2004 Letters to the Editor

[Lurking Fan]

Jackson,

The senior member upgrade page ( http://www.wsgforum.com/seniormembercriteria.html ) says to request upgrades by posting in the senior member upgrades section ( http://www.wsgforum.com/vforum/showt...&threadid=1505 ) but when I click on the link it says: No Thread specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the webmaster

I cannot find the section to post the request. Can you post a link to the section or has the upgrade procedure changed?

Thanks in advance.

Lurking Fan

[Tattooed Guy]

Edonist, I posted the same question a couple of days before you, but don't get any response, except 'Do about what?'

I'm stock with the same problem. Looks like we're on our own bud....

Hi Jackson, there's 2 of us with the same problem now. I have a messageboard on my own sites, so I know it takes a hell of a lot of work, especially upgrading them. I use IE, when that error comes up and that emailadress is either wrong, or the settings of that yahoo account are wrong.

This is the response I get from yahoo

Your message was rejected by mx3.mail.yahoo.com for the following reason:
delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (ralphcarson1@yahoo.com) [0] - mta261.mail.scd.yahoo.com

Hopefully you can sort it out soon and let us know..

Thanks and keep up the good work.

Guys,

The solution is simple: Use my official address jackson@wsgforum.com.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Seva Lurker]

Jackson,

I mentioned this in a response to someone elses post on the login screen a week or so ago. I tried to log in from a friends computer yesterday and I unchecked the 'remember me' button. The system would tell me "welcome Seva Lurker" and then take me to a screen with no user name, and limited functions. I just tried logging on with IE (I normally use Netscape) at home with the same results. When I select the remember me button, then I can log in.

Many thanks for the work you put in to make this a great forum.

[Phuquer]

Thanks for the replies, GandJim and JoeZop. Domino had pointed me in the right direction last night within 5 minutes of my post. Thanks, Domino. I currently have been away from home and haven't been able to check the board much these past few weeks. Since Jackson changed software, the board has been responding very slowly sometimes (an item he is working on), so I haven't had time to explore the many changes. I like some of the changes, but dislike others. Oh well, we will all get used to it. Once again, thanks to all who replied (GandJim, JZ, Domino, etc).

[GandJim]

but the results weren't the posts, it was the actual threads.

this question has been raised and answered many times already, some in this same forum. in the search window, at the bottom left, you have the option to "show results as ๏threads ๏posts". it is defaulted to threads, just click on posts. it's a new version, please spend some time to explore and familiarise yourself with it.


hizark21's ,

problem concerning the search function returning only posts made in the last month has also already been reported here many times. it happens in some forums only. jackson is fully aware of it and just needs time to fix it. be patient and give him some air to breathe, i don't think people can speed things up by any means by reporting the same problem again and again.

jim

[Joe Zop]

Phuquer, the trick is to use the "Search This Thread" function which will narrow things down as needed.

[Phuquer]

Hi, Jackson. I thoroughly enjoy the board, and I thank you for all the hard work you put into keeping this thing running. In reference to Hizark21's post about the search function not working, actually, it does. But it is not working very well at all. I tried to search for Grace Hotel in the Thailand section, and it brought up 2 results. But the results weren't the posts, it was the actual threads. So I had to scan message by message through the Bangkok 2004 Reports section and the Bangkok Hotels section. Needless to say, I didn't get the info I was searching for. Another comment, I used to be able to go to the printable version, and show all 1700 posts (or whatever number) in a thread in one page, so I could copy the posts and paste them in MS Word, so I could search through Word. But now, you can only show 40 posts per page in the printable version. So it doesn't work for me at all. Any idea if you'll be going back to the old way of showing all posts in one page? I would appreciate that soooooo much. Thanks.
(Another reason I would like to show all posts in the thread in a single page is that I save the posts on my PDA so when I travel and don't have internet access, I have all the information right there with me.)

[Lover Boy]

Yo Main man Jackson,
Congtatulation on improved site ...job well done.

[Hizark21]

forum search not working

Tried searching on a keyword, but the search ignored my keyword and brought up only recent posts....???

[GandJim]

Jackson

Must be some sort of automatic link or forwarding enabled .....

Indeed. If you don't want it, just disable it when you post. Have a look here for how to do it.

Jim

[Rolly Polly]

Rob,

Don't you think that would be a tad on the boring side? I realize that sum guys go a little overboard on the descriptions using rather colorful and poetic words, but the details are necessary.

The main reason being that I know how far a girl is willing to go by reading some of these posts. I don't want to have to PM someone everytime they report just to get the details.

It's all useful and necessary information and is important for keeping an adequate personality to the site.

[Edonist]

Dear Jackson,

Let me tell you the story of this poor little "Regular member" who wanted to ask some questions and get some answers. He wanted to learn some stuff. He also wanted other member to read his reports and give back what he took out.

Since he had a 48 wait before his posts had a chance of appearing on the forum, by the time they did, they had got completely lost behind all the real-time posts of "Senior members".

Surely there is something wrong with that.

I've tried asking for senior membership whcih I believe I should entitled to based upon my track record but I keep getting internal server error asking me to contact 'ralphcarson1@yahoo.com' ,but yahoo keeps rejecting it, saying that that yahooID doesn't exists.

Jackson this is a real problem , you can try it yourself. Please look into this.

Otherwise, site is great and and you are doing a great service to mankind.

Edonist.

[Rob Brown]

Dear Jackson,

As the topic about posting rules was closed I hope to be right here.

This forum is called *************. I do not think that any report about a specific locations needs to tell me if a specific woman was rated a 10 or 8 (As being too many times a matter of taste as I had to find out in this forum), if the author was drunk or had 100 viagras or how many times she was banged. If someone wishes to share every little detail about in what way he fucked her, then it is much better off in a private message or in category like "Pornographic/Erotic Literature"
I wish to read some facts about the locality, the prices and general impression of appearance and service.

Suggestions:
1. Please think about a category for people who wish to share pornographic literature.
2. Instead of blank space for writing anything you could introduce some fact requirements. Already filled in keywords of "Adress/Locality:...", "Prices:...", "Quality/Quantity:...." This would remind authors what is a difference between an entertaining and usefull report.

Thanks for considering.
Regards,

“Rob Brown”

[Traveler Tom]

Jackson

Do not know if anyone else is suffering but since posting a comment on the 24 hours' postings function I seem to be getting all the subsequent postings arriving in my PM mailbox.

Must be some sort of automatic link or forwarding enabled but I can read what is said on the forum without having it duplicated as PMs!

Regards

TT

[Tattooed Guy]

Is that emailadress correct to contact about the error? And I don't know if my form went through or not, because I don't want to bulk your email with forms if it did.

Thanks