Angeles City

[AceKicker]

In case you don't want to bring someone to your hotel, does AC have hourly hotel rooms or do bars have rooms upstairs? What about in Manila?

Yes atleast in Angeles there are plenty of hotels that let you rent a room just for few hours only. I've done it few times in perimeter road but can't remember name of any specific hotel (they have all been small ones).

[AceKicker]

I'm same as you! I always bareback all over the world! I can't get a hard-on with a condom. Thanks God I've never catch any STD. I do some control test regularly.

I just try to find some very good looking and sexy ladies who are in good health! Nowadays, I noticed that most of the men fuck without condoms, and girls too. I went Bangkok, Pattaya, Phuket, Manila, PP, Medellin and in many countries in Europe and girls accept without hesitation to fuck bareback!

Some of these girls do it for free, some ask extra money. But most of them do it.

I'm going back soon in Thailand and Colombia, and I love find sexy ladies on internet, facebook, instagram.

I'm pretty much the same when it comes to using the rubber. Best success I've had with Pasante king size but still. Feels like f*ing a rubber duck.

Anyways my experiences from the world are bit different. In Europe Spain + Germany never had success wuthout using one. In Thailand maybe 1/10 let me go bareback where as in Angeles the ratio in my history has been around 5/10 and in Olongapo 7/10. I guess I've just picked the wrong girls in Ac? Plus they have never mentioned this issue before we've been in my room.

What comes to std's I've caught chlamydia few times and nowdays trying to minimize the risk by sticking with one girl if I find one that is my liking and a solid performer.

[MoonShot]

This is another one of these things that everyone has been dancing around in society since the early 80's. Anytime you dare speak about attaining a satisfying sexual experience, you run into 1 of 2 predictable responses:

1. The anti-male diatribe - "How dare you pursue sexual satisfaction?" And "If you play, you pay. " This one never loses sight of how badly the fem**ists have been trying to punish men for feeling sexual desire (even when most of them are also hypocritically sneaking out behind the bushes for their surreptitious fun); just that they've mastered the art of hiding their own deceipt and promiscuity (better than dudes can) have over the past few thousand years. (Sorry mom, nothing personal).

2. The anti-hygienic guilt trip - "Well, at least I hope you're using protection. ".

What WC, MS, and RG are getting at is that a lot of guys face a seriously bad set of choices and an inescapable reality: Some of us don't respond as well to condoms as others. Some lucky guys can experience great sex with every partner, with or without a condom. But many lose functionality when they strap on a confining rubber tube.

Seriously, which one of us would not want to practice safe sex if we could do so without any loss of pleasure or functionality?

But as the fellow gents suggest, for many of us it really becomes a question of sex or no sex. I am also one of the genotypes who is negatively affected physically and sensually when capping the dom:

- It interrupts the hot momentum going on (aka coitus interruptus) and can make me lose the mood.

- It looks ridiculous and feels / smells like a hospital room.

- It creates a kinesthetic barrier, affecting some guys worse than others. And for those worst affected, it actually becomes a source of frustration, creating a negative sexual experience.

- It can squeeze you and force you to feel shrunken.

- It is difficult to get one that fits well to the right balance. Not too tight but not falling off.

For years, I searched high and low for condoms that work for me, and I tried many different tricks to make myself believe that they could become part of the fun. BS. So far, the magnums are the only ones I can manage, but only with a hot girl and only when I am seriously fired up. Otherwise, after dozens and dozens of times where I used them and felt a let down afterwards, I came to the same drastic conclusion that some of the other dudes here mention: It is either enjoy natural sex and take the risk or keep safe and not enjoy it at all.

Turgid, if you are one of the lucky guys who is not ill affected by condoms, I seriously envy you. I remember reading a few years ago about the Gates foundation planning to fund research for "pleasurable condoms. " Seems to be an oxymoron to me, but I'll be waiting for that, nuclear fusion, and a way for ISG dudes to ban together to fight go go inflation (just joking DG.).

Those of us who go bareback know that it could come back to bite us in the ass. I suspect that as many of us get older, we start deciding that it is increasingly worth the trade-off, given the relative (un) likelihood of getting anything life threatening or debilitating. But for those who constantly turn back to the cliches to admonish guys for wanting to enjoy sex, tell me something new, like how to enjoy it with a rubber band strapped on you.

I think this provides a better understanding at least with older guys who go bareback despite the risks. But if you are a younger guy and can have sex and come with a condom, the balancing is the risk and rewards is different. In that situation, due to the fact that you were younger, it might be in your best interest to wear a condom, otherwise you may have to live with herpes or HIV for the rest of your life.

For guys in their '60's and up, the rest of our sexual lives is much shorter because our ability to have sex starts to decline as we get older. As an older longer, when I wear a condom, sometimes I have erection issues especially when I switch positions and it is definitely much much harder for me to finish and in many cases I can't finish.

So it is not a case of sex with a condom or barebacking. It is a case of barebacking or no sex. When those are the two choices, the answer is obvious. But that is not the choices younger mongers have.

[DragonRing]

In case you don't want to bring someone to your hotel, does AC have hourly hotel rooms or do bars have rooms upstairs? What about in Manila?

[Gilolo]

I always bareback when I am in the Philippines and I am aware of the risk. You roll the dice each time you bareback and eventually you will probably catch something. I have caught something twice over 25 years. Luckily they were curable STDs. If you bareback thinking that you're not going to catch anything, that is stupid. You will eventually catch something But that is part of the game.

But each year that I don't catch anything, I thank my lucky stars because that means that when a year having a great bareback sex without any consequences. Was it worth it? Apparently so since I keep it doing it. There's nothing like the feeling of sliding your cock into bareback pussy and coming inside. Then again there's nothing worse than the feeling of symptoms of an STD.

Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.

I have a friend who was cautious about using a condom every time but he kept hearing my stories about barebacking girls and he could not resist. He just went to Angeles city 2 months ago and within a week of bare backing, he caught an STD. Sometimes you just get unlucky.

I'm same as you! I always bareback all over the world! I can't get a hard-on with a condom. Thanks God I've never catch any STD. I do some control test regularly.

I just try to find some very good looking and sexy ladies who are in good health! Nowadays, I noticed that most of the men fuck without condoms, and girls too. I went Bangkok, Pattaya, Phuket, Manila, PP, Medellin and in many countries in Europe and girls accept without hesitation to fuck bareback!

Some of these girls do it for free, some ask extra money. But most of them do it.

I'm going back soon in Thailand and Colombia, and I love find sexy ladies on internet, facebook, instagram.

[Volterra]

Wanking off is better than sex with a condom. I know all my fav things; nothing comes between us.

Turgid I am cautious, I use a condom. Guys who go bareback post a lot about their exploits yet there is not one post of them getting drug-resistant gonorrhea. When that happens they become silent.

This is another one of these things that everyone has been dancing around in society since the early 80's. Anytime you dare speak about attaining a satisfying sexual experience, you run into 1 of 2 predictable responses:

1. The anti-male diatribe - "How dare you pursue sexual satisfaction?" And "If you play, you pay. " This one never loses sight of how badly the fem**ists have been trying to punish men for feeling sexual desire (even when most of them are also hypocritically sneaking out behind the bushes for their surreptitious fun); just that they've mastered the art of hiding their own deceipt and promiscuity (better than dudes can) have over the past few thousand years. (Sorry mom, nothing personal).

2. The anti-hygienic guilt trip - "Well, at least I hope you're using protection. ".

What WC, MS, and RG are getting at is that a lot of guys face a seriously bad set of choices and an inescapable reality: Some of us don't respond as well to condoms as others. Some lucky guys can experience great sex with every partner, with or without a condom. But many lose functionality when they strap on a confining rubber tube.

Seriously, which one of us would not want to practice safe sex if we could do so without any loss of pleasure or functionality?

But as the fellow gents suggest, for many of us it really becomes a question of sex or no sex. I am also one of the genotypes who is negatively affected physically and sensually when capping the dom:

- It interrupts the hot momentum going on (aka coitus interruptus) and can make me lose the mood.

- It looks ridiculous and feels / smells like a hospital room.

- It creates a kinesthetic barrier, affecting some guys worse than others. And for those worst affected, it actually becomes a source of frustration, creating a negative sexual experience.

- It can squeeze you and force you to feel shrunken.

- It is difficult to get one that fits well to the right balance. Not too tight but not falling off.

For years, I searched high and low for condoms that work for me, and I tried many different tricks to make myself believe that they could become part of the fun. BS. So far, the magnums are the only ones I can manage, but only with a hot girl and only when I am seriously fired up. Otherwise, after dozens and dozens of times where I used them and felt a let down afterwards, I came to the same drastic conclusion that some of the other dudes here mention: It is either enjoy natural sex and take the risk or keep safe and not enjoy it at all.

Turgid, if you are one of the lucky guys who is not ill affected by condoms, I seriously envy you. I remember reading a few years ago about the Gates foundation planning to fund research for "pleasurable condoms. " Seems to be an oxymoron to me, but I'll be waiting for that, nuclear fusion, and a way for ISG dudes to ban together to fight go go inflation (just joking DG.).

Those of us who go bareback know that it could come back to bite us in the ass. I suspect that as many of us get older, we start deciding that it is increasingly worth the trade-off, given the relative (un) likelihood of getting anything life threatening or debilitating. But for those who constantly turn back to the cliches to admonish guys for wanting to enjoy sex, tell me something new, like how to enjoy it with a rubber band strapped on you.

[JusRide]

I started taking a z-pak (1500-2000 MG) after my mongering trip is done. Never had any issues since nor passed anything on to my girl upon return. Knock on wood. As BBFS is always on the menu.

Everyone here knows the risks of sex without a condom. Life is full risks. Obviously, there's a risk that your plane will crash on the way to the Philippines, for starters.

But for some of us, myself included, sex with a condom is about the same as no sex at all. Why bother? We might as well just wank off. So as for me, it's very much a risk versus return analysis. Of course, if you're happy with condomed sex, go for it. I wouldn't presume to pass judgment on your choices. I'll thank you for not passing judgment on mine!

RG.

[WestCoast1]

But for some of us, myself included, sex with a condom is about the same as no sex at all. Why bother? We might as well just wank off.

Wanking off is better than sex with a condom. I know all my fav things; nothing comes between us.

[NapaSlapper]

Everyone here knows the risks of sex without a condom. Life is full risks. Obviously, there's a risk that your plane will crash on the way to the Philippines, for starters.

But for some of us, myself included, sex with a condom is about the same as no sex at all. Why bother? We might as well just wank off. So as for me, it's very much a risk versus return analysis. Of course, if you're happy with condomed sex, go for it. I wouldn't presume to pass judgment on your choices. I'll thank you for not passing judgment on mine!

RG.

While I agree all are free to make their own choices some choices are much more risky than others.

You mention air flights, the chance of dying in a plane is 1 in 11 million.

Sticking ones cock into a pussy riddled with an incurable std unprotected then I would guess at best 50/50 of catching or not, big difference.

Others say there is nothing worse than the symptoms of an std, try being told by ones doctor, sorry sir but I have to inform you that you have aids.

A well known angeles std doctor mr guzman once told me years ago that on average he told a couple of people per month the sorry to inform you story.

Of course no amount of scare stories will change the mind of the commited, all the more reason for me to wear my condom.

[MoonShot]

Everyone here knows the risks of sex without a condom. Life is full risks. Obviously, there's a risk that your plane will crash on the way to the Philippines, for starters.

But for some of us, myself included, sex with a condom is about the same as no sex at all. Why bother? We might as well just wank off. So as for me, it's very much a risk versus return analysis. Of course, if you're happy with condomed sex, go for it. I wouldn't presume to pass judgment on your choices. I'll thank you for not passing judgment on mine!

RG.

I always bareback when I am in the Philippines and I am aware of the risk. You roll the dice each time you bareback and eventually you will probably catch something. I have caught something twice over 25 years. Luckily they were curable STDs. If you bareback thinking that you're not going to catch anything, that is stupid. You will eventually catch something But that is part of the game.

But each year that I don't catch anything, I thank my lucky stars because that means that when a year having a great bareback sex without any consequences. Was it worth it? Apparently so since I keep it doing it. There's nothing like the feeling of sliding your cock into bareback pussy and coming inside. Then again there's nothing worse than the feeling of symptoms of an STD.

Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.

I have a friend who was cautious about using a condom every time but he kept hearing my stories about barebacking girls and he could not resist. He just went to Angeles city 2 months ago and within a week of bare backing, he caught an STD. Sometimes you just get unlucky.

[Radical Guy]

I am cautious, I use a condom. Guys who go bareback post a lot about their exploits yet there is not one post of them getting drug-resistant gonorrhea. When that happens they become silent.

Everyone here knows the risks of sex without a condom. Life is full risks. Obviously, there's a risk that your plane will crash on the way to the Philippines, for starters.

But for some of us, myself included, sex with a condom is about the same as no sex at all. Why bother? We might as well just wank off. So as for me, it's very much a risk versus return analysis. Of course, if you're happy with condomed sex, go for it. I wouldn't presume to pass judgment on your choices. I'll thank you for not passing judgment on mine!

RG.

[Turgid]

I am cautious, I use a condom. Guys who go bareback post a lot about their exploits yet there is not one post of them getting drug-resistant gonorrhea. When that happens they become silent.

[Volterra]

Nonsense being that the idea we can all ban together and lower prices. Even the comparison to the inflation factor of goods is wrong.

We all have our financial capabilities and limitations. We all have our priorities and goals which may require increased income or lower expenses or both.

My mongering mo requires more money now to pursue. Yes, I spend more now. I have cut back or even eliminated expenses and had to increase my income to fulfill it. And I am having more fun and sex than any other time in my life!

Understood, DG, and at the end of the day I have to concur and admit it (banning together to lower prices) is wishful thinking on my part. I am one of the guys on the forum who is saying, "damn, I just missed out on the best of it".

At the same time, I intend to follow suit and spend more, as you have. It is now a major component of my retirement planning (privately, of course, I think it goes under "discretionary spending" or "travel and entertainment" in the financial planning software). So I am definitely going to endure that extra year of work so I can have that fun and great sex before my body gives out at some point. I got to admit, even with rising prices, my 2 AC trips this past year have been unforgettable, with girls who are younger and hotter than anything I've had in a long time. And some of the things they have done to me. Shit! Let's just say I have done more than a fair bit of daydreaming during afternoon work hours this past week. (Hope I don't inadvertently start blurting out "feel that deep cock" or some wild sex talk in front of my office mates.).

[NapaSlapper]

I still have the PM. I can send it to you if you want.

I just left Angeles.

I will return next November.

If you are real, I will apologize and buy you a beer.

Its funny how when guys get called out about being in angeles by requesting a friendly beer they all of a sudden happen to have just conveniently left angeles yesterday, amazing.

Anyways, some of us are actually in angeles and went out to the bars last night.

Not much new to report, the town is mainly young korean punters throwing money around like its going out of fashion, westerners are in very short supply, many western bars visited had no customers at all.

The drinks only girls are alive and well and earning the big money by hustling drinks only.

The cherry girls who are actually the cutest girls in the bar are also popular for lady drinks.

The fatties and uglies are still praying they can be called down by a nice korean for drinks but have to reside themselves that no drinks are forthcoming so might have to go through the torture of sucking grand daddys white cock again.

The lady drinks are definately all one price 300-350 pesos and again did not see any girls drinking from a bottle, mostly shot glasses.

[GreenBud]

Not sure what the hell you are on about messages years ago, maybe putting down the bottle will serve your memory better.

I still have the PM. I can send it to you if you want.

Rather than making baseless accusation on a faceless platform why not send me a pm and join us for a drink in angeles, I'm out both tonight and Saturday this week, that way you will know the truth, I won't hold my breath for your pm as your probably just another keyboard warrior that dreams of someday making it to angeles, lets see.

I just left Angeles.

I will return next November.

If you are real, I will apologize and buy you a beer.