American Politics

[Tiny 12]

Did Twitter take orders from the Fed and suppress Hunter Biden story? The more important point of this is that hard core Dems could care less their side is corrupt, yet they have months long fake media slander campaigns against Trump over fake Russian collusion, fake Ukraine dealings which lead to a fucking impeachment, Dems and Media look the other way when cities burn and they label the rioters as "protesters".

All that being said, it does not excuse the idiotic behavior of the Trump and Jan. 6 morons. I pray he does not run again. I also prey people start holding political parties they favor accountable when there is clear evidence of deep corruption or any evidence of corruption.

The average American witnesses these events and it leads one to believe that voters no longer care about right, wrong, corruption, super high inflation, billions spent on foreign wars, incredibly ineffective candidates "Biden / Fettereman". They just vote for a "the" or an "are". That type of thinking leads to a failed state. Sad.

I strongly agree with your last 2 paragraphs, although not necessarily with the first. But we're on the same page. The media is dominated by the left. We've discussed that here before, and the best the left of center crowd could come up with was "Oh, well, you don't take into account talk radio. " Fucking talk radio! If there were any big mainstream outlets besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox News on the right, maybe large numbers of conservative Americans wouldn't be resorting to radio for news and commentary.

[Tiny 12]

The screenshots below are what was staring me in the face on that Cook site. And still are:

https://www.cookpolitical.com/charts...e-tracker/2022

No mention of the Dem vote percentage, only the Repub vote percentage and a pitch to see more IF we subscribe.

Did you think I included a link and lied about what was in it at the same time? I am a Dem, not a Repub.

So BOTH parties sued, reduced early voting days in areas more likely to serve the opposing party voters and added new requirements for submitting ballots from those more likely opposition voters, did they? I provided three links for examples of Repubs targeting likely Dem voter choices, particularly voting by mail, since 2020.

Please provide links where Dems proposed obstacles to Election Day voting preferred by Repubs and as directed by their glorious champion of free and fair elections, Trump.

I think I know what happened. Apparently you were looking at the web page with an upright handphone and didn't scroll right or left or up or down. If you'd used a PC or rotated your phone 90 degrees, the percentages would have been staring you straight in the face, 47.8% Democrats vs 50.7% Republicans.

https://www.cookpolitical.com/charts...e-tracker/2022

As to your beliefs, both parties sue. I don't know why Republicans would want to restrict voting days. Compared to your average Democrat, your average Republican is more likely to be busting his ass instead of sitting on his ass. So the extra and weekend voting days benefit the Republicans. And as to "adding requirements," I don't believe there are any significant barriers preventing any American, other than individuals with a criminal record in many states, from voting.

No criticism of you though. You're subjected to a constant barrage of propaganda from Democratic politicians and operatives and left of center media so it's no wonder you believe there's a problem.

And, with the exception of former-Democrat Donald Trump and his acolytes, Democrats are arguably the bigger offenders when it comes to trying to avoid counting votes lawfully cast in favor of the candidates of the opposing party.

I picked this article out especially for you, as it comes from a source you know and trust:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/06/o...ral-votes.html

How about looking at the numbers? To appreciate this next link, you're going to have to view it on your laptop instead of some rinky dink handphone.

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_res...jected_ballots

Scroll down to the table "Comparison of rejected absentee / mail-in ballots in the 2016,2018 and 2020 general elections. Sort in descending order by rejection rate. Which state has rejected the largest % of ballots during the 2016,2018 and 2020 elections combined? New York, a blue state. In 2020, in descending order, the ten states with the highest rejection rates were Arkansas, New Mexico, New York, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Illinois, Louisiana, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. That's 5 blue states, 4 red states, and one purple state.

Yeah, Trump supporters went ape shit crazy after the 2020 election, trying to overturn election results. And what were the results? How many votes were overturned as a result of the Trumpsters' efforts? Was it a handful? Or zero, zip, nada, not a one. I'm not sure, but the courts, including Trump appointees, did their jobs the way they were supposed to.

The left of center media and Democratic Party are making a mountain out of a molehill, as it's a damn effective way of firing up the base and getting them to go out and vote. A good example is the fury of the Democrats at not being allowed to furnish food and beverages to people in election lines in Georgia. WTF? Do they want to return to 100 years ago, where politicians handed out booze and barbecue in front of the polling stations while they electioneered?

Well, combined with Trump's after election craziness and abortion, the strategy worked. Those are the reasons there wasn't a GOP blow out this year.

[EihTooms]

I don't believe Republicans unfairly suppress the vote any more than I believe that Democrats stole the 2020 election. The courts, which contrary to popular opinion are pretty damn close to impartial when it comes to protecting American Democracy, step in to prevent things like that. Furthermore, I believe BOTH parties try equally hard to disadvantage the other side in elections.

Wise move, the vasectomy. That ***** could have puked up your seed and planted it in her pussy. Just kidding. The last two go go girls I pulled from Nana were 10's, but were done with me in 45 minutes. I need to study up again on the EihTooms Hooker Selection Method.


If you clicked into the Cook link, which I did for the first time today, you would have seen that they had Democrats with 47.8% and Republicans with 50.7% of the popular vote. It stares you straight in the face. I don't understand why you would imply Democrats got 49.3%.

The screenshots below are what was staring me in the face on that Cook site. And still are:

https://www.cookpolitical.com/charts...e-tracker/2022

No mention of the Dem vote percentage, only the Repub vote percentage and a pitch to see more IF we subscribe.

Did you think I included a link and lied about what was in it at the same time? I am a Dem, not a Repub.

So BOTH parties sued, reduced early voting days in areas more likely to serve the opposing party voters and added new requirements for submitting ballots from those more likely opposition voters, did they? I provided three links for examples of Repubs targeting likely Dem voter choices, particularly voting by mail, since 2020.

Please provide links where Dems proposed obstacles to Election Day voting preferred by Repubs and as directed by their glorious champion of free and fair elections, Trump.

[RamDavidson84]

I don't believe Republicans unfairly suppress the vote any more than I believe that Democrats stole the 2020 election. The courts, which contrary to popular opinion are pretty damn close to impartial when it comes to protecting American Democracy, step in to prevent things like that. Furthermore, I believe BOTH parties try equally hard to disadvantage the other side in elections.

Wise move, the vasectomy. That ***** could have puked up your seed and planted it in her pussy. Just kidding. The last two go go girls I pulled from Nana were 10's, but were done with me in 45 minutes. I need to study up again on the EihTooms Hooker Selection Method.


If you clicked into the Cook link, which I did for the first time today, you would have seen that they had Democrats with 47.8% and Republicans with 50.7% of the popular vote. It stares you straight in the face. I don't understand why you would imply Democrats got 49.3%.

Did Twitter take orders from the Fed and suppress Hunter Biden story? The more important point of this is that hard core Dems could care less their side is corrupt, yet they have months long fake media slander campaigns against Trump over fake Russian collusion, fake Ukraine dealings which lead to a fucking impeachment, Dems and Media look the other way when cities burn and they label the rioters as "protesters".

All that being said, it does not excuse the idiotic behavior of the Trump and Jan. 6 morons. I pray he does not run again. I also prey people start holding political parties they favor accountable when there is clear evidence of deep corruption or any evidence of corruption.

The average American witnesses these events and it leads one to believe that voters no longer care about right, wrong, corruption, super high inflation, billions spent on foreign wars, incredibly ineffective candidates "Biden / Fettereman". They just vote for a "the" or an "are". That type of thinking leads to a failed state. Sad.

[Tiny 12]

Explainer: Republicans push to restrict mail-in voting ahead of U.S. November midterms

Republicans sue to disqualify thousands of mail ballots in swing states.

Now I'm curious. Do you and other Bothsiders/Neithersiders have any examples of party-wide efforts by the Dems to make it more difficult for likely Repub voters or anyone else to submit their ballots, to cast their votes, to have their votes count, to suppress, obstruct, disenfranchise, hinder and thwart likely Repub votes or to reduce legal voting anywhere in the country as the Repubs have with the Dems?

I don't believe Republicans unfairly suppress the vote any more than I believe that Democrats stole the 2020 election. The courts, which contrary to popular opinion are pretty damn close to impartial when it comes to protecting American Democracy, step in to prevent things like that. Furthermore, I believe BOTH parties try equally hard to disadvantage the other side in elections.

On that topic, I had a splendid shaved pussy DATY experience last night with a lovely face, very hot body, 20-something year old Nana Plaza go-go girl, followed by her treating me to one of the better BBBJ+CIM+swallow experiences I've had in a while. I loved it when she smiled and said, "I have your babies in my tummy now" after swallowing my cum. But not really. I've had a vasectomy. There is nothing in her tummy that could make a baby. Still, very cute.

Wise move, the vasectomy. That ***** could have puked up your seed and planted it in her pussy. Just kidding. The last two go go girls I pulled from Nana were 10's, but were done with me in 45 minutes. I need to study up again on the EihTooms Hooker Selection Method.

As of this writing, the Cook source I assume you referenced states Repubs have so far garnered 50.7% of the popular House vote. I don't see a percentage for how successfully the Repubs' voter suppression rigging worked against the Dems. Maybe you need to be a subscriber to see that. We could assume the Dems would be close to 49.3% minus any stray third party votes.

The AEI source, as you pointed out, is by now more than two weeks behind on the vote count. Moreover, it is an opinion piece from a winger Washington Examiner writer who, as far as I can tell, provided no source for where he came up with his 51% to 47% figures.

If you clicked into the Cook link, which I did for the first time today, you would have seen that they had Democrats with 47.8% and Republicans with 50.7% of the popular vote. It stares you straight in the face. I don't understand why you would imply Democrats got 49.3%.

[Tiny 12]

"House Republicans voted Wednesday against a proposed earmark ban during a conference rules meeting, a vote that held larger implications as House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy seeks to become speaker.

The conference voted 52-158 against an amendment proposed by Rep. Tom McClintock, are-Calif. , that would get rid of the current conference rule allowing members to earmark spending bills if they meet certain transparency criteria."

https://rollcall.com/2022/11/30/pres...ks-vote-nears/

I wonder what the results would have been if the ballot hadn't been secret.

[Beijing4987]

A note to the jingoists on this thread: David Morrell wrote the novel First Blood from 1968-1971. The name for his main character came to him shopping for food. Rambo is a type of Apple. Morrell taught composition at Penn State University, where he met many Vietnam war veterans with PTSD, which afflicted the fictional John Rambo.

[JustTK]

Not my favourite person at all. BW to me is a neo--lib quasi racist. BUt he is also one of the most intelligent people in the USA. He speaks here of COVID, corruption and the demise of the DEM party, and gets many issues exactly spot on. Goot admire his defence while under serious attack:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBRL5VZThTM

[EihTooms]

You're late to the conversation. Several very intelligent and very partisan posters believe the American economy (GDP and jobs) performs like gangbusters when Democrats are president and turns to sh*t when Republicans are president. If you look at the historical record, you'd think they have a point. You look closer and the reason is because Republicans were in office during most of the recessions, and during the start of the COVID pandemic. And indeed at least one of the posters holds Republican presidents and policies responsible for all the recessions, and for the worldwide COVID pandemic.

Anyway I believe you can make a stronger case that Democratic presidents are responsible for wars, than Republican presidents are responsible for recessions. Now do I believe either of those theories? Well, no. Hell no. I'm just trying to make a point.

Did Democratic presidents start those wars? Of course not. But it's just as ridiculous to say Republican presidents started the recessions.

Indeed. That is exactly what you will find "if you look closer", except I have yet to read a post by anyone here claiming Repub presidents and policies were responsible for "all recessions." However, I am certainly open to reading his / her case for such a claim.

But the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Job Losses of the past 100 years? No argument possible; they belong to Repub economic policies and stewardship. All of them.

Some posters here hope we accept that is only a 100 year long series of wild coincidences, accidents, weirdly partisan business and economic cycles, maybe even badly misunderstood or misrepresented data. LOL.

Oh, and you forgot to mention the equally wild series of coincidences, etc required to result in Repub policies and stewardship producing NONE of the Great Boom Times, Economic Expansions and Historic Jobs Creation of the past 100 years while only the Dems have done that.

Of course, "if you look closer", you will most certainly see that wildly coincidental pattern repeated right up to and including the recent Repub so-called potus and the current Dem POTUS.

[JustTK]

Still believe Fauci and the rest of the disgusting heads of state are telling the truth? Watch this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc9YHBXad5o

Where is the media coverage? Shockingly slient. Why? Bcos we live in an authoritarian society where discenting voices are silenced. Only those that are radically propagandised think we live in a free world.

[EihTooms]

With all the necessary information at one's fingertips now, why not check first before repeating false history? . The Republican Party began in 1854, staunchly opposed to slavery and Mormonism. Uncle Ho and the communists ousted the French colonizers at Dien Bin Fu in 1954. JFK sent in "advisors. This morphed into the Vietnam War, called "The American War" by its residents. Type in Gulf of Tonkin resolution, 1964. May 11,1961. JFK sent 400 special forces and 100 other military advisors to South Vietnam. On the same day he ordered the start of clandestine warfare against North Vietnam by South Vietnamese agents under the direction of the CIA. He also ordered the South Vietnamese forces to infiltrate Laos to disrupt communist bases and supply lines. John James Rambo is a fictional character. John Heisley, son of flag designer Newt Heisley is depicted on the POW MIA flag. He was never a POW, but had the gaunt look of one to his father.

So what do you suppose was happening over there during those Happy Days from 1954 until the election of JFK?

Vietnam War U.S. Military Fatal Casualty Statistics

https://www.archives.gov/research/mi...lty-statistics

The earliest casualty record contains a date of death of June 8, 1956, and the most recent casualty record contains a date of death of May 28, 2006.

[Tiny 12]

With all the necessary information at one's fingertips now, why not check first before repeating false history? . The Republican Party began in 1854, staunchly opposed to slavery and Mormonism. Uncle Ho and the communists ousted the French colonizers at Dien Bin Fu in 1954. JFK sent in "advisors. This morphed into the Vietnam War, called "The American War" by its residents. Type in Gulf of Tonkin resolution, 1964. May 11,1961. JFK sent 400 special forces and 100 other military advisors to South Vietnam. On the same day he ordered the start of clandestine warfare against North Vietnam by South Vietnamese agents under the direction of the CIA. He also ordered the South Vietnamese forces to infiltrate Laos to disrupt communist bases and supply lines. John James Rambo is a fictional character. John Heisley, son of flag designer Newt Heisley is depicted on the POW MIA flag. He was never a POW, but had the gaunt look of one to his father.

You're late to the conversation. Several very intelligent and very partisan posters believe the American economy (GDP and jobs) performs like gangbusters when Democrats are president and turns to sh*t when Republicans are president. If you look at the historical record, you'd think they have a point. You look closer and the reason is because Republicans were in office during most of the recessions, and during the start of the COVID pandemic. And indeed at least one of the posters holds Republican presidents and policies responsible for all the recessions, and for the worldwide COVID pandemic.

Anyway I believe you can make a stronger case that Democratic presidents are responsible for wars, than Republican presidents are responsible for recessions. Now do I believe either of those theories? Well, no. Hell no. I'm just trying to make a point.

Did Democratic presidents start those wars? Of course not. But it's just as ridiculous to say Republican presidents started the recessions.

[RamDavidson84]

With all the necessary information at one's fingertips now, why not check first before repeating false history? . The Republican Party began in 1854, staunchly opposed to slavery and Mormonism. Uncle Ho and the communists ousted the French colonizers at Dien Bin Fu in 1954. JFK sent in "advisors. This morphed into the Vietnam War, called "The American War" by its residents. Type in Gulf of Tonkin resolution, 1964. May 11,1961. JFK sent 400 special forces and 100 other military advisors to South Vietnam. On the same day he ordered the start of clandestine warfare against North Vietnam by South Vietnamese agents under the direction of the CIA. He also ordered the South Vietnamese forces to infiltrate Laos to disrupt communist bases and supply lines. John James Rambo is a fictional character. John Heisley, son of flag designer Newt Heisley is depicted on the POW MIA flag. He was never a POW, but had the gaunt look of one to his father.

No Rambo was real. All three movies were filmed with actual combat footage. Look it up. LOL.

[Beijing4987]

With all the necessary information at one's fingertips now, why not check first before repeating false history? . The Republican Party began in 1854, staunchly opposed to slavery and Mormonism. Uncle Ho and the communists ousted the French colonizers at Dien Bin Fu in 1954. JFK sent in "advisors. This morphed into the Vietnam War, called "The American War" by its residents. Type in Gulf of Tonkin resolution, 1964. May 11,1961. JFK sent 400 special forces and 100 other military advisors to South Vietnam. On the same day he ordered the start of clandestine warfare against North Vietnam by South Vietnamese agents under the direction of the CIA. He also ordered the South Vietnamese forces to infiltrate Laos to disrupt communist bases and supply lines. John James Rambo is a fictional character. John Heisley, son of flag designer Newt Heisley is depicted on the POW MIA flag. He was never a POW, but had the gaunt look of one to his father.

[EihTooms]

Google "House Popular Vote. " You'll see a link on aei.org that says Republicans got 51% of the popular vote to Democrats' 47%. I assumed 222 Republican and 213 Democrat seats to get the 2% margin for the Republicans in the House.

That link though was from November 18.

If you do what I told you to do with Google, the first link will be to the Cook Political Report, which right now shows Republicans with a 2. 9% margin in the popular vote and a 1. 6% margin in House seats, with two seats undecided.

I picked the aei.org numbers because they were staring me straight in the face and I didn't have to do any math.

As of this writing, the Cook source I assume you referenced states Repubs have so far garnered 50.7% of the popular House vote. I don't see a percentage for how successfully the Repubs' voter suppression rigging worked against the Dems. Maybe you need to be a subscriber to see that. We could assume the Dems would be close to 49.3% minus any stray third party votes.

The AEI source, as you pointed out, is by now more than two weeks behind on the vote count. Moreover, it is an opinion piece from a winger Washington Examiner writer who, as far as I can tell, provided no source for where he came up with his 51% to 47% figures.