FKK Oase - Burgholzhausen

[Pistons]

A few girls does look far better a bit covered up (Dee, Artemis being the arch example), but that is only when they wear corsets or sexy clothes. Not a towel. Towels are desperately a turn off for me at least.

[TankTank123]

However, thinking back, I saw a significant number of covered up girls at both Oase and Sharks, so it is not something exclusive to one particular club.

I was at Sharks this Wednesday afternoon and specifically looked out for covered up girls. Less than 20% wore accessories, as compared to about 90% in Oase on Tuesday afternoon.

By the way, longtime Oase girl Dahlia/Magda has just moved to Sharks. She was one of the covered up ones. Hope she does not spread this bad habit of the Oase girls to the Sharks girls.

[TankTank123]

If you plan to be at a club only up to 5.30 or 6.00, then probably Oase is not the club to visit.

I had sampled Oase, Sharks and World before on Tuesday afternoons. Oase had, in the past, been the best for me. Anyway, I still had a good time with my 2 favorites. What I was griping about was that I had almost no naked bodies to ogle at in-between sessions.

Or, if you enter during afternoon and find a small and impoverished line-up at Oase, try to be patient and wait until 19.00 before you walk out the door.

At 19.00 yesterday, I was already sound asleep in my hotel room. If I had been patient, I would probably have slept in the resting room, only to wake up at 4 am to depart! Thanks for the advice anyway; might well decide to test my endurance in a future trip.

[PussyLiccker]

We go to the same clubs but again we have totally different experiences at those clubs. Not that I went with a ton of girls at Sharks but I can't recall one who did not DFK. I also think overall Sharks girls are pretty friendly. Oase girls are friendly too outside the room but once inside the room you get a hard sell like you do from the gorgeous blonde Roxanna.

Agree with some of the previous posts the rooms at Sharks are some of the worst in a major FKK.

I agree. Sharks girls are friendly. Oase girls are easier to notice the quick business side of things. Like a girl talkin about prices as prezimmer. LOL. 100 for this baby. Only kiss for that.

I was at a distant club and met German locals and complaints were the same. They preferred Sharks.

[Ortos]

Not that there were many girls there. For me, the LU in World on Monday afternoon was better than what I found in Oase yesterday afternoon,


The rest of the afternoon was dismal, as the girls were parading around with all kinds of pieces of clothing and I thus did not feel any urge to take any of them.
Dinner was dismal too. The main dish featured very large dried-up chicken cubes that tasted like leather on skewers. I would not glorify it by calling it a kebab. More girls streamed in and came out of the changing room with even more garb. There was even an almost fully clothed policewoman!

As I had had enough of Dessous Tag and jet lag hit me again, I called it a day at 5.30 pm.

I had similar disappointing views of afternoon line-up at Oase, but as has been posted numerous times over the past few months, the line-up at Oase improves by quantum leaps after 18.00. I'm sure you are aware of this, so leaving at 5. 30 does not put you in a position to form an accurate opinion of the night-time line up. Even so, mid-week night line-ups at Oase at the moment are not that strong compared to Fri / Sat nights. The general note to take away from this: If you plan to be at a club only up to 5. 30 or 6. 00, then probably Oase is not the club to visit. Or, if you enter during afternoon and find a small and impoverished line-up at Oase, try to be patient and wait until 19.00 before you walk out the door.

But as I mentioned in an earlier post, I was able to work my way through the (night-time) line-up at Oase during mid-week visits and successfully find multiple girls that were very worth taking to the Zimmer and who, once inside, performed from above average to mind-blowing levels. I did have two rubbish sessions too. About the same success level and service level and beauty level as I found at Sharks, actually.

About the food at Oase: How many times has Syz posted (a very correct, but mysterious observation) that the quality of the food at Oase tends to be better after 21.00? Even then, it's not that impressive. But here's the line so many of us use (and some of us really believe this!): I don't visit the club for the food.

Lastly, about the covering up of naked girl bodies: This discussion crops up every other month or so. My personal take: I've seen a steady and gradual erosion of the strict naked dress code (for girls) at many clubs, for whatever reason (s). I've naturally grown to accept / ignore this and just filter it out unconsciously. However, thinking back, I saw a significant number of covered up girls at both Oase and Sharks, so it is not something exclusive to one particular club.

[Ortos]

We go to the same clubs but again we have totally different experiences at those clubs. Not that I went with a ton of girls at Sharks but I can't recall one who did not DFK. I also think overall Sharks girls are pretty friendly. Oase girls are friendly too outside the room but once inside the room you get a hard sell like you do from the gorgeous blonde Roxanna.

Yes we visit the same clubs, maybe even session with some of the same girls, but in the end get totally opposite experiences:

I recently sessioned with over ten girls at Oase during three visits and NOT ONCE did I encounter "hard sell" or any negative change in attitude. If anything, the girls mostly got even friendlier once inside the room. So BB's experiences at Oase don't jive with mine at all.

Not only does this show YMMV, but also that there are many different types of girls with different attitudes and approaches to their work / clients, so all the more reason to work your way through the line up and choose the girls that have the right physical and attitude for your sessions. That for me is the game to play at Fkks: finding the right girl (s) out of a sea of potentials.

[TankTank123]

After a good afternoon at World on Monday, I headed for Oase yesterday as it was Dessous Tag in World and Sharks on Tuesdays.

I quickly discovered that I gave wrong advice to a poster last month too when I suggested that he go to Oase rather than Sharks on a Tuesday if he wanted to see naked girls.

Many of the girls present were covered up with all kinds of clothing. Not that there were many girls there. For me, the LU in World on Monday afternoon was better than what I found in Oase yesterday afternoon, and furthermore all the girls in World were totally naked (except for one fatty, whom I guess did look better with her tummy covered up).

Luckily, one of my favorites, Juicy, appeared, fully nude as usual and became my first session for the day. Her service is always very reliable; but after that, she tried to sell her sister's services to me. But Laura was covered up with her usual white piece of clothing. So, no to Laura as I decided that I will only take fully naked girls.

Fortunately, the next fully-nude girl to appear was another old favorite, Czech Elizabeth. This was surprising as she used to wrap up her bottom. I did not recognise her at first as she now had plaited hair with 2 small pony tails. She provided reliable service as usual, and was as amusing as ever.

The rest of the afternoon was dismal, as the girls were parading around with all kinds of pieces of clothing and I thus did not feel any urge to take any of them. An ex-favorite, Jessica, tried to tempt me as as she fully nude, but I still cannot get over her horrible boob job, and I had to pass.

Dinner was dismal too. The main dish featured very large dried-up chicken cubes that tasted like leather on skewers. I would not glorify it by calling it a kebab. More girls streamed in and came out of the changing room with even more garb. There was even an almost fully clothed policewoman!

As I had had enough of Dessous Tag and jet lag hit me again, I called it a day at 5.30 pm.

[Craiova]

I know Craiova will start complaining about me or others hyping Sharks and that Mainhattan has the better optics and at least the same service level, better food and blah. LOL.

Ohh very funny. Maybe you can show me my post where I should have written about better optics, very strange. Food overrated in generall but bc you mentioned ofc it's at Mainhattan much more better. And this really starts to bother me if you compare same optic and classy girls than average service level is same. Basta LOL Girls change too often between the clubs. What you have at Sharks are the most girls but most of them 6's and 7's. Yep and you find more girls wasting her time with clients on sofa unpaid for long time and more 6's and 7's doing this and that for free at room. But this girls haven't for me almost close low level like the Dietzenbach girls. But it isn't a surprise if these guys usally like Dietzenbach that they prefer than Sharks.

[Banana Boi]

Too many non-DFK girls in Sharks........................ attitude and arrogance of the girls in Sharks is terrible however.

We go to the same clubs but again we have totally different experiences at those clubs. Not that I went with a ton of girls at Sharks but I can't recall one who did not DFK. I also think overall Sharks girls are pretty friendly. Oase girls are friendly too outside the room but once inside the room you get a hard sell like you do from the gorgeous blonde Roxanna.

Agree with some of the previous posts the rooms at Sharks are some of the worst in a major FKK.

[Der Auslander]

In my experience upsell tends to occur primarily when the booking is for 30 minutes only. With the exception of the offer of CIM longer bookings 60 min /60+min tend to decrease the chance of encountering upsell offers.

[Maxime]

Optically the lineup in Sharks is certainly on par with Oase. Too many non-DFK girls in Sharks however, but still you can find enough decent girls in Sharks, as long as you talk with many many girls first. Attitude and arrogance of the girls in Sharks is terrible however. In Oase the girls at least smile when they try to upsell you some extras, and the success ratio (decent DFK and service, also in 30 minutes session) is better here. Still not as good a succes ratio as in some of the NRW clubs, but ok, it is Hessen, what do you expect.

[Pistons]

I feel the facilities at Sharks are fine (except it needs more mirrors in the rooms like most clubs do. Oase being perhaps the only one that holds the mark on this), but the layout at sharks desperately needs to be fixed by an expert. Right now it feels like there was an explotion, and random couches and the bar was just thrown randomly around the warehouse. The layout is so randomly unintelligent that it hurts my inner zen walking into the place. Chances are it also hurts my view of the girls. But its a very small chance. Food is great in my view except for the salt, and the upper floor stuff is nice.

[Shark16]

Oase is still my go to club in Frankfurt. No competition. Excellent summary by Ortos, but I would probably add the garden to the list of reasons why this is my preferred club.

Nothing wrong with the line-up at Sharks. Optically speaking the Sharks line-up is the only club in Frankfurt that IMO rivals Oase. But I just can't stand the facilities, terrible F / M ratios, lack of good rooms and polluted air. Sharks is a bit hyped, yes.

World is a great club too. Love the facilities (couches, winter garden and garden!!). But the line-up is just not up to par with Oase / Sharks. Still a lot of fun can be had (at least on a Friday/Saturday night). My #2 pick.

I think I have about an 80% success rate at oase this year where I have nothing to complain about, and even a few of my 'complain' girls have come to me later and told me they would do this and that if I went with them again.

Yeah, that sums it up pretty nicely. Most sessions at Oase are excellent once you are capable of weeding out the bad apples. My success rate at Sharks and World are pretty much the same (not better at all). At Palace 50- 60% of my sessions are shite so IME Palace is the only club that stands out negatively. I rarely go there any longer and cannot recommend.

[Pistons]

In my experience the Oase girls in general are much more ymmv than what I've seen at other clubs where the girls tend to be more good, mediocre or bad in service across the whole line.

I've had a few oase girls this past year that has really come through after getting to know them and have bloomed while the first impression was more cold.

I think I have about an 80% success rate at oase this year where I have nothing to complain about, and even a few of my 'complain' girls have come to me later and told me they would do this and that if I went with them again. There is high competition at Oase, in my opinnion by far the highest competition I've seen for the past 12 months. So the girls do what they must to sell themselves if they want to earn the money. It is deffinately a buyers market, but perhaps it also boils down to being a little bit of 'better service to returning customers in the club', or 'taking it cool, and playing the girls right'. I don't know.

For me, the club is #1 in optical LU as far as I know (sharks is not even in the same league). But truth be told I havent checked out GT yet.

[Ortos]

This is likely true. I would say Oase is more on par with Palace in terms of upselling.

Oase does have a good LU. I can't say Sharks is better optically. Ironically, Sharks girls are just less Sharky.

I had record time session there last time. Disastrous session. One of the worst. If anything the attitudes of girls I'm interested there gives me bad vibes. So, I had no interest in sessions there.

Oase is scratched off my list of clubs to visit.

There you go: blame the whole club because you made a mistake by choosing a bad apple from the barrel? And that barrel may well contain other (lots of?) bad apples, but there are still plenty of very good pieces of fruit in that barrel. To put Oase in the same group as Palace: That is much too extreme, you over-state the case, in my opinion, of course. And even at the extreme sharky Palace, with its own club (try to rip-off-the-customer) culture one can find the right girl (s) if you try and work your way through the line-up.

I speak in these terms because I have just completed ten days of multiple visits to Oase and Sharks. At Oase, I was initially disappointed by the line-up, even during the evening between 19-22.00. So many of my favorite / regular Zimmer mates were missing / on holiday, whatever, just not there. Then, I went to Sharks three days in a row, because I found Oase so lacking in enticement and because Sharks is just so, so good right now. However, I went back to Oase for another visit, this time on a Fri and then Sat night. I worked my way through the line-up and weeded out the sharky, inexperienced or girls for whom I just had no interest and I found some real gems working there right now. Yeah, during the Euro-football thing.

In fact, I went with a few new girls and I got above average to totally mind-blowing sessions from most of them! Yes at Oase. Sure a few of my new tries did not manage to impress. But as I got more "warmed up" in choosing correctly I was able to find great so-called "GFE" girls from those amongst the new crop.

One girl in particular stands out: Kiara (I think that is the correct name), striking girl with very vivid red-dyed hair, long very well looked after hair that comes down almost to her ass. She has lots of tattoos and said to me she worked at Oase two years ago (as a blonde), left and has now come back for a short stint. She said she normally works as a window girl in one of the better-known RLDs of Belgium. Wow, this girl delivered to me one of the only "off-the-charts" sessions I've had in several years. I was amazed that I could find this at Oase (or even Sharks) these days. What a full-out erotic performance she gave me, but also very affectionate and intimate. Yes I initially stayed one hour, which I quickly extended to two. However, she told me she'd be leaving soon, and probably not be back for a while. Just shows you that Oase is still a "destination" club where you can find girls from all kinds of backgrounds, both in and out of the p6 world, and if you "work the line-up" you can find very good opportunities and, at same time, perhaps avoid "disasterous" encounters.

Another girl at Oase that is representative of good service girls (and I believe there are several others) is Krina, who has been around for about 5 years or more. I actually sessioned with her a few years ago when she was fairly new, and it was pretty good. But when I met her last week (she works days til 22.00), I liked her look and her vibe, so I went into Zimmer again: Wow, great, great, great session! Followed by two more on subsequent early evenings.

So please, let us not paint the whole club / the entire line-up with the same brush. Are there problems with Oase right now? Yes. Are there negatives? Yes, not just the food too. But there are several positives. Besides the LU, which can be debated ad nauseum in subjective terms, there are other things to consider in the club's favor:

--Oase is a good deal emptier / quieter / less-frequented by men than Sharks. This makes for overall better mongering conditions (for me, at least). Go to Sharks on busy times (Weds, Saturday nights, etc) and it can become a Zoo!

--Many of the rooms at Oase offer superior conditions than the rooms at Sharks, esp during these summer months. Many of the Oase rooms are cooler, better ventalated than Sharks rooms (in general) and there is a greater population of mirrored-rooms at Oase than Sharks.

--The 280 e (Pay 4/ Enter 6) Eintritt deal at Oase is vastly more friendly to the repeat visitor than Sharks' 325 e for 6 visits.

On balance, I would agree and my recent experiences confirm that Sharks has a vaster and perhaps overall more-enticing line-up than Oase. But based on my very recent visits to Oase, I would definitely not cross it off my list, and I would certainly not ditch a whole club just because I fucked up and selected bad girls for my sessions.

But to each there own.