not need to crave that with women you have sex with.
Some men become different after they have sex with women, but for me, once I have sex with them, it is beginning of the end, I tend to prefer to have sex with people who are just beautiful looking and young. And bottom line of this is described by one quote mentioned by Karl Lagerfeld, "I do not like to have sex with people I love".
However, I understand you about nice breakfast in nice cafe morning after you have sex with the person you had sex with, beautiful trip together to beautiful destination you both never been before and so on, you know sharing the beautiful moment of life, it is very beautiful personality thing and each human has somewhere inside, but I used to do that in my university days, maybe I was lucky and for me that was so beautiful, nice and memorable and I appreciate those beautiful girls gave me such a good memories, but that now become burden, I think as years went by got into my 30's, I became more harden as I was hard before, but that intensify, so I prefer to have sex with just beautiful girls that I can change.
I had rational personality and for me as I entered my 30's and this began since I was about around 26 or 28 ish, I tend to become more rational and began to think, I should take the best part of whole package and keep on fucking young beautiful girls I can change as I wish to. It was big paradigm shift for me. All this began when mongering industry begin providing me normal beautiful university girl who just began in industry, models who some of them even made it to tv screen and famous magazines, porn stars like maria ozawa and rola takizawa etc. I did thing not all men can do, and that is why I begin to shift this way. I never felt jealous with any men who have sex with lower looking quality women because that is something I do not want to do the most. I like fucking young beautiful girls that most men jerk off to on computer screen because I only get to live once, so I do not want to be a masturbation type of guys, which are most guys.
I was a monger, I am a monger and I will always be a monger till the day I die as long as the industry keep on providing me with top level girls which they began to do in this recent 10 years. With opposition attempt, with its up and down, still the prostitution industry is at its best in history in this recent 10 years, I hope it remain that way and thanks to aviation industry that when it is down here at my home city, I fly to else where. Plus I traveled quite extensively since young age and each city I visit since I am 17 or 18, I make sure I fuck the hottest girl in town no matter what, this is important thing for me even when I am travelling for cultural reason because I believe fucking among the most beautiful girl from the travel destination is the essential part of knowing their culture.
In closing, fucking beautiful women helps a lot to develop you as human, but human connection with friends, animals, natures, travel, with different cultures, books, internet forum like this, talking to random strangers that you only see once in your life, sky line you see from airplane you are travelling etc etc also help you a lot to develop as human. This is my stance in life. Oh! Also the fight to, when I am attack, I fight, I always fight and it help me to develop as human too, it is in our blood as human to fight against attackers.
-
Well, I started off going to all sorts of places in east and south east Asia, before feeling Europe was more convenient due to shorter travelling distance. And I can surely attest to the notion that mongering in all sorts of cultures helps fight prejudices against people from these nations. Also as opposed idea on wg's in south east Asia, they are as normal as any other girl or woman from lets say Romania. I know this since I hit up on several normal girls at the university and in shopping malls too in three different Asian countries. And they were exactly like the WG's. Well except also much easier to get uncapped. And the normal girls were always soaking wet. But that is where the difference stopped.
But I also notice how mongering cause protective racism among the locals. You see it with the local male populace in Asia. You see it with Romanian males across Europe. And you see it with american white males when a non white male gets a white girlfriend. This is basically an unstoppable force of globalism. It is not limited at mongering, but has equally much to do with girlfriend / boyfriends. And the only way to not getting dragged into depression, hatred and racism, is to fuck your way out of it by having sex with women from other cultures as well. There should perhaps be some sort of international sex exchange organization.
Like that Japanese woman who felt guilt towards the Chinese after all the killings during ww2, and wanted to sell herself to Chinese males. It was even a diplomatically framed story about it in the newspapers in Asia. Way to make peace!
-
Jmioffe, thanks for sharing your experience.
Loneliness is a growing epidemic and reportedly affects 1 in 4 people in many countries, so I do not think it should be stigmatized. It should not be something one needs to be defensive about: [URL]https://www.kff.org/report-section/loneliness-and-social-isolation-in-the-united-states-the-united-kingdom-and-japan-an-international-survey-section-1/[/URL].
You write that it "jeopardized your human development" and that you find it hard to "develop a connection" with people. Why do you feel this? Would you say it is because you lack the social skills? Or maybe you feel you have the social skills to develop a connection, but you are too busy to "nurture" that connection over a longer period of time? For instance, you might meet some guy at the pub (not sexual of course) and bond the entire night over beers, but if you never follow up on that friendship or check in once a while, then that connection eventually fades. Life is busy. There are too many distractionsnevermind a time-consuming hobby like mongering. Let me know, if I am way off track.
I can be my most worst critic, but I would rate my social skills as 5-6 on a 10-point scale. Amongst other HARDCORE mongers, I am probably 8-9 on a 10-point scale. I am sorry to say, we are not the most socialized group. It is noticeable in conversations within five minutes of meeting someone and sometimes even reading posts. I would liken it to other skills. Some people just haven't had the repetitions or life experience of drinking beers and relating to another human face-to-face, so at best it is awkward, at worse they are annoying. Others you meet and they are just more likable and pleasant to speak with. They are engaging. They have a way of making you feel comfortable (and they can sense when you are uncomfortable and steer the conversation back). They listen to you and at least appear to value what you have to say. They are able to connect and relate to people. Often times, I observe that these people are better storytellers. Why? Because they have rehearsed the story many times, because they are extroverts and they socialize a lot more. They speak about their emotions. Some of their stories show vulnerability (coincidentally a tactic that WGs use to build closeness). They speak about fears and insecurities. Their emotional vocabulary is even different and more colorful I. E. "I felt devastated". They are not bitter at the world. They are not incessant complainers. They do not dominate the conversation and there is no conversational narcissism.
Having a lack of social skills is nothing to be ashamed of. You cannot change your past. The important thing is to strive to improve. We stereotype that poor social skills is always the result of some loser kid that got bullied causing him to withdraw from all social activities and thereby stunting his "human development". But this article lists many other reasons: (1) being sick and bedridden as a child, (2) immigrating as a child, (3) being sheltered as a child, and (4) even cultural reasons such as is the case when Indian and Asian parents emphasize academics over socializing: [URL]https://www.succeedsocially.com/relatedfactors[/URL].
-
[QUOTE=Neurosynth;2301640]So because you are running late you have a right to risk MY life? Driving "subconscious (ly)?
I can't believe you are trying to justify this.[/QUOTE]Especially if it comes to your life. LOL.
Unless you live on the edge, you are taking up too much space!
-
[QUOTE=McAdonis;2301806]Loneliness is a growing epidemic and reportedly affects 1 in 4 people in many countries, so I do not think it should be stigmatized. It should not be something one needs to be defensive about: [URL]https://www.kff.org/report-section/loneliness-and-social-isolation-in-the-united-states-the-united-kingdom-and-japan-an-international-survey-section-1/[/URL].[/QUOTE]True. But as far as I am aware, this loneliness epidemic is not related to the channels of online communication. They are secondary. But more to the technologies themselves. Which are the primary part. Such as a smartphone. An xbox. A computer. Or some fancy new toy you can play with alone. It is not like it was when I was young and all I spent my time on was playing ball sports like football and some basket. Or other games with 5-10 friends. I have seen this shift away from sports with friends towards technology related stuff one step at a time since test playing football for a top team, to irc after school, onwards to friends doing professional pc gaming, tons of friends playing mmos while at university etc etc. In a way, girl-guy relationships seems to just be an offshoot. But nowadays tinder dating is as normal as it can be. While 10 years ago, online dating was as frowned upon as p6. And you'd better hide it if you ever tried it!
-
Edit again: I believe there is a layer of sensationalism to these forum posts here. I certainly am guilty of this, and I feel others are too. Where I come from, we don say we like something. We either love it or hate it. Romanians do some of the same. With new media, this is getting more and more normal all over the world too. Either you give it a thumbs up, or a thumbs down. Love it or hate it. Nothing in between! So narcissistic traits gets apparingly overblown towards the uninitiated reader. Different local cultures can be like night and day in regards to this, and it is very hard to spot on an internet forum. These are things you are only able to spot when meeting several people from the same area. The reality is always grey.
-
[QUOTE=McAdonis;2301806]Jmioffe, thanks for sharing your experience.
Loneliness is a growing epidemic and reportedly affects 1 in 4 people in many countries, so I do not think it should be stigmatized. It should not be something one needs to be defensive about: [URL]https://www.kff.org/report-section/loneliness-and-social-isolation-in-the-united-states-the-united-kingdom-and-japan-an-international-survey-section-1/[/URL].
You write that it "jeopardized your human development" and that you find it hard to "develop a connection" with people. Why do you feel this? Would you say it is because you lack the social skills? Or maybe you feel you have the social skills to develop a connection, but you are too busy to "nurture" that connection over a longer period of time? For instance, you might meet some guy at the pub (not sexual of course) and bond the entire night over beers, but if you never follow up on that friendship or check in once a while, then that connection eventually fades. Life is busy. There are too many distractionsnevermind a time-consuming hobby like mongering. Let me know, if I am way off track..[/QUOTE]I think it is too stereo type man, social skill is something you born with, you cannot practice that if you born mentally weak. Also social skill is not about get people to like you, that is called sucking up and getting people to like you is so easy as long as you are presentable, well mannered, well dressed and let others hear what they want to hear from your mouth and being educated helps because oddly people like brand of certain education.
I never got why people like brands of education because that is stereo type too. I have good degree, but only thing I got out of my schools and univerisities (went to 2) people I met, rest are not even worth branding beside names people like and that come from stereotypical social marketing conducted on masses by society. Well I guess they need to put some kind of order in society, so such marketing that has been conducted for centuries make sense. But one get tired of playing such roll sometimes, and if you call playing such roll as expected by society is social skill, I do not think that is it.
Social skill to me is the ability to live the life style you want to live in this stereo typical world that is programmed to take your freedom to enjoy life. For example; Even for mongering, this is result of social skill because I wanted fuck many young beautiful girls beyond one can imagine, but society prohibit to do that, so one has to find out what is the counter solution to this? So I had to go out there to find out what is the best set up that exist in this society for me without people noticing and I found my set up here back home to enjoy beautiful Eurasian girls and Eurasian av stars and some famous models before they become famous that required a lot of research and getting people who has access to that level of girls to trust me because it is sellers market for such level of girls here. And for international young beauties, I found out that the set up in far land of Germany is best set up that may exist in this society we live in, so I had to fly all the way there and found out if that is true and it was for my international sector.
So this is just one example related to our hobby, but doing what society tell you to do require zero social skill, it is out there like a text book or manual book. Where as going outside that boring boxed way of life and enjoy life more without people noticing require more social skill to do that because you are out side the box and got to find your own way in society and still you manage to enjoy life more without damaging your reputation.
-
Sexology or sociology?
The thing about sex is the inherent part it forms of how we came to exist in the first place and urge to procreate that humping simulates. It is inherently social, just as our mothers, aunts, sisters, daughters and female friends form a tapestry of sex free emotional bonds. Sometimes this group is more like a debating club meets speakers corner. A few things to remember. Our hobby is considered morally deviant by many and is statistically deviant as a fact relative to the general population sexual experiences. Secondly FKK's are fun but like ice cream. Tasty, but you cannot live on the stuff. Thirdly, good mental health is the building block of life. Psychology and all its big words and Latin prefixes like hyper, hypo and <insert -oid or <insert -ism like economics. A big messy social space they try to pretend is scientific by formulas like g=j where g is good and j is justice, a game of words without end or agreed meanings. There is some truth to the assertion that psychology is not a discipline at all. Attributing big words and pseudo scientific labels to others has many risks including our observations not having enough data or the data nor fitting any curve.
Having insight that we are all screwed up and suffer from a thing called the human condition of contradictions (horny, attention seeking, addiction, compassionate, selfish etc, etc all mixed up and in constantly shifting quantities) is needed to advance spiritually. In science it is called falsification. Without it we would have square wheels and a flat earth. But in human behavioral land, perception of fault and wanting to adapt and change is about as far as you can take things.
And, Takedown, people in glass houses should should not throw stones. Now, more importantly, where are some hotties to be found this spring for some wild times by the poolside?
-
[QUOTE=PahllusMaximus;2301883]There is some truth to the assertion that psychology is not a discipline at all.[/QUOTE]Wow, a super proof for: "The ultimate thing a person will give up is the suffering on oneself and on one's self-concepts".
-
[QUOTE=PahllusMaximus;2301883] There is some truth to the assertion that psychology is not a discipline at all. Attributing big words and pseudo scientific labels to others has many risks including our observations not having enough data or the data nor fitting any curve.[/QUOTE]I suppose I should have expanded on the claim I made that defining people by syndromes is a syndrome in and of itself.
I don't think it is by chance that the field of psychology is booming at the same time as neoliberalism is also booming. Basically putting everyone into conditional boxes. The problem is just what the article I posted about travels and creativity points out: Narrow minded people who has not travelled enough, and has lower creativity, also has a tendency to create these stigmatizing boxes way more often than creative people who has traveled more.
This is for example important when it comes to combating racism. Ironically the neoliberalists believe they are anti racists. But this points towards their take on the world actually producing racism. (I hope this one post regarding racism gets through censorship).
Lets just say that the world is never how it seems. Because peoples awareness is always closed off by limiting factors. So the very idea of analyzing a different person is utterly absurd. For example, we had no idea about quantum physics before 100 years ago! And it changes so much of what we thought the world was. Not to mention that they have now measured brain particles all the way up to the 11th dimension! So we are not even close to having figured it all out!
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;2301993] . . . Not to mention that they have now measured brain particles all the way up to the 11th dimension! So we are not even close to having figured it all out![/QUOTE]You should really stick to things you know something about.
The research you are referring to had nothing to do with "measur (ing) brain particles," whatever that is supposed to mean.
What the research found was that temporary networks are formed among neurons, and those virtual networks have a connectivity topology in 11 dimensions. This in no way implies that neurons occupy 11 physical dimensions. It has nothing to do, for example, with quantum theory or string theory.
-
FKK Nearby
Anything reasonable around / between Nautraubling and Heidenheim?
P.S. Been to sharks, world, palace, oase, Globe.
-
[QUOTE=NickTheG;2301973]Wow, a super proof for: "The ultimate thing a person will give up is the suffering on oneself and on one's self-concepts".[/QUOTE]That quote sound exactly like a modern day marriage LOL. Husband sacrifice his life, especially sex life for one pussy that is depreciating in beauty and youth LOL. And he pays million dollars for that low quality woman of he's LOL.
Well, they also say marriage is end of good life. It is beginning of the end without him realizing it. Some men realize and divorce later which may destroy him financially, some they just suffer without noticing it what is going on due to his boxed thinking that he cannot escape with his brain because his brain is programmed by society and he no longer can think for himself.
-
[QUOTE=Neurosynth;2302091]You should really stick to things you know something about.
The research you are referring to had nothing to do with "measur (ing) brain particles," whatever that is supposed to mean.
What the research found was that temporary networks are formed among neurons, and those virtual networks have a connectivity topology in 11 dimensions. This in no way implies that neurons occupy 11 physical dimensions. It has nothing to do, for example, with quantum theory or string theory.[/QUOTE]True, I don't know enough about these things. And it seems to me that neighter does anyone. I have just read some basics about quantum entanglement and what that may mean. Quantum fields etc is probably not the end of it either. And what the heck is dmt and dream state's link to all of this? Not to mention Einstein's mc square is useless. And there is a theory of two different sets of time. It makes me dizzy just to consider these things. All I am saying is that no human being has any clue at all. If you think you do, then you are lying. Maybe you have heard more theories than me on quantum physics, but there are too many open ended theories as far as I can tell. And we are all part of it. Especially our consciousness through measurement.