The Truth about AIDS

[SW Man]

Great report!

[Starchild2012]

AIDS virus man made....proof

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/so...nspiracy30.htm

[Rubber Nursey]

She would probably end up with herpes and venereal warts.

You're absolutely right. Mind you, rates of herpes and HPV are still comparatively low among Australian sex workers. It mostly comes down to adequate sexual health education (to recognise visible symptoms of infection) and a legal enironment that allows sex workers to refuse and/or alter the services offered, if infection is suspected. Sure, there are 'invisible' STIs that sex workers won't be able to spot, but at least they're looking for them. The average sexually active person doesn't even know what to look for, and probably wouldn't bother if they did.

But my point was that, in relation to HIV, 'promiscuity' has nothing to do with transmission risk. Condom use is what matters.

[Tiny 12]

A sex worker can work for decades, using condoms, and never catch anything.

She would probably end up with herpes and venereal warts.

[Informater]

The truth about aids is much more difficult to believe than that; Here are a fiew informtions everybody is aloud to know;

When vih was declared as cause of aids it hasn't even been isolated as a virus wich is the medical term for " found in the blood of the patient". It was in fact only a theory thouthed by Gallo

The tests are actually only detecting an antibody that can be present in your blood for many reasons mainly certain medicents

In the 80 the the amount of the presence of this antibody nessecary to be declade seropositif wasn t the same in us australia and Africa!

2000 very scientist of the whole world whithin 5 nobel prices signed a declaration saiyng that vih is not the cause of aids

The mortality of aids starting to decline when it stopped to be treated with important quantity of azt

This medicent is was actually prevíously used for cancers but banned because of his to dangerous toxic effects

A lot mores informtions if you try "aids vih lies" on google

[Rubber Nursey]

HIV, in short, is not behaving like a typical sexually transmitted disease. Sexual promiscuity, per se, does not put female prostitutes at risk for either HIV or AIDS. There is only one possible conclusion: vaginal intercourse and oral forms of sex (which are by far the most common forms practiced by the prostitutes interviewed in the studies summarized above) are not high risk activities for either the acquisition or transmission of HIV and AIDS.

Sexual promiscuity, per se, does not put female prostitutes at risk of HIV...if they consistently use condoms. Australian sex workers have lower rates of HIV than the general Australian community, thanks to almost universal condom use within our sex industry. It certainly doesn't mean that unprotected vaginal and oral sex is safe. What a bizarre conclusion for so-called 'research' to reach!

HIV and STI infection have nothing to do with sexual promiscuity, and everything to do with safe sex practices. A sex worker can work for decades, using condoms, and never catch anything. A 'regular' person can have unprotected sex with one random hookup and catch a raft of diseases.

[Jon32]

Luc Montagnier is credited with being the first discoverer of hiv. He was awarded a Nobel prize for this discovery.

He's recently said in an interview that:

People can be exposed to hiv many times without being chronically infected. And that people who have a good immune system will rid itself of the hiv virus.

He says some other controversial stuff. Watch the interview here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4

Wow that is a crazy interview...

[Ricci1003]

Luc Montagnier is credited with being the first discoverer of hiv. He was awarded a Nobel prize for this discovery.

He's recently said in an interview that:

People can be exposed to hiv many times without being chronically infected. And that people who have a good immune system will rid itself of the hiv virus.

He says some other controversial stuff. Watch the interview here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4

I have better news after doing research on "HIV" and "AIDS" actually in Uganda for the last six years and consulting doctors and scientists who have charged for many years that "AIDS" is not even caused by a virus, that the tests referred to as an "AIDS test" don't even detect any virus and that the medications are often a big part of the problem.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SL1yagwaKM4

[Jon32]

http://aids-clinical-care.jwatch.org...ull/1998/201/1

Yeah was a good one.

[Brad Dupree]

Luc Montagnier is credited with being the first discoverer of hiv. He was awarded a Nobel prize for this discovery.

He's recently said in an interview that:

People can be exposed to hiv many times without being chronically infected. And that people who have a good immune system will rid itself of the hiv virus.

He says some other controversial stuff. Watch the interview here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4

[Clandestine782]

http://aids-clinical-care.jwatch.org...ull/1998/201/1

Pragmatically, how do you determine if a sexual exposure confers sufficient risk to warrant postexposure prophylaxis (PEP)?
Drs. Katz and Gerberding: The quantitative risk associated with a specific sexual exposure to HIV is hard to measure. The available data suggest that the probability of transmission through a single episode of rectal or vaginal intercourse with someone known to be HIV infected is within the same order of magnitude as that associated with occupational needle punctures (0.003). Probability of transmission is highest for unprotected receptive anal intercourse (0.008 to 0.032). Unprotected receptive vaginal intercourse (0.0005 to 0.0015) is riskier than insertive vaginal intercourse (0.0003 to 0.0009).

Per-episode risk estimates for other types of sexual exposure to HIV are not available. There are no published estimates of the per-contact risk of HIV transmission with insertive anal or oral intercourse, but both of these behaviors transmit HIV. Even for the sexual behaviors for which we have per-contact risk estimates, a number of other factors influence transmission (e.g., trauma, inflammatory or ulcerative genital lesions). Moreover, in some cases (e.g., sexual assault, anonymous sexual contacts), it may be unknown whether the partner is HIV infected.

Given the tremendous uncertainty in the estimates of risk of HIV transmission with a single exposure, we recommend offering PEP to people who have had unprotected anal or vaginal intercourse with a person known to be HIV infected or in a group at risk for HIV, such as an injection drug user. We also recommend offering treatment to people who have had unprotected receptive oral intercourse with ejaculation. Condom breakage and slippage would be considered unprotected sex

[Jon32]

Seven percent Amsterdam prostitutes has hiv virus

published: Tuesday, January 24 2006, 5:35PM

Research has shown that on average 7% of the Amsterdam prostitutes carry the hiv virus, that can cause AIDS.

For the investigation a sample of 242 prostitutes were examined.

The virus occurs more often with transsexual prostitutes (17%), and also more often with prostitutes who use drugs (11%, versus 3% for prostitutes who don't use drugs). Of the prostitutes who operate behind windows in the Red light district, 4% was infected.

Also, 52 clients were tested, in order to find out how they could best be reached with information. None of them were infected.

HIV, in short, is not behaving like a typical sexually transmitted disease. Sexual promiscuity, per se, does not put female prostitutes at risk for either HIV or AIDS. There is only one possible conclusion: vaginal intercourse and oral forms of sex (which are by far the most common forms practiced by the prostitutes interviewed in the studies summarized above) are not high risk activities for either the acquisition or transmission of HIV and AIDS.

[Jon32]

In Seville, Spain, 20 percent of intravenous drug users are HIV seropositive and 2.5 percent of the non-needle using prostitutes. Only 8 in 10,000 non-needle-using prostitutes are HIV seropositive in the Philippines.

Studies of drug-free prostitutes in Amsterdam, London, Zurich, Paris. Vienna, Athens, Pardenone (Italy), Callao (Peru), Reno (Nevada), Tijuana (Mexico), and Central Tunisia over the last eight years have found only a handful of cases of HIV infection.

Thus, American researchers M. J. Rosenberg and J. M. Weiner concluded in 1988 that "HIV infection in non-drug using prostitutes tends to be low or absent, implying that sexual activity alone does not place them at high risk, while prostitutes who use intravenous drugs are far more likely to be infected with HIV."

[Jon32]

thanks for deleting those posts jackson.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34048658/ns/health-aids


Check this map out. Seems that outside africa everything is less than 1% infection.


But I wonder how many sex workers as a percentage are infected? For example in the USA less than 1% of the population is infected. But maybe 30% of sex workers are infected?

Thoughts?

[Admin]

Greetings Everyone,

I recently cleaned up this thread by deleting a number of off-topic and otherwise pointless posts, as well as a number responses made by other forum members to these deleted posts.

This cleanup process is not perfect, and it's possible that I may have inadvertently deleted a few otherwise legitimate posts. If you find that your own report was also deleted, please don't take it personally.

Thanks,

Jackson