|
Search:
Type: Posts; User: Sabio
|
|
Search:
Search took 0.06 seconds.
-
My farewell post
The forum moderator suspended my instant posting privileges and sent me an e-mail that included the following
I am stunned that an intellectual discussion at the core of the...
-
joe_zop
Thank you for your post and your kind words. Please take my remarks in the same spirit. Even when we disagree, I benefit from your point of view.
I said "if there was an agenda to be...
-
hysteromania
I'll take your posts as a break to loosen up in the middle of a serious discussion :) .
Of course, all of us are playing the STD lottery except those who choose abstinence. What...
-
Prokofiev
Well, we are about to fill a page of the safe sex section in 24 hours, which should be a record for this section of the board :)
I perfectly understand that the one in seven figure...
-
Prokofiev
Thank you for your commentary.
Please point out the page of the report in which the qualification at least is mentioned in connection with the 85% figure, and also the part where it...
-
joe_zop
Points well taken. I am not treating the one in seven as cast in stone, but it is the best scientific estimate available. That's what we have. The conclusion is that test kits are three...
-
joe_zop
Many thanks for your detailed and informed post (coffee seems to work well for you :) ). I am glad you took the time to go through the NIH report, and I will comment on your observations....
-
Just to be sure there is no confusion, it is three times safer than using condoms.
Again, I agree that if you consider the down side, you will be scared even if the odds are small. Objectively,...
-
Prokofiev:
Thank you for your response. Here are my comments on some of the points you raised.
>The odds of catching HIV or Herpes with a provider using a condom is an unknown number.
I...
-
And the winner is ......
I have been researching the subject of testing versus covering in order to quantify the risks involved and have a fair comparison between the two scenarios (see my...
-
From a post by Zidaho in another section:
Information found on this WSG site regarding the herpes test kit, "PocKit" was GREAT! However, my initial investigation and contact with the company...
-
The probability for a man to catch HIV from a single covered vaginal encounter with an infected woman is estimated to range from one in several thousand to one in tens of thousands. It is seven times...
-
Prices for PocKit
Here is an e-mail response from a small US distributor of PocKit (the herpes 10-minute test kit). It's about $20 per kit, but I suspect one can get a better price from other...
-
spit or stick?
The reference below confirms that OraQuick works with either saliva or finger stick. I contacted the manufacturer to ask about this. Since they applied for FDA approval for finger...
-
3-minute home test kit for HIV
The Canadian company MedMira received preliminary FDA approval, and is about to receive final approval, for a new easy-to-use HIV-1 test kit called MedMira Reveal...
-
Someone who actually used the fast test kits :) . This is abridged from a post on another board:
I read about portable HIV testing, and called Abbott in Thailand and
Vietnam (see below). I was...
-
Instead of measuring the risk per encounter, some studies measure the risk per (total number of encounters a typical person in the study has in a year).
No. They mean to become INFECTED with...
-
A picture is worth a 1000 words
Here is a picture of the OraQuick 20-minute test kit. Some love it :) , some hate it :mad: . If you are just joining us, start with the February 26 post.
...
-
Effectiveness of condoms
Just to be sure that there is no confusion here, the 85% figure is the effectiveness of
condoms in preventing HIV transmission compared to bareback, not the probability...
-
The 85% is not my number. The US Congress commissioned the NIH to determine what
that number is, and NIH had a panel of experts consider a multitude of scientific studies
and concluded that it is...
-
Performance numbers for PocKit
This is the herpes 10-minute home test kit that I am exploring for checking providers
for herpes-2 (even when they don't have outbreaks). The performance looks...
-
NIH study says it is one in seven
The US National Institutes of Health conducted a study on the effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission during vaginal intercourse. The results...
-
RN:
Many thanks for your well-informed post. Please understand that I have not reached
a conclusion yet. It would be great if we continued the discussion at the intelligent
level of your post,...
-
hooky wrote (in another section):
>hey sabio
>
>still looking for those numbers. it was something i heard on public radio
>i think about 6 months ago. no luck so far finding it on the net....
-
purplengold
You are right. The probability is straightforward to compute once you have the components. The one in a million is clearly a guess on my part. My reasoning goes as follows. One in a...
|
|