"Germany
 La Vie en Rose
 Sex Vacation
Escort News

Thread: FKK Oase - Burgholzhausen

+ Add Report
Page 51 of 1893 FirstFirst ... 41 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 61 101 151 551 1051 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 765 of 28388
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #27638

    Really surprising

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuckerberg  [View Original Post]
    Last week I went to these two clubs for the first time in two and a half years.

    Both are my favorite clubs.

    Oase still had the highest quality in Frankfurt. I was really impressed with this when I came back.

    Sharks wasn't as busy as they used to be, with fewer girls and fewer Visitors.

    Beautys and service are declining and prices are rising.

    And a relentless upsell.

    Needs improvement.
    Well night two of my trip to FKK having been to Sharks last night (Friday) and was disappointed with the line up. But it was very much better than Oase on this Saturday night. Arrived Oase 8 pm - 50 e entry only. Don't know why it was cheap.

    The club is struggling in my opinion. As Sirioja predicted, correctly, the number of girls present is a lot less than Sharks and the quality is significantly poorer based on this one visit. My last visit to Hessen FKKs was September 2021. I attended Sharks, Oase, Palace and Mainhattan then. I felt there wasn't much between Sharks and Oase then. There is now. Oase really lacks good options. I reported that I was slightly disappointed with Sharks line up last night. But then there were 4/5 girls I would have been happy to room with. At Oase I struggled to find 3. Daniella is still there and pretty but she was always overweight and is even more so now. First time in the club when I didn't have an hour with her. Too big for me. Clara (blonde) pretty but again has put weight on. There was a blonde spinner I haven't seen before but seemed cold. Ended up only doing one room with Ella. Dark - half Saudi Arabian (looks Middle Eastern) with a lot of tattoos but very slim. Large silicones. Service very forgettable despite the nice body. Returned to bar looking for options but really did not fancy anybody and left, unusually for me, "balls full". Tania (tall blonde) was ok but too big around the waist.

    I like the club but:

    1. The food is really awful. If Sharks gets 7/10 Oase scores 2/10 for food. Dreadful.

    2. Drinks options. Still got that stupid buying tokens at reception system. Cannot buy a glass of wine (bottle only), very limited spirits, - ended up drinking soft drinks as the options were so poor and despite having bought 50 euros of tokens returned 40 of them!

    3. Line up. Currently VERY weak and they need to get girls in and quickly. Too many guys, very few decent girls. Did not speak to any who will now do 60/100 - every single girl was 150 for an hour.

    Truthfully, felt like a wasted night. Ended up having the professional massage and heading back to hotel. Didn't even check out the bar as was so disappointed at line up.

    Oase in the sun in summer is exceptional but presently the line up is the weakest I've seen it. What a shame!

  2. #27637
    Quote Originally Posted by Fuckerberg  [View Original Post]
    Last week I went to these two clubs for the first time in two and a half years.

    Both are my favorite clubs.

    Oase still had the highest quality in Frankfurt. I was really impressed with this when I came back.

    Sharks wasn't as busy as they used to be, with fewer girls and fewer Visitors.

    Beautys and service are declining and prices are rising.

    And a relentless upsell.

    Needs improvement.
    I may go to judge Oase casting soon, of course I will on one of the best casting day, but I m pretty sure less girls at Oase than at Sharks. But I prefer only 1 elegant natural beauty rather than quantity of average. Many Oase girls left for better business at Globe, Sharks and even 6.

  3. #27636

    Oase vs Sharks

    Last week I went to these two clubs for the first time in two and a half years.

    Both are my favorite clubs.

    Oase still had the highest quality in Frankfurt. I was really impressed with this when I came back.

    Sharks wasn't as busy as they used to be, with fewer girls and fewer Visitors.

    Beautys and service are declining and prices are rising.

    And a relentless upsell.

    Needs improvement.

  4. #27635
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    Shiva, Estefania left. Dead business as told. Same at Palace. Result of upselling for many years, when no Asians buses now.
    What I can say for sure is that the upsell that is done at Sharks is more intense.

  5. #27634

    Entrance Reqs

    Can somebody please advise if current entry reqs for Oase mirror Sharks? Current policed policy for mask wearing? Current pricing majority of girls are acceptiong? TIA.

  6. #27633

    Beatrice

    Beatrice is sweet. Not money chaser.

    I had good time with her couple months ago.

    Good fuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by EscapeArtist  [View Original Post]
    Exactly. Line up still looked good and you could get a room for club rates up through 2016 and maybe even 2017. But since 2018, Beatrice turned out to be the only new arrival who was both a good optic and didn't hustle for more money. The rest of the girls since then were either big time upsellers or left after a short stay. By 2019, a good 100 euro hour was basically off the menu for most visitors. At Sharks before the pandemic, the only people who didn't take 100 euro on an hour was Melissa and a couple of Germans.

  7. #27632
    Quote Originally Posted by Turgid  [View Original Post]
    Oase pre-2012 for me was the best mongering on the planet. However, Oase began to decline just around the time that Sharks came into existence which is inexplicable as Sharks did not take away Oase girls at the time. It has been a long slow decline for Oase since then. Up to my last visit in 2020 Sharks has been my go to club.
    Exactly. Line up still looked good and you could get a room for club rates up through 2016 and maybe even 2017. But since 2018, Beatrice turned out to be the only new arrival who was both a good optic and didn't hustle for more money. The rest of the girls since then were either big time upsellers or left after a short stay. By 2019, a good 100 euro hour was basically off the menu for most visitors. At Sharks before the pandemic, the only people who didn't take 100 euro on an hour was Melissa and a couple of Germans.

  8. #27631
    Quote Originally Posted by Einhorn  [View Original Post]
    As I say from the beginning, I want beauty as much as you do. That's why I go to this club. Of course, not only girls but also clubs are the best. If there aren't too few girls, the number isn't that important. That's true of any club. The amount doesn't matter to me if the service provided by the girl is commensurate with the cost. I am delighted to go to a club with beauty and have a good time.
    Shiva, Estefania left. Dead business as told. Same at Palace. Result of upselling for many years, when no Asians buses now.

  9. #27630

    Oase vs Sharks

    Oase pre-2012 for me was the best mongering on the planet. However, Oase began to decline just around the time that Sharks came into existence which is inexplicable as Sharks did not take away Oase girls at the time. It has been a long slow decline for Oase since then. Up to my last visit in 2020 Sharks has been my go to club.

  10. #27629
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCane  [View Original Post]
    ShinieStone,

    ]I guess I'm in the minority among posters in the FKK threads because I've always like Oase better than Sharks. As I've said before, Sharks has just never worked for me. Oh well!
    In reality we are not minorities. You can understand that by going to each club and looking at the percentage of visitors. That is the reality. Even if I post here 100 times daily, that's one opinion. I also love Oase.

  11. #27628
    Oase is so fine business, Iranian moved to Sharks, after Estefania still at Sharks. Palace is also without business, so Colombian Marta moved to Sharks, pretty, natural tits and ass even little mum, really Caucasian type, my first ever Colombian when I usually run away, when I had a wow Venezuelan at Palace before my peritonite there. No porn fake moaning like Latinas, but she made honey so fast on DATY, passionate in missionary but I m sorry I made her arching back in doggy rather than telling me. Colombian little mum but with small pussy when we chose my twin elephant room.

  12. #27627
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    Yes, we may have different tastes for looks. When nobody criticized Sharks like me from 2017 to 2019 when quantity but very average quality for me except few exceptions like Florentina, Mady2, wow Tamara but only for 2 week ends, a good room with previous Angela, but I was very lucky with some girls on 2021, no money talk, GFE for 100/60. When Oase fell for me on 2021, Sharks really improved for casting quality and I love supermodel types like Miss, or Kelli. Ro, impressing my desire. Same for 6 with better looks now for me.
    As I say from the beginning, I want beauty as much as you do. That's why I go to this club. Of course, not only girls but also clubs are the best. If there aren't too few girls, the number isn't that important. That's true of any club. The amount doesn't matter to me if the service provided by the girl is commensurate with the cost. I am delighted to go to a club with beauty and have a good time.

  13. #27626
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCane  [View Original Post]
    ShinieStone,

    ]I guess I'm in the minority among posters in the FKK threads because I've always like Oase better than Sharks. As I've said before, Sharks has just never worked for me. Oh well!
    For me, over the past 9 years (since I first went to both of these clubs) which has been best has varied, largely depending on line up. I much prefer the layout of Sharks interior. Easy to walk around the two floors. I really don't like all the up and down stairs around Oase. Really poorly thought out.

    The outdoors of Oase (particularly when the weather is good) is far superior. The pool is much better, the activities / football / ping pong, the basketball net. Once had a fabulous game of girls v guys footy - 12 girls played only 5 of us guys. Deal was that if they scored only half of the boys number of goals in 20 minutes they all got one room. Watching 17 naked people play football was hilarious. Not sexy but great fun. The girls lost and didn't get the goals, but all 5 of us took a shower and took each of the 12 girls to rooms in singles and threesomes. Great fun, great party atmosphere. And I cannot stand the amount of wasps nests in the sharks outdoors. Have been stung twice!

    I much prefer the rooms in sharks. Other than 27 and 28 at Oase. The big rooms. But then I have rarely ever had to wait for a room in Oase but have done that many times in Sharks.

    The sharks FOB system for drinks is SO much better than the silly Oase buying of chips (which are easy to lose).

    Bar staff at Oase usually better than at Sharks. But reception staff much better at Sharks.

    But it's really all about line up. And that has fluctuated. Sharks had some great times but then got a year or so with quite a lot of (for me) overweight girls. I felt last year (2021) it had recovered.

    I suppose to each their own. I agree with a previous poster that the sports on TVs at Sharks is much better than the porn at Oase which is boring. But I have watched football matches on the TVs at Oase too.

  14. #27625
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCane  [View Original Post]
    ShinieStone,

    ]I guess I'm in the minority among posters in the FKK threads because I've always like Oase better than Sharks. As I've said before, Sharks has just never worked for me. Oh well!
    An Oase visit in 2022 will produce disappointing results if visiting based on 2019 experiences. Like Sharks, the line up has been devastated, but unlike Sharks, the line was up never replenished.

    Like a few minority members, I also had good days at Oase. On the best days, and those days coincided with days I only took 1 hour or longer rooms, Oase produced better times than Sharks ever did. On days where I wanted numerous rooms and expecting some 50 euro rooms mixed in, Oase could not deliver.

    Point is, people visiting Oase based on accolades from previous years of grandeur, in this case perhaps 3 years out of date, will lead the reader looking for recent site-rep quite astray.

  15. #27624

    Minority View

    ShinieStone,

    ]I guess I'm in the minority among posters in the FKK threads because I've always like Oase better than Sharks. As I've said before, Sharks has just never worked for me. Oh well!

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
escort directory


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape