Domino in Thailand

[Prov1]

Here are the facts:

Judging from the photos he has posted over time, "John Skinless" aka Domino prefers wizened old prunish looking back-alley street meat, so therefore, he has no need to check IDs. "A picture is worth a thousand words."

"John Skinless" is an insane imbecile who thrives on people telling him what an incredible nut-case he is.

Let's just let "John Skinless" aka Domino stay in his cage and screech like a monkey.

So should I assume you are not as big a fan of Domino as I am?

[The Traveler]

gladiator,

would you please be so kind and provide a link to any of "my" below mentioned posts where i admitted to have had sex with more than one 17yo ?

that's your typical tactic, increase numbers of posted pics and incidents, stating something without proof and repeat it endlessly to have it sink in. how desperate you guys are that you need to lie.

i also only referred to thai law because domino used to cite it and accused me of [CodeWord125] ****d.

anyway, i just posted a pic of the 17yo bargirl who claimed to be of legal age and i had sex with and another one that looked young (but no way 15/16y) but was indeed an 18yo working in soi 6.

since you refer to my posted pictures, what about the over 300 other pics of legal aged thai girls ? do they back up your - and of course domino's - accusations or do they in fact prove the opposite ?

i wonder how someone like you, who tells us in the kenya section, that he will fuck any girl regardless her age, as long as she just looks like 18yo, feels being entitled to blame and judge others ?

you clearly don't occupy the moral high ground to judge anybody. you most likely had sex with many ****d, probably more than anybody else in here.
anyway, as everybody knows, you are one of domino very few friends - he doesn't have many, guess why ?

prov1, in case you are really interested, why not read back in the archieves. you will soon find out that gladiator is lying.


guess the attached pic describes your character very well. enjoy :d

[Ralph Kramden]

Here are the facts:

Judging from the photos he has posted over time, "John Skinless" aka Domino prefers wizened old prunish looking back-alley street meat, so therefore, he has no need to check IDs. "A picture is worth a thousand words."

Worldwide, fake IDs are extremely easy to acquire, so checking the ID of every prostitute that serves you is an exercise in futility. How could you possibly belive one if you ask her how old she is?

"John Skinless" is an insane imbecile who thrives on people telling him what an incredible nut-case he is.

The Traveler has fallen into his cage-trap and is obsessed with trying to redeem his character. Traveler, you don't have to explain yourself to a fool like "John Skinless" aka Domino. The Traveler is not any more a "kiddy fucker" than the ordinary LOS sex tourist.

Let's just let "John Skinless" aka Domino stay in his cage and screech like a monkey.

[Gladiator]

domino, i’d have to agree with the traveler on this one. it appears the only evidence you have that causes you to call him “k man” is the incident where he peeked into her purse after the deed and found out she was 17. if so, i really think you’re being a little too tough on the dude.

prov1,

you are right, it would be unfair to jump on a guy who once in his life fucks a 17 yo, but the ‘only one 17 yo’ fairy tale is just the latest story that our resident **** has created in order to deceive new members who aren’t aware of his background as a sex offender in thailand. the ‘only one 17 yo’ story is just his most recent lie, his latest version, the version ‘traveler xp’.

i personally liked most one of his past versions, ‘traveler 2000’, whereby his innocence resided not in the fact that he had fucked only one 17 yo, but in the fact that thai law’s technicalities do allow you to abuse as many 15-16 yo as you like, as long as you do it in the right places, so in the ‘traveler 2000’ version he didn’t deny yet that, as he had confessed himself, he systematically abused numerous **** girls.

just for your information, his confession came along with about 5-6 photos of several different disgustingly young girls, 15-16 yo at most, which were later deleted.

as you can see, the sophistries about thai law giving the green light to abuse children in certain places, which were the base of the ‘traveler 2000’ version, are still present at the back of his sick mind, despite the launch of ‘traveler xp’.

as joe zop said, he is very welcome to re-invent his own history, but he shouldn’t expect us to believe it – at least those of us that have been here long enough to remember his victims’ pictures before they were deleted.

[The Traveler]

Domino,

again you only post statements, no facts, no evidence, nothing that would back you up. In short : bullshit.
Why not prove me wrong instead of just state that I am wrong in your opinion ?

You only cited Section 8 of the Thai Prostitution and Prevention Act and did ignore important parts and therefore misinterpreted it. I just refered to the very same law and additionaly proved by an independent source (www.ageofconsent.com) that it in fact does only cover sex in a brothel.

Outside of so called "places for prostitution" the Thai Penal Code sets the according rules. You have never mentioned it, besides the "Thai Entertainment Places Act" that is also involved. You obviously don't know shit about Thai Laws and aren't able to interpret them properly or even cite other sources properly.

You want your "case", you want it so much that you are willing to sacrifice the truth.

[The Traveler]

guiness,

i totally agree with you. that's why i said it's more a moral than a legal issue to me.

but the point is, that it is a complete different thing if you target ****d by intention or just accidently ran into one. domino accuses me of targeting them, which is complete nonsense.

killing a person is against the law, but if you kill someone by hitting him/her with your car, it doesn't make you a murderer, especially when the killed person crossed the street on a red traffic light. you might blame me for speeding, but not being a murderer.

[Guinness]

Isn't the law written to protect children from being exploited and fucked by grown men? Legal or not legal, when you are a grown man, fucking girls under 18 is just wrong no matter what country or culture you're in. IMHO (of course).

Guinness

[Domino]

The Thraveler's last post again proves what a menace he is.
Neutrals thinking of going to Thailand: If you follow his advice and his interpretaion of the law, you stand a great chance of landing in prison.
The Traveler: I have pointed the law and facts out on numerous occasions but you move on, posting photos of monkeys and what not. You are a menace to society. You are a person with over 20 years' experience in Thailand and you still go for jailbait and still don't check IDs. Get off the stage, you joker.

[The Traveler]

domino,

first, i bet that i am by far younger than you.

second, the more you post the more ugly you look. don't forget, you are locked up, not me.

you keep that shit going by constantly calling me names and accusing me of crimes that do not exist and that i haven't committed. opposite to you, i provide detailed info about the sources of my arguments which will also help other members to have a deeper insight in thai jurisdiction as most people don't know much about it - just like you - and only repeat hearsay. you instead never provide any evidence or back up your accusations by an independent source.

you referred to thai law and said that i have broken that law and committed a crime, but obviously haven't ever read it or do not understand it. now when i refer to thai law to show that i in fact haven't broken any thai law as you claim, your answers only consist of stupid statements and links to stupid posts of your fellow pal freeler.

why not prove me wrong by referring to thai law ?

you avoid it for a single reason, you know that you can't.
but you want to keep it going on endlessly, so instead of sticking to facts and arguments, you keep insulting me and talk bullshit. it's hard to be honest and admit that you have been wrong. you obviously haven't the balls for it.

your lack of honesty is obvious to everybody with just a tiny bit of common sense, your lack of self reflection as well. an honest person would have said, "hey dude, better always insist on providing an id, i know it's not fool-proof, but it's better than nothing". end of story.

but instead you like to blame me and presume that i target ****d - without knowing me at all and ignoring all facts that are contrary to that. you also don't have the balls to admit that you might have run into an ****d as well because of your arguable approach of blindly believing in a piece of paper that could easily be faked.

you once asked me where my 20yrs of experience come in. quite easy, i check ids but i don't blindly believe in them as you do, i know that many girls provide faked or borrowed ids, have seen it a thousand times when 18-19yo girls enter the discos and fool the bouncers by doing so. but remember, those guys see thai ids every day and can read what's printed on them, you can't. they should be able to determine a faked id but they are still fooled by them, but not domino and freeler, you two detect them all. do i have to say more ?

i also talk to them, ask them about their time in school, how long ago they started in that kind of business, what the have done in the meantime and so on. then i do my math. many girls lie about their age but not many have the according story of their life. that's how i try to verify their age in addition to checking ids, it's not fool-proof, but much better than just looking at a piece of paper like you do.

[Domino]

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...&postcount=268

The Traveler: Examine your Peter Pan fixation. Old men like you should move on from little girls. THAT is what is at the heart of our special relationship. Have you ever spent any time reflecting on your life? The more you post, the more guilty you are.

[The Traveler]

***********,

with all due respect but your interpretation of the term "... places for prostitution ..." is wrong.
i thought about it myself when domino first cited section 8 of the thai prostitution and prevention act about three years ago, so i did some research on thai laws with the following results :

"the thai entertainment places act" contains a definition of this term, but it is somehow vague as it describes them as "places for baths, massage or steam baths which have women to attend male customers". these places are required to obtain operating licenses from local police.


also have a look at the editor's update 09/2000 at www.ageofconsent.com (domino's preferred source of info) :

"the 1996 prostitution prevention and suppression act:article 8:
those who [CodeWord123] or have sex in a brothel with children aged over 15, but not yet 18, with or without the consent of the children, are subject to one to three years imprisonment or a fine of 20,000 to 60,000 baht."


you also claim that mps, brothels and the like are illegal in los, but in fact they are not, at least not all.

according to the already above mentioned thai entertainment places act, entertainment places, such as massage parlors, bars and night clubs are considered legal if registered with the government. the girls and women working there have some ability to negotiate the terms of their employment and the nature of the interaction with their clients.
brothels, which can range from seven or eight girls in the back of a noodle shop to a multi-story building with over a hundred workers, are, by contrast, illegal.

domino, watch out, your beloved philok brothel is illegal !
what does such a law loving guy like you do in an illegal place, illegal actions ? (you know what i mean)


i already proved you wrong by citing the according section of thai law but even if you wouldn't, your conclusion that any place where the act or sexual intercourse takes place (e.g. a hotel room) is such a place for prostitution, in short everywhere, doesn't makes sense.

if the lawmakers really had that in mind, why do they made that exclusion at all ?
wouldn't it be sufficent to state that having sex with someone below the age of 18yo is illegal, no matter where it happens ?
everywhere is everywhere, so why this exclusion ?

killing other people or selling drugs for example is also against the law and forbidden everywhere. but have you ever seen a law that states that killing another person is forbidden in a "place for killing" or selling drugs is forbidden in a "place for selling drugs" ?
i haven't !

so by making this exclusion the lawmakers not only tell us that it is forbidden at certain places, but they also tell us that the law doesn't cover other places and therefore it isn't illegal at those other places under this law !

the thai lawmakers had places in mind where people are often forced into prostitution and even if those places might be illegal, they sadly do exist. so section 8 just defines the law in greater detail, giving out the details about how you will be punished if you use the services of a prostitute below the age of 18yrs in such a place. just like many other laws which define murder of the first, second or third degree for example.


regarding domino's accusations of statutory [CodeWord123] :

"the thai penal code" severely penalizes [CodeWord123], which it defines as an extra-marital offense, and punishes sexual intercourse with minors, providing in section 277 that

"any person who commits an act of [CodeWord123] on a girl aged under 15 years, who is not his wife, with or without the consent of such a girl, shall be liable to imprisonment from four to twenty years and fine from 8,000 - 40,000 baht."

"for wrongdoing pursuant to the proceeding paragraph against a girl aged under 13 years, the perpetrator shall be liable to imprisonment from seven to twenty years and fine from 14,000 - 40,000 baht."

note that the law doesn't mention any person above the age of 15 years !
there is no such thing as statutory [CodeWord123] of a 17yo in thailand due to the according laws.
there is no penalty for having agreed sex with a female above the age of 15 years outside a brothel, no matter if she is a prostitute or not.
therefore the age of consent in los is 15 years, just as it is stated at www.ageofconsent.com.

thailand has at least four separate legal regimes addressing various and sometimes overlapping components of both trafficking and prostitution. the immigration act also contains relevant prohibitions. as a result, inconsistencies and even contradictions emerged:

• the penal law severely penalizes persons who have sex with minors (a minor is someone below the age of 15y regarding to that law);
  the anti-prostitution law does not.
• the anti-trafficking law exempts women trafficked into prostitution from imprisonment or fines;
  the anti-prostitution law makes no such exemption.
• the suppression of prostitution act penalizes prostitution;
  the entertainment places act, at least indirectly, regulates and even taxes it.

these inconsistencies, while clearly not insurmountable, undermined the development of a clear legal sanction on prostitution and trafficking and, to some extent, contributed to several thai governments' utter failure actually to suppress or even meaningfully control prostitution and/or trafficking.

that said, domino's accusations against me aren't not only completely unjustified, they also have absolutely no legal background. he doesn't know what he talks about and never provided any evidence on which basis he accuses me.

[The Traveler]

Guiness,

I don't go through their purse, I just put some money in and they don't mind, at least none have ever made a remark about it.
I do that because in the past a few girls forgot to check their trouser pockets - not knowing that I put some money in - before they brought their laundry to a shop to have it done for them. So the money finally landed in the hand of the laundry shop instead of the girl.

[Guinness]

Prov1,

I put some money in !
I don't like to pay upfront putting it in her hand, so I usually put it in the purse.

Most girls I know would not like a stranger going through their purse. Maybe Thai girls are different and don't care. I usually slip it in their pocket and tell them it's for the taxi ride home...it saves them from the reality of it all.

Guinness

[The Traveler]

Prov1,

these girls aren't necessarily in denial, it's more that I don't like it and many girls appreciate it to not being treated as a prostitute. Guess that has something to do with self-respect, or how would you feel ?

Anyway, I also never talk about money when I pick them or agree on a special amount beforehand. I rarely ever have been asked by a girl. We just meet, have a great time together and sooner or later she leaves with a few more baht in her purse. So money is never an issue, even if it might be the friving factor for her.


Regarding those pics that remind you on Juniour :
I don't know about him, these pics are taken by a surveillance cam I have installed in Domino's cage. A few are also from his photo album. He had to deliver all personal belongings before he was encaged.

[Prov1]

Prov1,

I put some money in !
I don't like to pay upfront putting it in her hand, so I usually put it in the purse.

ok, now I get it. I was not aware that Thai girls are in denial about their profession which makes it easier for them if you slip it in their purse. This is common in the Philippines but they are all Catholic.