General Reports

[Turgid]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

There must be something to marriage as throughout human history billions of people have tried it.

[The Cane]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

It's extremely rare for me to find a woman in her 50's to be attractive. And when I do, it's usually somebody on TV LOL! That said, I have a colleague in her 50's who is hot and who I would fuck in a heartbeat! Otherwise, it's also exclusively women in their 20's and 30's for me too. And I've never had to adjust because, after becoming a committed monger, I've been able to just keep fucking hotties in their 20's and 30's, and I'm happy with that. I decided a long time ago for my own personal reasons that marriage (and all of the challenges that come with it) wasn't for me. Like you say, I calculated that marriage, for a variety of reasons (including but certainly not shallowly limited to how one's spouse might look 30 years later), was a very bad deal. Jackie888 mentions some of the pitfalls of marriage, but that's only the tip of the iceberg really.

So, despite societal expectations and pressure I decided not to go there, and to instead focus on my education, establishing a career, and earning and saving money. Then when I discovered the world of mongering where I could have as much sex as I could both handle and afford, well then that sealed it. That's all she wrote! Speaking of societal expectations, I remember when I landed my first professional job. It was coming right out of university, and one of the female professors stated that now that I was going to be employed, I needed to get married because, in her view, every gainfully employed man needed to be supporting dependents. Really? Uh, I don't think so! Well, I didn't always deflect the weight of the pressure that easily, but by the time I decided to become a pro monger many years ago, that did it for good. Monger for life!

[Jackie888]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

I'm in my mid-50's and women my age are grandmothers. If I date them, I run the risk of being attracted to their daughters who are in their 20's and 30's. IMHO, marriage is something one should do if one wants a family with kids. But just be aware that living together is tough and a majority of marriages end after 7 years according to statistics, so keeping her a wife for 30 years (20 to 50) requires a lot of effort. But hey if a 20 year old is willing to marry my 55 year old ass, I'll give it a try!

[Phordphan]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

If you both truly love each other, as your relationship (and yourselves) matures, physical beauty is replaced by something else. You each become attractive to the other for different reasons. Only the most shallow and self-absorbed people never experience this.

When I married my late wife I thought she was very attractive. Over the decades her looks faded, but her inner beauty grew. It sounds corny, but it was very true.

Now I have Mexican GFs of 50,49, early 40's, 30, and 25. And a Thai GF of 61. I appreciate each of them for their uniqueness. They all have varying levels of physical beauty, but I find that isn't the most important thing in a relationship. Much better to have a kind and sweet 7 than a psycho-***** 10.

[SmallWeinerGuy]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

Just look at older men who are attractive. DiCaprio throws women away after they turn 26. Pacino is 80 and just got his 29 year old girlfriend pregnant. Monika Lewsinsky was in her early 20's when she sucked Bill Clinton off. Basically some men age with their wives but I would argue that they're settling. The evidence suggests that men who are able to, generally trade in their wives for younger models.

[Baxter Slade]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

Good question.

I'm in my late 60's I can't even get a women in her 70's to give me a 2nd look in the states. To be honest I wouldn't want her to, due to 0.0 attraction.

Now add Tijuana to the equation I have a mid 30's GF who I'm very attracted to.

[Izl80]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

Not a gaurantee but meet her Mom and Auntie and see how they might look in their 50's.

Maintain your health and hopefully your sexual appetite in your 60's can match her sexual appetite in her 50's.

A woman that is easy on the eyes is way better than viagra any day!

Happy hunting Tijuana Amigo!

[StubbornMule]

I'm in my 30's and prefer girls in their 20's and 30's; women over 50 don't do anything for me. I'm curious if those of you in your 50's and 60's feel any attraction towards women in their 50's? It seems to me that marriage is a bad deal, in the sense that even if you marry a beautiful woman in her 20's, you take the risk that won't be attracted to her when she reaches her 50's. Any thoughts?

[SlickVick0303]

To me this is easy. It just depends on whether you have to fly.

If you can drive to Tijuana it's something you can do anytime. It's a great place to wedge in whenever. So go to Med and save Tijuana for last min trips.

If you have to fly either way do Med. The longer flight is not that big a deal once you're dealing with airports. You'll just lose an afternoon.

Unfortunately I do have to fly to either so it makes the decision tougher as both are quite the hike for me and thus don't get to visit easily.

On another note. I have been looking at other places in Mexico as Tom Jackin seems to conquer and find something everywhere! LOL. But I just don't see a place with a better easier set up than Tijuana. With just 5-6 days, I think most other towns take some work and tougher time just executing. I was in Mexico City, Puebla and Oaxaca and Jesus was it SOOOO hard to find any action.

I am leaning towards Medellin, just need to keep it to parque lleras and keep things simple I think. I would love to explore and find gems in other areas, but being solo and not knowing the lay of the land well yet. Don't want to explore only to strike out.

I've even contemplated a whole other destination like Panama City, Lima or Guatemala. All within the same price range flightwise, so just need to find the best option with some sure hits and a nice scenery.

[TjBrazil]

Where? Cancun, Ensenada, and Cabo were awful for this. Just bad.

Unfortunately, Cancun should be the greatest mongering destination in the world but isn't due to Mexican business models. I went into one strip club. Pretty nice place. I was the only guy there, and 20 girls stood up and were smiling at me to come sit down. They were so desperate for customers. The manager in a suit came to me to explain. It was like 300 dollars to be with a girl plus entrance fees or tips. They rather have no customers and charge outrageous prices that few bite on. The sweet spot there would be 150 dollars and the club makes money on drinks and entrance fee.

[AmericanPi]

To me this is easy. It just depends on whether you have to fly.

If you can drive to Tijuana it's something you can do anytime. It's a great place to wedge in whenever. So go to Med and save Tijuana for last min trips.

If you have to fly either way do Med. The longer flight is not that big a deal once you're dealing with airports. You'll just lose an afternoon.

Sorry Vets don't want to get slammed for this seemingly which is better post, but I legitimately want to put this out there as someone who has been to both Tijuana (many many times) and Medellin (just once).

I have 6 days free coming up in December that I can take off and this will be the last time I can make magic happen for the year. I am torn between what I know and exploring a bit more.

Here is my thought process:

Tijuana.

Pros:

1. Know it very well and even explored outside the Zona and found many good places to eat and drink and just overall hang out. Plus many spots still left to explore with confidence.

2. Easy to get to, I have GE so crossing back is not a hassle to me..

[Explorer8939]

I personally don't see the zona being around in 10 years. The land is too valuable at this point.

If you are referring to land near the border, there are many blocks to develop before the Zona is impacted. In other words, if the Zona Norte is going to be develop as part of some cross border complex, there's about 10 square blocks that would also have to be developed, those blocks north of the Zona Norte.

[SlickVick0303]

Sorry Vets don't want to get slammed for this seemingly which is better post, but I legitimately want to put this out there as someone who has been to both Tijuana (many many times) and Medellin (just once).

I have 6 days free coming up in December that I can take off and this will be the last time I can make magic happen for the year. I am torn between what I know and exploring a bit more.

Here is my thought process:

Tijuana.

Pros:

1. Know it very well and even explored outside the Zona and found many good places to eat and drink and just overall hang out. Plus many spots still left to explore with confidence.

2. Easy to get to, I have GE so crossing back is not a hassle to me.

3. Plenty of pickings. ZN makes it so easy to have fun and party (which I like) and get girls with no issues or hassle of getting girls to your spot or just get a bar girl / street girl and be done.

4. I have a regular there that I can BB with at will. She's been begging me to go see her. Seems like a slam dunk, but ass much as I like her and love BB, I am a creature that loves variety.

5. Seems like lots of girls new to the Escort Scene that I haven't taken part in for quite a while. If I do go, this seems my likely route.

Cons:

1. Been here so many times, it's kind of stale at this point. Always fun, but just meh lately.

2. Cost has gone WAY up. From BG to drinks and food. It is outrageous. I'm not complaining about money because I know it is part of it, but the cost per pop now is insane at the clubs.

Medellin.

Pros:

1. It is new and from what I saw on my last trip of only 2 days it was amazing. Granted I only saw Parque Lleras and loved the club scene.

2. Much Cheaper than Tijuana.

3. Women are amazing.

4. Cost for fun seems to be at or below Tijuana for a top tier girl (depending how you play it).

5. Much much more left to explore.

Cons:

1. Flight duration.

2. Wasting time on the unknown trying to figure things out.

3. food isn't the best.

4. Solo traveler. It is not as easy and fun being alone compared to Tijuana where it seems easier to immerse.

I am 90% (or so I would say) fluent in spanish so no issues in either location.

I do have to work remote so can mix things up. In Tijuana I know my way around and how things work so easy to go out. Medellin, I have no clue anything outside to Parque lleras.

I know this may be biased given where I am posting, but for those vets that have been to both locations, if you had to choose 1 spot where would you pick?

[Sol12]

If you live in SoCal I could see trying the escort scene in Tijuana. If you're flying in to San Diego, though, there are so many other places to go in Mexico that are beautiful, fun, or beautiful and fun. On top of that, you can forget about the hassle of PedEast / PedWest if you fly straight to a destination.

I agree that to fly to Tijuana isn't the best idea but the reason guys do has been discussed many times here. Lots of guys are married so to use San Diego as a business trip is simple. Others might not feel comfortable deep in a different country so Tijuana allows them to dip their toe in the water with the comfort of the US being minutes away.

I think most guys that begin to get comfortable with visiting a foreign country will soon try other destinations if they have the ability to. Tijuana is just a good place for beginners.

[Sol12]

I don't know about that, especially the 10-year time frame. It's not just the tolerance zone, but low-income housing that's existed there for decades. But Zona Norte as it exists now is actually a tourist boon and I think even the city realizes that. As mentioned in another post, Tijuana has (much) bigger fish to fry than redeveloping Zona Norte. The Zona won't be around forever but I don't see it going anywhere anytime soon.

In terms of geography, I guess you could say the Zona is on the "fringe" of the city, but if you consider the "heart" of Tijuana to be the Zona Centro / Zona Rio area, it's basically right there in a close-to-central location.

Like I said before the city moved people that were in an area to make room for the new Otay crossing, so if the government wanted to build a bridge they could move the residents. They are also building a new highway from Playas to the airport and if I remember correctly they had to move some residents for that as well.

The tolerance zone would just be moved to a different part of the city like they have in other parts of Mexico.