Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 2,326 to 2,340 of 14412
-
03-01-23 16:04 #12087
Posts: 1789Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
Then to home in a little on your dislike -.
- you don't like public sodomy.
- you don't like child grooming.
But I fail to understand why you hold a prejudice against gay folks then. Bcos:
- many gay people do not commit public sodomy nor child grooming; whereas.
- many non-gay people do commit public sodomy and child grooming.
So you should direct your grievance against sodomizers and child groomers in general, not against gay folk.
-
03-01-23 04:36 #12086
Posts: 3235Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
Bernie Sanders proposed making community college free. He was blown off as stupid and we were told we could not afford it when in fact it would cost $80 billion a year. We have already spent $100 billion on Ukraine for a war that we provoked with Russia. The globohomo agenda is funded by Wall Street and the military industrial complex to make certain money keeps coming to them by distracting from the real issues where Republicans and Democrats would agree. A bill that government pays for college will NEVER be voted on in my lifetime because Wall Street banks make too many $ off the loans, but a vote on military aid to Ukraine was a sure thing.
Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell have made disgusting amounts of money trading stocks on insider information. There will NEVER be a bill sent for a vote to ban Congressional insider trading in my lifetime, but you better believe they will pass some bill regarding hate speech.
With health care and the defense industry, you will NEVER see a bill sent for a vote on a public option of Medicare for all. I will also NEVER see an audit of the defense industry in my lifetime. However, you will see plenty of bills and laws aimed at limiting production of fossil fuels to "save the planet".
The Democratic douches here are like the cult members of true believers. Instead of empowering the people even with voting, they do not care about that. They only care if Democrats win. If the FBI rigs an election ot two, they are cool with that. As long as the Democratic douches subscribe to the globohomo agenda, issues like soaring education costs, Congressional insider trading, health care, and the out of control defense department will continue to be problems.
For all the shit said about Trump, he kept the peace. If he were re-elected, there would not have been a war in Ukraine. Instead of recognizing that, we see Democratic douches wearing their yellow and blue lapels and criticizing anyone who questions the end game in Ukraine or questions spending $100 billion earmarked for killing people as a Putin puppet.
Cheering on war and demonizing the man who would have prevented it is part of the globohomo agenda. As long as they can keep red and blue bickering, the money will keep rolling in.
-
03-01-23 04:01 #12085
Posts: 3235Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
https://public.substack.com/p/fbi-me...ess-respond-to
Just like MSNBC should be known as spook network for all the former spies it has hired, Twitter and Facebook are loaded to the gills with presumably "former" FBI, NSA etc agents.
https://twitter.com/NameRedacted247
After learning that Twitter employs at least 15 former FBI agents, I searched Facebook. What I found is alarming.
Facebook currently employs at least 115 people, in high-ranking positions, that formerly worked at FBI / CIA / NSA / DHS:
17 CIA.
37 FBI.
23 NSA.
38 DHS.
Google currently employs at least 165 people, in high-ranking positions, from the Intelligence Community.
Google's Trust & Safety team is managed by 3 ex-CIA agents, who control "misinfo & hate speech. ".
Here's the breakdown:
CIA-27.
FBI-52.
NSA-30.
DHS-50.
ODNI-6.
Oh right, these are "former" agents and a "private" company. Yeesh. I have learned that many of these "former" employees are still getting benefits from their "former" employers.
If this is not censorship, then nothing is. If you watch the 3 minute video at the above link and get the facts and tell me that the FBI did not censor the Hunter Biden story, then you are not an American who believes in the Constitution. At this point, it is unarguable that this is censorship.
But if you are a Democratic douche, this is a non-story because Biden won.
-
02-28-23 22:41 #12084
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
That is perhaps the most egregious political scandal in American history, and must result in nothing less than the disbandment of the organizations involved.
BTW regarding Nixon / Watergate, LBJ was known to have spied on Barry Goldwater in 1964 https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-j...-lbjs-campaign.
But because LBJ was in favor of the nascent Globohomo Agenda which had just begun (the Immigration Act to destroy the country demographically; the "Great Society" to normalize welfare gibsmedats and single motherhood; the start of affirmative action, etc) he was given a pass, as all leftists are.
Indeed, elements of the FBI actually spied for him, showing that the rot in that organization began a long time ago.
-
02-28-23 22:32 #12083
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Elon Musk, a figure of similar stature to Zuckerberg, has stood up to the FBI and deep state by releasing the Twitter Files detailing FBI and other alphabet agency corruption and political interference in the election to support and protect the woke deep state globohomo candidate Biden. He is not languishing in prison.
Zuckerberg is just trying to pretend he is impartial, probably to save his failing platform which is dying. But the real scandal in all of this is the open bias and lies of the Washington deep state alphabet agencies who knew the laptop was real but pretended it was fake in order to interfere in the election. They are no longer fit for purpose and must be disbanded.
-
02-28-23 22:26 #12082
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
The authors and backer of the Act, including Chappaquiddick Ted Kennedy and the Jewish congressman Emanuel Celler (it was named the Hart-Celler Act) falsely promised Americans that the demographic balance of the country would not be changed.
As for homosexuals, I am opposed to their public sodomy parades but most of all their targeting of children for grooming with the ultimate goal of legalizing pedophilia (see my previous post).
-
02-28-23 22:18 #12081
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
And it is not a "business decision" to be stuck in years of costly legal hell. These ridiculous and overtly political cases should be thrown out at the first hurdle. As indeed they are the other way round.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
If you can allow an elementary school age boy to say he's a faggot, or change his gender, then he is already sexualized. It's not a huge step to saying that he can consent to sex with adults. Woke globohomo media are even trying to use the term "MAP" (Minor-Attracted Person) instead of pedophile, to condition and normalize people toward their ultimate goal of fucking little boys.
As for lesbians, they hardly exist in reality. Women's sexuality has always been fluid and based around trends of the time. Centuries ago, if one tribe defeated another, they would kill all the men and the women would save themselves by fucking / marrying the winners. Nowadays, because Globohomo hollyweird and media has made lesbianism trendy (at least in the cringe circles that certain urban sluts exist) some of them are declaring themselves to be lesbian. It is just another female strategy to gain attention and advance themselves in society.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
The current situation, in which aforementioned media, finance and hollywood attempt to silence any discussion of the above facts, is not sustainable and indeed deeply repressive.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
Tucker Carlson is excellent, and has earned his position as the most watched and trusted anchor in America. Some of the other people at Fox are good too, such as Brian Kilmeade. Newsmax and OAN have been decent from what I have seen of them. The Federalist is worth reading, and Breitbart still has its moments (though since Steve Bannon left it has become too hysterically Zionist). Andrew Anglin is one of the best living writers, hilarious and informative at a deep level. Vdare.com (which is currently undergoing the aforementioned deep state attack, having been debanked and attacked by Jewish finance and fake news) is compelling. The Washington Examiner is OK. Many more.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
But of course nobody was punished because the globohomo deep state swamp protects its own, just like Crooked Hillary Clinton wasn't punished for clearly breaking the law by using a private servers and deleting her emails while Secretary of State, and Sleepy Joe "10% for the Big Guy" Biden wasn't punished for openly boasting about threatening to withhold US govt loan while VP in order to force Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son's criminal activity in the country.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
"The FBI, through informants and undercover agents, hatched the kidnapping plot, served in the key leadership positions of the militia group, trained the militia members in military tactics, actively recruited participants, and funded much of the militia's activities. Then, when various members of the Watchman militia became uncomfortable with the kidnapping plot, with several quitting, the FBI's primary informant pushed the plot along, eventually becoming the militia group's leader. ".
January 6 was run along similar lines.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
That was indeed the case until 2016. However, the election of Trump and the growing rejection of woke Globohomo lunacy meant that the woke deep state was forced to begin censoring its opposition because its fake news and twisted message was being so thoroughly debunked. This made the Big Tech platforms publishers, as they were deciding what was to be posted and publicised, rather than simply allowing the free competition of ideas (something that the left can never do because its ideas are so utterly full of shit and wacky).
Big Tech must go back to being free speech platforms, not publishers. If not, its Section 230 privileges must be removed.
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
-
02-28-23 17:38 #12080
Posts: 1604Spot on
Originally Posted by CheckMate1 [View Original Post]
Gibberish is Chrissie's stock-in-trade. The more off-the-wall something is, the harder she pushes it.
Chrissie loves to use the term "heritage Americans" but forgets that she and every one of her ancestors are immigrants.
And actually, anal sex appeals to Chrissie very much. People who complain the loudest about something are usually the first ones to embrace it (in secret, of course).
-
02-28-23 17:32 #12079
Posts: 1604So
Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
Kinda blows your "all of the alphabet agencies lied" about the laptop thing, doesn't it?
-
02-28-23 04:06 #12078
Posts: 3235Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Laptop bit was total crap? LOL.
-
02-28-23 04:02 #12077
Posts: 3235Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
So any alphabet agency in the federal government can just go to Twitter or Facebook and say "We believe this is disinformation" and censor a story. They do not have to be factually correct just believing is enough.
So PVM, let us get off your Democratic douche agenda and your whataboutism and go with absolutes. Give me one non-partisan story that has political impact that an alphabet agency could not censor today. Given your ridiculous standard of what qualifies as censorship. Watergate never would have happened, and Nixon would have finished out his term.
-
02-28-23 03:52 #12076
Posts: 3235Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
-
02-28-23 03:50 #12075
Posts: 1789Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
And what did gay folk do to you that got you so angry with them? I don't like classical music, but I don't feel the need to insult people that do like it at every opportunity.
I don't think you are necessarily old-fashioned, just missing out.
-
02-28-23 02:43 #12074
Posts: 123Originally Posted by ChrisP [View Original Post]
You believe people shouldn't be allowed to file lawsuits because they feel that they have been harmed by discrimination. Plaintiffs don't pay lawyers or filing fees to go to court. And that it cost the business owner too much to defend their business practice. I believe that is a business decision.
You don't like gay people (men). Curious if you have the same animus toward gay women;.
You don't like jewish people;.
You don't like wall street, Big Tech, law enforcement, intelligent agencies, military industry complex.
You don't like "mainstream fake news media organizations". Who are the "real" news media organizations?
You believe there's a scandal of Lois Lerner https://www.wsj.com/public/resources...ts/IRS1023.pdf.
You like kidnapping plotters https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/final...-years-prison..
You don't like Big Tech (shadow) banning people, but you like other companies to actually ban people.
You believe "heritage Americans" will be replaced. By who?
And, anal sex does not appeal to you.
Got it!
-
02-27-23 22:34 #12073
Posts: 1044Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Which is more secure: an election in which people show up to vote in person with ID to verify their identity, on paper ballots which are held securely and counted under scrutiny from all parties on the night of the election?
Or hundreds of millions of ballots spammed out freely to every address in the country, "harvested" en masse from inner city ghettos, retirement homes and who knows where else by Soros- and Zuckerberg-funded democrat political operatives, and then republican scrutineers kicked out of the counting halls in democrat-run cities?