2002 Letters to the Editor

[JimmyDR]

Can you ad in

New York, under
Manhatten

Lap Dance Joints

There is a new one that might generate lots of posting, called F Stop.


Thanks

[JT]

Jackson,

When we email you pics, do you want only recent ones or are pics that are 2-4 yrs old alright? I have tons of pics, so I need to seperate them for the forum.

JT.

[Rubber Nursey]

Jackson,

Just wanted to send my best wishes to you and yours for the holiday season. Thanks for all the hard work you've put into the site this year. It doesn't go unnoticed, you know! Hope Santa brings you everything you wished for, babe. Merry Christmas!!
(I know it's a bit early, but very soon I'll be heading off to the beach for the Christmas break and I'll be offline for about a week).

And to all you other WSG inhabitants...
Christmas kisses to you all *mwahhh* and may your beer be cold and your women hot, in 2003.

[Kingpin]

Hey Jackson,

I was wondering if you had updated the photo section on the Main Page. I saw some posting that said they submitted photos for El Salvador, but I don't see the new section. Thanks for the great site!

[Headhunter2000]

Jackson, I agree that the changes have improved this great site. I have an idea to make it even better. Could spell-checking be added? I have noticed some other webboards have it. They send the message to www.spellcheck.net so the spell-checking is outsourced, not actually built into the forum. Of course, I don't know shit about programming. Would this be difficult to do? I think we could all use help with our spelling now and agin.

HH

[SledDog]

why are certain words censored and turned into **** on screen? arent we all grown up here?

FAQ #31

[Boxcc]

Jackson,

I would like to thank you for your relentless effort in keeping this site so great. I love the new senior and regular member rules, that was a great idea!

Keep up the great work.

[Direct_Deposit]

Jackson,

Could you please tell me the difference between a regular and senior member, and how you get from one to the other. I was just wondering.

Thanx.

I probably need to clarify this better in the FAQ.

Regular Members are members who have registered to use the Forum but have posted no or very few reports, which automatically includes all new members. Regular Members may post messages in the Forum, but their messages are temporarily held until they are reviewed by a Forum Moderator. This results in a delay of anywhere from a few hours to a couple of days.

Senior Members are members who have made substantial contributions to the Forum, either by quality or quantity. This designation is conferred by me during periodic reviews of member posting activity wherein I review the posts of the most active Regular Members and make a subjective decision as to who will be elevated to Senior Member status. Senior Members are the Forum's strongest contributors who have demonstrated by their contributions that they share my goals for the Forum. Posts by Senior Members are not held for review and thus are immediately displayed in the Forum.

The purpose of this entire hierarchy is to exercise some controls over new members with the specific intent of stopping serial spammers and reducing garbage posts.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Denis]

Jackson,

I sent you couple of picture from nice asian hookers but I have seen them posted on your Gallery
any reason?
Denis

FAQ #36

[Nibu Raphael]

Jackson Will be in Arequipa tommorow night. When will you add Arequipa on as a place listed in Peru???? Remember it is the 2nd largest city in Peru.

[Kilgore Trout]

OK, I see. Just the coding has changed. But why change the code and screw up the old posts?

I was trying out various tactics, like turning off the ability to post messages containing HTML code, to prevent a certain asshole from posting obnoxiously large type specifically to take up screen space. It didn't stop him, but I decided that I like controlling and thus limiting the formatting capabilities.

BTW, blue lettering is reserved for me. Thanks.

Jackson

[nai]

Originally posted by Kilgore Trout
It may be a silly question, but I noticed that users are no longer allowed to change the color of the text in their posts. What happened to this feature? I guess some people were abusing it, but removing it has really screwed up some of the old posts that used multiple colors.

[Kilgore Trout]

It may be a silly question, but I noticed that users are no longer allowed to change the color of the text in their posts. What happened to this feature? I guess some people were abusing it, but removing it has really screwed up some of the old posts that used multiple colors.

[PsyberZombie]

dear jackson :

thank you for clarifying your rules here.

but... i don't 'get' your problem with the age of consent laws

fer example = here in rhode island, the age of consent is 16

don't *you* remember being 16 ??

weren't you able to make informed choices by that age ??

didn't you know right from wrong at that age ??

and... many young ladies are women at that age

[ i.e. are fully developed and capable of having their own kids at that age ]

why would you frown on their right to make a living as they see fit, at that age ??

don't get me wrong = neither you nor i advocate ****philia...

where we disagree, i guess, is *when* a 'girl' becomes a 'woman'

and i would stand by my basic libertarian philosophy by siding with the teenaged woman who says :

*** leave me alone to live my own life !!! ***

as always, the favor of a reply will be greatly appreciated

pz

pz,

obviously, you choose to ignore the distinction between consual sex between persons of approximately the same age, and commercial sex. it's one thing for a 16 year old girl to have a sexual experience with a 16 year old boy, it'a an entirely different situation for a 16 year old girl to engage in a commercial sexual encounter with an older man. i don't want to argue the point into exaustive detail, but the central principal is spelled out below.

reposted from the editorial page:

gentlemen, i've decided to voice my opinions and invite discussions on exactly why this website does not permit discussions of sex with minors under the age of 18.

first, it amazes me that i even need to state what i consider to be obvious facts, but some of the discussions in the discussion board have illustrated to me that some people just don't get it. therefor, i'm going to make these arguments for the sake of those among us who have difficulty realizing their responsibilities to the human race.

1. as men, it is our responsibility to protect women and children.

2. young girls, as the most vulnerable members of the human race, are especially deserving of our protection.

3. regardless of the specific age when a girl has passed biological puberty, young girls are not emotionally capable of handling the emotional turmoil of prostitution. if you have any teenage daughters yourself, or if you have any friends with teenage daughters, this observation is self-evident.

4. as educated, intelligent, civilized men, we are expected by our peers to operate on a higher moral plain in these matters than other cultures may tolerate. therefore, we do not participate in the exploitation of emotionally **** girls, regardless of the behavior of others.

i hope that those of you who may have been confused on this subject now have an understanding of your responsibility to protect young girls, not exploit them under the justification that others have already done so first. however, because i know that some of you will postulate the usual justifications for this immoral and reprehensible behavior, let me respond to these common arguments.

1. "hey man, lighten up. in these girl's cultures they start having sex as soon as they pass puberty, and many girls here get married very young."

first, it doesn't matter if the indigenous culture is willing to exploit these girls, as an educated, intelligent, civilized man, you are expected to refrain from this type of exploitation.

second, there is a big difference between getting married and engaging in prostitution. when a young girl gets married, she receives the emotional support of her immediate family and friends, and theoretically a supportative husband. conversely, when a young girl gets involved in prostitution, she is typically thrust into a situation where she receives no emotional support, and in fact is usually confronted with mental and physical abuse.

2. "these girls need the money to buy food and to eat. it's wrong to deny them the only method by which they can earn enough money to survive. i think i'm doing a good thing by fucking them for money."

don't kid yourself, the prostitution business isn't big enough to make an appreciable dent in the suffering of young children in these countries. the unfortunate reality is that in many of these countries, hundreds of thousands of young people are suffering from lack of basic necessities, including food. the fact that a small fraction of one percent earns money for food through prostitution isn't exactly a universal solution.

if you genuinely want to help these young girls, then give them a few bucks for food. now, i know that this advice would make a tri-f explode in anger, but you can afford it, and in fact you'll never know it's gone.

3. "you call them "girls" but many of them are battle-hardened veterans by the time they're 16. it doesn't matter if i pay them for sex, they're used to it."

let me see if i understand this argument: it's okay to victimize somebody who's been victimized before? so i guess it's okay to rob somebody who's already been robbed, and i guess it's also okay to [CodeWord123] a woman who was raped before? come on guys, just because a young girl is already a victim doesn't give you license to continue the abuse.

please remember, this is a website for men looking for sex with women

as always, your comments are welcomed.

thank you,

jackson

[Admin]

PyberZombie,

I appreciate your interest in understanding the forum's posting rules. FYI, I personally don't enjoy banning anyone from posting on the forum, and usually do so only under the most persistent and egregious circumstances.

In the forum I do not allow any poster to request, provide or comment on the subject of intentionally seeking or having sex with any person under the age of 18. The limitation applies to all sections of the forum, regardless of the local laws, customs or practices. The age of 18 established herein is admittedly arbitrary, and I personally would draw the line at 21, but I had to pick an age limit, so I ceded to the generally accepted age of majority utilized here in the USA and in many other civilized countries.

Nevertheless, regardless of the specific age definition of juveniles utilized herein, there is a BIG difference between deliberately seeking to have sex with juveniles and inadvertently having sex with a juvenile. I would assume that every member of this forum would exercise reasonable and responsible judgement in determining the age of the women with whom he engages in sex, but it's certainly to be expected that occasional mistakes will be made. The story behind such occasions may be legitimate topics for forum postings, assuming that they are intended as an advisory to the other members and not merely as bragging in disguise.

Jackson