[QUOTE=Syzygies;1711422]You could improve on this by say why you think artemis is better. In what way are the girls superior in your mind. Most of us presumably care more about the standard of service and looks of girls than anything else. Facilities count little for me unless rooms are not usable.
What types of girls are your preference?[/QUOTE]Fair comment. I think Artemis is the best club in terms of overall facilities. I just like the layout the best. I really don't like the layout at Oase. Up the stairs, down a flight, corridors, etc and the main bar area is far too dark. There is no natural circuit to stroll around at Oase. I really like Sharks. Big club (which is my preference), easy walk around that oval shaped bar etc. The area downstairs in Artemis is great. The indoor pool beats the other clubs hands down. The downstairs sports bar is better than in the other clubs. It has a gym. The equipment is new and top quality. It's for those reasons I like the club layout and facilities best.
Now. I fully expect everyone will be saying I should be going to a gym / bar / sports bar etc if this is what I'm really only interested in. I'm not. FKK is predominantly about the girls. I accept that. But unlike a normal brothel, I like the whole FKK experience of being able to turn up early, go to the gym, get a shower, maybe have a session, relax or sleep, get food, go sit outside in the better weather, another session, get a sauna or massage, watch something in the kino, talk to some guys, watch a dancer, and finish the night with a final session. For those reasons the facilities are important to me. Not just the line up. But the facilities could be amazing and I wouldn't go to the club if the line up was poor.
In answer to your question, about my girl preferences, the answer is that facial beauty is most important to me. I like the very pretty girls though I know they don't always give the best service. I don't agree with your previous post that its possible to close eyes and still really enjoy it if the service is good. That might work for you and others. It wouldn't work for me. I need my chosen lady to be facially attractive to me. Next is the body. I like slim girls but I love big tits. I prefer natural but I'd take sillies every day over A cups. I would struggle to go with even a very pretty girl with A cups. Just my thing. Finally, the personality / chemistry is very important to me. I prefer long sessions. It's rare for me to want 30 minutes. I therefore like the discussion at the bar etc beforehand to try to assess if the session will be good. I've posted about sessions before at all three clubs. I think the line up at Oase flatters to deceive. Though I hasten to add that I'm not from Germany and my 6 visits are my only visits so I'm far from expert or veteran enough on FKK to give more than an impression based upon those 6 clubs. I've probably had no more than 20 visits in total to those clubs. Elizabeth (Hungary) at Oase is the prettiest girl I've come across in Oase. Natural large boobs, beautiful face and good body. But I don't find her chemistry or service that good. I've sessioned (and reported on it) twice at Oase with Ruby (rom) blonde, voluptuous who often wears a white dress. She is pretty. Not so much as Elizabeth. But her service is excellent. I've not really been blown away (literally or otherwise!) by the Oase line up. I think you arrive there thinking its paradise but on closer inspection there are not that many girls I really wanted to session with. Sharks had a much better line up on the 3 occasions I've been to the club. But it was over 6 months ago. I was in Artemis a few weeks ago. The line up was, as ever, very strong. There just always seem to be quite a strong selection of pretty girls there. I completely agree with other posts that you do see the porn star appearances more at that club. The girls are mainly a bit older than the other clubs (but many still in 20's). I also agree with the observation here that they can be more mechanical in approach. But my best sessions in all the clubs have mainly happened in Artemis. Maybe that's what has left me with the impression it is the best club.
Happily, this all goes to show that what is one man's paradise is another's dive! The logistics of Artemis are also a factor. It's really easy to get to. Walking distance from some good hotels (I reported on last stay in the Aspira) and easy to get to by train. Oase and Sharks involve taxis after train rides. All that said. I'm still glad I've been to the FRA clubs and I shall definitely return.
Hope that answers your questions! The original post said the guy had 3 days. I agree with what someone else posted. Don't do all three days in the one club. The internal flight suggestion was probably the best. Not the right forum (as this is just Oase) but given your experience Syzygies. And indeed the same is true for the other seniors in the various forums, I think it would be a great idea for someone to produce not just the great lists you do, but a club comparison table to be posted in the general FKK Chat forum.