American Politics

[ScatManDoo]

Hearsay noun.

Information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor:

"according to hearsay, Bob had managed to break his arm".

Synonyms:

Rumor gossip tittle-tattle tattle idle chatter idle talk mere talk report stories tales tidbits bavardage on dit Kaffeeklatsch labrish shu-shu bruit.

What is pathetic is that guys like you cannot acknowledge the FACT that Nancy's January 6 committee is dishonest and totally discredited.

The committee's star witness, White House assistant Cassidy Hutchinson, testified under oath that President Trump lost control of himself after the Capitol riot began. This is a stunning charge. Too bad it is not true.

"The problem is her testimony is 100 percent hearsay. Nothing backs it up.

Axel Heist is 100% wrong in her assertion:

Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony contained numerous direct quotes coming from TrumpShit's own mouth.

Directly quoting criminals is not heresay.

It is often damning testimony accepted in all courts.

And often the key to tricky convictions.

Like TrumpShit will eventually get.

[PVMonger]

Hearsay noun.

Information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor:

"according to hearsay, Bob had managed to break his arm".

Synonyms:

Rumor gossip tittle-tattle tattle idle chatter idle talk mere talk report stories tales tidbits bavardage on dit Kaffeeklatsch labrish shu-shu bruit.

What is pathetic is that guys like you cannot acknowledge the FACT that Nancy's January 6 committee is dishonest and totally discredited.

The committee's star witness, White House assistant Cassidy Hutchinson, testified under oath that President Trump lost control of himself after the Capitol riot began. This is a stunning charge. Too bad it is not true.

"The problem is her testimony is 100 percent hearsay. Nothing backs it up. The committee could have illuminated Ms. Hutchinson's allegations by subpoenaing the Secret Service agents involved. The committee did not do that and did not explain why not.

But I can tell you why the Secret Service wasn't called. The agents would have contradicted Cassidy Hutchinson, that's why. ".

So here is the lack of integrity on the part of the committee: They knew Hutchinson testimony was third hand and could not be substantiated but they brought her forth anyway with the sole purpose to smear Trump. They knew that the leftwing media would run with the story and not question it for at least one new cycle. The key relevant point is that the committee refused to call the 2 FBI witnesses who had firsthand knowledge of what really happened. You do understand what firsthand means?

This is undeniable proof that the purpose of the committee was: 1. Smear Trump one more time and to hopefully prevent him from running for President, 2. To take the spotlight off the Biden administration's colossal economic failures before the November election, and 3. To throw some more red meat at party loyalists like yourself.

So, this public flogging has become a sanity test. I understand that you hate Trump. Fine, that is your right. But is your hatred clouding your judgement. To refuse to acknowledge the truth of what I have just described is irrational. There are no 2 sides to this. Just imagine if the situation was reversed and it was Republicans running a sham Soviet style public inquiry on Joe Biden with the outcome already preestablished before the first witness testifies. And further imagine that there were key 1st hand witnesses that were not called to testify under oath because their testimony would contradict the partisan hearsay testimony against Biden. You would be irate. Thus, the committee is totally discredited, and you would realize this fact if you were rational.

Hey AxeH. Stop parroting FUX Snooze.

When a person says "What 'personX' told me was that the Mango Mussolini grabbed for the steering wheel. ", they are not saying that they were there. They are saying what they were told. In an actual trial, this may or may not be classified as "hearsay" depending upon the circumstances. See, the issue is that Ornato told Hutchinson what was related to him by an agent who was in the vehicle and was present in the room when the story was told. The agent who was in the vehicle could have spoken up then-and there and called BS. He didn't. There's a cure for this, though. Just have the two parties that were in the freaking room when Ornato told Hutchinson the story testify under oath. But they haven't and they won't.

What you tRUMPers fail to grasp is that the committee hearings are not a trial. You may not like it but you had your chance to have an actual bi-partisan commission but the dumber-than-dogshit RethugliKKKants refused. So you made your bed and now you've got to sleep there.

Ahhh, yes, undeniable proof. You, of course, don't show any of this proof. Gee, I wonder why? Maybe because this proof exists in your mind only.

[PVMonger]

From reading PVMonger and his buddies, they sound like Woke Army Recruiters! Army Unsure Why Their New Slogan 'America Is Racist, You Should Die For It' Isn't Getting Traction. . .

FORT FARRAKHAN CA A USA Army spokesperson admitted concern today after the recent drop in recruitment numbers, despite the unveiling of the new "America Is Racist, You Should Die For It" slogan.

Colonel Rip Skirtsteak said the Army will continue its push for diversity in hopes of drawing more new recruits. "It's just really hard to find recruits who hate this country as they should but are also willing to put their lives on the line to protect it," Skirtsteak said as he adjusted his rainbow flag lapel pin. "We may have to switch to Plan be, which is to offer free gender reassignment surgery for everyone who signs up. ".

The USA Army, once regarded as the premiere fighting force in the world except for the far superior Marine Corps, has instead diverted its efforts to getting rid of people who love America while promoting more inclusivity. "I really just wanted to join the military to serve my country, provide a bright future for my family, and stand up for what I believe is right," a young cadet said as he walked away from his local recruitment center after being asked by the recruitment officer if he regretted his white middle-class upbringing.

At press time, the Army was in deep discussions to create more publicity and attract potential recruits. "If our new rainbow camouflage uniforms don't get people in line to sign up, then maybe our planned 'Drag Queen Boot Camp' will do the trick," Colonel Skirtsteak said as he closed his press conference and strutted in his red high heels back to his office. . . .

Like a typical RethugliKKKant, you copied-and-pasted without giving "credit" to your "source".

You realize that the opposite of "woke" is "asleep". So evidently you prefer going through life asleep as opposed to wide awake. After all, if you are asleep, the FUX Snooze messaging penetrates easier.

[Axel Heyst]

Calling it hearsay is idiotic.

Pathetic!

Hearsay noun.

Information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor:

"according to hearsay, Bob had managed to break his arm".

Synonyms:

Rumor gossip tittle-tattle tattle idle chatter idle talk mere talk report stories tales tidbits bavardage on dit Kaffeeklatsch labrish shu-shu bruit.

What is pathetic is that guys like you cannot acknowledge the FACT that Nancy's January 6 committee is dishonest and totally discredited.

The committee's star witness, White House assistant Cassidy Hutchinson, testified under oath that President Trump lost control of himself after the Capitol riot began. This is a stunning charge. Too bad it is not true.

"The problem is her testimony is 100 percent hearsay. Nothing backs it up. The committee could have illuminated Ms. Hutchinson's allegations by subpoenaing the Secret Service agents involved. The committee did not do that and did not explain why not.

But I can tell you why the Secret Service wasn't called. The agents would have contradicted Cassidy Hutchinson, that's why. ".

So here is the lack of integrity on the part of the committee: They knew Hutchinson testimony was third hand and could not be substantiated but they brought her forth anyway with the sole purpose to smear Trump. They knew that the leftwing media would run with the story and not question it for at least one new cycle. The key relevant point is that the committee refused to call the 2 FBI witnesses who had firsthand knowledge of what really happened. You do understand what firsthand means?

This is undeniable proof that the purpose of the committee was: 1. Smear Trump one more time and to hopefully prevent him from running for President, 2. To take the spotlight off the Biden administration's colossal economic failures before the November election, and 3. To throw some more red meat at party loyalists like yourself.

So, this public flogging has become a sanity test. I understand that you hate Trump. Fine, that is your right. But is your hatred clouding your judgement. To refuse to acknowledge the truth of what I have just described is irrational. There are no 2 sides to this. Just imagine if the situation was reversed and it was Republicans running a sham Soviet style public inquiry on Joe Biden with the outcome already preestablished before the first witness testifies. And further imagine that there were key 1st hand witnesses that were not called to testify under oath because their testimony would contradict the partisan hearsay testimony against Biden. You would be irate. Thus, the committee is totally discredited, and you would realize this fact if you were rational.

[JustTK]

Reading thru these comments, watching htem go backwards and forwards, round and round in circles, always trading in insults and making no progress. It makes me wonder why both sides set their bar so low?

It; s like listening to 2 sets of partisan sports fans arguing about their sports team - "you're so shlt its unbelievable", "you couldn't score in a brothel". The fans are so partisan and biased and so fixated in each other that neither set of supporters notices that both teams get relegated for finishing last and second last in the league! That's really it. Neither of you accept your own parties faults and just want to attack and blame the other, when the reality is that these 2 latest versions of the parties are possibly the worst representations of both parties in a long, long time, if not ever!

Furthermore, you both live under the same shared delusion. You are both deluded by what you think the Dem Party is. The Red side accuse it of being left wing, when the truth is it is a corporate elitist party, same as the Reps. And the Blue side wish it were left wing and continue to live under that delusion, in the vain hope that it is the party fo change, when the truth is it is a corrupt corporate elitist party that supports its sponsoors that buy its policy makers.

[EihTooms]

Methinks you need to lay off the booze in retirement. This is as laughable and unsubstantiated as any of the right wingnut conspiracy theories. Not to mention that this "mainstream media" obviously isn't very good at instigating these "knife's edge" elections given the landslides and many elections won by a comfortable margin over the last 50's. It's their job to present the sides of both campaigns during an election year and for the most part do a good job at it.

But this is as disingenuous as your false claim that Democrats haven't "presided" over any recessions or otherwise economic downturns while you cherry pick the data, picking what suits your agenda while ignoring that which doesn't. Yet the most hilarious hopefully booze induced claim in the unbridled hyper-partisan anti-Republican agenda was to reach way back and blame Lincoln for the Civil War. Lolol That's when he had no other choice besides allowing the nation to split. But the point is moot anyway as the roles have reversed in that the Republicans were the progressive party back them.

But anyway type me out another filibuster. You go on and on and on and people on both sides of the isle grow tired of reading and unraveling your protracted tripe. That's the aim. Bore them with bluster. LOL.

Please stop lying about what I post in order to promote your pro Repub Bothsiderism. I never said Dems never presided over a recession or otherwise economic downturn.

The term I use is "Great Recession" or "Great Repub Recession. " There has not been a Great Recession started or presided over by a Dem POTUS in at least 100 years. Only Repubs.

The time frame is 100 years, not "ever" and I have explained why multiple times.

When Mainstream Media engages in your brand of tortured Bothsiderism, repeating any nonsense notion that Republicans are no worse (or better) at handling the economy than Dems, often right in the middle of a Great Repub Recession or a Great Dem Recovery, without bothering to mention Repub potuses have produced and presided over every Great Recession and Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years and none of the Great Recoveries, Jobs Creation and Expansions while Dems have produced and presided over every Great Recovery, Jobs Creation and Expansion of the past 100 years and none of the Great Recessions and Jobs Destruction, particularly during an election year, that is by any definition "helping Repubs win elections. ".

It is only marinally more blatant pro Repub Bothsiderism (or False Equivalency claim) than your repeated suggestion that a relatively insignificant and brief mini recession under Truman post WWII and the utra brief mini one purposely induced under Carter in order to cool down an overheated economy that was creating too many jobs, neither of which saw a spike in the Unemployment Rate higher than 7. 8% and for a single month, is no different than the massive downturns seen under Hoover, Reagan, Bush and Trump, where millions of jobs were wiped out and unemployment rates skyrocketed into double digits, often for many months.

Or is it "cherry picking" and oh so unfair to Repubs' chances of winning elections on the always critical issue of The Economy in this election year?

Apparently you and MSM think so.

[EihTooms]

I think Trump will win.

Trump will run again only if he is confident that all of the election-denying QAnon Repub loons have been put in place at the state and local level to throw out enough ballots with likely Dem votes and only retain ballots with likely Repub votes in order to ensure his name will be called out as the "winner" on that year's January 6 no matter how many millions more votes and dozens more Electoral College awards his opponent actually earned.

And, apparently like every other Repub nominee from now on, he won't even risk getting the snot beat out of him by his Dem opponent again in real time in a live, televised Presidential debate because the Repub Party seems to have thrown in the towel and given up expecting anyone in their party to know anything about any important issue well enough to compete.

[Paulie97]

I am talking the Repub congratulating, Dem slamming spin MSM engages in during election time when it matters....The intention is to see that these election contests are decided on a knife's edge, how exciting, when all data, historical results and logic dictates there is no way it should be so.

Methinks you need to lay off the booze in retirement. This is as laughable and unsubstantiated as any of the right wingnut conspiracy theories. Not to mention that this "mainstream media" obviously isn't very good at instigating these "knife's edge" elections given the landslides and many elections won by a comfortable margin over the last 50's. It's their job to present the sides of both campaigns during an election year and for the most part do a good job at it.

But this is as disingenuous as your false claim that Democrats haven't "presided" over any recessions or otherwise economic downturns while you cherry pick the data, picking what suits your agenda while ignoring that which doesn't. Yet the most hilarious hopefully booze induced claim in the unbridled hyper-partisan anti-Republican agenda was to reach way back and blame Lincoln for the Civil War. Lolol That's when he had no other choice besides allowing the nation to split. But the point is moot anyway as the roles have reversed in that the Republicans were the progressive party back them.

But anyway type me out another filibuster. You go on and on and on and people on both sides of the isle grow tired of reading and unraveling your protracted tripe. That's the aim. Bore them with bluster. LOL.

[Travv]

From reading PVMonger and his buddies, they sound like Woke Army Recruiters! Army Unsure Why Their New Slogan 'America Is Racist, You Should Die For It' Isn't Getting Traction. . .

FORT FARRAKHAN CA — A USA Army spokesperson admitted concern today after the recent drop in recruitment numbers, despite the unveiling of the new "America Is Racist, You Should Die For It" slogan.

Colonel Rip Skirtsteak said the Army will continue its push for diversity in hopes of drawing more new recruits. "It's just really hard to find recruits who hate this country as they should but are also willing to put their lives on the line to protect it," Skirtsteak said as he adjusted his rainbow flag lapel pin. "We may have to switch to Plan be, which is to offer free gender reassignment surgery for everyone who signs up. ".

The USA Army, once regarded as the premiere fighting force in the world except for the far superior Marine Corps, has instead diverted its efforts to getting rid of people who love America while promoting more inclusivity. "I really just wanted to join the military to serve my country, provide a bright future for my family, and stand up for what I believe is right," a young cadet said as he walked away from his local recruitment center after being asked by the recruitment officer if he regretted his white middle-class upbringing.

At press time, the Army was in deep discussions to create more publicity and attract potential recruits. "If our new rainbow camouflage uniforms don't get people in line to sign up, then maybe our planned 'Drag Queen Boot Camp' will do the trick," Colonel Skirtsteak said as he closed his press conference and strutted in his red high heels back to his office. . . .

[PVMonger]

That is classic whataboutism. To a dumb Dem, the answer to what a fascist, misogynist, homophobe, and xenophobe is a Republican, and it is does not matter if that Republican is a freedom loving, foreign, gay woman.

The king of whataboutism, that is.

You have been told, in many posts by me and others, what constitutes fascism, homophobism, xenophobia and misogyny. We have provided links. We have shown you proof.

Your response has been the usual RethugliKKKant response of deriding the sources and calling them "fake news".

We all know that a RethugliKKKant's idea of "freedom" is the ability to tell others what they can read, what they can think, who they can love and what they can do with their bodies. Nothing else matters to you. Especially democracy because what RethugliKKKants want is an autocracy, preferably headed by Agent Orange or one of his ilk.

[EihTooms]

I read this every few days and see the same thing all the time. Ultra left and crazy right. I used to think that ET was just an over the top Dem lover (and no I am not right wing and can't stand Trump) but first calling Bill Maher a Republican lover and now this CNN pro Republic nonsense has me wondering if he is truly addled.

Someone else who has been sound asleep oblivious about this for at least 40 years?

The record of results for Repub stewardship vs Dem stewardship (well, vs anything really) was already abysmal pre Reagan. During and after Reagan it has been spectacularly horrific.

No way should a Repub have come within 30 percentage points of winning an election since Reagan's first term as potus.

Yet, they have.

Mainstream Media need a close horse race contest every time. It does not want a foregone conclusion of a Dem blowout win every 2-4 years.

Consequently, MSM must elevate and praise Repub legislative and stewardship nothingness and failures and denigrate and slam Dem legislative and stewardship successes.

Otherwise known as "helping Repubs win elections. ".

Oh, I don't mean CNN and other MSM sources ignore all those Repub failures and Dem successes or lie about them all the time like FUX News does. Particularly during non election years when it really doesn't matter or effect them financially in the furture. After all, they are real news sources.

I am talking the Repub congratulating, Dem slamming spin MSM engages in during election time when it matters.

The intention is to see that these election contests are decided on a knife's edge, how exciting, when all data, historical results and logic dictates there is no way it should be so. And, guess what, sometimes the knife's edge cuts juuust enough the wrong way for America and a Repub squeaks out a win despite losing the vote by 500,000 to 3,000,000 votes against him.

Oh well. Too bad. But MSM got what they wanted and worked so hard for; an exciting horse race right down to the wire. Or was it a knife fight? Whatever.

In October 2020, MSM pundits were actually providing free Trump campaign ads by wondering aloud why was Trump talking about this "rigged election" nonsense instead of, you know, "touting his economy? Because, hey, most Americans think Repubs are better than Dems at handling the economy. ".

LOL. Tout what economy? The millions upon millions of jobs Trump's economic decisions and stewardship wiped out? The collapse of global supply-chains due to his methods and madness more than any other world leader?

But, gee, to hear MSM's spin on it you'd think Trump had produced some terrific economic results worth touting! LOL.

Again, otherwise known as, "helping Trump win an election. ".

Come on, guys. This decades long election year pattern for MSM spin is not so subtle and nuanced that anyone capable of booting up a computer and typing out the occasional coherent sentence would miss it.

[Villainy]

Adjust to what? Not reading twitter? Not following Trump in the news? How did you suffer so with Trump?

WTF are you talking about? I have been short Biden's market and done better than most. Lately, there has been some pain but I have added to my positions. I have done better than anyone else I know.

Are you so dense you do not see the suffering of others? For a guy making constant noise about Trump, you are even more self-absorbed than he is.

There would be hundreds of thousands of people who would not be dead now in Ukraine and Afghanistan had Trump been re-elected but it is worth it for you. You do not have to deal with hit mean tweets.

You've been challenged a number of times in the 'Stupid Shit in Medellin' forum to back up your claims. You haven't invested in anything AND the investments you claimed that you made have deteriorated completely. You're now underwater. All you had to do to shut up the detractors is copy your April and June statements and redact your name and account number. If it is too much trouble I'm sure some 8 year old could do it for you in 2 to 3 minutes. You made up your fantasy trades and bragged about how well you were doing. Truth is a month and a half later, even those hypothetical trades are losers.

[Xpartan]

Hutchinson's testimony was 100% hearsay? Not even close.

First, hearsay only applies to a trial. Are the hearings a trial? Nope. So I call BS on your statement for that reason alone.

Need more proof? How about this: https://lawandcrime.com/jan-6-commit...e-complicated/ or https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...imony-00042985.

But you'll just call it "fake news" because that's what "FUX snooze" says it is, right?

Calling it hearsay is idiotic.

First, you testify under oath and second, you tell them what you know. You're not supposed to prove anything.

Trump says I don't fucking care they're armed.

Medows tells you Trump didn't want to save Pence from a lynching mob.

Your job, as a witness, to tell what you've heard and seen, not to prove it.

How is it hearsay?

Pathetic!

[ScatManDoo]

Almost 70% of what CNN says is just crap or false. Hopefully sooner or later someone will file a lawsuit against them and put them out of there misery.

I wonder if your English teachers were finally put out of "their misery".

[Elvis 2008]

Think I've answered that question. Hey, I've learnt how to adapt, adjust and persevere under Agent Orange

Adjust to what? Not reading twitter? Not following Trump in the news? How did you suffer so with Trump?

and you claim to be a smart guy, so....

learn to ADAPT, ADJUST and PERSEVERE under President Biden. Man-Up, dude! You'll get your chance in 2024.

WTF are you talking about? I have been short Biden's market and done better than most. Lately, there has been some pain but I have added to my positions. I have done better than anyone else I know.

Are you so dense you do not see the suffering of others? For a guy making constant noise about Trump, you are even more self-absorbed than he is.

There would be hundreds of thousands of people who would not be dead now in Ukraine and Afghanistan had Trump been re-elected but it is worth it for you. You do not have to deal with hit mean tweets.