Oase now when compared to Sharks?
Back in September 2016 when I had asked for a general opinion about if I want quality of service with no up-selling and reasonably good looking girls which is the place to go Sharks or Oase and I had got a equivocal response that If I want service I should go to Sharks but if I am ready for upselling for DFK, Pussy Eating and stuff then only go to Oase. My experience last September Sharks line up was very bad found only one or two girls which were fuckable for me sad I didn't do Oase last time. Has the situation changed now? Does Oase by far has the best looking girls than Sharks? And is there no upselling for Kissing and pussy licking etc?
Day 6, Review 11 - Nicole and Ana (repeat, threesome)
Name: Nicole + Ana.
Age: 21 + 26.
Nationality: Romania.
Hair color: Black + Blonde.
Height (w / o heels): 5'0" + 5'3".
Weight: 90 lbs + 110 lbs.
Additional description: see previous posts. My favorite two girls at the club.
Visual rating: 10/10.
Session description: There's not too much else to say that I haven't said already in my previous posts, so I'll keep this short. This is my third session with Nicole, and third session with Ana. They're the best.
DFK: Yes.
Upsell in Room: No.
Session rating: 10/10.
Cost: 1. 5 h /300 e.
Visual+session rank this trip:
1. Nicole+Ana (10/10).
2. Nicole+Julia (10/10).
3. Ana (10/10).
4. Nicole (10/10).
5. Julia (10/10).
6. Lara (9/10).
7. Diana (9/10).
8. Ada (9/10).
9. Amanda (2/10).