Pattaya Reports

[Mr Enternational]

You have been fooled many times without knowing it. You will keep being fooled by pictures and appearance. Where did you find your so called statitistics? Stop being stubborn, you are wrong and you will keep being wrong.

You are making a dumb statement. I could just as well say that you have fucked ladyboys many times without knowing it. You will keep fucking them because from their appearance you don't really know. How are you going to prove that you have not? It is trying to prove a negative. You might as well have said that I have seen many aliens without knowing it. I can not prove to you that I have not seen any aliens. But until you can show me the ladyboys that have fooled me, you have no argument sir. I know one thing for sure. The ladyboy that the OP posted sure was not one that fooled me!

[MongerForSex]

Show us this group sir. Is there some secret lair that they are being held in? Even when they have those pageants and shows you can tell that the mfs are dudes. Maybe the statement needs to be clarified to say 99.99% of the ladyboys that the average monger will ever see on a dating site profile or in person at some venue or walking down a normal street, I can tell they are not female. If that wasn't the case, they could just pass themselves off as women and nobody would ever be the wiser. But instead there is a separate venue called ladyboy bars to notify those of us who may not carry around medical equipment in order to distinguish ladies from ladyboys.

You have been fooled many times without knowing it. You will keep being fooled by pictures and appearance. Where did you find your so called statitistics? Stop being stubborn, you are wrong and you will keep being wrong.

[Mr Enternational]

To take a sanctimonious approach and say correct 99.99% of the time is a show of ignorance. What one sees on the street will likely not be the very best of what a LB can look like as they likely don't have the financial backing to get surgery done past a boob and nose job. There are LBs out there who will shave bone on their face to get better lines and take off the Adam's apple. Take a group of LBs who have the best surgery done,

Show us this group sir. Is there some secret lair that they are being held in? Even when they have those pageants and shows you can tell that the mfs are dudes. Maybe the statement needs to be clarified to say 99.99% of the ladyboys that the average monger will ever see on a dating site profile or in person at some venue or walking down a normal street, I can tell they are not female.

If that wasn't the case, they could just pass themselves off as women and nobody would ever be the wiser. But instead there is a separate venue called ladyboy bars to notify those of us who may not carry around medical equipment in order to distinguish ladies from ladyboys. All the money in the world is not going to give them smaller heads. Speak to any artist that draws people and ask them if there is a difference between drawing males and drawing females.

"MEN HAVE BIGGER HEADS AND LONGER ARMS AND LEGS than women, relative to body size. Sources differ on comparative limb length but they all agree women have smaller, lighter heads & necks."

"To illustrate this point, this is what happens when a man is drawn with female proportions and vice-versa."

https://design.tutsplus.com/articles...--vector-19869

[Kickoffs]

To take a sanctimonious approach and say correct 99.99% of the time is a show of ignorance. What one sees on the street will likely not be the very best of what a LB can look like as they likely don't have the financial backing to get surgery done past a boob and nose job. There are LBs out there who will shave bone on their face to get better lines and take off the Adam's apple. Take a group of LBs who have the best surgery done, and the 99.99% claim doesn't exist though it's just sample size. If you see a FL who looks like a LB but was born a natural female, you're not on the 99.99%. In a hobby like this in Thailand, most will err on the side of safety. There are plenty of punters who have been fooled though you won't hear about it perhaps due to embarrassment and how most places card any FL.

[MongerForSex]

Hey, Doc, I don't want to say those are two contradictory statements. But if a dude can't think of any number of excuses for bedding an ugly woman every now and then he has just been lucky in never being seen by his friends on the way to a hotel with one. (insert non existant wink emoticon here)

Meaning: There is absolutely no excuse for travelling miles to stay for free in a run down favela shack to fuck ugly shanks when you can afford to fuck stunners in a hotel.
You may have been fooled by pictures and appearance without knowing it. But if you can't think of any number of excuses every now and then either you have just been lucky in never knowing you were wrong and fooled .

[EihTooms]

I am 100 percent straight...
...
...there is no excuse for bedding ugly women.

Hey, Doc, I don't want to say those are two contradictory statements. But if a dude can't think of any number of excuses for bedding an ugly woman every now and then he has just been lucky in never being seen by his friends on the way to a hotel with one. (insert non existant wink emoticon here)

[MongerForSex]

I don't know what MongerForSex meant by "examining them inside", if he actually said it that way. But I would think a separation of labia with your fingers, checking for depth and testing to see if manual or oral stimulation will produce convincing amounts of self-lubrication ought to produce 100% certainty. I don't think I'd need to whip out a speculum and start digging in wearing a light-equipped miner's helmet. Then again, once I have stuck my finger in and so on, is it too late? Have I already had "sex" with a ladyboy? LOL.

I am 100 percent straight and I have examined many men and transexuals, I performed many biopsies even on dicks and ass because it's my job to examine skin and find the right infectious disease (non-sexual transmitted disease or sexual transmitted disease). There are many ways to know ladyboys but never from pictures or just by looking at them. You may also mistake a woman for a man. Like a member says in the Brazil thread. Being fooled from a picture or from watching is ok but there is no excuse for bedding ugly women.

[MongerForSex]

LOL. That was really weird. As if chopping off their dicks magically makes them look like a female. They still look like the same dude with long hair and makeup as they did before.

I was in an argument in the Brazil thread with MongerForSex last week. He was telling me that he is a doctor and that the only way to tell if someone was really a girl or a guy was by examining their insides. I said he could have saved a bunch on medical school by just buying some glasses. He claims I have some special power to be able to tell a male from a female by just looking at them. Glad to know there are others out there like me with the same special power.



If what he is saying was truly the case then we would all be on here talking about how we mistakenly took a ladyboy because we thought it was a woman. But those stories are few and far between on this board.

I studied general medicine, dermatovenereology and infectology for over 10 years and know what I am talking about. I don't need to buy glasses. Above all, I don't need to be teached by a folk that doesn't know anything about medicine.

1 man in 500 men suffer from this condition (Klinefelter syndrome).

https://medlineplus.gov/klinefelterssyndrome.html

https://www.icliniq.com/qa/feminine-...ne-please-help#gref.

Men starting hormone therapy before puberty can change bone structure. The bone structure doesn't change in adults undergoing HRT for gender transition purposes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transg...rmone_therapy_(male-to-female).

You will always be fooled when watching pictures. You have been fooled so many times without knowing it.

[EihTooms]

How do you know you are right 99.9999% of the time? Do you always ask if someone is a ladyboy if you have a suspicion? I don't think so because according to you it so obvious almost 100% of the time that you don't need to ask.

And how about the natural born ladies who look like ladyboys? We all know there are quite a lot of them in Thailand. So maybe they are the ones that fool you every now and then LOL.

I pride myself in being able to identify ladyboys even from a distance and have never found myself facing a man-made naked vagina in my bed. But I could never claim to being able to identify "all" ladyboys based on outside observation alone. And certainly not from a still photo. It gets easier if there is a video clip and easier than that if you see one up close. As you have pointed out, how in the world could anyone substantiate a claim that he has accurately identified "all" of the ladyboys he has ever seen in a photo or passing by on the street? That's like saying I can tell 100% of the time when a man is wearing a toupee. Well, in fact, like everyone I can only tell when it is an obvious one. There are major Hollywood stars who wore toupees until they were very old and most of their fans never had a clue because they were the best money could buy.

In my case, I'm talking about seeing a ladyboy from a moderate distance where a seasoned Thai monger friend says something like, "Hey, look at that gorgeous chick over there!", and I say no that's a ladyboy. As he approaches closer it is obvious to both of us I called it right. Those are the only ones I can reasonably claim to be accurate about.

I don't know what MongerForSex meant by "examining them inside", if he actually said it that way. But I would think a separation of labia with your fingers, checking for depth and testing to see if manual or oral stimulation will produce convincing amounts of self-lubrication ought to produce 100% certainty. I don't think I'd need to whip out a speculum and start digging in wearing a light-equipped miner's helmet. Then again, once I have stuck my finger in and so on, is it too late? Have I already had "sex" with a ladyboy? LOL.

On your final point, I have at least twice now met natural born Thai females on the dating sites that looked fine in their photos but had me suspecting they might be a ladyboy on first meeting. However, it was borderline enough and the girl was intriguing enough in many other ways for me to forge ahead and take it as far as I could, being fully prepared to back away like a cat held over a bucket of water if it went badly. Yet, swear to god, those girls turned out to be genuine females right down to so some of the best, well self-lubricated humping, pumping and more sex without their leaving my sight I have ever had. They were just a bit more androgynous/tomboyish in appearance than most. I am sure if I had not engaged in conversation enough to hear their voice and had not met them under a dating site situation, I would most certainly have dismissed them as ladyboys on the street. And I would have been wrong.

[Mogwai]

As NB said, 99.9999% of the time I can tell that it is not really a woman

How do you know you are right 99.9999% of the time? Do you always ask if someone is a ladyboy if you have a suspicion? I don't think so because according to you it so obvious almost 100% of the time that you don't need to ask.

And how about the natural born ladies who look like ladyboys? We all know there are quite a lot of them in Thailand. So maybe they are the ones that fool you every now and then LOL.

[Mogwai]

With their panties on what's the difference? Posties still look like ladyboys to me even though they may think of themselves as girls. In either case I believe I can spot a ladyboy or at least have a suspicion that one is 99.9999 % of the time.

Having a suspicion is easy. Identifying them 99.9999 % of the time is not that easy.

[Falcon 95]

I don't get your logic. The girl said she would accept 1500 but you are looking for reasons to pay more. You don't need to be a regular. You don't need to buy any drinks. You don't need to offer more. All you need to do is send her a message and wait for her to come.

I have said time and time again that these chicks will take 1000 - 1200 for LT, but the moment you step into that bar or gogo you become the rich foreign ATM that is expected to spend, spend, spend. All of that is not needed or expected outside of those 4 walls. You would have proved that to yourself had you just sent the girl a message or made her come with you right then.

I don't blame you since you and I are very different.

Perhaps I didn't make it clear enough in the original post. The girl said OK right away without thinking. Then after thinking about it for literally 5 seconds, she said, "OK, maybe tomorrow". That was a no. How do I know? Because I was there. In my experience (yours might differ), Thai girls don't like to say no to potential customers. It reduces their customer base. Instead, they use phrases like "maybe tomorrow". Working girls do not care or worry about tomorrow. They only care about tonight. Again, that has been my experience so far.

I did not message her the next day because I knew she would not come for 1,500 LT. Her going rate is 3,000ST and 5,000 LT. (And yes, the going rate is highly inflated, as many would agree.) But if that was my going rate, I also would not accept a 1,500 LT offer, unless I was really desperate for cash. And the girl did not look desperate. In fact, she looked very happy.

Also, I don't know what would have happened if I had tried to make her come with me that night. (as you had suggested) Maybe it would have worked. Maybe not. Again, I did not try because that is not my style.

I understand that you get your girls for 1,000 to 1,200 LT and that's truly admirable. (Many here, myself included, do not seem to be able to achieve that feat.) I know you said it's as easy as you say it is. But that Tantra girl is not one of them.

[Mr Enternational]

So, his point was, if someone truly fooled you, you wouldn't know it. You're talking about obvious transvestites and transsexuals. It's not quite that easy. It's like a con man. With the best ones, you never know you're conned. Also a doc.

Actually what happened was another member posted photos of a person and said he didn't know this beauty was actually a dude until it was time for bed. I replied and said nobody could mistake that person for being a woman. I was then admonished and told that I was full of shit and there was no way I could tell that a man dressed up like a woman was not really a woman unless I examined the insides.

The administrator has since deleted the post containing the pictures of the obvious man with fake tits and fake hair and women's loungewear on. As NB said, 99.9999% of the time I can tell that it is not really a woman and out of a couple thousand chicks, I have never made the mistake of taking a dude thinking it was really a woman. There are no best ones. There are only guys that need glasses or guys that want to be fooled.

[Falcon 95]

If you look on youtube you will see there is a way to open that style safe by pretty much just banging on it with your fist or some other object.

I did.

Now, that poses a slight headache for the next time.

Maybe hiding the "dineros" under the mattress would be safer.

[Growtek]

LOL. That was really weird. As if chopping off their dicks magically makes them look like a female. They still look like the same dude with long hair and makeup as they did before.

I was in an argument in the Brazil thread with MongerForSex last week. He was telling me that he is a doctor and that the only way to tell if someone was really a girl or a guy was by examining their insides. I said he could have saved a bunch on medical school by just buying some glasses. He claims I have some special power to be able to tell a male from a female by just looking at them. Glad to know there are others out there like me with the same special power.

So, his point was, if someone truly fooled you, you wouldn't know it.

You're talking about obvious transvestites and transsexuals. It's not quite that easy.

It's like a con man. With the best ones, you never know you're conned.

Also a doc.