"Germany
OK Escorts Barcelona
escort directory
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #12158
    Quote Originally Posted by ReefLostCause  [View Original Post]
    Sounds like Mitu Massage (http://mitubangkok.com/), although that would be the LHS if you enter the Soi from Sukhumvit.

    I went there 1 1/2 year ago, so you can probably search my posts from this era for the review. However, the website and the girls seem to have changed completely since then, so not sure that would be helpful to you. The prices also seem to have risen dramatically...
    Can't imagine why Daddysan wants to know?

    They seem to be promoting lbclubmitu .com outcall for all night. Can we assume lbclub means ladyboys? or is it just an unfortunate abbreviation?

    I suggest instead, trying Dream Heaven round the corner in Soi 33. I have had the odd nice girl from there.

  2. #12157
    Quote Originally Posted by Syzygies  [View Original Post]
    Your post is quite confusing to me. You say you like Nataree and recommend it, but the performance of the girls is really drab. That is precisely why I don't go there. Girls being mostly dick scared and giving poor performance. I don't find that many girls there to my taste either. Many many girls above average looks but not many truly pretty.

    It would help a lot more if you specified the size of the line up for each place and what time of day you attended. It seems strange to dislike some place based on a single visit. I have generally liked Copa Cabana, even if line up can be a bit ordinary.

    I have been to Colonze 2 a couple of times, some time ago, and the line up was very small (no more than 12), no girls pretty enough for me. However it sounds like you are saying there is an upstairs model section. I was not aware of that.

    I have had visits to Meree in the past where there were doable girls.

    Don't bother with Utopia unless you are East Asian looking guy. Its expensive for Farangs and line up is shrinking.
    The times I attended all of these places is 5-6 PM. I know they can have pretty bad lineups before then. Sometimes I visit at 7 PM, but never later.

    Yes I definitely have mixed feelings about Nataree. I'll revise my opinion to a "Do not go to Nataree at all". Here's why. If you are in Bangkok for vacation (not a sort of resident), don't bother going to Nataree (tourist trap kinda). Instead, go to The Lord, Alaina, Meree or Colonze 2. If you are in Bangkok for a long awhile, you're going to end up at Nataree on curiosity alone. In that case, just any FYI, it's about 80% poor performers. Probably because they are so tired from doing bus-loads (literally) of customers. The plumper chicks tend to perform better IMO because they aren't picked as much.

    Colonze 2 must have changed a lot by then. I went on a Tuesday at like 7 pm and the place was filled to the brim with hotties on the first floor. Probably 40-50 girls ready to be picked. The second floor had about 10 "models. " Only one of them was rather good looking in my falang opinion. So, I also visited on a Friday at 6 PM and it was fairly decent, but not as good as Tues 7 PM. Maybe because they don't really get busy until 7-8 PM? Maybe because Friday is the night that the locals pre-book their favorites? Colonze 2 appears to be areal gem in the rough, and it's been kind of rough lately in the Ratchada soapy scene. It's insane that they are about 1000 baht lower than their competition (not comparing to the ultra-upscale), and have a great line-up to boot.

    Overall, if I can condense my soapy advice. I would say to visit Colonze 2/ Alaina / The Lord since they are all right near each other. And avoid the more popular ones that are closer to the MRT exits (Nataree / Emmanuelle / Ceasars / Poseidon).

  3. #12156
    Quote Originally Posted by Pogostick  [View Original Post]
    Thanks,

    I'll probably cruise the arcade. I just wasn't sure if they would be open that late as I am usually an early monger. I've never had a problem with the LBs there. My radar is pretty good and if I am in doubt, I just ask. So far every massage girl I've had in the arcade was born that way!
    I am happy to report that I did not need to worry, Bangkok never disappoints. I didn't get to my hotel until 2 am. Had a quick shower and headed over to Soi 11. The massage girl gauntlet was as intense as ever. There was one absolute stunner but unfortunately her feet were larger and voice was deeper than mine. I finally found one very sweet and fairly attractive girl and had a halfway decent massage and a very nice handy, which is all I wanted. 1000 baht all in including a tip.

  4. #12155
    Quote Originally Posted by ParkVille  [View Original Post]
    I have been patronizing the Ratchada soapies a lot lately. I have pretty good intel on them. I will start with the most reviewed / recommend as I feel they are not that good anymore and this should be brought up since they are too often (incorrectly) recommended on highly trafficked blogs.

    Nataree: I go here a lot. I obviously like the place. In fact I do like the place. I can recommend it IF you want a really good looking younger Asian woman (not the fake gogo hustler type). Reluctantly, I can recommend Nataree. Especially because they have so many women working, and many of them are good looking. You're find your type most likely. They have a good supply line basically. However, the performance is really drab. Only about 25% give me BBBJ and that's probably just because I frequent the place fairly often. If they do perform BBBJ, it's always like. Bad. Many times, sex is about getting me off so they can get back down-stairs. They are obviously servicing a lot of customers and this place has kind of a fast food business practice. I go here sometimes on weekdays and I must admit, the selection is actually pretty underwhelming. The better looking ones only seem to work on the busy nights. Also, lots of Jap tourist buses quickly fill this place up.
    Your post is quite confusing to me. You say you like Nataree and recommend it, but the performance of the girls is really drab. That is precisely why I don't go there. Girls being mostly dick scared and giving poor performance. I don't find that many girls there to my taste either. Many many girls above average looks but not many truly pretty.

    It would help a lot more if you specified the size of the line up for each place and what time of day you attended. It seems strange to dislike some place based on a single visit. I have generally liked Copa Cabana, even if line up can be a bit ordinary.

    I have been to Colonze 2 a couple of times, some time ago, and the line up was very small (no more than 12), no girls pretty enough for me. However it sounds like you are saying there is an upstairs model section. I was not aware of that.

    I have had visits to Meree in the past where there were doable girls.

    Don't bother with Utopia unless you are East Asian looking guy. Its expensive for Farangs and line up is shrinking.

  5. #12154
    Quote Originally Posted by DaddySan  [View Original Post]
    Hi Guys, I need your help to refresh my memory.

    At the start of my yearly stay in BKK in January, I did some scouting on the MPs in Soi33.

    On the lot where Hotel S33 is (former Peep Inn, where Akane used to be), on the RHS as you enter from the Soi, there is a Japanese style MP.

    I think you have to go up one stairs, but I am not sure any more.

    It seemed very worthwhile visiting, but my steady TGFs kept me permanently exhausted, so I never made it and now I cannot remember the name of the MP.

    Can anyone help me withe name / website of the place? Any personal experience would also be most welcome.

    Thanks.

    DS.
    Sounds like Mitu Massage (http://mitubangkok.com/), although that would be the LHS if you enter the Soi from Sukhumvit.

    I went there 1 1/2 year ago, so you can probably search my posts from this era for the review. However, the website and the girls seem to have changed completely since then, so not sure that would be helpful to you. The prices also seem to have risen dramatically...

  6. #12153

    Soapies

    I have been patronizing the Ratchada soapies a lot lately. I have pretty good intel on them. I will start with the most reviewed / recommend as I feel they are not that good anymore and this should be brought up since they are too often (incorrectly) recommended on highly trafficked blogs.

    Nataree: I go here a lot. I obviously like the place. In fact I do like the place. I can recommend it IF you want a really good looking younger Asian woman (not the fake gogo hustler type). Reluctantly, I can recommend Nataree. Especially because they have so many women working, and many of them are good looking. You're find your type most likely. They have a good supply line basically. However, the performance is really drab. Only about 25% give me BBBJ and that's probably just because I frequent the place fairly often. If they do perform BBBJ, it's always like. Bad. Many times, sex is about getting me off so they can get back down-stairs. They are obviously servicing a lot of customers and this place has kind of a fast food business practice. I go here sometimes on weekdays and I must admit, the selection is actually pretty underwhelming. The better looking ones only seem to work on the busy nights. Also, lots of Jap tourist buses quickly fill this place up.

    Prices: 2600 - 3200. I almost always pay 2600 because any more and the girl is probably just not my type (pale / tiny /18). Definitely do not get any of the models at Nataree. They are "near virgins," and are really only appealing to the foreign Asian clientele.

    Bottom line: Yeah go to Nataree and see for yourself. There is something about the women there that seems unmatched by their competition. But only go on a busy day like Friday / Saturday and BEFORE 9 pm. Definitely avoid Monday / Tuesday / Wed. Only the bland / fatter ones working then. It's just like any place but with high prices and low quality if you don't go on the busy night. But get there before the jap tourist vans fill it up.

    Poseidon: Model lounge. Looked more like a retire lounge for hookers. I visited at 5 PM and it was really 'meh'. No boner material, I think the only thing these women excel at is their education level. It seems like not being from a farm is an important distinction for Thai's with money to through around. Like a caste thing I recon. Being a 100% superficial person, I would say the model lounge is crap. Went to the normal fish bowl. High prices for falang (500 baht more, so it's 2700 and 3200). Service is quite good here. I saw I lady I liked and saw her a few more times. Sadly, I think I kept picking her because all the other women were so bad looking. Also, she wasn't like hot. She was 30+ but really cool and I liked her.

    Bottom line: Really bad selection. Even if there are many women and you go at a prime time, so many of them are below average looking.

    Colonze 2: Holy crap, this place is awesome. 1800 for women who are almost on par in looks with the 2600 sideliners from Nataree. And honestly, not a bad selection either. Lots of women here. As for the model lounge, they only cost 2600 - 3200 baht when I was there. Many of them looked kind of okay. Not much boner material. Seemed like they were higher class than anything else because the women down stairs looked quite good, and these women didn't seem much better. There was also only about 10. I found only 1 I liked, and she was really nice looking. And great, great performer all-around, no questions asked, high enthusiasm throughout (something Nataree almost never provides, except their fat chicks which I guess aren't picked as often and therefore aren't as tired). Been here 2 times, both times BBBK no questions asked, very accommodating women. I recon they aren't high mileage per day in terms of clientele so that helps.

    Bottom line: By walking for 10 minutes from Nataree, which is sort of a Jap trap, you can get 2 x better service at almost half the price.

    Alaina: Another winner in my book. Only went once, but it's really great place. The building is new, so it's not run down like many of these places. The women seem a bit older than those who work at nataree, but I think it's the same women because both are owned by the same person. Prices are good, only 2300 baht. I think the price is helped since they aren't unloading van loads of drunk japs. Mamasan was very accommodating, the girl I picked was great and really took her time.

    Copa Cabana: I went only once, and it was the day before a 4 day Thai holiday / weekend so maybe it was an off day. Not a lot of women. I picked a model for 5500. She wasn't my type after all, once the clothes came off. I mean she wasn't ugly, she was a model. I could see her being on TV or something (except that her nose surgery didn't really turn out that perfect.). Overall, not impressed with their low selection. The women here seemed to be more pale than beautiful. I was expecting models, I mostly saw above average by Thai standards. However, I'm more into busty / darker Thai's so my word probably isn't that helpful about this place. I wouldn't rule it out.

    Meree: This place is really good IMO. Probably my second personal favorite. Prices are kind of low, about 2400 baht. The women are in the 24-25 range, so more of my type. A lot of really good looking women in that they aren't knockouts, but they are so far above average in looks. Kind of like "that fairly hot chick on the subway" look. Only drawback is the distance to get here. One of my favs. Great attitude by the staff and usually the women working there.

    Avita / Evita: Usually I can't find anything here I like, so few women are in the fishbowl since most are booked. Really low prices, like 1800-2200 baht. Great service the one time I went (BBBJ in bath). It's next to Meree so worth stopping by if you can speak Thai.

    Ceasars: I used to really favor this place, probably #1 for me a year ago. I stepped in after a year hiatus. I was really unimpressed with their lineup. Most of the women had nose surgery and were simply not great looking. I'll have to stop by again later and see.

    Bottom Line: I hope others can prove me wrong, but I'm going to say avoid now. They used to be a great place to get super hot models for 4200 baht (instead of 5500 baht at The Lord). I think they are more of a tourist destination / trap now.

    Emmanuelle: I hate this place. Can't stand the papasan pressuring for tips / not handing me my change back. Pressured to by drinks. Really poor selection compared to 2 years ago. The girl I picked a few months ago wouldn't stfu about tipping her 1 k baht for a second baht. She simply was not letting it go. Place seems to really be suffering due to Nataree.

    Cupidy: This place is a meth lounge. Super shady and I have heard some pretty scamming / bad reviews. I went once and got 2 women, one of them was clearly coked up. She demanded that I tip her because she needed money for food (she was rather fat).

    Will never check out (I've only heard bad reviews): Amsterdam, Hi-class.

    Haven't checked out yet: The Lord, Utopia, La Belle. These are the high end places. I haven't really had the model / high-end itch much lately.

  7. #12152

    MP on Soi 33 in front of hotel S33

    Hi Guys, I need your help to refresh my memory.

    At the start of my yearly stay in BKK in January, I did some scouting on the MPs in Soi33.

    On the lot where Hotel S33 is (former Peep Inn, where Akane used to be), on the RHS as you enter from the Soi, there is a Japanese style MP.

    I think you have to go up one stairs, but I am not sure any more.

    It seemed very worthwhile visiting, but my steady TGFs kept me permanently exhausted, so I never made it and now I cannot remember the name of the MP.

    Can anyone help me withe name / website of the place? Any personal experience would also be most welcome.

    Thanks.

    DS.

  8. #12151
    Quote Originally Posted by Syzygies  [View Original Post]
    ... tits a bit too round too.
    Hahaha...sorry mate, had to laugh at this statement. So you go for girls with square tits do you, Syz? Or maybe triangular boobs? The mind boggles! Think that I'll stick with good old fashioned round knockers.

  9. #12150

    Upcharge

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan7373  [View Original Post]
    I checked out lady Ja's picture, and she is good-looking alright.

    http://bamboobkk.com/ladies/ja/

    I'm surprised that a good-looking lady like Ja is now doing A+ with guys. This is one positive change in Thailand now compared to before. More massage ladies are now doing A+ with their guys. You can now actually ask a good-looking massage lady to do A+ with you and not feel embarrassed about it.

    But this increasing popularity of A+ among massage ladies is probably no accident. That 500B surcharge for A+ probably has a lot to do with it. Because the lady has a financial incentive to do A+ with her guys and become good at it too. When the hot lady gets paid extra for A+, then she is liable to invite you for some A+ with her, rather than be reluctant about it and perhaps say 'No' to you.

    When you ask the lady to do some A+ with you for free, then this makes you feel like a beggar. It's an embarrassing thing to do. Because you are asking her for an extra favor, without doing anything extra for her. But when you know that the lady gets paid extra for it, and she might even want to do it with you, then this makes you feel free to go on an ass-banging spree.

    I never would've thought before of going A+ on every hot lass at a massage place like Bamboo. But now this might be the thing to do. Not every lady there does A+ with her guys, but most ladies do. And these ladies aren't going to look at you as some kind of pervert, when you ask them for it, not when you are paying them an extra 500B for it.

    If you like A+, then it makes a lot of sense to pay the ladies extra for it, even when the lady does it routinely, and she is unlikely to say 'No' to you. Because by rewarding her, you make an example out of her for other ladies to follow. Your A+ lady has many friends, and she probably boasts to them about making extra money by doing A+. It's an incentive for other ladies to start doing A+ too.
    If Bamboo is to be similar to its originators like tulip, mango SW etc, the upcharge on anal etc has to go. Period.

  10. #12149
    Quote Originally Posted by Syzygies  [View Original Post]
    I can compromise somewhat on either face or body, but never on both. Something needs to be well above average, and not too many things below average.

    Angie at Cherry, I mentioned, had 10 out of 10 body but face was only an 8 (still very good). However I don't go as low as really marginal faces. Cherry at Mango had a great body maybe close to a 9, but face was only a 7 at best. Not really an amazing looker as such, but good enough for me. For face, Cat was far cuter but body a little bit puffy. When Cat first worked at Mango, she was the prettiest face there by a considerable margin and trimmer at that time, and I did not session with any others. I guess Cherry arrived somewhat later. I have a photo of Cherry somewhere and face is above average by not so much. Bo was fairly ordinary looking but at least no fat. Sillies wrecked it.

    When I first met Nestle at Tulip, around 2006 or 2007, her face looked too adjusted which put me off. Her looks appeared to improve greatly years later, when she had retired. Rumours were she had some face enhancement removed, but maybe bulldust since I don't know any details or really understand. I never actually had a session with her.

    I liked June at SW, since while not a stunner, she was well above average in all categories, face, body, and performance. In time became A+, although not originally. Very reliable. I would probably rate her higher or at least equal to Cherry even though tits were smaller.
    Personally I found Cherry at SW to be more attractive than June when it came their faces. Body wise and performance wise Cherry gets the nod as well. June was cute though and had an amazing body despite having one child. Always enthusiastic and seemed to enjoy the act, but found her BJ to be a bit toothy at times.

  11. #12148
    Quote Originally Posted by Goatscrot  [View Original Post]
    Never really was preoccupied with "stunners" but I like a gal who is easy on the eyes. A marginal face and a rocking body does it for me any day. Whereas I will pass on a marginal body and great face. Sadly I don't really see gals with marginal faces and great bodies at the PSE oilies much anymore.

    To my eyes there were some amazing lookers at the oilies years back. Mango had Ann, Cherry, Mook, and to a lesser extent Apple and Bo. SW had a few as well. Tulip had some ok gals. Nestle in her prime. Nong was not bad either. Of course every dude has a different idea of what a stunner is. When you posted the pics of the gal from LaBelle I much preferred her look in the later pics. I like my gals very "slutty" looking. I have no issue with a nose job if its done well and think that good sillies do nothing but enhance a figure. I prefer gals well made up as opposed to "natural. " I like the gal next door look, that is if I live next door to a brothel.
    I can compromise somewhat on either face or body, but never on both. Something needs to be well above average, and not too many things below average.

    Angie at Cherry, I mentioned, had 10 out of 10 body but face was only an 8 (still very good). However I don't go as low as really marginal faces. Cherry at Mango had a great body maybe close to a 9, but face was only a 7 at best. Not really an amazing looker as such, but good enough for me. For face, Cat was far cuter but body a little bit puffy. When Cat first worked at Mango, she was the prettiest face there by a considerable margin and trimmer at that time, and I did not session with any others. I guess Cherry arrived somewhat later. I have a photo of Cherry somewhere and face is above average by not so much. Bo was fairly ordinary looking but at least no fat. Sillies wrecked it.

    When I first met Nestle at Tulip, around 2006 or 2007, her face looked too adjusted which put me off. Her looks appeared to improve greatly years later, when she had retired. Rumours were she had some face enhancement removed, but maybe bulldust since I don't know any details or really understand. I never actually had a session with her.

    I liked June at SW, since while not a stunner, she was well above average in all categories, face, body, and performance. In time became A+, although not originally. Very reliable. I would probably rate her higher or at least equal to Cherry even though tits were smaller.

  12. #12147
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan7373  [View Original Post]
    I checked out lady Ja's picture, and she is good-looking alright.

    http://bamboobkk.com/ladies/ja/
    Not stunning for me. Face a bit too round and tits a bit too round too. LOL I would not go specially looking for her, but if she is for your taste, great. A+ certainly no great surprise.

  13. #12146
    Quote Originally Posted by Goatscrot  [View Original Post]
    Here here. That is why the Baron's Tulip model has been so great. One price; all girls do everything. I have no issues if gals don't want to do A+, up to them. But charging extra is a slippery slope that we don't want to head down.
    However most shops are moving toward one price for all in, and that price varies by duration of session and whether its Oily or Gel, etc. There is no way to get a cheaper session for HJ or BJ only for all-in price shops. I believe all shops will move to all-in price eventually. This means girl's share of 1400 will gradually increase upward over time as overall price rises occur.

    Those who want BJ only will be forced to go to BJ shop or accept paying more for it.

    If some shops do not go to all-in price, may increase entry fees gradually, and start giving the girl part of entry fee, so she could make more than 1500 for sex part. I am just speculating, but clearly prices cannot remain fixed forever. Super market bills keep rising, rent keeps rising, quality of the PSE shop girls probably goes down. We see some places offering A+ for extra fee. Since not every girl is forced to provide it to get customers, extra incentive made be needed to make them consider doing it. Some girls clearly don't want to give it, even to attract extra customers.

    I think prices have to rise, one way or another. The discrepancy between what the Oily girls make for a ST and what bargirls make for less work is getting wider. Bargirls realistically have more choice of customer as well. Being an Oily girl gets less and less attractive, especially for pretty girls. Are any girls in PSE shops making big money? I don't know about this. Not attending regularly enough.

  14. #12145
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan7373  [View Original Post]
    Not every lady there does A+ with her guys, but most ladies do. And these ladies aren't going to look at you as some kind of pervert, when you ask them for it, not when you are paying them an extra 500B for it.
    So you are saying that something that in the lady's mind normally would be considered perverted, somehow becomes normal because not only does the man want it, but he wants it so bad he is willing to pay extra for it? You really believe this?

  15. #12144
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolvenvacht  [View Original Post]
    That's exactly why I think it is a bad idea to pay extra for A+. Not that I am interested in anal sex, but it might just give the girls the idea that there are many extras they can charge separately. Think of CIM, COF, BBBJ or even BJ. In Europe most pros charge extra for all this. Hell, I once even had to pay extra to get her to take off all her clothes. Surely we don't want that to happen in LOS?
    Here here. That is why the Baron's Tulip model has been so great. One price; all girls do everything. I have no issues if gals don't want to do A+, up to them. But charging extra is a slippery slope that we don't want to head down.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
 Sex Vacation
Escort News


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape