American Politics

[Elvis 2008]

The immortal words of Ronnie Ray Guns. Benghazi, Benghazi, Burisma, the Big Guy, Burisma! How are historical multiple criminal charges against a charlatan Ex-President a sign of strength? Inside a basket of deplorables yes, in the immortal words of Crooked Hillary. The end is definitely near. My jiffy pop popcorn is smoking in anticipation of Fat Nixon under cross examination under oath. Will he bring his self autographed Bible?

LOL. Someone has said it better than me.

There's no worse feeling in media than being the next guest after Stephen A. Smith. Whatever you have to say, you'll say it worse. Right, wrong, whatever, the man was born to be on television. The upside is listening to his segments. Last night, while waiting to talk about NPR, I listened as Chris Cuomo told a story about an unnamed hip-hop artist complaining that it took a rich white man like Trump being abused, for people to see the "maladministration of justice" black people have always known. What did his guest, Stephen A. Smith, think?

Stephen A. SMITH: No question. That hip hop artist who called you, he's right on the money. Here's the sad part. It gives credence to the argument Trump made during a speech weeks ago where he talked about black folks relating to him. Now, what the hell would black folks have in common with a guy that was born on third base thinking he hit a home run? Born with the proverbial spoon in his mouth? It's the legal system. I can say this because 95% of the time I voted Democrat. I'm looking at a Democratic party that looks at the black community that says, "We are there for you. We are there for you.".

But when it's time to vote, you want to talk to black people about what you're doing for them. And how you are on our side. But this man right here, who's the presumptive GOP nominee, is in a position to literally get back into the White House because what you're doing to him, we find fairly relatable to things that have been done to folks in our community, and it's happened for decades. There's no escaping that fact and Trump pointing it out, and being accurate in doing so, is perhaps the height of embarrassment for the Democratic party, in my estimation.

This exchange was preceded by a classic Stephen A-ism:

When you got four indictments and 91 counts and two impeachments and civil suits in excess of $454 million. But he still keeps marching forward, marching forward, gaining momentum. The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that either. And I'm quite disgusted by it, to be quite honest with you.

If you watch ESPN you've heard that speech a hundred times: "You got Karl-Anthony Towns and the Stifle Tower Rudy Gobert and the high-flying new face of the league in Anthony Edwards and Naz Reid and Slo-Mo Anderson and all those boys, and you can't even beat the eighth seed in your conference one time in the regular season — one damn time, J. J. Redick! — frankly, I find that disgusting. ".

The Trump rant (click here to watch) was no sports take, nor particularly novel, as Stephen A's been branching into politics and appearing as a guest on Fox News, which can't get enough of him for obvious reasons. The hit pieces haven't come yet, but if he keeps this up, they will, and we can guess what form they'll take. It'll be ugly. But any Democrat watching should immediately recognize the red flag Stephen A. Is raising, and I don't mean the one that has to do with race. This is about sports:

Americans love sports because we have a strong egalitarian streak and love the simplicity; you play better, you win. The villain is always the overconfident favorite taken down by an underdog who wants it more. Phi Slamma Jamma dunked into infamy by Lorenzo Charles, the Greatest Show on Turf cut down by a placekicker, Miracle on Ice. That 1980 Soviet team was actually quite likable and packed with all-time greats, but they'the been trained to show no mercy in international play and piled 16 goals on poor Japan before the fateful clash. Americans love that story because the Soviets were so much better, because that's sports: you got to play the games. "If we play 'them ten times, they might win nine" — but the ice doesn't know the odds.

In every sports contest two groups of spectators are irrational and have worthless takes: the fans of the two teams playing. (This rule applies with equal or greater force to politics.) Once the homers are out of the picture, the rest of the sports-watching world argues over who will win, who should win, who deserves to win, who maybe deserves to lose. This country hates a sore loser, but a sore winner is worse. Act like you've been there! A PhD and an iron worker in the stands of a Buffalo Bills game will be equally plastered by the third quarter and react the same way if their own team chooses to run up the score, especially against an opponent they might see in the playoffs. They'll stare at each other in glassy-eyed panic, each knowing: "That will come back to haunt us. ".

Every sports fan — rich, poor, black, white, old, young — is steeped in these intricacies. We know why "ball don't lie," and why coaches who whine about injuries deserve to lose ("Next man up" is the rule). Stephen A. May not be the spokesperson of "the black community," but he might be Chief Justice of sports talk. Democrats should hear what he's saying: to the average person, these interminable Trump indictments and lawsuits and lawfare (hearing a popular sportscaster use that term unironically should inspire a Beltway mass-clench) seem worse than cheating. It comes off as cowardice, fear of even competition, something that never, ever plays in this country. "The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that," is a heavy indictment, and if he's thinking that, you can bet a hell of a lot lot more people are. Just win, baby. What happened to that?

[Beijing4987]

The immortal words of Ronnie Ray Guns. Benghazi, Benghazi, Burisma, the Big Guy, Burisma! How are historical multiple criminal charges against a charlatan Ex-President a sign of strength? Inside a basket of deplorables yes, in the immortal words of Crooked Hillary. The end is definitely near. My jiffy pop popcorn is smoking in anticipation of Fat Nixon under cross examination under oath. Will he bring his self autographed Bible?

[EihTooms]

Geeze. Reading these posts just make me laugh.

If Trump does not win the next election (which he will hands down) . The world is effed.

Democracy just does not exist.

You have tried every thing. Give me a break. Stormy. HA HA. Again. Gee is that the best you can do. What about Hunter. I suppose your going to say. He did nothing wrong.

You Democrats are the biggest joke I have ever seen. How can you defend yourselves. I know you will call me a racist or a aussie or a.ha again.

I can't even read these posts because Trump is that far in front of the rest of you.

There is no way the Dems can win.

Which consensus of polls shows Trump "that far in front" of Biden? Link please.

Even in the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics consensus of Winger-selected, manipulated and timed polls, with 7 months left Trump and Biden are in a statistical tie, well within a normal +/-MoE on the head--to-head, 5-Way and in the Top Battlground States hypotheticals. Which have been improving with all the positive momentum for Biden since his terrific State of the Union Address proved everyone claiming he is feeble, cognitively impaired and can't put two words together to be blithering liars.

Uh, that would be Joe Biden by the way, not Hunter Biden. See, Joe is the President of the United States while Hunter is just the guy whose dick pics the REALLY Getting Smaller All The Time Pink Tinkle Repub Manureity House have been staring at and drooling over for the past 16 months.

Oh, and, like Donald Trump, you appear to think he is running against either Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, Barack Obama or gawd knows who this year.

Here is the only place Trump is far ahead of anybody; when it finally dawns on him his criminal lawyers have no more delay tactics left to throw against the wall, Trump is definitely way ahead as the first person in the courtroom most likely to drop his pants around his ankles, crow like a rooster, whip out his mushroom dick in one hand and bite the head off a live bat he had hidden in his coat pocket.

Meanwhile, the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP President Betting Odds consensus is the most reflective of Joe Biden's upward trajectory vs Trump's fish hook decline since that Biden SOTU Address from the sites that take everything into consideration, not just the Tied poll consensus. And the most historically predictive of the group, Predictlt, shows Biden ahead of Trump by the greatest margin:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/el...024/president/

[Tlito]

Just watching crooked Hillary.

Gee.

Nothing more to say.

[Tlito]

Geeze. Reading these posts just make me laugh.

If Trump does not win the next election (which he will hands down) . The world is effed.

Democracy just does not exist.

You have tried every thing. Give me a break. Stormy. HA HA. Again. Gee is that the best you can do. What about Hunter. I suppose your going to say. He did nothing wrong.

You Democrats are the biggest joke I have ever seen. How can you defend yourselves. I know you will call me a racist or a aussie or a.ha again.

I can't even read these posts because Trump is that far in front of the rest of you.

There is no way the Dems can win.

[Beijing4987]

Will the midgets of jurisprudence wait until all the evidence, cross examination under oath and spin (closing arguments) are complete? I doubt it. But juries must. Anyone who is innocent, facing prosecution with multiple (nothing but the best) lawyers should not fear what is assumed to be a non partial jury of peers. If the mushroom doesn't fit, you must acquitt. Even David Pecker and Stephanie Clifford, called to testify know this.

[EihTooms]

In fact, it isn't and can't get AS stupid as this:

Can it get more stupid than this?
Jury selection is underway now complete in the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Donald J. Trump, which alleges that the defendant lied to his own check register, and lied to the general ledger of his own company, when the invoice given to him by his lawyer was paid and recorded by someone else, and that the misstatement he made to himself in his own records was done "with the intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof. "

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...leyn-treatment

Man, maybe he should just be executed.

That local prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, is a member of the Democratic Party and the voters who elected Bragg and from whom the jury will be chosen support the Democratic Party. In 2016, the people of New York County voted 87% for Hillary Clinton and 10% for Donald Trump, and in 2020,87% for Joe Biden and 12% for Donald Trump. In other words, the jury pool is chosen from one of the most partisan jurisdictions in the country a place where almost all the judges are Democrats as well.

So the Democratic prosecutor elected in the second most Democratic county in the United States will try the former Republican president and current putative Republican Party presidential nominee before a Democrat-appointed judge and a jury drawn from a pool 87% of whom voted against him (and who are being asked if they watch Fox News or listen to talk radio in the screening process).

In other words, this is what Democrats think is fair.

Moreover, New York's statute of limitations requires that misdemeanor prosecutions be commenced within two years of the commission of the act, meaning that under the last provision, this case should never have been filed.

Gee, and you wonder why this case was filed.

For example, why does the entry in the check register or the general ledger matter at all? When would those entries, as opposed to the allegedly false invoices, be shown to anyone for any nefarious purpose? And were the entries even false? Was there any intent to fool someone to obtain something in making the entries who was the target of the allegedly false entry in private books and records? If there's no mark, no victim, then how could there be an "intent to defraud"? Defraud whom? And what is the other crime that the person making the book entry intended to commit or hide? If the other crime is not a New York crime but a federal crime, does every county prosecutor in the United States, including Alvin Bragg, have the jurisdiction to enforce an alleged federal crime indirectly through a state crime?

The answer is the New York legal system where all is fair if you are a Democrat going after a Republican.

And how about Trump's right under the 6th amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Speedy trial? Impartial jury? LOL.

https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-new...-90m-off-case/

Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations and used the case in their solicitation emails raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.

The judge's daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump's first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser.

"Authentic Campaigns, and thus the judge's daughter, is actively making money from this sham attack against President Trump, rendering Judge Merchan conflicted out," Trump spokesman Steven Cheung told The Post, adding that evidence of bias is even clearer now than it was in August when Merchan rejected Trump's first recusal motion.

And we have the infamous words of "only 10 million illegals" rule of law soy boy saying how much Democrats were after truth, and they do not like being lied to and have so much integrity. So this judge, who has an obvious conflict of interest, recused himself from the case right?

Nah, he shoved a gag order down Trump's throat.

So here we go again. While Democrats are going to be cackling and giving themselves high fives for finding Trump guilty in this blatantly stupid and rigged case, your average American is going to see how fucking stupid this case really is and get that once again, Democrats want to cheat and win an election in a court room and not at the ballot box.

I have a feeling this trial is going to push Trump's numbers into the stratosphere.

Try this instead:

Trump indictment full text: Read the court document here.
The indictment lays out 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to the former president's alleged role in hush money payments to two women during his 2016 campaign.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...ment-rcna78051

[EihTooms]

"real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president."

LOL. In which case it would have been a clean sweep for the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since and including 1992, thirty-two years ago, allowing for the fact that the only Repub to win slightly more votes than the Dem since then, in 2012, would never have been there to run as a Repub-initiated counterproductive quagmire Wartime Incumbent president had it not been for him already being an undemocratically appointed so-called president in 2000 by a handful of equally undemocratically appointed Supreme Court Justices and Electoral College members.

Yeah, I mistyped 2012 when I meant to type 2004 for the year of the only Presidential Election since and including 1992 when the Repub candidate was the choice of the American voters to win the presidency over the Dem. Thanks solely to him and others in his administration lying to the world almost 1000 times in order to bamboozle us into two quagmire counterproductive Wars so he could run as a Wartime President.

Oh, I might as well also add here that subsequent Dem presidents eventually pulled us out of those ridiculous Repub Wars while the Repub so-called presidents did not have the balls or the patriotism to assume the political risk of actually doing it rather than just flapping their yap for years and years about someday doing it like the Repubs did.

[Elvis 2008]

Jury selection is underway now complete in the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Donald J. Trump, which alleges that the defendant lied to his own check register, and lied to the general ledger of his own company, when the invoice given to him by his lawyer was paid and recorded by someone else, and that the misstatement he made to himself in his own records was done "with the intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof. "

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...leyn-treatment

Man, maybe he should just be executed.

That local prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, is a member of the Democratic Party and the voters who elected Bragg and from whom the jury will be chosen support the Democratic Party. In 2016, the people of New York County voted 87% for Hillary Clinton and 10% for Donald Trump, and in 2020,87% for Joe Biden and 12% for Donald Trump. In other words, the jury pool is chosen from one of the most partisan jurisdictions in the country a place where almost all the judges are Democrats as well.

So the Democratic prosecutor elected in the second most Democratic county in the United States will try the former Republican president and current putative Republican Party presidential nominee before a Democrat-appointed judge and a jury drawn from a pool 87% of whom voted against him (and who are being asked if they watch Fox News or listen to talk radio in the screening process).

In other words, this is what Democrats think is fair.

Moreover, New York's statute of limitations requires that misdemeanor prosecutions be commenced within two years of the commission of the act, meaning that under the last provision, this case should never have been filed.

Gee, and you wonder why this case was filed.

For example, why does the entry in the check register or the general ledger matter at all? When would those entries, as opposed to the allegedly false invoices, be shown to anyone for any nefarious purpose? And were the entries even false? Was there any intent to fool someone to obtain something in making the entries who was the target of the allegedly false entry in private books and records? If there's no mark, no victim, then how could there be an "intent to defraud"? Defraud whom? And what is the other crime that the person making the book entry intended to commit or hide? If the other crime is not a New York crime but a federal crime, does every county prosecutor in the United States, including Alvin Bragg, have the jurisdiction to enforce an alleged federal crime indirectly through a state crime?

The answer is the New York legal system where all is fair if you are a Democrat going after a Republican.

And how about Trump's right under the 6th amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Speedy trial? Impartial jury? LOL.

https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-new...-90m-off-case/

Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations and used the case in their solicitation emails raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.

The judge's daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump's first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser.

"Authentic Campaigns, and thus the judge's daughter, is actively making money from this sham attack against President Trump, rendering Judge Merchan conflicted out," Trump spokesman Steven Cheung told The Post, adding that evidence of bias is even clearer now than it was in August when Merchan rejected Trump's first recusal motion.

And we have the infamous words of "only 10 million illegals" rule of law soy boy saying how much Democrats were after truth, and they do not like being lied to and have so much integrity. So this judge, who has an obvious conflict of interest, recused himself from the case right?

Nah, he shoved a gag order down Trump's throat.

So here we go again. While Democrats are going to be cackling and giving themselves high fives for finding Trump guilty in this blatantly stupid and rigged case, your average American is going to see how fucking stupid this case really is and get that once again, Democrats want to cheat and win an election in a court room and not at the ballot box.

I have a feeling this trial is going to push Trump's numbers into the stratosphere.

[EihTooms]

And the biggest share holder and founder of Amazon is Jeff Bezos. He also owns the Washington Post. And you think he is a Republican? You keep railing against billionaires and do not get how many of them are Democrats. LOL. Thank God you have a handle on the facts "only 10 million illegals" Soy Boy.

https://www.socialexplorer.com/blog/...election-11047

Among the 25 counties with the greatest concentrations of households earning more than six figures, President-elect Joe Biden won 16 two more than 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

"I am Spidy. I have integrity. I know all the facts. " You are so full of it Soy Boy.

Ah yes, soy boy, your fat flimsy tower of "integrity" is okay with using the law to punish someone breaking the law as long as it helps you. Hey, those 10 million illegals cross the border, and you are totally down with that. Yeah, two Democratic douches found Trump guilty of a victimless act right before the election in an effort to rig it, and it just happened to be in the year of an election. That was a shocker!

And now we have the latest.

Check out this potential Trump juror at the 4:47 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojKFOsNZjgA

This witch admits this case is not about the law. She says she is not a fan and talks about abortion, Covid, and Trump's policies. The one thing she does not mention is what Trump was accused of. She openly admits that which everyone knows. This is not about breaking the law. It is about rigging an election, and she hates Trump so much she does not even get how fucking selfish she is that she as a juror thinks she can choose who should be president more than the voters.

At this point, they should not even have a trial. The more honest thing to do is just find Trump guilty because New Yorkers do not like him. There has not been one speck of testimony but does there need to be? Anyone with a brain knows this jury will find Trump guilty.

And THIS is why Trump will win. Unlike you Soy Boy, a guy who supports people illegally crossing the border and stabs his own sex in the back, real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president. That is why whenever Trump gets charges brought against him he goes up in the polls. The rigging of the 2020 election was done in secret. Shit, the rigging of the 2024 election is completely out in the open now.

But all you care about is your government check.

"real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president."

LOL. In which case it would have been a clean sweep for the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since and including 1992, thirty-two years ago, allowing for the fact that the only Repub to win slightly more votes than the Dem since then, in 2012, would never have been there to run as a Repub-initiated counterproductive quagmire Wartime Incumbent president had it not been for him already being an undemocratically appointed so-called president in 2000 by a handful of equally undemocratically appointed Supreme Court Justices and Electoral College members.

[Elvis 2008]

Y

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/15/tech/...tax/index.html
https://www.vox.com/2019/2/20/182317...rporate-income

Just goes to show who's really bankrupting the country, while hiding behind the "theatrical media hysteria" on immigration from the right-wing Repub propaganda media apparatus over at likes of FOXY News and NewsMax.

And the biggest share holder and founder of Amazon is Jeff Bezos. He also owns the Washington Post. And you think he is a Republican? You keep railing against billionaires and do not get how many of them are Democrats. LOL. Thank God you have a handle on the facts "only 10 million illegals" Soy Boy.

https://www.socialexplorer.com/blog/...election-11047

Among the 25 counties with the greatest concentrations of households earning more than six figures, President-elect Joe Biden won 16 two more than 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

"I am Spidy. I have integrity. I know all the facts. " You are so full of it Soy Boy.

I forget, Elvis 2008, must have taken accounting/math at Trump University. You know, the one that says, to arbitrarily deflate the numbers/asset valuations when in office/being taxed and inflate the numbers when I'm out of office/going to the bank for a loan. If I'm not mistaken, Trump was found guilty and ordered to pay $355 million in tax fraud, for such fraudulent claims.

Ah yes, soy boy, your fat flimsy tower of "integrity" is okay with using the law to punish someone breaking the law as long as it helps you. Hey, those 10 million illegals cross the border, and you are totally down with that. Yeah, two Democratic douches found Trump guilty of a victimless act right before the election in an effort to rig it, and it just happened to be in the year of an election. That was a shocker!

And now we have the latest.

Check out this potential Trump juror at the 4:47 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojKFOsNZjgA

This witch admits this case is not about the law. She says she is not a fan and talks about abortion, Covid, and Trump's policies. The one thing she does not mention is what Trump was accused of. She openly admits that which everyone knows. This is not about breaking the law. It is about rigging an election, and she hates Trump so much she does not even get how fucking selfish she is that she as a juror thinks she can choose who should be president more than the voters.

At this point, they should not even have a trial. The more honest thing to do is just find Trump guilty because New Yorkers do not like him. There has not been one speck of testimony but does there need to be? Anyone with a brain knows this jury will find Trump guilty.

And THIS is why Trump will win. Unlike you Soy Boy, a guy who supports people illegally crossing the border and stabs his own sex in the back, real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president. That is why whenever Trump gets charges brought against him he goes up in the polls. The rigging of the 2020 election was done in secret. Shit, the rigging of the 2024 election is completely out in the open now.

But all you care about is your government check.

[Spidy]

Guesstimates are 🚫 not facts

Nor are "alternative facts" How many hundreds of millions did Fox News pay to settle the Dominion Voting machine lawsuit? More lawsuits are pending. How about a "guesstimate" of how many undocumented immigrants that work, own businesses and pay taxes vs oligarchs that pay no taxes?

You bring up an excellent point!

Remember back in 2019, it became known that, immigrants paid more in taxes, than the multi-billion dollar corporation, Amazon, who had paid nothing ($0) in federal income taxes, since 2016.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/15/tech/...tax/index.html
https://www.vox.com/2019/2/20/182317...rporate-income

Just goes to show who's really bankrupting the country, while hiding behind the "theatrical media hysteria" on immigration from the right-wing Repub propaganda media apparatus over at likes of FOXY News and NewsMax.

[Spidy]

Do you? The point was that illegals have driven up rents and are bankrupting the USA. Do you think ONLY 10 million illegals have entered the USA since Biden was president versus 20 million is a winning issue?

(...kkkk!) Sure dude...sure!

I forget, Elvis 2008, must have taken accounting/math at Trump University. You know, the one that says, to arbitrarily deflate the numbers/asset valuations when in office/being taxed and inflate the numbers when I'm out of office/going to the bank for a loan. If I'm not mistaken, Trump was found guilty and ordered to pay $355 million in tax fraud, for such fraudulent claims.

Yeah, attending Trump University would about sum up your nonsensical example, w/r to the numbers you're pulling outta your ass on immigration! (...kkkk!)

Meanwhile the billionaires have you and your FOXY Muse gullible minions, doing their biding, as Trump Tax cuts benefit the top 1%, while paying very little to nothing in federal taxes.

Trump is clobbering Biden on the immigration issue. Your outrage over the number just shows how morally bankrupt your position is.

Is that what you've been told at Foxy News? (Hint: If so, they're lying to you! ...kkkk!)

Sleepy Trumpy Trump is clobbering Biden?...NOT according to:

• Democrat Tom Suozzi win the N.Y. 3rd district, 2024 special election (for the seat left vacant by George Santos), beating the Repub candidate, largely on immigration, issues.

• Repub Chip Roy (R-TX), as it's abundantly clear, that the border problems and failure, were ALL due to TRUMP!

• The CBPs estimated at-the-border apprehension rate averaged 78%, from 2018 to 2020, compared to 35% from 2002 to 2004.

• The beloved drafted bipartisan border security bill by the Senate and Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), that solves most everything Repubs want.

• The numerous election wins in 2022, 2023 and 2024, Democrats have demolished Repubs in elections, special elections and primaries, on primarily the number one issue that front and center for most Americans abortion, abortion bans, women's health and reproductive rights to choose.

I'm still waiting for Trump, Repubs and the INCEL He-man women haters, such as yourself to make it pass the starting line on abortion, the continuing use of Misferpristone and Misoprostol, IVF and contraception.

Hint: If Repubs, want to win the presidential election race in 2024, they may want to take off the blinders on those women issues.

[Xpartan]

LOL. But you Democratic douches sure swallowed up the guesstimate on where Covid came from right? It did not come from a lab and anyone blaming China was racist right?

Hell, you probably still think Covid came from nature and not a lab.

And here we go again. Watch yet another Elvis' escape to one of his happy places (COVID or AIDS) when he has lost the argument on the subject matter.

[EihTooms]

LOL. But you Democratic douches sure swallowed up the guesstimate on where Covid came from right? It did not come from a lab and anyone blaming China was racist right?

Hell, you probably still think Covid came from nature and not a lab.

Senate GOP Covid origins probe finds circumstantial evidence but no smoking gun to support lab leak theory.
May 17, 2023

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/17/polit...ort/index.html

"What we present below is a substantial body of circumstantial evidence that supports the plausibility of such a scenario, the executive summary of Rubios report states about the lab leak theory, making clear the findings do not offer a definitive answer to the origins question.

Specifically, Rubios new report highlights evidence that Chinese government officials and relevant figures in the scientific community possessed some level of awareness of an outbreak of infectious disease well before that information was disclosed publicly on December 31, 2019.

It also notes that the congressional investigation unearthed information that further suggests there was some kind of serious biocontainment failure or accident at the state-run Wuhan Institute of Virology during the second half of 2019.

Despite Repub douches looking and looking and looking very hard to find conclusive evidence that Trump's Pandemic virus originated in a lab leak rather than the overwhelmingly more common way in nature and then being brought to a lab where a leak can always occur (as if that makes any big deal difference at all. LOL), they did find plenty of evidence that, sure enough, if only Donald Trump had not stubbornly defunded and eliminated Obama's Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams from those labs contrary to all expert warnings not to do something as stupid and dangerous as that, the world would have had crucial weeks or months of advanced notice to have launched into the necessary isolation and quarantine in that area of China in order to have effectively Prevented Trump's Pandemic from developing in the first place and to have delayed the wider spread of it until well after fully tested and distributed vaccines for it had been distributed around the world.

As Donald Trump himself acknowledged in a March 2020 recorded interview with Bob Woodward.

Which would have saved millions of lives and averted the business, school and travel industry closures, the global supply-chain destruction, worldwide economic collapse and the inevitable hyper-inflation that followed.

Essentially every historic destruction and disaster that Trump had been warned for about a year prior would likely occur if he insisted on going forward with his planned typically Repub economic and national security policies and stewardship in that regard.