Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 9,631 to 9,645 of 14398
-
09-21-21 19:49 #4768
Posts: 1604Vaccine lunacy
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Now I realize that this might be a difficult concept for you to grasp, but 0.2% is an incredibly low number. Out of every 1,000,000 fully vaccinated people, only 2,000 will experience a breakthrough infection. That means that the other 998,000 people can't spread COVID.
Unvaccinated people are also 4 x more likely to catch COVID than vaccinated people. https://www.wnct.com/health/coronavi...o-catch-covid/.
And now insurance companies are beginning to institute "cost sharing" for COVID treatments. How long will it be before they change that to "unvaccinated people" will be responsible for 100% of their medical bills. What this means is unvaccinated MAGAts will risk death and their family's bankruptcy just to "own the libs". Brilliant.
-
09-21-21 19:08 #4767
Posts: 1604I'll try this once more.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I went through numerous old posts of yours. I found many instances of you saying, essentially, "actions have consequences". Any business has a right to make whatever decisions they want as long as they don't violate federal law. Businesses can decide to pay no more than minimum wage. You have the option of working there or not. But if you quit, the state might deny your unemployment claim. Actions have consequences. You have the option to speed or not while driving. But if you do and get caught, you might receive a ticket. Actions have consequences. Most school districts require certain vaccinations. You are free to not have your kids vaccinated but the school district is free to decline admitting them. Actions have consequences.
Just in these examples, any business can mandate vaccinations. You are free to refuse but they can fire you. Actions have consequences.
Why is it that the QOP is "free and easy" with the "actions have consequences" line when it involves Democrats or gays or POC but whine, yell and bloviate when the "actions have consequences" line is used on them? Hypocrisy maybe?
-
09-21-21 18:51 #4766
Posts: 2374Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 17:54 #4765
Posts: 3497Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 17:10 #4764
Posts: 1115Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 16:57 #4763
Posts: 1604Wtf?
Originally Posted by Golfinho [View Original Post]
I can't wait for all the wingers to find out that "they" (whoever "they" are) actually hid microchips in ivermectin, hid magnets in monoclonal antibodies and hid the "turn you gay" gene in hydroxychloroquine. BTW, "they" also hid the "genius gene" in the vaccine.
-
09-21-21 15:34 #4762
Posts: 3228Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
If the vaccine does not prevent transmission of the virus, then it should not be mandated.
But to a typical closed minded douche like you, whenever the government wants to take away personal freedom or choice, you are like, "Here, take it!
Why don't you give me all your money, you know, for your health? It is amazing how dense you are.
-
09-21-21 15:11 #4761
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 15:10 #4760
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Golfinho [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 15:07 #4759
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Would the democrat policy of allowing thousands of covid-infected Chinese to fly into the country daily have:
A) increased, or.
B) reduced.
The spread of covid? No need for a long-winded answer which nobody will read, just A or b. Thanks.
-
09-21-21 14:59 #4758
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
BTW do you agree with the democrat decision in California to legalize HIV-infected people having unprotected sex with others without telling them their health status?
-
09-21-21 14:54 #4757
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
This is completely different from the scam of the 2020 clown world fraud, in which tens of millions of ballots were spammed out all over the place to whoever, wherever; and then when Trump won the democrats / deep state had pallots of hundreds of thousands in reserve, 98% for Biden, which they delivered like magic to the necessary counting centers at 4 am (after they had inexplicably stopped the count, and forced out all the GOP observers).
Having the overwhelming majority of the electorate show up and vote in person on election day with photo ID is a basic prerequisite for election integrity. That is why every serious democracy does it.
The rest of your post is typically worthless, ill-conceived bunk.
Everyone who wants a photo ID has a photo ID. They are available easily and for free. If a US citizen doesn't have one, it's because he / she doesn't want one. Of course, it is more difficult for non-citizens to get a valid photo ID for voting, which is why the democrats want to remove the requirement to further aid their fraud efforts.
(As an aside, no doubt you and other dem douches are wildly in favour of the vaccine passport for everyone. I doubt you can even see the irony of demanding people prove not only their identity but their personal health status to go to a bar or supermarket, but letting them vote for the President of the United States with no verification whatsoever).
You also don't understand how the United States works. The clue is in the name. Elections are run state by state. No doubt bolsheviks like you would love to remove all the states and replace them with a centralized communist dictatorship minus the First and Second Amendment. But it ain't happening.
On election day, the polls are open from early in the morning to late at night. As with photo ID, anyone who wants to vote can easily do so. Some people don't, which is their right.
Finally, "gerrymandering" is entirely subjective. Politicians of all sides sometimes attempt to reshape districts to give them a better shot at re-election when they are in power.
For you to suggest that only one side does it, or that there is even any objective way of creating districts, simply exposes yet again your lack of basic understanding of the matter.
-
09-21-21 09:24 #4756
Posts: 5452Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I agree that it is sickening that anyone would dare to point the finger of blame regarding something relatively trivial toward the other side, the only side whose stewardship and legislation over the same 100 years produced all of the historically positive economic results, massive USA Jobs creation, etc and none of the major economic downturns or disastrous national security breaches.
To engage in the latter form of finger pointing is not only sickening, it is so counterproductive as to be downright anti American.
-
09-21-21 08:50 #4755
Posts: 5452Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 07:52 #4754
Posts: 1056It's All About You
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]