Should I add video file sharing?

[Switched]

There are already other websites that allow uploading of video files. I don't think it is necessary for this site.

[Steave69]

My opinion is that it is not needed to waste technical resources for porn movies. The world wide web is full porn, and that shouldn't be needed.

[Rxracer]

I was just thinking that it would be nice to have a page where user submitted links to videos were gathered in one place like the Photo Gallery. Not sure we really need the videos themselves if we had this.

[Fun And Sun]

IMHO having the ability to upload vids would be absolutely great and take the forum to a new level. I have posted lots of vids on a different site and then linked to them from ISG but would post a lot more vids if I was able to just upload them to ISG instead of putting them on a third party site.

Vids are a lot more fun than pictures I think.

[It Travel]

May be no... thre are lots of places where to post videos, usually shaking and grainy... I would widely prefer bigger photos (so you can se more) for the same lost of bandwith...

Just my opinion...

IT

[Johnny Maldiva]

I agree with a previous poster; bandwidth may be an issue. Depends on the financial status of the board and whether it can cope with increased BW. It also may put some women's identity at danger as videos generally don't obscure faces well, unless it's shot from a specific angle.

[Cybertron]

I don't think adding videos would be useful to this site. The photos and the threads are more than enough. Plenty of video porn sites for jerking off.

If you're planning on hosting the videos on you're web server it does not consume much bandwidth since it uses the UDP protocol which has a lower overhead.

[Romano V]

Take a look on my video in Dnipropetrovsk last week here on youtube you can put videos if they are soft like mine and see to all mongers by the link : http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=kuAtu86StBU

Enjoy your trip

[HarryR]

I've uploaded some of my videos to a site and almost all of them are "Private" which means you can only see them if you have the link. The only ones who will get the link are people with a PM function on this site and have contributed constructively to this site. They will also have to e-mail me from a REAL e-mail address (ie not Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail and so on) to my real e-mail address.

I want to help this site is my main motivation.

Sure the quality is not great, the photography is not the best, but it is all real action. Nothing something from a posed porn film, although it does have that as well.

Harry Rose.

PS. I don't get any pay from Jackson.

[Mugroso]

I have begun posting video on my site and have some stuff I won't post on my site but I would love to share some of that video with the guys here on ISG.

In the meantime how can I get the nasty shit out to you guys?

Mugroso

[Fawn The Guyver]

15sec ? this is a bit short.
We can take WMV the quality is ok size is ok too. I don´t mind files up to 100MB
and WMV in this size would have a lot of minutes.
But when WMV is still to big for you then RM :-P

[Aunsa]

I would be all for it, as i love to view the current photos on this site, and it would enhance the site that bit more. But I feel that there should be a limit to the size of the video's and recording time, i.e. 15 seconds per clip as otherwise they will take up far too much space!

Thanks,

[Fawn The Guyver]

A torrent server is no problem I have set up one, but not everyone can use torrent. I think about a fileshare service like:

http://www.filefactory.com
or
http://www.rapidshare.de
or
http://www.sexuploader.com


I think this would be the best solution. But if ppl want use torrent no problem I can open my torrent server to public in few minutes.

[Muratlale4]

I believe that showing movies would give this site an edge over many of the appearing knock of sites. And as for the bandwith it is easy to solve. Just use the Torrent platform, this way your own bandwith wont be taxed too much.

[XXL]

i wouldn't contribute videos nor be too keen to view videos, especially if they risk using up a lot of ressources and create problems with the site.

the core of this site is good reporting and peer review of the reports. even pics do more harm than good imho because they attract voyeurs and encourage faking, not to speak of the (unrresolved) issue of the girls' consent to appear on the www.

i'm only arguing from the point of view of a (non-paying) senior member. videos might make sense from a business point of view, as a way to finance the site.