-
Some girls seem to take weight, enjoying home mum foods. Not only at Oase, also Madalina at Sharks, but for sure they should eat for next cold Winter, rather than Oase dogs foods once a day when they pay more than 100 for entry. Oase and World management are a shame for me, not respecting their girls health. They should understand girls attract clients and make work their brothel, now I can play football at Sharks.
-
[QUOTE=AnilMania;1918701]Hi,
Can anyone please guide me about this as google maps shows no public transport routes to Oase.
Also, I can either go at around 3-4 PM and be back maybe by 7-8 pm or go at 8-9 PM or be back by 12- 1 AM. How do these choices impact potential public transport options.
Thanks,
Anil[/QUOTE]Take S5 to Friedricksdorf (4. 25 euros). From F-dorf it is a 10 euro taxi ride to Oase. Last train back to Frankfurt will be somewhere near midnight, so check return train times on white schedule at F-dorf station. In short, it is possible to go from central Frankfurt to Oase and back for about 30 euros all-in.
-
Has anyone seen Laura / Livia the past few days?
Beffen.
-
[QUOTE=HessenBub;1918091] Adrianna is still working. AFAIK. In Switzerland. Michelle. Never heard of her again. For me a highly overrated girl, looks- and servicewise.
HB.[/QUOTE]Don't disagree. Linda / Adriana was a much better lay than Michelle, I would still happily fuck ladies like her in their 40-50's. Michelle was reliable and wild, but not really sensual. Still a great girl to hang out with, her good-mood style is highly missed in nowadays Oase. Isabella, Nina, Gabriella, Adriana, Julie, Vivian, Timea, Judith, Claudia, Luna, Ambra / Raffaella, blond Denisa. Girls with that level of service used to be almost the norm in Oase, unfortunately they are the exceptions now. Sharks has had a higher number of top service providers, at least in the last 2-3 years.
-
[QUOTE=Beffen1;1918808]Has anyone seen Laura / Livia the past few days?
Beffen.[/QUOTE]I thought you said: been there, done that.
-
[QUOTE=Dutedrac;1918832]. Isabella, Nina, Gabriella, Adriana, Julie, Vivian, Timea, Judith, Claudia, Luna, Ambra / Raffaella, blond Denisa. Girls with that level of service used to be almost the norm in Oase, unfortunately they are the exceptions now. Sharks has had a higher number of top service providers, at least in the last 2-3 years.[/QUOTE]Linda, at least in my opinion, was actually at her best when she first started out: her early Palace years. That is when Palace was alot different than it became / devolved into, again, only in my opinion.
As for the very impressive list of top peformer girls you quite wonderfully post for us in the above quote: honestly they are exceptions now not only at Oase, but pretty much across the board in all FKKs, nowadays. Or perhaps the lens of hindsight enhances the past more than the present?
-
[QUOTE=Ortos;1918876]. Or perhaps the lens of hindsight enhances the past more than the present?[/QUOTE]-Or demand grows as you age?
-Or chemistry wanes as you looses interest?
-Or hormones wanes?
-Or you get less overwhelmed by the options?
-Or you think you are exclusive by claiming a lie on the forum?
Personally I see absolutely zip, zero, no, nada difference in the overall FKK quality of 2016 and 2013,2014 and 2015. Some clubs come up, others go down. But overall its the same.
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;1918880]-
Personally I see absolutely zip, zero, no, nada difference in the overall FKK quality of 2016 and 2013,2014 and 2015. Some clubs come up, others go down. But overall its the same.[/QUOTE]True. But the guys were discussing the good old days, way before '13.
HB.
-
[QUOTE=Dutedrac;1918832] Linda / Adriana was a much better lay than Michelle, I would still happily fuck ladies like her in their 40-50's. Michelle was reliable and wild, but not really sensual. Still a great girl to hang out with, her good-mood style is highly missed in nowadays Oase. Isabella, Nina, Gabriella, Adriana, Julie, Vivian, Timea, Judith, Claudia, Luna, Ambra / Raffaella, blond Denisa. Girls with that level of service used to be almost the norm in Oase, unfortunately they are the exceptions now. Sharks has had a higher number of top service providers, at least in the last 2-3 years.[/QUOTE]The "good old Oase times" finished for me around 5 years ago. Before that I've never asked a girl before a session if she would do this or that or also can't remember that a girl start a session with cleaning my clean dick. Nowadays things are different. Maybe there are now some more better service providers at Sharks than at Oase but this is first questionable and second in now way of the level of the top young good looking girls as it used to be at Oase some years ago.
But even at the good old times at Oase you could find a flop but the large majority performed good and you could find some top level performers. From your list my favs were Ambra / Rafalla (till 2009 before tattoos and silicon), Isabella / Lila, hungarian black belt bearer in turbo-DT Timea and Vivian (nowadays on weekends at Mainhattan) and Adriana / Linda F (booked her very late and she was better than expexted) and polish Julia (before her private break). Additional some gone favs were polish Olivia, Dagmara, Lilly, ofc russian Steffie before silicon, cz Hannah before silicon and with 15 kg less, hungarian Kira (friend of Timea), and romanian big tits Karina and Ramona (ex World Rebecca) and more.
Nowadays I find and have girls at that service level together with good optic but ofc usually it doesn't work anymore for 50 euro to get this level and it's much more difficult to find them. And I don't see any significant difference between Oase, Sharks, Mainhattan and World.
-
[QUOTE=Dutedrac;1918832]Don't disagree. Linda / Adriana was a much better lay than Michelle, I would still happily fuck ladies like her in their 40-50's. Michelle was reliable and wild, but not really sensual. Still a great girl to hang out with, her good-mood style is highly missed in nowadays Oase. Isabella, Nina, Gabriella, Adriana, Julie, Vivian, Timea, Judith, Claudia, Luna, Ambra / Raffaella, blond Denisa. Girls with that level of service used to be almost the norm in Oase, unfortunately they are the exceptions now. Sharks has had a higher number of top service providers, at least in the last 2-3 years.[/QUOTE]I was confused at first but I think I now get why some punters say they didn't like Michelle. Her wildness made me blind to the perceived lack of sensuality. I remember the first time I sessioned her, as usual I tried some positions and after a while she was like ok lets try this.. Then this, we had some balancing problems leading to some mishaps and we had a good laugh, it was so much fun. The following year when I entered the club she came up to me and chatted and recited every position we had done twelve months earlier in detail, no way I was not repeating with her. Some people also don't like Sunny but I do for she was good to me. I think everyone liked Simona, she was a real sweetie even more so than Romanian Megan in Sharks who I was fortunate enough to have sessioned with before she went on vacation, she's the best Romanian I've had this trip among a very dismal lot. Anyone remembers a Romanian Sarah at Oase 5 years ago, she was one of the most beautiful women I ever laid. My best girls so far have been German, Moldavian and a Latvian. So far I've been to Oase only once and to Sharks and Mainhattan several times, much more so to Sharks. I will try to visit Oase once again before I leave Germany, for old times sake.
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;1918880]
Personally I see absolutely zip, zero, no, nada difference in the overall FKK quality of 2016 and 2013,2014 and 2015. Some clubs come up, others go down. But overall its the same.[/QUOTE]You are way off the mark: We are talking about line-ups and club experience about 10+ years ago, not during the years to which you refer.
Do you have any idea who Linda was? Or Michelle?
-
[QUOTE=Craiova;1918892]
Nowadays I find and have girls at that service level together with good optic but ofc usually it doesn't work anymore for 50 euro to get this level and it's much more difficult to find them. And I don't see any significant difference between Oase, Sharks, Mainhattan and World.[/QUOTE]I agree with everything you write in your post. And absolutely there is no difference between the girls at one club or another: It's a myth that one club has better girls, in general, than another. The line-ups ebb and flow from day to day, week to week, month to month, and girls who work and perform in one club, could / would / do migrate to another club (s) from one day / week / month to the next.
It's all about visiting any of these clubs on the right day, right time, and being able to assess the qualities and select the right girl from the line-up at the club you are in at any given time. This is of course just my opinion.
-
[QUOTE=Turgid;1918895]I remember the first time I sessioned her, as usual I tried some positions and after a while she was like ok lets try this.. Then this, we had some balancing problems leading to some mishaps and we had a good laugh, it was so much fun. [/QUOTE]Finally, someone has accurately pinpointed for me why I liked Swiss Michelle so much that during my visits to Oase in that era, I spent most of my time with her. I have never done with any other girl anywhere close to as many ridiculous positions as I had with her. And every session starts with her backward somersault after taking off her shoes such that her pussy would end just above my face for me to lick!
But it was also the good mood factor; not just in the room but throughout the day. Even after we leave the room after the session, she would continue to joke and chat whenever she was not occupied with another customer. And knowing that I was tickled by her bouncing boobs, she would bounce them by walking vigorously every time she spots me from afar and knows that I was looking her way. She was also generous in introducing other girls to me.
-
[QUOTE=Ortos;1918913]You are way off the mark: We are talking about line-ups and club experience about 10+ years ago, not during the years to which you refer.
Do you have any idea who Linda was? Or Michelle?[/QUOTE]I would add Judith and Lena to the list. I don't think you will find equivalents today.
-
[QUOTE=Dutedrac;1918832]Don't disagree. Linda / Adriana was a much better lay than Michelle, I would still happily fuck ladies like her in their 40-50's. Michelle was reliable and wild, but not really sensual. Still a great girl to hang out with, her good-mood style is highly missed in nowadays Oase. Isabella, Nina, Gabriella, Adriana, Julie, Vivian, Timea, Judith, Claudia, Luna, Ambra / Raffaella, blond Denisa. Girls with that level of service used to be almost the norm in Oase, unfortunately they are the exceptions now. Sharks has had a higher number of top service providers, at least in the last 2-3 years.[/QUOTE]Linda / Adriana was a regular girl for me. Quirky but good. She liked having her nipples licked but not grabbed. Her blowjob was the best. Slow and slurpy. Michelle had a different BJ not so good for me. Michelle's looks were nothing special for me and added to the incredibily smoky breathe / taste of a chain smoker, meant I only ever tried her once. Was not a great session for me. Sure I could see she was a pornstar type which is not what I need.
I was not really a regular at Oase 10 years ago. Was a regular at Palace in its early years. My first girl at Oase was Gabriella, possibly 2005.
Judith never really worked out for me. Pussy was too small. Black Luna was great despite the sillies.
Lena was the absolute star top girl in the room that I knew. I was also very keen on Kimmy Brazil but that is not as far back. What was her Oase name? Something like Cynthia.
In the modern years we have had a few girls really great in the room too. Probably the room standard average accross all the girls has declined slightly, but can still find super girls. I would bot know about pornstar types.
The overall standard of looks has improved over the years. Very few really pretty girls in the old days with odd exceptions like Kimmy. Cassandra probably the best looker ever seen by myself followed by Valentina. Both lasted a relatively short time. Marie stunning for many, not so much for me. Body yes, face not quite. Riccarda was also greatly over rated for me. No GFE for me did not like doggy nor fucking and BJ not soft. Clearly a dick scared girl. Maybe very small would suit her.
There has always been some levels of upsell at oase since even old times, however it increases along with the girls' need to make more money. Not generally a big problem for guys taking their regular girls.