Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 5,686 to 5,700 of 14360
-
06-25-22 15:10 #8675
Posts: 1604What a laugh
Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
You guarantee that war would have never started? How can you do that? Just because Putin didn't invade Ukraine while the Orange Buffoon was in charge does not mean that Putin didn't invade because he was scared of the Mango Mussolini. There is a Latin phrase that says exactly when that type of analysis is: "Post hoc ergo propter hoc". That means "after this therefore because of this". "A" happened, then "be" happened, therefore "be" was caused by "A". An example is: "I ate Wheaties this morning and later in the day I had a car wreck. Therefore, eating Wheaties caused my car wreck. " Now, obviously, anybody with a brain will look at the last statement and say that it is patently absurd. And it is. But that's what "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is trying to say.
Using the same type of analysis, it is just as likely that Putin didn't invade while Donnie the Dumbass was in charge because he knew that if his puppet was re-elected, he would destroy NATO and essentially give Putin Ukraine without Putin having to do anything.
Of course, to you tRUMPers, "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a perfectly fine analysis when it suits you ("Putin didn't invade because he was afraid of tRUMP") but a horrible analysis when it doesn't ("Putin didn't invade because tRUMP would have destroyed NATO and essentially given Putin Ukraine without Putin having to do anything".
-
06-25-22 14:29 #8674
Posts: 1604Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Originally Posted by Gino02 [View Original Post]
Using the exact same analysis, Putin didn't invade Ukraine while the Orange Buffoon was in charge because he knew that war would be costly and the Orange Buffoon would dismantle NATO and give Putin what he wanted anyway if the Orange Buffoon was re-elected.
See how that works?
-
06-25-22 13:49 #8673
Posts: 1773Originally Posted by ScatManDoo [View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 05:11 #8672
Posts: 3211Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
This is only about the 100th time you have gone off on an imaginary point, and once more, you think you can read my mind. Xpartan just did the same stupid thing when he read the mind of 75 million Trump voters.
My point was that with all the Red-blue shit going on the bureaucrats are having a heyday writing up their own laws, and what do you morons do? Go right back into a red-blue conflict. Eih even lies and says the Republians had a veto proof majority and that is why Glass-Stegall was repealed which is complete BS. I wonder why you did not correct him on that? Did you not know that?
And the repeal of Glass-Stegall happened under Clinton, and he signed the bill into law. There was no veto. You all lied about that too.
What was so funny is that JustTK does not have a dog in the fight. He is more leftist than anyone of you, and even he cannot stand you dumb Dems. There is no getting to the truth with you. The collapse in 2008 was not just on Republicans or Dems but so many people, and it might be something he would be interested in discussing, but with you guys, it is just that if there were no Republicans, the recession never would have happened.
Everything good is Democrats, and everything bad is Republicans. Of course, neither you or Eih are living here anymore so why do you care so much? The only reason I see is that the government is paying you off and you think if the Republicans come into power, your gravy train may end.
Hey, Viiainy, you genius, you want to tell me where you are invested right now? You all in on Biden too? Or are you totally dependent on the government's cheese?
-
06-25-22 04:51 #8671
Posts: 5428Ah, that is a much better use of your time.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Uh. In 1999 the Republican Party held the Majority control in both the House and the Senate. Famously so, I would say. That means every committee in both houses of Congress was Chaired by a Repub, every bill proposed and put up for a vote done so by a Repub, etc.
Therefore, when 90%+ of the House and 90%+ of the Senate voted to repeal and replace Glass-Steagall under those circumstances in late 1999, way way more than the 66% or so necessary to make it impossible for a POTUS to veto it, well, sure enough, that meant it was done "by a veto proof Repub Majority Congress. ".
See how that works?
And I am pleased to see you further confirm how obsolete and ineffectual Glass-Stegall had become well before that 1999 vote in that its violation had not only been upheld by court ruling years prior but that also allowed for the Fed to grant a waiver to Citicorp for "violating" it at least a year before its official repeal and replacement.
Hence, that high percentage of evil Dems and saintly Repubs agreed in the Republican Majority House and Senate of late 1999 that such an obsolete and no longer effective legally or by Fed dictate law ought to be repealed and replaced by something that addresses the realities of the banking world as it existed at that time. And for the most part the ultra evil free and enthusiastic blowjob-accepting Bill Clinton agreed with them.
The only requirement was that, like Glass-Steagall and every other banking regulation law on the books, that replacement's effectiveness would be determined by how diligently a president's Treasury Department monitored and enforced the regulation.
Lo and behold, history shows evil Dem Clinton's Treasury Department monitored and enforced banking regulations extremely well. But for the next 8 years of a saintly Repub Treasury Department, not so much. Spectacularly and disastrously so. What a surprise.
-
06-25-22 03:30 #8670
Posts: 1138Originally Posted by ChuchoLoco [View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 03:26 #8669
Posts: 1138Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 02:39 #8668
Posts: 1949Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
I bet he was holding that note right in front of his face when he told a military widow that her late husband knew the risks.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/p...-signed-up-for
-
06-25-22 02:36 #8667
Posts: 2793Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Jan 6.
I guarantee the war would have never started or would have ended under Trump. Bidden for some stupid reason is doing everything in his powers to keep it going and doing nothing to find a solution or compromise between the 2 countries. Again, Bidden is not calling the shots. He has one foot out the door, he will powerless in 4-6 months or sooner. If liberal media is turning on him his days are numbered, thank god. He is destroying this country. Somebody needs to step in before it is too late.
-
06-25-22 02:17 #8666
Posts: 2579Boycott amazon
Originally Posted by Gino02 [View Original Post]
https://amgreatness.com/2022/06/23/t...erating-purge/
-
06-24-22 23:58 #8665
Posts: 2579How loooooow can he go
Originally Posted by Gino02 [View Original Post]
-
06-24-22 23:35 #8664
Posts: 2579Ron Klain is the first Jewish potus
Originally Posted by Gino02 [View Original Post]
-
06-24-22 23:07 #8663
Posts: 1138Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
Is Trump the best ever diplomat? Nope.
Is Trump better diplomat than Buyden? Definitely.
Stay on point please.
-
06-24-22 22:47 #8662
Posts: 2793Originally Posted by Gino02 [View Original Post]
Lastly, he gets in a fight with oil companies, this is the last thing he should be doing. Find a compromise and a solution, but Democrats want to fight with everyone and blame everyone for their problems.
If you subtract Trump from the polls, I would bet Bidden approval is in the teens now, not the 30's.
-
06-24-22 22:01 #8661
Posts: 5428Repub Majority SCOTUS' Rating Sinks To All Time Historic Low
https://news.gallup.com/poll/394103/...toric-low.aspx
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- With the U.S. Supreme Court expected to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision before the end of its 2021-2022 term, Americans' confidence in the court has dropped sharply over the past year and reached a new low in Gallup's nearly 50-year trend.