-
Can't recall where I read it, but I remember something about new restrictions requiring "digital proof of vaccination" aka vaccination proof through QR codes.
So for non-EU travelers, you can get Vax cards converted at some German pharmacies:
[URL]https://www.stuttgartcitizen.com/news/local-pharmacies-offer-transcription-of-cdc-vaccine-cards-into-eu-digital-standard/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=DrPoon;2634594]Still to this day I don't understand how the USA engaged in mass hysteria by drafting millions of men and forcing them to fight and it seemed like they were happy to fight? I just can't see what was in it for them as it was like an extreme overreaction to an invasion of Hawaii. I mean Hawaii is nice but its not worth millions of people dying for.[/QUOTE]Well, we didn't see millions of American deaths in WW2. It was less than half a million.
[URL]https://www.statista.com/statistics/1009819/total-us-military-fatalities-in-american-wars-1775-present/[/URL]
I mean, Pearl Harbor was the first attack of American soil since 1812. It would seem that military retaliation wouldn't have been unjustified.
But yes, I think the theory that FDR wanted war and American intelligence actually had knowledge of Japanese plans but let it happen has merit.
-
Correction, American intel knew of an imminent attack, but not necessarily on Hawaii.
-
[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2634870]You also think that we are living in a simulation, that there are nanorobots in vaccines, and that the Evil Big Pharma is corrupting the doctors with pencils.
Are you able to be a little consistent from time to time?[/QUOTE]Simulation: check (but its a very large one).
They are called nanoworms. We actually get them in us through the facial diapers also. So not only through the quackzines. And used in cooperation with infrared lasars, they enter our brain and can simulate neurons. This leads to the same mind control as is mentioned in regards to the Kali Yuga.
The pencils are just tokens. But the corruption is strong with these folks.
The red line through all of this tells the same story.
-
Ironically in 1993 the USA passed an "Apology Law" regarding apologizing for stealing Hawaii in 1893 by having US citizens engage in a conspiracy to overthrow the King of Hawaii and ask to be annexxed. Thus the USA had no legitimate basis to defend Hawaii as it later admitted to stealing same.
[URL]https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-107/pdf/STATUTE-107-Pg1510.pdf[/URL]
[QUOTE=McAdonis;2634892]Even before the attack on Hawaii, It is widely believed that FDR wanted to go to war. Public opinion and the isolationists in his own government were simply against him. Although not officially part of the war yet, FDR's speech here implores the American public to boost production in support of its Allies (Britain, China, Russia):
The operative word here is "unless attacked". That said, USA did its best to financially cripple the Japanese war machine:
The tense moments came in the last few weeks before the attack. By late November, USA had realized that a Japanese attack on American interests was imminent:
American war planning had already started. Three days before the attack:[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Mursenary;2634849]One measure of (functional) intellect is the ability to identify your audience and having the discipline to present topics that they give a fuck about rather than presenting a tangental diatribe in which 9 out of 10 readers checks out after the 2 paragraph. You would think that a "communications expert" would know and utilize this fundamental concept.[/QUOTE]Well technically the "comm expert" was hired to be the webmaster of his village's library no? Some kind of charity job?
-
[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2634870]You also think that we are living in a simulation, that there are nanorobots in vaccines, and that the Evil Big Pharma is corrupting the doctors with pencils.
Are you able to be a little consistent from time to time?[/QUOTE]Why did you change the subject?
-
[QUOTE=Mursenary;2634849]One measure of (functional) intellect is the ability to identify your audience and having the discipline to present topics that they give a fuck about rather than presenting a tangental diatribe in which 9 out of 10 readers checks out after the 2 paragraph. You would think that a "communications expert" would know and utilize this fundamental concept.[/QUOTE]Just for the record while wasting my time on you yet again:
Communication is always about adding something new. Not about mirroring others. Like when you always only mirror others, nothing new is created. You are then just a tool.
-
[QUOTE=Mursenary;2634960]Well, we didn't see millions of American deaths in WW2. It was less than half a million.
[URL]https://www.statista.com/statistics/1009819/total-us-military-fatalities-in-american-wars-1775-present/[/URL]
I mean, Pearl Harbor was the first attack of American soil since 1812. It would seem that military retaliation wouldn't have been unjustified.
But yes, I think the theory that FDR wanted war and American intelligence actually had knowledge of Japanese plans but let it happen has merit.[/QUOTE]America thrives on war. Even wars that it loses such as Vietnam and Afghanistan. America was stronger than ever after Vietnam and is still the most powerful country on earth after Afghanistan. America will decline big time if there is world peace. Russia and China do not want war with the US for they know the consequences as nukes will be involved, they have been bending over backwards to avoid a confrontation. Furthermore war seems less likely under a Democrat government than under the Republicans.
All signs point to the next big war for the US being a civil war. The war will be white supremacists against the liberals. White supremacists have been arming themselves for decades. The liberal's ammunition have been words. Anyone else in the US seeing things differently? If you are on the ground and hear people talk you would know that something is brewing. In a military conflict it would be hard to see the liberals winning. How ironic it would be if the USA is governed under the same ideology they fought against in world war II.
-
[QUOTE=ShooBree;2635119]Why did you change the subject?[/QUOTE]He is trying hard to use his brain beyond the 25% has been allotted during the Narrow dark Kali Yuga. And to think more divergently as is being done in any of the higher Yuga states. But by trying just that, he fails hard and falls into the trap of only rewriting other peoples ideas. Unfortunately however, even when trying that, he fails miserably when it comes to source context. This context error is a big sin according to Osiris, so his chance of entering the Halls of Amenti is thus reduced.
-
Oh, by the way. The Halls (or House) of Amenti is outside of this simulation. Or at the very least entering these will give you the option to choose which simulation to later enter after death.
-
[QUOTE=Pistons;2635135]Just for the record while wasting my time on you yet again:
Communication is always about adding something new. Not about mirroring others. Like when you always only mirror others, nothing new is created. You are then just a tool.[/QUOTE]Communication is about communicating. As in, others need to hear it. And no one gave a damn about your rant on the Vedas.
You're lucky to be even having this interaction with me. In the physical world, our only interaction would be me telling you to go fetch my damn coffee.
-
[QUOTE=Turgid;2635208]All signs point to the next big war for the US being a civil war. The war will be white supremacists against the liberals. White supremacists have been arming themselves for decades. The liberal's ammunition have been words. Anyone else in the US seeing things differently? If you are on the ground and hear people talk you would know that something is brewing. In a military conflict it would be hard to see the liberals winning. How ironic it would be if the USA is governed under the same ideology they fought against in world war II.[/QUOTE]It's mostly talk. I live in the heart of right wing disgruntle attitudes and very few people are willing to resort to physical conflict. Protests and riots have happened but all out physical conflict would quickly be squashed out by the state.
It doesn't matter who has the guns as the US military heads have shown to be rational minds, not showing even an inkling of support for the likes of the January 6th rioters.
Not many supremacists actually exist, but there are tons more people who are completely over the overreaching liberals. Most conservatives just want to be left alone and for social advocates and politicians to stop telling them what to do.
So no, I do not think there will be an extended military conflict between white supremacists and liberals anytime in the next 20 years.
-
[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2635097]Well technically the "comm expert" was hired to be the webmaster of his village's library no? Some kind of charity job?[/QUOTE]Yes, putting him in a building that people don't actually visit was probably the right call on their part, like giving a child a meaningless task to get him to stop annoying the fuck out of other humans.
-
[QUOTE=Turgid;2635208]America thrives on war. Even wars that it loses such as Vietnam and Afghanistan. America was stronger than ever after Vietnam and is still the most powerful country on earth after Afghanistan. America will decline big time if there is world peace. Russia and China do not want war with the US for they know the consequences as nukes will be involved, they have been bending over backwards to avoid a confrontation. Furthermore war seems less likely under a Democrat government than under the Republicans.
[/QUOTE]I mean, it's already begun, the decline that is. But that's all relative. The power gap has been so large for decades that there was only one direction to go. I personally think the equitable distribution of power and thus responsibility is a great thing. UK, Germany, Japan, and maybe even France are all in the positions to be able and should rise up and take on more global leadership positions. Unilateral American decisions should end. I may be American but I'm a global citizen first.
Nation versus nation wars may be mostly a thing of the past as that is the point of the United Nations and as you mentioned, the threat of nukes. That's probably why wars had to be justified by things like "ending terrorism. " Afghanistan wasn't really a war was it? And Iraq part 2 was really just a month followed by 8 years of occupation. Heck have any other nations engaged in wars outside of the US and our allies in the middle east?