La Vie en Rose
Masion Close
 Sex Vacation
escort directory

Thread: American Politics

+ Add Report
Page 549 of 957 FirstFirst ... 49 449 499 539 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 559 599 649 ... LastLast
Results 8,221 to 8,235 of 14343
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #6123

    Market is down 1500 points this year already

    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    And what makes it a fairytale?

    EihTooms not only provided the data but also the link so you could verify his statement.

    If you disagree with his statement or the source, the grown-up response would be to explain why.

    You could insist, for example, that the OP was incorrect and there haven't been 17 recessions presided over by the Republicans.

    Of course, as a grown-up, you would be expected to substantiate your rebuttal with a coherent and persuading argument. Calling it a fairytale is not it.

    Are you a grown-up, Mr. Canada?.
    Market is down 1500 points already this year. This must be the great democrat crash that you guys keep talking about.

    Unfit for president because he Has Dementia!

  2. #6122

    Donald Trump is a criminal and he belongs in jail

    The January 6th insurrection investigative committee got great news from the Supreme Court yesterday.

    They told TrumpShit NO NO NO to his lame claim of executive privilege as he tries to hide his seditious behavior that got into the record.

    Hundreds of pages from the archives were delivered the same day after the SCOTUS 8-1 decision. (Proving once again that Clarence Thomas is a legal lightweight).

    But the bipartisan investigative committee has enough already.

    They have interviewed dozens of lower level White House staffers that have already testified to the committee as to what was said and done.

    It does not matter if the higher level folks try to be silent.

    Liz Cheney & the other committee members already have the goods on what went down, and it was criminal.

    Donald Trump is a criminal and he belongs in jail.

  3. #6121
    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    ...I'd like to ask every right-winger here who watched that 2-hour press-conference personally. What specific answers convinced you he's unfit for president? That is if you actually watched the event and not the commentaries from your favorite lunatic TV pundits.

    Anyone want to chime in?
    Of course, the peanut gallery is silent.

  4. #6120
    Quote Originally Posted by EihTooms  [View Original Post]
    Here is what I know about economic contractions / Recessions relative to Party affiliation stewardship as fully substantiated by the National Bureau of Economic Research in the link I provided:

    There have been 17 Recessions in the USA economy over the past 100 years.

    All but 4 of them began under Republican Party economic stewardship in the White House.

    All of the half dozen or so of the deepest and most damaging to employment numbers Recessions began under Republicans.
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    And that concludes fairytale story time today. Keep up the fiction.
    And what makes it a fairytale?

    EihTooms not only provided the data but also the link so you could verify his statement.

    If you disagree with his statement or the source, the grown-up response would be to explain why.

    You could insist, for example, that the OP was incorrect and there haven't been 17 recessions presided over by the Republicans.

    Of course, as a grown-up, you would be expected to substantiate your rebuttal with a coherent and persuading argument. Calling it a fairytale is not it.

    Are you a grown-up, Mr. Canada?

    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    I'd like to ask every right-winger here who watched that 2-hour press-conference personally. What specific answers convinced you he's unfit for president? That is if you actually watched the event and not the commentaries from your favorite lunatic TV pundits.
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    Yes unfit to lead. First stage of Alzheimer's and delusional. Pretty obvious to most Americans.
    Are you a psychiatrist? Should we start addressing you Dr. Canada? You seem to be able to diagnose a mental illness on TV.

    And yet, you don't seem to be able to distinguish a yes / no question from a WH question. Here, allow me to help.

    My question was: "What specific answers convinced you he's unfit for president"?

    What do you say? Try again?

  5. #6119

    It figures

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    Yes unfit to lead. First stage of Alzheimer's and delusional. Pretty obvious to most Americans.
    The OP listed specific questions and you didn't answer one of them.

    But since you believe that Biden has Alzheimer's, please provide a copy of your medical degree in addition to the diagnosis of one of Biden's doctors. Since "delusional" is a subset of "psychosis", please also provide a copy of your doctorate degree in Psychology as well as the relevant diagnosis of Biden's psychologist (if he has one).

    Since none of the above exist (except in your mind) you are guilty, as usual, of spreading manure.

  6. #6118

    Lol

    Quote Originally Posted by EihTooms  [View Original Post]
    Two began in 1945 and 1948 when America was in the process of resetting and retooling factories and jobs from its WWII efforts.
    Of course, as recessions often follow wars. Yet the same benefit of the doubt isn't given to Dwight after the end of the Korean War. Instead we get all the hubris "atrocious, etc." You are pretty much in the same vein as Canada and his various other names, but from the other side. And it's rather irrelevant as the audience is rather small, a sex forum, and in a thread tucked away where few know about it.

  7. #6117

    Delusional

    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    I was truly taken aback by his comment. I just couldn't believe he didn't realize it was in zest. Jesus! Who are these people?

    On the other hand, I'd like to ask every right-winger here who watched that 2-hour press-conference personally. What specific answers convinced you he's unfit for president? That is if you actually watched the event and not the commentaries from your favorite lunatic TV pundits.

    Anyone want to chime in?
    Yes unfit to lead. First stage of Alzheimer's and delusional. Pretty obvious to most Americans.

  8. #6116

    Fantasyland

    Quote Originally Posted by EihTooms  [View Original Post]
    Here is what I know about economic contractions / Recessions relative to Party affiliation stewardship as fully substantiated by the National Bureau of Economic Research in the link I provided:

    There have been 17 Recessions in the USA economy over the past 100 years.

    All but 4 of them began under Republican Party economic stewardship in the White House.

    All of the half dozen or so of the deepest and most damaging to employment numbers Recessions began under Republicans.

    Of the 4 that began under Democrats, all of them were among the briefest and least damaging to employment.

    One began in 1937 during a historic recovery from a previous Great Repub Crash in the economy.

    Two began in 1945 and 1948 when America was in the process of resetting and retooling factories and jobs from its WWII efforts while also paying the bills for that war.

    And the 4th one, the briefest and least damaging of all, began in early 1980, almost didn't even qualify as a Recession in that we were already pulling out of it by the second consecutive quarter of fractional contraction and, most notable of all, was purposely induced by the Fed in order to reverse the trajectory of inflation by cooling down an overheated economy that was creating far more jobs than there were applicants to take them..
    And that concludes fairytale story time today. Keep up the fiction.

  9. #6115

    You did it. Again

    Quote Originally Posted by EihTooms  [View Original Post]
    Yes, wingers either forget or pretend to forget Biden's lifelong struggle and amazing victory over a stuttering problem.

    They always mischaracterize or outright lie about his compensation tactic of occasionally briefly stopping in mid-sentence to choose a perfectly acceptable alternate next word or phrase in order to avoid the ones he suspects might trigger a stutter. Which he does brilliantly and largely seamlessly, I should add.

    Now, when Trump repeats the words "anominus, anominus" or "oranges, oranges" over and over again when he apparently is struggling to say "anonymous" and "origins" and when he thinks one of our great and world renowned National Parks, Yosimite, is really a "Yo, Semite!" call to people of Jewish heritage, would that be considered a stutter, a stammer or merely more examples of his serious cognitive decline?

    Which is the politically correct term for that?

    I wouldn't want to be insensitive and unwoke about his disability and mental challenges.
    As to your third paragraph, you need to be careful using sarcasm with the fascists who post here. They won't understand it. But, then again, they don't understand facts either.

    Just watch. One of them will say that it is "fake news" that Biden had / has a stuttering problem and / or that the one-term, twice-impeached former guy ever said "anominus", "oranges" or "yo-semites".

  10. #6114
    Quote Originally Posted by PVMonger  [View Original Post]
    I tried to find something that was "true" in this but I couldn't. The highlights are:

    "I remember the previous White House Resident, the one of the orange disposition, who was world-famous for his elaborate speeches, clear and coherent answers, deep analytical thinking and, what else?" was the original comment. It is completely unsurprising that you can't tell that the comment was sarcasm.

    "There has never been a president in the last 50 years that stuttered and stammered so much. " There has never been a President who had a stuttering problem before Biden. Again, I find it completely unsurprising that you didn't know this.

    "There is a reason 49% of the people think Biden is unfit to be president. " Sure there is. 35% of the American population (Republicans) are morons. The other 15% are unhappy.
    Yes, wingers either forget or pretend to forget Biden's lifelong struggle and amazing victory over a stuttering problem.

    They always mischaracterize or outright lie about his compensation tactic of occasionally briefly stopping in mid-sentence to choose a perfectly acceptable alternate next word or phrase in order to avoid the ones he suspects might trigger a stutter. Which he does brilliantly and largely seamlessly, I should add.

    Now, when Trump repeats the words "anominus, anominus" or "oranges, oranges" over and over again when he apparently is struggling to say "anonymous" and "origins" and when he thinks one of our great and world renowned National Parks, Yosimite, is really a "Yo, Semite!" call to people of Jewish heritage, would that be considered a stutter, a stammer or merely more examples of his serious cognitive decline?

    Which is the politically correct term for that?

    I wouldn't want to be insensitive and unwoke about his disability and mental challenges.

  11. #6113
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    Obviously you know nothing. We have an incompetent president destroying America and you are ok with this because you think you can blame fabricated Republican history. You can't be American. Not sure if your nationality. Probably Indian or Asian as you want to see America fail. You keep your hatred propaganda in your country and we will vote our way out of this disaster.
    Here is what I know about economic contractions / Recessions relative to Party affiliation stewardship as fully substantiated by the National Bureau of Economic Research in the link I provided:

    There have been 17 Recessions in the USA economy over the past 100 years.

    All but 4 of them began under Republican Party economic stewardship in the White House.

    All of the half dozen or so of the deepest and most damaging to employment numbers Recessions began under Republicans.

    Of the 4 that began under Democrats, all of them were among the briefest and least damaging to employment.

    One began in 1937 during a historic recovery from a previous Great Repub Crash in the economy.

    Two began in 1945 and 1948 when America was in the process of resetting and retooling factories and jobs from its WWII efforts while also paying the bills for that war.

    And the 4th one, the briefest and least damaging of all, began in early 1980, almost didn't even qualify as a Recession in that we were already pulling out of it by the second consecutive quarter of fractional contraction and, most notable of all, was purposely induced by the Fed in order to reverse the trajectory of inflation by cooling down an overheated economy that was creating far more jobs than there were applicants to take them.

    Of all the "economic problems" to have, that last one is about the best one any country would want. Rest assured, there has never been such a "problem" under any Repub so serious to require Fed intervention.

    https://www.nber.org/research/data/u...d-contractions

    Now, Great Repub Bear Market Crashes is a different topic that requires a different link. But they are related in that most Bear Market Crashes do accompany a Recession. Consequently, most deep and significant Bear Market Crashes of the past century have accompanied Great Repub Recessions, as was the case with each of the most recent Repub so-called potus', Trump and GW Bush.

  12. #6112

    When you don't have facts, attack!

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    Obviously you know nothing. We have an incompetent president destroying America and you are ok with this because you think you can blame fabricated Republican history. You can't be American. Not sure if your nationality. Probably Indian or Asian as you want to see America fail. You keep your hatred propaganda in your country and we will vote our way out of this disaster.
    When you don't have facts, make stuff up. When you don't have facts, attack. When you don't have facts, belittle. These three (3) things are straight out of the fascist playbook.

    Oh, and by the way, Repubs didn't manage to vote their way out of anything in 2020. And because 50% of you are willfully ignorant, there will be even fewer to vote for Cheeto McBonespurs in 2024.

  13. #6111
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    I advise you to watch it. It pretty much shows he is unfit for president. He looked like a tired old man in first stage of dementia and his answers backed it up. It is scary to think he is meeting with world leaders.
    Quote Originally Posted by PVMonger  [View Original Post]
    I tried to find something that was "true" in this but I couldn't. The highlights are:

    "I remember the previous White House Resident, the one of the orange disposition, who was world-famous for his elaborate speeches, clear
    I was truly taken aback by his comment. I just couldn't believe he didn't realize it was in zest. Jesus! Who are these people?

    On the other hand, I'd like to ask every right-winger here who watched that 2-hour press-conference personally. What specific answers convinced you he's unfit for president? That is if you actually watched the event and not the commentaries from your favorite lunatic TV pundits.

    Anyone want to chime in?

  14. #6110

    Obviously you know nothing

    Quote Originally Posted by EihTooms  [View Original Post]
    Do you even know what an economic "contraction" is according to every economic measure and the NBER?

    Clearly, you do not.
    Obviously you know nothing. We have an incompetent president destroying America and you are ok with this because you think you can blame fabricated Republican history. You can't be American. Not sure if your nationality. Probably Indian or Asian as you want to see America fail. You keep your hatred propaganda in your country and we will vote our way out of this disaster.

  15. #6109

    I tried, but I couldn't

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada  [View Original Post]
    No surprise here that you didn't watch the Biden disaster but somehow you remember watching Trump press conference. Obviously you knew Trump had more to say. There has never been a president in the last 50 years that stuttered and stammered so much. Totally confused. Just keep avoiding the obvious. Your life will not get better if you ignore Biden mistakes. CNN on full damage control trying to show clips of Biden press conference. Showing the early questions that Biden had the answers written down in advance. After that press conference it explains why Russia and China are ecstatic dealing with the USA now. There is a reason 49% of the people think Biden is unfit to be president. When that question was presented to Biden he said I just don't know why 49% think he is unfit.
    I tried to find something that was "true" in this but I couldn't. The highlights are:

    "I remember the previous White House Resident, the one of the orange disposition, who was world-famous for his elaborate speeches, clear and coherent answers, deep analytical thinking and, what else?" was the original comment. It is completely unsurprising that you can't tell that the comment was sarcasm.

    "There has never been a president in the last 50 years that stuttered and stammered so much. " There has never been a President who had a stuttering problem before Biden. Again, I find it completely unsurprising that you didn't know this.

    "There is a reason 49% of the people think Biden is unfit to be president. " Sure there is. 35% of the American population (Republicans) are morons. The other 15% are unhappy.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Escort News


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape