-
A Good Pimp
[QUOTE=Chocha Monger]Pimping is a noncontact sport. Those guys are what real pimps call Magilla Gorillas and Godzillas. They might have hoes bringing them money but they’re simps. They’re gorillas who dress, walk and talk like pimps but they lack the finesse to control their hoes without resorting to violence. A good pimp gets hoes to give him their money willingly without using force. Gorillas and Godzillas beat their hoes to near death and eventually find themselves under pimp arrest. ;)[/QUOTE]
A good pimp has his women / females going to Corporate America every morning and bringing home their checks. Better yet, they direct deposited into his account or their joint account.
A good pimp gets women / females to give the pimp money with a few basics. (1) He's giving her guidance and will / is showing her how to achieve in her profession / Corporate America. (2) They are a team, and not a couple, with a common goal for the future. (3) They are partners / teammates. (4) He never used too much violence 'cause if she doesn't want his professional guidance for success in Corporate America, then she can leave. All of the other women he knows want his guidance and therefore he's in demand and everyone knows it. (5) This is how you P.I.M.P.
-
Pimp Hand Defined
[QUOTE=ThatGuy865]The problem with your assertion is Ike turner did it when a man could get away with hitting a women and the law did nothing. Chris brown paid a heavy price for that incident and he was very lucky Riahnna refuse to cooperate with the police, and he still had to do community service and pay a fine. Jim brown was thrown in jail for 90 days. Now what do you think they would do to a non celebrate. So go ahead and swing that "pimp hand" but you better make sure you are ready to spend some time in jail for it because if LE gets involved. You might find yourself washing some guys underwear to keep him from keepin his "pimp hand strong". Player[/QUOTE]
Pimp hand does not refer to violence, but refers to control. Mental control, emotional control, financial control, reproductive control.
Pimp hand is / are the rules and regulations that you force all females to accept if they are to associate with you.
I play male-female relations like this. If you like it, let's play; if you don't like it, go away. That's Pimp Hand.
-
[QUOTE=ThatGuy865]The problem with your assertion is Ike turner did it when a man could get away with hitting a women and the law did nothing. Chris brown paid a heavy price for that incident and he was very lucky Riahnna refuse to cooperate with the police, and he still had to do community service and pay a fine. Jim brown was thrown in jail for 90 days. Now what do you think they would do to a non celebrate. So go ahead and swing that "pimp hand" but you better make sure you are ready to spend some time in jail for it because if LE gets involved. You might find yourself washing some guys underwear to keep him from keepin his "pimp hand strong". Player[/QUOTE]During a marriage, there is bound to be some kind of altercation. In the event of the wife calling the police (legitimately or not) is there any way to mitigate the anti-male bias in the U.S., eg they always make the man go to a hotel regardless of evidence (this also is looked upon by the court as "abandoning the home)? For instance, is there a way to get a lawyer on hand to come down? I don't think lawyers are on call like doctors. Is there any way to get some legal protection at the house before the cops get there? I hear that cops are less fascist if a lawyer is present?
-
heh
I have extensive experience with Japanese women, both in and outside of Japan. This group of women has many subsets (though this is counter intuitive when one takes into account the mono-lithic cultural norms). There are traditional women that haven't changed in decades. These women don't speak much English and are hard to find for foreigners. They are also a little stunted.
There are educated, traditional women. These are the best. They have a good job and drive and follow the responsibilities Japanese society is still very successful in holding women to. Then there are the women that reject Japanese society and don't fit in. These are the women who have traveled the most and speak English, hence the main cohort Western men meet. These women are bad news and will take full advantage of the USA system.
This is why I have to respectfully disagree. Any human being is going to take advantage of what they can, as life for working folk is hard. You see this in Japan with expats-they live a fast-paced, sexual lifestyle. Often times they don't appreciate it and instead become jaded and give the evil eye to other foreigners.
Saying that, I do agree with you in that some people are just more prone to bad behavior. Right now, I'm in contact with a 30s Japanese woman who is divorcing her American husband, while blue balling another American guy to get free rent. Any of these points would be extremely inappropriate in Japan, and not just from parents, but coworkers and maybe friends. They would either shun her or put pressure on her to reform. I've seen this from working in a Japanese high school.
On the other hand, I've dated Japanese women of the same demographic in the USA that are kind and giving, like back in Japan, even if I can identify personality traits that make them outliers. I've noticed older women are less likely to change. So yes, one's individuality does influence the degree that a foreign women will assimilate, but our environment also influences us. Most American guys have no idea of foreign culture and are not in the position to remotely discern the quality of a foreign woman; I sure couldn't when I first went to Japan. Even after explaining the norms Japanese women have to my rust belt brother, he still doesn't believe me. It's beyond the imagination of the average USA male.
[QUOTE=DJ FourMoney]Your mostly correct, it is a self created issue.
I find more issues when you [I]look inside the numbers[/I].
The describes a Philippine Women who got a ticket out of object poverty (I would say this is correct because as others have correctly stated on here, foreigners are generally rejected by middle/upper class Flips), was provided with an education and now works 50-60 hours a week in the US health care system.
Several things, if she has 50K in gambling debt, is she paying for it, or is he paying for it? I think that's key. You may think her family are a bunch of moochers but many jobs in PI are not well paying why not spend them money, even if its lift her family out of poverty. How many AW go off to college, get a well paying job and send money back home?. NONE!
RW I believe have been unfairly blamed for being Gold Diggers, especially those that speak English close to fluently, at least that's the perception.
I think its not quite the case, men ultimately make the decision to marry X woman, its never up to the woman really. What usually happens when women ask men to marry them? Its usually when the man has gone X amount of time without coming close to that question. Many men aren't upfront with their desires. If you have no intention of getting married, you shouldn't never leave any opening.
If I came home with a see Class Benz and she complained, its going back!
These guys picked the wrong women clearly.
This is where we really need to focus on:
The problem isn't marriage itself its WHO you marry
The problem isn't dating/courting women, its WHO you choose to date
So while I love to highlight the zaniness of typical AW/WW behavior, it is not lost on me when people like to use certain examples to backup their claim they want to blame our culture for indoctrinating foreign women with AW ideology, when I say its failure to pick up those clues that lead these men down the road of failure, in other words women that agree with AW ideology.
I know more foreign women that think AW are nuts and wouldn't mimic their behavior. This is hearsay of course, proof is in action.
I think the first problem is the tendency of males to believe they are playing Capt Save A Hoe especially to non-US citizens. You aren't saving these women, you are extending them an opportunity, treat it as such.
Don't you think these women KNOW how the game is played, even in other countries? Unless you are the first Western man in her village/town/city to take her away and marry her, which is HIGHLY unlikely.
Women talk, when they spend hours and hours on the phone back to their home country what the hell do you think they are talking about, especially if they are speaking their native language? They are expressly talking about how life is here in America and if anybody else is interested in such, you need to do a, be and c. Remember especially with Eastern European women; American women especially married one spend too much time dressed down, hair up in rollers and wearing sweat pants everywhere. They believe AM are desperate for good looking, skinny, cultured, attractive Woman.
They would be correct, but not only good women hear these stories, but bad women hear them. Wouldn't you think this gives the Bad Women shunned by local men for her behavior incentive to maybe try a bumbling, easily lead, desperate American male?
Some men are easy targets, aren't we fond of saying around here, there's a sucker born every minute? That sucker doesn't have to be you, let it happen to the next guy.
This has very little to do with lucky.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Helpmann]Aww dawg, be careful. That attitude is only going to lead to disappointment. Yes, you can't turn a ho into a housewife, but believe me, they all change. Yes, the hoes will be done with you in less than three years, but even the good ones will start to turn bad after 10 years if you can't keep the biatch in line. Unfortunately, the use of the "pimp hand" is hard to get away with in the United States.
Men in Africa, Asia, and South America (AAS) have a lot more leeway when it comes to keeping biatches in line. In Iran husbands can launch a charge of adultery against their wife (with no evidence) and have them stoned! In India, thousands of wives die each year due to "dowry deaths" resulting in only a handful of convictions! Don't tell me that ain't some serious "pimp hand."
Shit, 95% of Chinese children up for adoption are females!!! Women on these continents know that they're 2nd class citizens and the local men are keeping them in-line. Nevertheless, once these ladies set foot in the USA, the game changes
What can I say? Don't hate the player, hate the game. If you want an obedient loving wife, don't play that game in the United States.
-Helpmann :cool:[/QUOTE]
That's the key -
Keeping your woman in-line and being with a woman that's willing too be kept in line is ideal.
Impossible? Unlikely? - Maybe
I refuse to believe that only Asian Women and Latinas are only cut out for these type of relationships because the Caucasian and African-American women have been so tainted by Western Culture and Modern Feminism.
As I have been maintaining the whole time, some women reject this completely, after all its not because 50% of marriages fail and the other 50% is going to fail within the next 10-20 years, that is highly unlikely.
I'm just saying by increasing the size of my potential pool of women, my chances of making an error decrease. Especially if I don't allow sex to muck up the works, which often causes errors in judgement.
The negative stereotype is that women from struggling countries (countries with tiny middle classes) are more prone to be Gold Diggers. I think some men want to believe that all women are bad unless proven otherwise and that's a safe position to take especially if you have no intention of getting married and having children.
But I think you have to understand that Western Media is more prone to report negative outcomes than positive ones. Positive outcomes tend to be treated as special or out of the ordinary.
Its hard to do any kind of study on the subject of Western Men marrying Foreign Women because the Federal Government keeps limited information and nobody has invested a large amount of money to court couples for their opinion.
I agree that women around the world are largely the same, they have the same desires as most women have when it comes to relationships. The subtle differences is where they are from if your using the United States/Canada/UK as reference point, since we share a common culture.
Taking them away from where the balance of power is shifted from men to the center of the debate does not guarantee they'll align themselves with "Ankles" and build up the same sense of entitlement.
This is no different than buying a product in the marketplace.
Some people intentionally get a six pack from the top of the stack or behind other stacks or even from the backroom. Others don't care and take whatever is in front of them, who's more intelligent here?
-
I have instructions
I'm going back to the Midwest to visit an ailing aunt next weekend. Meanwhile, some nearby nearly married Vietnamese broad I banged last summer is telling me to spend the first night with her. And her friend.
Her friend is a married broad, too, but also has a husband who doesn't get into sex.
The woman I already screwed tells me that to get into her friend's pants, I should pitch up the drink tab and dress like I have money. She's already told this broad I have money; I mean, I do OK, but I'm not rich by any means.
She just wants to see me screw her friend.
"You need to enjoy life. Try new hamburger."
To me, using the appearance of wealth to snag pussy isn't much different than the Showcase Showdown feature of "The Price is Right."
"And all this could be yours, if you let me tap that pussy!"
-
[QUOTE=Vaquero]I'm going back to the Midwest to visit an ailing aunt next weekend. Meanwhile, some nearby nearly married Vietnamese broad I banged last summer is telling me to spend the first night with her. And her friend.
Her friend is a married broad, too, but also has a husband who doesn't get into sex.
The woman I already screwed tells me that to get into her friend's pants, I should pitch up the drink tab and dress like I have money. She's already told this broad I have money; I mean, I do OK, but I'm not rich by any means.
She just wants to see me screw her friend.
"You need to enjoy life. Try new hamburger."
To me, using the appearance of wealth to snag pussy isn't much different than the Showcase Showdown feature of "The Price is Right."
"And all this could be yours, if you let me tap that pussy!"[/QUOTE]
I too like it when a female-friend gives you her friend to f*ck, and you f*ck both of them side-by-side.
-
If you pay the lawyer enough he will be on call.
Just have an agreement that if you wake him up you're going to pay him $185 or what ever his hourly rate is for each hour or fraction of that he is helping you.
Prepay for one such call a month, whether you use it or not.
He should be happy to do it. If not, there is probably some junior partner at the firm who will do it.
I guess you could call the cops before your wife does, have them come out to remove HER.
Then it is just going to be he said she said.
I think cops are more first come first serve than always chosing the woman's side.
[QUOTE=Barronz8006]During a marriage, there is bound to be some kind of altercation. In the event of the wife calling the police (legitimately or not) is there any way to mitigate the anti-male bias in the U.S., eg they always make the man go to a hotel regardless of evidence (this also is looked upon by the court as "abandoning the home)? For instance, is there a way to get a lawyer on hand to come down? I don't think lawyers are on call like doctors. Is there any way to get some legal protection at the house before the cops get there? I hear that cops are less fascist if a lawyer is present?[/QUOTE]
-
I don't know if it is that easy. For instance, most cops say they have to take someone away in these situations, and its usually the man, even if the guy calls. I've also heard from cops, that often its whoever is easier to get out of the house, eg who's near the door. Ergo, never meet the cops at the door. Have the wife open it, or invite the guy in.
If the man owns the house (in his name) does this supercede the common law aspect of co-ownership when it comes to cops asking one to leave?
[QUOTE=Crazy Jim Wood]If you pay the lawyer enough he will be on call.
Just have an agreement that if you wake him up you're going to pay him $185 or what ever his hourly rate is for each hour or fraction of that he is helping you.
Prepay for one such call a month, whether you use it or not.
He should be happy to do it. If not, there is probably some junior partner at the firm who will do it.
I guess you could call the cops before your wife does, have them come out to remove HER.
Then it is just going to be he said she said.
I think cops are more first come first serve than always chosing the woman's side.[/QUOTE]
-
Fyi
[QUOTE=Barronz8006]I don't know if it is that easy. For instance, most cops say they have to take someone away in these situations, and its usually the man, even if the guy calls. I've also heard from cops, that often its whoever is easier to get out of the house, eg who's near the door. Ergo, never meet the cops at the door. Have the wife open it, or invite the guy in.
If the man owns the house (in his name) does this supercede the common law aspect of co-ownership when it comes to cops asking one to leave?[/QUOTE]
Generally LE are going to make the man leave the home, at least in the USA, it has become SOP amongst many police forces around the country. Especially if children are in the home. There would have to be extenuating circumstances such as the woman is drunk or she is the violent on and again children are in the home.
Regarding having the house in your name only, e. G. You bought the home before marriage, here is a piece of information some might find interesting. In the event of a divorce if the wife can prove that the husband used any of her funds to pay the mortgage then she could be entitled to part of the equity of the home. For example, the mortgage was paid from a joint bank account. An appraiser friend told me the following story. A guy had bought a house about 6 months previous to marriage. Once married, he paid the mortgage with the joint bank account, though the money in there was mostly earned by him, I believe the wife worked part time. The couple ended up divorcing after one year and the divorce court ruled that she was entitled to nearly half the equity on the house as the guy had only been in it 6 months before the marriage. The guy either had to pay her half the appraised equity of the home or sell the house and split the proceeds. This was when the market was booming in AZ and the guy didn't have the cash and had to sell the home. Now, this could work in favor of the man as well, but be careful out there. This happened in Arizona, so laws could be different state to state but it is food for thought.
-
[QUOTE=Barronz8006]During a marriage, there is bound to be some kind of altercation. In the event of the wife calling the police (legitimately or not) is there any way to mitigate the anti-male bias in the USA, eg they always make the man go to a hotel regardless of evidence (this also is looked upon by the court as "abandoning the home)? For instance, is there a way to get a lawyer on hand to come down? I don't think lawyers are on call like doctors. Is there any way to get some legal protection at the house before the cops get there? I hear that cops are less fascist if a lawyer is present?[/QUOTE]There is no easy answer to this, because if you have an altercation which means someone has struck the other. In some states the one who can prove they were struck will stay and the other is taken to JAIL to spend the night. No lawyer can prevent this. It is the law, mandatory.
I. E. Your wife slaps you and tries to slap you again, and you catch her by the arm to prevent her from slapping you again. If the cops come and you have no bruises to show because she was not strong enough to draw blood. But because you have a strong grip and left marks where you grabbed her to prevent her from slapping you. You will go to jail. Period. Wrong as it may be, she will have proof of your assault, but you don't have any proof of hers.
So be very careful even if you call the police and she can prove you violated her. The police will take you and not her to jail.
-
[QUOTE=Barronz8006]
If the man owns the house (in his name) does this supercede the common law aspect of co-ownership when it comes to cops asking one to leave?[/QUOTE]
The police are not there to act as lawyer. The police are there to arrest for court fees.
If the female has 0% mail, she is a visitor.
If the female has limited clothing, and is not on the lease or has any bill in her name, or does not have any mail with that address on it, she is a visitor.
If the female has any documentation with her name and that address on it, she lives there and you, the male, will get gender-biased out of the home.
Best solution: Keep your human existence / adult personal respsonsibility (ie. housing, employment, food, clothing) personal and not a community activity. If you take care of yourself (ie. food, clothing, shelter, employment, transportation), you will never be in the position of displaced housing.
-
[QUOTE=Barronz8006]I don't know if it is that easy. For instance, most cops say they have to take someone away in these situations, and its usually the man, even if the guy calls. I've also heard from cops, that often its whoever is easier to get out of the house, eg who's near the door. Ergo, never meet the cops at the door. Have the wife open it, or invite the guy in.
If the man owns the house (in his name) does this supercede the common law aspect of co-ownership when it comes to cops asking one to leave?[/QUOTE]
Barronz:
If the police are called to the house they will take into consideration the person who made the call and any evidence of domestic violence found at the scene. If no evidence of violence is found they will not make an arrest however they will warn the person being complained against that remaining in the house leave the possibility of further allegations being made against them. In other words if the police get called back to the residence that same day or night someone is going to have to leave or go to jail. When it comes to determining who is telling the truth or not the police would rather let a magistrate figure that out instead of leaving the two parties in the house and then later having to deal with an assault or murder. Even if you call a lawyer I doubt you will be able to evict the domestic partner on the spot unless you bear some evidence of injury and there is damaged property in the house. If the person is making the accusation against you they can claim you hit them or threatened their life the minute after the police left the scene. So sharing a residence after any dispute is unwise. The person who must leave has little to do with ownership. The first person to file and obtain a protective order will be the one to remain in the residence. This is why you should never ask for a divorce or get into verbal disputes with a spouse when you have decided the relationship is unsalvageable. Simply have your lawyer file the paperwork and have your spouse served while they are away from the residence. If they are required to leave the residence have your lawyer or the police present when they arrive to remove their belongings. If you are leaving, then be gone before they return with everything that belongs to you.
Anyway, it is best to not find one’s self in such a situation in the first place. That means avoiding marriage and cohabitation. With donor eggs and surrogate mothers fatherhood is now possible without a woman attached in the bargain.
-
Words to live by!
Whatever you do, don't let them know where you live. Period. They want to hang out and have a good time, take them out. There is no telling who or what type of person you are going out with nowadays.
Since the system dictates in nearly 100% of the cases that the male will be at fault, even if the beautch is lying through her teeth, my rule is simple: If you want to play, let's play outside. There is just way too much to lose. If you value your possesions and your lifestyle, why take that chance? In my opinion, it is just not worth the risk. Family and relatives are always welcomed in my home. Girfriends, hell no. If she doesn't like it, I just get another one :D
[QUOTE=Chocha Monger]Barronz:
Anyway, it is best to not find one’s self in such a situation in the first place. That means avoiding marriage and cohabitation. With donor eggs and surrogate mothers fatherhood is now possible without a woman attached in the bargain.[/QUOTE]
-
Michael Jackson
[QUOTE=Chocha Monger]
Anyway, it is best to not find one’s self in such a situation in the first place. That means avoiding marriage and cohabitation. With donor eggs and surrogate mothers fatherhood is now possible without a woman attached in the bargain.[/QUOTE]
Despite his obvious mental issues, Michael Jackson, had the right idea. Pay a b*tch to produce his offspring and he will be 100% custodial parent. He can never be subjugated to the roles of "fatherhood" from afar or playing "weekend daddy." He's in control. The b*tch is irrelevant.
For any male that truly values his input, un-interfered, into the development of his offspring / jizz, then they / we should consider surrogate mothers.
If not, you will be the only person with all of the risk and 0% voice. Everyone else has a voice in the child's rearing (ie. mother, judge, mother's family, Attorney General, Welfare Services, daycare center, educational system, etcetera.) For the father to have a voice, he must hire an attorney and take the default custodial parent, mother, to court for custody. Otherwise, the father has 0% voice and 100% liability with limited access to the offspring.
Good Insight Chocha Monger.