FKK Oase - Burgholzhausen

[McAdonis]

As I expect DFK and DATY and a personality right from a 50 euro first session I was clearly in the wrong place. I think one needs to be a regular at Oase and to adopt the KK strategy (see the thread for Mainhatten).

Isn't KK's strategy to empty his balls at daycare prior to going to mainstream club to swim with sharks? Being sperm depleted makes it easier for me to walk away from deals I don't like at least.

I went with plenty of money to spend and expecting to extend my visit, but I was so turned off by the attitude I came home with my money. These girls don't seem to understand there is more to business relationships. They said that if I want a service I must pay because I want it, and were unwilling to provide any goodwill.

They expect Goodwill from customer. Agreeing to a 100+ EUR session ahead of time for a WG you just met. That or establish enough social proof as someone the WGs know consistently spends well.

[ExpatLover]

I bought a two hour entry and was hugely disappointed. Every girl I spoke to gave me a menu of extras and had interest only in money, not in providing good service. As I expect DFK and DATY and a personality right from a 50 euro first session I was clearly in the wrong place. I think one needs to be a regular at Oase and to adopt the KK strategy (see the thread for Mainhatten).

I went with plenty of money to spend and expecting to extend my visit, but I was so turned off by the attitude I came home with my money. These girls don't seem to understand there is more to business relationships. They said that if I want a service I must pay because I want it, and were unwilling to provide any goodwill. I told them that fuck and suck was really boring. I even took a girl to a room and didn't ask her to do anything, but she had no idea how to relate. My FKK visits are getting cheaper and cheaper and less rewarding.

I did however bump into an old scammer, who I like very much, so something was salvaged. She provided in public all the services she used to provide in the past.

KK strategy, may be but still a big question mark for me, knowing that he needs to take so much Viagra to session his girls.

[Optimist]

Upstate. I just reread my post and realise it comes across a bit strident. Apologies for that. It was meant to be a polite reply.

Cheers.

[Optimist]

Upstate Mann. Yes of course there is collusion. The romanian girls have always been good at enforcing peer established norms (of course, I generalise). Oase itself supports this pricing structure at the Front Desk.

You say you are baffled by these "complaints". I am not sure why. You explain that you come from somewhere where you get nothing much good for 50 euros, so you are importing those values.

Being a high spender is not relevant to the point being made. For example, I have frequently paid a couple of thousand to or so to whoever is my current favourite, but this is not relevant. My turn off is that I do not want a menu all agreed up front as you like to do. I look for a personal interaction which develops its own course, rather than picking standard dishes from a set menu. A mercenary attitude by a girl seems to me to be the same as going with an ugly girl is for you.

I hope this helps explain.

Cheers.

[Member #4581]

Most guys don't session with a girl they find unattractive -- I don't, for sure. So, by definition, all the girls I ask for a session are girls that I personally find quite attractive. Perhaps some of them are more attractive than others, but if I like the optics of a girl, regardless of her reputation I will ask for a session.

As such, I think this inverse relationship between looks and service is tough to ascertain. If I never take someone with looks below 7, I can't really vouch that a 5 would give better service than my 7 or 9. I just would n't know.

Does a 7 on looks *always* give a better service than a 9 on looks? I don't think so. There are plenty of 8's and 9's who gave better service than 7's -- and vice versa.

It is like claiming someone who is less smart in your workplace is necessarily a more hard working person, because he has to compensate his lack of smarts with better work ethic. That is not always true. Neither is the looks to service inverse relationship in clubs.

[Uppstate Mann]

Sure. No kissing, short BJ and pounding her. 20 min. Done. You'll get that from all girls at all clubs.

DFK, DATY, BJ, Sex in multiple positions no starfish, 30 min for 50 - that's a bit harder to find.

These Romanian girls, although independent contractors, have apparently colluded and are putting their heels down on this one. You might find exceptions, but most know they can get their way. I know in my country a 50/30 would get you a girl who would likely have STD's and drug problems. You wouldn't want to DFK her and certainly not go DATY.

As what I suppose would be considered a big spender in these clubs, I don't have problems. I only go with one girl (usually for several hours), get a total GFE with extras, and everything is determined up front. I love the service I receive, every time. All of these complaints baffle me.

Oh, and to respond to another post, no ugly girls! But bless them and I am glad somebody is taking care of them! LOL! I just can't go there. These clubs are about fantasy fulfilment and that doesn't include ugly girls for me.

[Optimist]

Sure. No kissing, short BJ and pounding her. 20 min. Done. You'll get that from all girls at all clubs.

DFK, DATY, BJ, Sex in multiple positions no starfish, 30 min for 50 - that's a bit harder to find.

I bought a two hour entry and was hugely disappointed. Every girl I spoke to gave me a menu of extras and had interest only in money, not in providing good service. As I expect DFK and DATY and a personality right from a 50 euro first session I was clearly in the wrong place. I think one needs to be a regular at Oase and to adopt the KK strategy (see the thread for Mainhatten).

I went with plenty of money to spend and expecting to extend my visit, but I was so turned off by the attitude I came home with my money. These girls don't seem to understand there is more to business relationships. They said that if I want a service I must pay because I want it, and were unwilling to provide any goodwill. I told them that fuck and suck was really boring. I even took a girl to a room and didn't ask her to do anything, but she had no idea how to relate. My FKK visits are getting cheaper and cheaper and less rewarding.

I did however bump into an old scammer, who I like very much, so something was salvaged. She provided in public all the services she used to provide in the past.

[ExpatLover]

In most cases chemistry moreso than looks gets me going. I have had excellent sessions with downright ugly girls (they must have good bodies with rotund bundas though). Very long hard banging enjoyable in doggy and other positions. In mish just put a pillow over the face, don't stifle them though, LOL.

Everyone has is own opinion about sex and erotic, for me beauty is the only driver so easy in the real life to fuck ugly girls for free.

[Sirioja]

In most cases chemistry moreso than looks gets me going. I have had excellent sessions with downright ugly girls (they must have good bodies with rotund bundas though). Very long hard banging enjoyable in doggy and other positions. In mish just put a pillow over the face, don't stifle them though, LOL.

Can't compete with you, can t enjoy a girl if I have to put a pillow on her face, can't enjoy sex if I don't enjoy to kiss her. Then I prefer to leave with my heavy full balls. I don't need this level of sex.

[Turgid]

Although, I have to say that I really can't comment from experience about ugly girls since I don't even talk to them, let alone fuck them haha! No, I don't even give them a chance LOL!

In most cases chemistry moreso than looks gets me going. I have had excellent sessions with downright ugly girls (they must have good bodies with rotund bundas though). Very long hard banging enjoyable in doggy and other positions. In mish just put a pillow over the face, don't stifle them though, LOL.

[Turgid]

........DFK, DATY, BJ, Sex in multiple positions no starfish, 30 min for 50 - that's a bit harder to find.

I have got that but have to work a little harder these days to get it at FKKs. Perhaps the girls talk and word has gotten around about the size of my member and my penchant for hard pounding in different positions. In Latin America that works in my favor.

[Sirioja]

Not at Oase anymore. She was at World but she left from there also. Heard something about ROM.

What was the name of very smiling, black supermodel type? Really pretty, at Sharks on end of 2017, but, despite her smiles, I was not able to go with her, when I'm pretty sure she would have been great time in bed. Not seen on my June Sharks visits.

[The Cane]

Very good viewpoint; however, I've been taxing my memory and I cannot think of one ugly girl who has ever given me bad service. Indeed, beauty lies in the eye of the beholder and what I may consider average another might think of as ugly. For convenience sake I will divide girls' looks into three categories hot, average and ugly. I have had a few average girls who have provided poor service but a greater percentage of hot girls who have given me regrettable service. That is not to say that I have not had a few beautiful providers who have performed adeptly in bed.

Although, I have to say that I really can't comment from experience about ugly girls since I don't even talk to them, let alone fuck them haha! No, I don't even give them a chance LOL!

[Rogue Nation]

Since May I have pounded many hot girls at Oase for 20 minutes in 50 euro half hour sessions. It is good that other punters romance them so that they could be less inclined to upsell.

Sure. No kissing, short BJ and pounding her. 20 min. Done. You'll get that from all girls at all clubs.

DFK, DATY, BJ, Sex in multiple positions no starfish, 30 min for 50€ - that's a bit harder to find.

[Turgid]

Let's not forget that poor-looking girls who perform badly get selected out of the pool. I can remember a few below average girls who were scammers. By the laws of natural selection such girls shouldn't last long. Therefore we are left with only the poorer looking ones who have been able to maintain their customer base through good performance.

A good-looking poor performer on the other hand can continue to work. This skews the perspective.

Very good viewpoint; however, I've been taxing my memory and I cannot think of one ugly girl who has ever given me bad service. Indeed, beauty lies in the eye of the beholder and what I may consider average another might think of as ugly. For convenience sake I will divide girls' looks into three categories – hot, average and ugly. I have had a few average girls who have provided poor service but a greater percentage of hot girls who have given me regrettable service. That is not to say that I have not had a few beautiful providers who have performed adeptly in bed.