[QUOTE=Syzygies;1774667]Of course not. You can get a weak line up line-up anywhere on a bad day, however, Oase has always had more pretty faces than Sharks, in general (to my taste of course). Caveat that I did not attend Sharks for 2 months.
No need to take notice of Sirioja. He pays cost of entry, just to dump shit. He should not even be there. He should know his girls are not there, most likely.
Turn over at Oase is not huge. Pretty girls on holidays will return. A buddy said he much preferred Oase line up over Sharks, last weekend. I trust his taste more-so. Sirioja's opinions are far from representative of the norm. Hearsay, but it was heard that Sharks was rather dead on Saturday. I have no idea why, but many guys may be preferring cheap entry days.
If I would rate a club for bodies only (ignoring the faces), I would put Sharks in front, with a higher number of really great bodies, ignoring the bodies that don't appeal completely. Unfortunately I am often face oriented, and I did not find that many really pretty or even cute faces at Sharks this year. Some would say my taste is strange, but I do believe Oase has had more cute faced girls, including one black girl I thought was gorgeous.[/QUOTE]I know you like "teeny LOL. " girls and support Oase, but you know my tastes for girls: Agnes, Madi, Ina, and you were not at Oase, nor Sharks this week end, nor for a while. For who like pretty natural girls for face and body, Oase can't compete with Dina, Helli, Carolina, Cosmina, Evita, Ester and other new girls at Sharks or Marina or Suzi at Mainhattan at the moment, and I was very surprised by a so bad casting on a Saturday evening, just before IAA, I did wish I could find a pretty girl just 5 days before IAA, but unfortunately not, EricaCarla is not pretty for me, I know her from Sharks and never tried. About my tastes for girls look, some many readers are interested by my girls, too many unfortunately.