[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1925102]But you have not been a non-regular for ages! LOL.
[/QUOTE]Outside Hessen I am a non-regular.
HB.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1925102]But you have not been a non-regular for ages! LOL.
[/QUOTE]Outside Hessen I am a non-regular.
HB.
Kliens. Great that you realised that Romanians use "chocolate" as a friendly term. It is very widespread and positive. Glad you had a good time.
[QUOTE=Takedown;1925117]Extremely poor Saturday night at Oase.
I arrived at midnight and there were less than 40 girls, nearly all were terrible.
I sessioned with Amelia. Skinny Romanian, 168 cm. Short brunette hair. Mechanical session. Light kissing, does not like intense DATY. Mechanical cowgirl with little passion during missionary. She does not perform ball licking and said that she does not to that for anyone. She could tell that I was not enjoying the session and asked what was wrong. I told her honestly that she did not give the passionate session that I liked. She tried to explain that girls do not have sex like wives at this club, obviously a lie. I left after 20 minutes and she was not at all happy with me. Oh well.
Luckily, Ellie was there to save the night, 168 cm dark brunette, almost black hair. Voluptuous, tight body with large augmented 'C' cups and probably Botox in her lips. I previously described her as an Aletta Ocean look-alike. She is relatively new, previously from Globe. She started in July but left for Romania for 2 weeks and has only been back for a week. I usually assume that girls who look as perfect and augmented as her give poor sessions; and while she is not the most passionate performer, this session being my second with her, she was definitely better. She is very talkative and is truly a nice girl. She did haggle for upsell on our first visit but not this time. She gives an above average blowjob, nothing special but does performs ball licking. She is responsive to DATY, does not like like hard sex, and gives good eye contact during missionary. I am not a frequent visitor to Oase, but would go back just for her.[/QUOTE]I stopped to arrive so late to the FKK fro mainly 2 reasons, too many drunk guys around and I think that the girls are mostly tired and are trying to get short sleeps to recover. If possible try to go there just after opening around 11 am.
[QUOTE=HessenBub;1925200]Outside Hessen I am a non-regular.
HB.[/QUOTE]And at Mainhattan? For me, same level for girls services than Sharks and World, I had my best bloody room with Sara / Megan at Mainhattan, not more upselling, just, often average casting.
[QUOTE=HessenBub;1925200]Outside Hessen I am a non-regular.
HB.[/QUOTE]Define regular though. LU do not change radically in most FKK.
I fly in few times per year and when I do I go consecutive days. However, most of time LU are 85% similar to previous LU with 15% new girls, so I doubt LU change radically in any FKK club, I think LU change to noticeable level once every few month and not every few weeks.
[QUOTE=Takedown;1925117]I sessioned with Amelia. Skinny Romanian, 168 cm. Short brunette hair. Mechanical session. Light kissing, does not like intense DATY. Mechanical cowgirl with little passion during missionary. She does not perform ball licking and said that she does not to that for anyone. She could tell that I was not enjoying the session and asked what was wrong. I told her honestly that she did not give the passionate session that I liked. She tried to explain that girls do not have sex like wives at this club, obviously a lie. I left after 20 minutes and she was not at all happy with me. Oh well.
[/QUOTE]Most (almost all) guys underestimate the number of girls by a significant factor. I don't really think it could be as low as 40 like you say. No matter though. The attendance was low.
I took Amelia once a long time ago. I am assuming it is the same one, since there was only ever one in my experience. She really expected me to repeat her after that and did not understand why I did not. So she does not perhaps really understand some girls are performing much better than wives, and giving a really wonderful time to the customer. She did have her restrictions.
I would describe my session back then as okay But a bit lacklustre. Perhaps she was a little better back in those days. Could be jaded by now.
YY is obviously an optimist who can find almost all girls to be great, which seems a bit unrealistic, but the girls know how to behave I guess.
[QUOTE=Ortos;1925061] But when the atmosphere here gets polluted with nasty, pointless posts (not just to me, but others as well) and it degenerates into personal attacks that are not based on any facts or reason, you start to loose your lust and appetite to put in the time and effort to compose these reports. You get disgusted, like expecting to dive into a clean pool just to find that some wanker is pissing in it. It used to be fun, but now it becomes boring to non-enjoyable.
But look: This whole thing is a complete distraction. Who really cares about this crap anyway? Right? So let's put this whole discussion to bed, and turn back to what this thread is supposed to be about: Girls and action at BHH.[/QUOTE]Best to ignore the negative shit dumpers, as far as possible, who have to be the one who knows everything, right? Other readers will be able to get value from any good info produced. Any useful data.
I agree its about which girls can really give a good time, and why they can be good, since different guys have different motivations. Most other things, outside of plain facts, are too wishy washy to be much value. Once several guys include the same girl in their list of favourites, I think we can take notice. Even I never tried a girl, I can suspect how good she might potentially be, given several recommendations.
Most of my favourites have been crap for somebody, looking for something different, but still liked by some other customers.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1925323]Most (almost all) guys underestimate the number of girls by a significant factor. I don't really think it could be as low as 40 like you say. No matter though. The attendance was low.
Amelia...[/QUOTE]Perhaps you are right. The best estimate I can give without a number is that the numbered girls on this Saturday night was similar to a Monday might number. Perhaps it was the rain or the Germany vs Brazil Olympic gold medal match, but the numbers were abysmal for a Saturday night. Then again, I arrived at midnight so maybe it was better at 2100.
I believe it was the same Amelia because when I looked at a list you put out in July, the descriptions match.
[QUOTE=Ortos;1925061]But when the atmosphere here gets polluted with nasty, pointless posts (not just to me, but others as well) and it degenerates into personal attacks that are not based on any facts or reason[/QUOTE]What facts are we talking about here? When it comes to how I determine which posters to be reliable, it's about deduction. It's a combination of my experience, frequency of reporting noticed, what clubs they have reported on, and what girls reported. Also, posting patterns that are apparent.
For people like I, good intel and perspectives are highly important than quality of the writing. Although, some reports are just fun read and well written, but doesn't mean there is good intel in the writing.
Like Der Auslander for example. His postings I will take with a grain of salt. There is nothing he contributes besides postings about what his opinions on members here (not that I haven't done the same, and of course we both greatly differ in who's content are the most reliable). What does seniority have to do with anything here? Many members with various backgrounds and experiences. Some has not made a career out of mongering, doesn't mean they cannot provide reliable intel, and perspective on things.
We all have opinions on various clubs, girls, etc. Some dedicate to a club. Some only attend a club or two. Some attend many clubs. This is another factor I look for in punter, s perspectives.
Things that are questionable are those that cannot be determined to be factual. Nobody can verify what has actually occurred. We can only go by a bit of deductions and posting patterns.
I look for posters with reliable content. Facts about club prices, transport are easily verified factual or not. Other than that, a lot of things you cannot determine factuality of the content.
Things can be tailored to sound reasonable. Lawyers do it all the time. It just takes some common sense(some deductions) to figure things out. I like things that are straight up to the point. No beating around the bush.
[QUOTE=Takedown;1925373] Then again, I arrived at midnight so maybe it was better at 2100.[/QUOTE]Dayshift at Oase finish at 10 pm therefore you can add around 20 girls to your figure.
[QUOTE=Neurosynth;1925065]I'd like to suggest yet again that the Oase thread be used for Oase topics, and the General or Lounge threads be used for topics that are not specific to a single FKK.[/QUOTE]Well said. I agree.
[QUOTE=MrHo;1925288]Define regular though. LU do not change radically in most FKK.[/QUOTE]The term is somewhat subjective but in my opinion a Regular Customer (or Stamgast) would visit a club (like FKK Oase) several times per month and perhaps at least once or twice a week. Such a customer would know most of the girls working in the club (at least by name) and would perhaps have gained intimate knowledge of many of the working girls over time. A good example would be how the indomitable [B]Syzygies[/B] can provide Line-Up Lists of the girls working in his preferred club on any given night when he is in attendance (see linked examples of Syzygies Line-Up Lists in the Reports of Distinction Thread). Therefore it is easier for a resident of Germany (or perhaps a neighboring country) to become a regular at his favorite club and less easy for a non-national or someone travelling from outside Europe.
Are there advantages to being a Stamgast or Regular Customer? There would possible be more consistent and better service offered by the working girls even for half hour sessions because the Stamgast is a regular visitor and his €50 would possibly be available to the WG on a more frequent basis. If the Regular Customer is a high roller the girls will fight to get him as a customer. Obviously if you are a regular at any club you get to know the staff working in the establishment and also some of the other regular customers. This can make any club visit a more enjoyable experience.
Are there disadvantages? I've seen guys get fixated about a particular girl and only visit a club regularly for this working-girl. In effect the club wife syndrome where the customer cannot go with another girl without offending the regular WG. Of course the regular WG may be offering extra services to keep the Stamgast or Regular Customer happy. But all said and done although some guys are happy with this particular club wife scenario, its definitely not for me!
[QUOTE=Takedown;1925178]They sound like different girls. "Amelia" is much taller than 160 and cannot pass as German at all. This one also says that she has been there 2 years. Has some letters tattoo'd on her neck.[/QUOTE]Thanks for your confirmation. Maybe different one.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1925323]YY is obviously an optimist who can find almost all girls to be great, which seems a bit unrealistic, but the girls know how to behave I guess.[/QUOTE]Yes, IMHO, every girl has something special or something unique, that I love.
While double names are a fairly common thing in Oase, the Amelia Syz is talking about has been there for about 4 or 5 years. I didn't see her in the beginning of August, but in the spring she was still "going strong". For me she is always a good example of how club "rules" or "atmosphere" or "mafias" can make or brake girls (from our persopective).
Just today I had avery crappy session in Luderlounge with a girl that just transfered from Paradise Saarbrucken. When I told her to call it quits after about 18 minutes (always nice to have the option of a 20 minute session), she made me stay and explain why. The only real counter she had was "In saarbrucken we didn't really do all this stuff and it is difficult to change", we are talking decent DFK and the like. But anyway, I digress.
When Amelia was very new, shy and had few rooms. We are talking about the times where the kino was closed, food was served from behind the bar and the idea of going to a room without making out in the kino (or somewhere else) was preposturous. Nothing changed in oase over the last years as you can see. Back then I used to meet up with a buddy of mine, who is smarter and has given up on Oase a while ago, and would do a handfull sessions each. His final one would typically be the first girl that was willing to start blowing him in the bar and then finish the whole the right there, still see a lot of that as well. But again I digress.
We were sitting in one of the couches opposite the kino (also gone) and a very young Amelia sat down in my lap and we just made out for about 15 minutes, without really saying anything and funliy enough: "better than with a wife". Rooms also very GFE without any real restrictions. This continued fairly steadily even as the first cracks in Oase's service reputation strted to appear, and off course at some point we were in the room (or tent really) and she suddenly wouldn't kiss anymore, or maybe if I stayed an hour. We spent half an hour doing pretty much nothing but discuss her sudden service development and after getting her "well deserved" 50 that was it. Although she of course tried to patch things up when she felt the need for some money, nowadays she just ignores me, so everything is nice and as it should be, and she spents her time with Montana and a few others waiting for a busload of Asians or Italians to arrive.