General Reports

[Smoothy]

your impression of her in the flesh, much better that her photo IMHO.

My impression of her in the flesh was exactly the same as in the photo. A unique and wild looking girl. One look at that photo and nobody will deny that.

[EihTooms]

I remember the sausages they push around on that cart look so good to me. Finally I could not resist and had to try one. I am sure you guys do not believe I ate the sausage because I am not posting a picture of it. But what I can tell you is that it tasted horrible. Not even sure it was sausage. Anyone have any idea what it really is?

Okay. I did decide to post the glamour shot of the sausage, but I promise you I did try one. Why would you have any doubt that I bought the sausage?

LOL. Sorry, Mr. E, I am inclined to cast aspersions on you and your credibility in this regard since a photo of just the sausages alone could have been posted by anybody, even some poor 65 year old Caucasian loser who is plagued by being roundly rejected by those horrible tasting sausages time after time.

Got any pics of you actually biting into one of those sausages? Unless we see that, there is no way to accept that it happened.

[EihTooms]

Not at all. I think that photo of Ice very well represented exactly what she looks like.

...

She's not beautiful, but I consider her sexy.

...

No text description can tell the story better than a photo.

See, imo that first statement does not contradict my point. Even though "does not look like the photos" is one of the more often repeated refrains here, I conceded that one could use a photo in order to locate a particular girl in a bar. My point wasn't that a photo would not "look" at all like the girl. Just that it does not tell the story about whether the girl is fuckable or doable or not.

The second statement agreed with my point exactly.

Finally, your third text statement actually DID tell your story, your impression of her in the flesh, much better that her photo IMHO.

[Syzygies]

Syzgies is still drooling over that one photo I posted of Ice from Crazy House a while ago. Had I not posted the photo, the post wouldn't even have gotten a notice.

Just in case others don't recognise your satire.

I can't recall the pic of Ice now. OF no interest at all. I know who she is. I call her Geronimo due to the level of war paint. I have never spoken to her at all or just declined if she approached. Face is too boy like for me and piercings were too much at one time. Not my taste at all even if is a raunchy girl. Prefer more delicate look. Sillies bore me too.

The last guy that posted pics of pretty girls consistently was Nocbj4 me. Since he went, the Photo gallery has been generally not worth opening.

I got to see pics from some Buddies who do not put them on the forum. So it did happen in case of Natty and some others. Yes there can be bullshit artists too. Allow for all possibilities. Some posters don't see the point to invent bullshit posts.

[Smoothy]

Dicks with genital warts?

Bingo. They aren't selling those to make money, they just sell them for a laugh.

[Mogwai]

Not even sure it was sausage. Anyone have any idea what it really is?

Dicks with genital warts?

[Smoothy]

And what happens if a poster has sex with someone far less attractive than the reader imagined? Nothing, imo. I think you found that out with regard to Ice. For you and perhaps for 1,000 other guys, sitting in the presence of Ice turned you on in ways her photo could never in a million years convey, right?

Not at all. I think that photo of Ice very well represented exactly what she looks like. She's not my type, but I had to do her since she was so unique looking. I think every guy who goes to that bar should give her a try simply because she's got such a unique look. I've never seen any other girl like that anywhere in the world. She's not beautiful, but I consider her sexy. That photo let everyone know exactly what I was talking about when referring to her. No text description can tell the story better than a photo.

[Franciscass]

The validity of posts on the forum has always existed. Personally I couldn't give a rat's ass whether somebody's post about an encounter is true or not especially if they are well written and entertaining as some of them are.

Why would I care whether it happened or not. If a member's posts are irritating simply use the ignore button and the problem goes away. Why continue reading and taking issue with the poster. I don't get it.

I do however take exception to shilling and misleading posts if they are intended to entice readers into visiting particular establishments or girls they are in some way associated with.

[Mr Enternational]

Yet their photos might make them appear to be super hot. Photos often mean near to nothing when it comes to sex. So I don't see the point in providing that kind of perspective.

I remember the sausages they push around on that cart look so good to me. Finally I could not resist and had to try one. I am sure you guys do not believe I ate the sausage because I am not posting a picture of it. But what I can tell you is that it tasted horrible. Not even sure it was sausage. Anyone have any idea what it really is?

Okay. I did decide to post the glamour shot of the sausage, but I promise you I did try one. Why would you have any doubt that I bought the sausage?

[EihTooms]

Nobody said they didn't have sex with "anyone". They just likely had sex with a girl far less attractive than they claim. A photo tells the story. They don't have to post themselves having sex with the girl or even a photo of them with the girl, they can simply post a photo that is obviously not a glamour shot and we can take them for their word. At least it gives more perspective than a claim in text.

I've posted hundreds of pics on this forum over the years. It's not difficult. Some guys like some of the girls and others don't. But the photos speak volumes. Syzgies is still drooling over that one photo I posted of Ice from Crazy House a while ago. Had I not posted the photo, the post wouldn't even have gotten a notice.

And what happens if a poster has sex with someone far less attractive than the reader imagined? Nothing, imo. I think you found that out with regard to Ice. For you and perhaps for 1,000 other guys, sitting in the presence of Ice turned you on in ways her photo could never in a million years convey, right?

By contrast, I might sit next to someone 2-3 posters here claim is their very high and never to accept a compromise standard/spec for 30 minutes with my hand on her bare thigh and not sprout so much as half a woody. Yet their photos might make them appear to be super hot. Photos often mean near to nothing when it comes to sex. So I don't see the point in providing that kind of perspective. Maybe as a way to identify someone in a bar search I suppose.

Imo, barring extremes of age, weight or physical deformity that take a girl off the list, photos have very little to do with telling the story when it comes to fuckable, doable or even damned sexy girls I and perhaps many, many others might be willing to pay money to be with when out mongering.

[Smoothy]

In that case, there are only 2-3 posters here who have ever had sex with anyone. And that many isn't even a certainty. How often do we see pics in these threads of people engaging in actual sex acts? On the rare occasions we do, how do we know the guy in the pic is really the poster or that the girl is the one he is reporting on?

You're not counting Line screen shots or pics of girls sitting next to a guy, smiling at the camera as proof that actual sex occurred at any time between them are you?

Nobody said they didn't have sex with "anyone". They just likely had sex with a girl far less attractive than they claim. A photo tells the story. They don't have to post themselves having sex with the girl or even a photo of them with the girl, they can simply post a photo that is obviously not a glamour shot and we can take them for their word. At least it gives more perspective than a claim in text.

I've posted hundreds of pics on this forum over the years. It's not difficult. Some guys like some of the girls and others don't. But the photos speak volumes. Syzgies is still drooling over that one photo I posted of Ice from Crazy House a while ago. Had I not posted the photo, the post wouldn't even have gotten a notice.

[Blanquiceleste]

In that case, there are only 2-3 posters here who have ever had sex with anyone. And that many isn't even a certainty. How often do we see pics in these threads of people engaging in actual sex acts? On the rare occasions we do, how do we know the guy in the pic is really the poster or that the girl is the one he is reporting on?

You're not counting Line screen shots or pics of girls sitting next to a guy, smiling at the camera as proof that actual sex occurred at any time between them are you?

Hey, I was not the guy who made that preposterous statement. 5555.

[Blanquiceleste]

Same in PH. If she says she's 18, it normally means she's turning 18 this year or next.

Same story in Cambodia. On my recent trip last month I met a girl at a bar near the Pontoon area. In the bar she said 22. I barfined her and took her to my hotel. At the hotel reception the guy checked her ID and told me she is not even 17 yet. I gave her $10 and sent her on her way. This is why I prefer a hotel which enforces a strict ID check policy.

[Goferring]

If a girl in Jakarta tells you she is 18 or 19, she is likely 14 or 15. So it's best to check their ID first.

Same in PH. If she says she's 18, it normally means she's turning 18 this year or next.

[Smoothy]

I'd like to bring up a point that most girls who say they are 18 or 19 are really older

I think that's true in the USA, but it's definitely not true in Jakarta. If a girl in Jakarta tells you she is 18 or 19, she is likely 14 or 15. So it's best to check their ID first.