Thread: American Women
+
Add Report
Results 751 to 765 of 11975
-
03-14-15 06:12 #11225
Posts: 409Originally Posted by NakedGunz [View Original Post]
-
03-14-15 05:25 #11224
Posts: 1398Just had a view of TV's sexiest videos countdown on CW. Of course they are broadcast all over the world EXCEPT the USA. Of course they all glorified the MAN as a fucking MAN.
I found my fav on YT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePz1grQf8RA.
We have so many grandmas working on airlines now that this commercial would be seriously protested by them and all the rest of Americas thundering herd - (AKA the average AW). Have fun seeing what will never be seen or done in America.
-
03-02-15 18:59 #11223
Posts: 614Originally Posted by SavePros321 [View Original Post]
TG865 . "Global professor of all things male".
-
03-02-15 12:55 #11222
Posts: 2927Monday Morning Self Check
Guys, as you go about your day / week, be sure to evaluate all of your female coworker (or classmate) "friends" connections and ensure that you are not just wasting your time by "Orbiting":
Orbiter - Also known as Beta Orbiter. A beta guy who accepted the proposal to "just be friends" from a girl he has oneitis for. He will stick around her and constantly validate her whenever she requests it. Also known as "friendzone. " She will keep him around because he will do anything for her and provide validation, giving small hints that he might eventually win her love- but he never will. Typical signs of orbiter status: likes and comments on new facebook photos. Go-to guy when girl has problem with boyfriend. Also known as emotional tampon.
=====
TG is no doubt a Master Orbiter, as well as a Master Beta, hahaha.
http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/c...ossary_thread/
-
03-02-15 12:34 #11221
Posts: 2927Briffault's Law
http://www.stickmanweekly.com/Reader...reader5546.htm
"So, let's get to Korski's question, "Who is a hoar", and my initial response, "They all are". By Briffault's Law if a woman is associating with you (assuming you are a man) then she is doing it because she sees some benefit, either current, or in the future, from that association. How is this different from the bargirl on Soi Cowboy? I think only in the duration of the intended association, the amount of benefit expected, and in the woman's acceptance of delay in getting that benefit. Guys, let's get real about this. It is past time to take off the rose colored glasses.
How does this help? If you know going in that she is there to derive a benefit, then make sure you are willing and able to provide that benefit, that you are willing and able to continue to provide that benefit, and that the cost to you of providing that benefit is worth the benefit you derive from the association. Be fully aware that when the benefit to her stops, the relationship will stop. Have no illusions. This is true in the UK, France, America, Thailand, and everywhere else. So, if you spend every dime in your retirement fund to build her and / or her mother a house (in her name of course), do not expect that the association will continue. You must say no early and often so you preserve your ability to provide a continuing benefit. If you drain all your resources, then you get what you should expect (see corollary 1).
Keep control of your money, only you will be responsible with it, because you had to earn it. After my first divorce I commiserated with a female secretary that was at least two decades older than me, and who was herself divorced. When I told her that I had let my wife run the family finances (common in 80% of married couples in the USA), and that she had run us deep into debt, she told me, "Any man that turns over his paycheck to a woman is a fool. " I would add that giving any woman every penny you have in the world is just asking her to kick you to the curb and walk away from you.
Deriving mutual benefits from a relationship is not a bad thing. Where Brokenman and the rest of us men lose the plot is when we expect past benefit provided to the woman to continue generating current or future association (see corollary 1). Loyalty, honor, gratitude, and duty are male values that we men project on women, but which very few, to no, women actually possess. We aren't born with these values; they are drummed into us from the cradle on by society / culture, our families, and most definitely by the women in our lives (sorry, but that includes you too, Mom). Women get different indoctrination, so they have different values; mostly, for a woman, whatever is good for her and her (biological) children is what is best, full stop. So, do not expect that the woman in your life will be grateful, and sacrifice for you, when you can no longer provide for her and hers. And make no mistake, you have never been, and never will be, part of what is hers. What are hers will be first herself, then her (biological) children, then her parents, then her siblings, and then the rest of her blood relatives. The biological imperative has always been to extend her blood line. It stops there, and it always will. This is true everywhere in the world. Get over it.
Men love women, but I truly believe that women are incapable of what we men call love. "Greater love hath no man than that he lay down his life for his friends. " How many women are willing to die for their husbands, friends, country, or comrades in arms? Damn few, if any. Yet it is commonly expected of men (made compulsory under certain circumstances). How many men continue on in their marriages, supporting their family and their wife, while the wife is making their life a living hell? Far too many. How many men choose their wives over their parents and siblings? Most. Women do not behave like this. Men take out large insurance policies so their wives and children will be well taken care of should they die. Even if the wife is making (nearly) as much money as the husband, she will not have insurance. She sees no reason to reduce her current ability to spend to take care of others after she is dead. She could care less what happens to the husband, and doesn't want the husband to be able to spend money on some young bimbo, after she dies. The life insurance gender statistics are well known, and widely available. None of this should be a shocking revelation. When my second wife died, her mandatory insurance (free) provided by her teacher's union covered her funeral expenses. It would have made life much easier if her insurance had paid the over $350,000 my life insurance would have paid.
When does the expectation of mutual benefit in marriage go seriously wrong in the west? It goes wrong as soon as the "I Dos" are said, or very shortly thereafter. Why is this so? Because you, the man have just entered into a contract with the state where you have promised that you will provide everything to your bride, and where the bride has promised nothing. By the way, the full weight of the law and public opinion will support her stripping you of every thing you have, including your children, and most of what you will ever make in the future, when (not if) she decides to dump you. Hence, once you enter into the contract you have nothing left to offer her. Everything you have, or will have, is already hers. Seem like a harsh statement? I thought so too, the first time I heard it, during an argument with my first wife towards the end of our marriage. She asked me the eternal female question, "What do you do for me?" (I. E. What benefit do I get from associating with you?) I responded, "I pay all your expenses. I feed, clothe, and house you. And, I am paying for your college tuition. " She told me that all the money I earned was her money and that if she let me have any of it that was pure charity on her part, so I was doing nothing for her. I thought this was unduly harsh. The divorce courts showed me that it was pretty much just a statement of fact. The wife has it all, and can make her part of the marriage contract, the portion where she is to provide you with companionship, comfort, loyalty, sex, etc. , null and void at any time while keeping everything you have / had / will ever have. She has no need to associate with you further once you are married (see corollary 2). (What is the difference between regular Barbie doll and divorced Barbie doll? Divorced Barbie comes with her stuff and all of Ken's stuff too.) This seems a totally destructive state of affairs. Recently many in the western nations have been up in arms over a law passed in, I believe, Saudi Arabia that said if a married woman refuses her husband sex, then he can refuse to feed her. All are screaming it is Islamic misogyny. Seems to me, it is an equal degree of enforcement for both sides of a contract.
Presenting Briffault's Law is a duty I felt I owed to the readership, as a public service. We all need to take off the blinders. You will get from women exactly what you should expect; if you keep Briffault's Law (and my corollaries) in mind. Knowing this earlier in life would have saved me a lot of pain. I hope it helps some of you out there keep a hand on the reins. All of us, men and women, will be happier if men take charge of their relationships and their finances. ".
BRIFFAULT'S LAW:
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Briffault
-
03-02-15 05:07 #11220
Posts: 409Originally Posted by UltraHappy [View Original Post]
A man that doesn't like sports, hunting or fishing. Yes I think you're better off hanging with women in the USA.
You can talk about food. By the look of there fat asses, they know a lot about that.
-
03-02-15 04:07 #11219
Posts: 74Originally Posted by ThatGuy865 [View Original Post]
-
03-02-15 04:02 #11218
Posts: 614Originally Posted by Smoothy [View Original Post]
You don't like the pay structure. Don't join. If you like it. Join. Either way. It is the way it is.
-
03-02-15 01:20 #11217
Posts: 1312Originally Posted by TellAll [View Original Post]
You are lucky TellAll that you enjoy hanging out with your Man-Friends so much. Me, I don't much care for sports, hunting, and fishing.
I'm sorry that the AW in your part of the country are so horrible and terrible that you derive no enjoyment from spending time with them if they're not sexing you up. Things must be pretty bad in your area of the country I guess.
-
03-01-15 23:25 #11216
Posts: 6441Originally Posted by ThatGuy865 [View Original Post]
-
03-01-15 19:53 #11215
Posts: 409Originally Posted by SavePros321 [View Original Post]
-
03-01-15 19:07 #11214
Posts: 3359A wise man once said, "You can't watch your wife and your outside woman, too."
-
03-01-15 18:10 #11213
Posts: 614AM who are AW haters mainly are.
Guys who have been burnt from a marriage, scorned by a woman. Mad because of something they asked the woman to do. She didn't ask them to marry. They did it. And when they left and not they mad because of the 50/50 split at divorce. Which has been that way since man has been getting divorced, so its not like any man can say. "I didn't know" . But they blame the woman for the resentment of their mistake. So they hate all AW.
Or.
Guys who think a woman should drop the panties pretty much after the guy says "Hello" . Their attitude is why should she need to get to know each other. She should drop the panties, after a 20 min conversation and however long it takes to find a place to fuck. She should want to fuck at least the second meeting.
But since AW for the most part have the ability to support themselves, have financial independence, it gives them a greater feeling of self worth. They don't have to settle for just any dick w / a steady paycheck. They can afford to pick and choose. This means some guys end up rejected, and some guys more than others. Resentment sets in. These poor rejected misfits of society. Many start writing on forums about how AW are no good.
These guys attitudes has nothing to do with P4 P. Because there are many guys who do P4 P abroad and still appreciate AW. But the number of AM who hate all AW. I say is a small percentage of the American male population. And the problem says more about the guys than the women. IMHO of course.
TG865 . The Global professor of all things male.
-
03-01-15 14:06 #11212
Posts: 2927Originally Posted by DeltaIndigo [View Original Post]
How the hell can people not tell that the post I made was something I took from another site? Fuck, I even put it in quotation marks and added the link to the original post at the end of it! Fuck, I even added
=====
To separate what I had to say from the actual article!!!
Indigo, why not click the link to the original post on Reddit (I placed it at the end of the article post that I added quotations around) and post the same advice to the poor guy who actually needed it, lol.
-
03-01-15 13:19 #11211
Posts: 409Originally Posted by DeltaIndigo [View Original Post]
Dude if that woman is not fucking someone else on the side right now, I would be shocked.