Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 4,996 to 5,010 of 14385
-
08-03-22 01:13 #9390
Posts: 714Soviet Style Politics
So now that it can no longer be hidden or denied that there were eyewitnesses willing to come forth and testify under oath as to what actually took place in the famous or rather infamous limo ride, Woke Marxist propaganda agents must set to work trashing the two secret service agent's character and credibility so that their sworn testimony can be called into question on Marxist media outlets. The 2 agents have not even testified yet, but the Marxists are already attacking them. It seems very Soviet Union to me. The two secret service agents are lucky they have not been shipped off to the Aleutian Islands.
Of course, we must believe the Party's witness and her 2nd or 3rd hand, hearsay, testimony because woman never lie for political gain or personal reasons except when they accuse Woke politicians of misconduct. But for those of us who have not yet been forced to become card carrying members of the Woke Marxist New Democrat Party, an interesting question remains: who told her about what happened on the Limo ride? Another third person who saw nothing or someone actually in the Limo? But I guess this is just a trivial, unimportant question for party loyalists like yourself since we common folk are expected to shut up, fall in line, and follow the party's directive Soviet Style.
You are back on my ignore list, poncho.
-
08-02-22 21:58 #9389
Posts: 1604What?
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
When the Mango Mussolini said to inject disinfectant, trump supporters immediately began making bleach martinis. Because they believed what he said. words matter.
They also believed the Orange Moron when he said that Mexico would pay for the wall. Nobody else did, of course, but trump supporters did.
They also believed Hair Furor when he said that he had proof of the election being stolen. Nobody else did, of course, but trump supporters did.
They believed Cheeto Tweeto when he said that Chinese thermostats changed votes. Or was it Italian satellites? Nobody else did, of course, but trump supporters did.
See, that's what I mean when I say words matter.
But sure, deflect and say that there were only dozens of calls when the facts say otherwise. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertg...h=47476a4a1157.
-
08-02-22 21:46 #9388
Posts: 1604Hogwash
Originally Posted by AxelHeyst [View Original Post]
The committee will call them to testify under oath.
Besides, Ornato has a history, when not under oath, of pulling a trump.
"Two former Trump White House aides took to Twitter Wednesday to say Ornato has a pattern of denying conversations that they know took place.
"Tony Ornato lied about me too," tweeted Alyssa Farah, former White House communications director. She said that she spoke with Ornato and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows before the forcible clearing of Lafayette Square in June 2020, in which they refused to warn reporters who were staged at the park that they needed to move.
"Tony later lied & said the exchange never happened," Farah wrote.
Olivia Troye, a former senior national security aide to Pence, took to Twitter as well to express her views of Ornato.
"Those of us who worked w / Tony know where his loyalties lie," she wrote. "he should testify under oath."
There's more. "Lawmakers on the committee said Ornato had said in his initial testimony that he was unable to recall other actions and statements by Trump on Jan. 6 that other witnesses had described in great detail."
So, Ornato and Engel will testify under oath. Or at least they'll be asked to testify. Whether or not they actually testify is another matter entirely.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ecret-service/
But here's the thing. Let's say that you and I are having a meeting and a third person shows up. I say to that person, "Hey, ole' Axe told me {insert story here} and he was there in person. " What do you do if I told a falsehood about the story? Do you stay silent? Do you speak up and correct me? I guaran-damn-tee that you'd speak up. And so would Engel if the story about what happened in the SUV was false. But he didn't say a word. Did he?
-
08-02-22 21:35 #9387
Posts: 3222Originally Posted by Spidy [View Original Post]
Thing is now we have another pro war idiot who is just as dense as Bush on the economy as president now. People I trust like Matt Taibbi have pointed out that the pro-war, neocon morons who wanted us to go to war in Iraq are now being sought out by Biden for advice. I think some if those fools may even switch parties. You can have them.
You think there is this huge gulf between Republicans and Democrats. Outside of his bone headed energy policy (and Bush's was boneheaded as well but in a different way), I see little difference between Biden and GW Bush. They both love war.
The best presidents in my life time (Reagan, Clinton, Obama, and Trump) all kept the peace.
-
08-02-22 21:22 #9386
Posts: 3222Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
So we see a movie like 2000 mules and a woman who lives in another state put ballots into a ballot box wearing gloves, threw them out, and the pathetic excuse given, "it was during a pandemic don't you know", we just sit in shock. No one knows why she was wearing gloves, so why do you fools give out such an explanation?
Thing is PVM, we do not know what the fuck she was doing. She could have been stuffing the ballot box for Trump right? But you dumb Dems do not care if there was an election fraud. All you care about is the result, and if that woman is deposed, there is a chance the result you desire comes into question.
So when it came to Russiagate, Kavanaugh, Rittenhouse, Hunter Biden's laptop, and now election fraud, your goal was not truth but power, so we who vote Republican have totally tuned you out. And now you are blathering on about the significance of some second hand heresay. You have lost us again. You have shown that you have no respect for the rules of an election and want to cheat and get some group of people to disqualify Trump versus beating him in an election.
So let me repeat this fact. Russiagate was a fraud devised by Democrats and carried out by the FBI to illegally oust a duly elected president. Do you deny that PVM?
So you dumb Dems already committed fraud and tried to rig one election. That is a fact and amazingly when it came to 1-6, you dumb Dems think that had nothing to do with anything.
You are so dense it is inconceivable that people would riot and March because you were trying to commit election fraud not once but a second time. No, it had to be Trump.
If you do not care about the fraud that was Russiagate, why the hell should we care about 1-6?
-
08-02-22 18:23 #9385
Posts: 714PV Acknowledges A. H. 's Critical Point
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
So, PV Acknowledges my critical point that the reason the Secret Service were not asked to testify in front of Nancy's inquisition is that their firsthand testimony would have been exculpatory because their testimony would have completely contradicted the third hand testimony of the woman. I am not even going to mention her name anymore. Note: some posters on this thread may not know what exculpatory means. Ha ha.
In any case PV and I agree on something. Unbelievable, but apparently true. These are his words not mine. "If somebody flat out lies in your presence about something you said, you call bullshit immediately. " Absolutely right, and that is just what the two secret service agents riding in the car with Trump on Jan 6 did. They went public with it within hours of the woman's testimony and stated categorically that what the woman told the committee never happened. They also volunteered to testify under oath in front of the committee to what they witnessed firsthand that day in the limo. But the committee did not call them. Game set match. The committee hearings are nothing more than choreographed soviet style show trial. A propaganda ballet.
Note to our literary challenged radical bm's: my reference to a "soviet style show trial" is an analogy.
So, PV may not have been aware that the 2 secret service agents came forward right after the woman testified and denied her version of what took place. The corporate news media tends not to report political news that does not support the leftwing narrative. The woman 's shocking testimony was allowed to dominate at least one news cycle before the whole truth came out. The committee knew this would happen and played the corporate news media like a violin. This is a problem worthy of further discussion, the political corruption of the 5th Estate, but not now. It is like pulling teeth on this web site to prove the committee is not concerned with finding out what really happened on Jan 6 and even now with undeniable proof presented as to their bias, I know that most if not all of the ISG radicals will refuse to concede the point. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
-
08-02-22 17:05 #9384
Posts: 1110Unhinged Tweets, meets More Consequences
Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
As this RethugliKKKant armed rioter, Guy Reffitt, now feels the DOJ "consequences boot", derived directly from the mad capped, unhinged tweets of Agent Orange.
More suffering for Americans, albeit this time, justified and well placed suffering.
-
08-02-22 16:34 #9383
Posts: 1110Agent Orange, Foxy News...leads to comic relief
Originally Posted by Elvis [View Original Post]
He had months to act before the severity of the virus got out of hand and save American lives and he did nothing. Naturally, with his racist and bigoted arrogance (for anything Obama), he threw out the Pandemic Response Playbook, thereby laying a very clear, direct path and an unequivocal trail of ineptitude and incompetence, that most certainly lead to the many hundreds of thousands of preventable COVID deaths.
Originally Posted by Elvis [View Original Post]Originally Posted by PV Monger [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis [View Original Post]
Well, Elvis, with you being a staunch purveyor of Foxy News (hint: which is really just entertainment, but most of the time, just comic relief disguised as news), I'm sure you'll have no trouble relating to any future reports from me.
-
08-02-22 14:07 #9382
Posts: 1604A good read
The following is an excerpt from the following article. I have chosen not to include some parts because they relate to the "local politics" of the area from where the person who wrote the article lives. However, the article makes some excellent points. https://news.yahoo.com/ray-buursma-c...041513238.html.
Yes, Trump committed treason.
The Jan. 6 hearings are completed (maybe). Anyone with a smattering of gray matter between the ears recognizes Donald Trump did the following:
1. Rejected the results of a legitimate election.
2. Made illegal, immoral and unethical attempts to maintain his presidency.
3. Gathered supporters for a rally in Washington, the. See. , on Jan. 6, 2021.
4. Encouraged those supporters to preempt the proceedings which would announce the next president.
5. Took no sincere action for three hours to end an attempted insurrection at the Capitol, but instead attempted to contact senators so they would halt constitutional proceedings.
6. Chose to sacrifice the well being and even the life of Vice President Pence, if necessary, so Pence would not declare Biden to be America's next president.
None of this is new, and we need not rehash specifics of Trump's misbehavior. His offenses have been presented over and over, culminating with the last bipartisan Congressional hearing less than two weeks ago.
What of those who still support Trump?
Today we address not Trump, but those who still back him. Let's start by defining two terms.
Treason is attempting to overthrow a nation's government.
A traitor is a person who commits treason.
Based on these definitions and his actions above, Trump is clearly a traitor, but what of the tens of millions who still condone him? What do we call those who committed no overt treasonous act but still stand behind the orchestrator of Jan. 6?
Well, what do we call one who condones a wife beater, a child molester, or a thief? He is not guilty of a crime, but is he an enabler? A facilitator? A booster? An ally? He certainly is reprehensible, but for now, let's call him a "supporter."
Trump supporters come in two types. Some blatantly and overtly endorse the usurper. They still wear MAGA hats, fly Trump flags and display his yard signs and bumper stickers.
Others are closet supporters. They side with Trump but seldom announce their backing, for doing so would appear morally awkward. They are like KKK supporters who do not don pointy white hoods, but still urge their buddies to "Have fun at the cross burning and lynching!" When asked to justify their approval for Trump, most say, "I don't like Trump, but I like his policies."
"Liking policies" might cover a few sins, but "liking policies" can never, ever justify an attempter insurrection or coup, and Trump did nothing less. Atonement is impossible without repentance, and Trump, clearly, is unrepentant. There is no way around this. Remaining a Trump supporter makes one vile to America, vile to the Constitution, and vile to American values.
Jesus, in Matthew 5: 27-28, stated he who lusts after a woman has already committed adultery in his heart. That being so, why should those who condone the traitorous leader of an insurrection not be called traitors?
The author of the article goes on to ask a few questions of a particular local politician. Maybe we ought to ask the same questions of the RethugliKKKans who post here:
First, do you dispute Trump took the six actions listed above? If no, please explain.
Second, do you consider those actions treasonous? If no, please explain.
Third, do you still support Trump? If so, please explain.
-
08-02-22 11:50 #9381
Posts: 714Xpartan, in order to defend Pelosi's disgraceful congressional committee proceedings, you are not only misrepresenting what I posted, you are dancing around what actually occurred in the house of Representatives. Why won't you address the relevant issue? Why were the two eyewitnesses to whatever actually occurred in the limo not called to testify under oath? Your silence about the Secret Service agent's firsthand information being ignored by the committee and your foolish attempt to dance around the issue confirms your absolute political bias and concedes the point that the House committee is not interested in finding the truth about what actually occurred on Jan 6. Shame on you and shame on your party.
Unfortunately, from your point of view these hearings failed. Nobody tuned in to watch and the hearings failed to distract the American people from the colossal failures and outrageous behavior of the Biden administration. Namely the economy "stupid", the border chaos, the violence in the streets of all Democratic party controlled cities, and the communist critical race theory and trany indoctrination being forced on our school children. So, November is fast approaching. I can't wait.
-
08-02-22 07:06 #9380
Posts: 1955Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
-
08-02-22 04:29 #9379
Posts: 1604Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
AxeH says "Elvis just told me that the President of the company punched out his aide while on the way to the airport". (Elvis was in the car with the President of the company and saw the incident).
If the story was false, (ie. Elvis never said what AxeH related) would Elvis just sit there quietly and not say a word? Not on your life. He would, right then and there refute what AxeH said. Because that's what people do. If somebody flat out lies in your presence about something you said, you call bullshit immediately.
-
08-02-22 02:31 #9378
Posts: 3222Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
By the way, where are all the articles about people who died from Covid after Biden said you could not get it if vaccinated? Where are those hundreds of articles?
When a Republican talks, words mean things. When a Democrat talks, what does the word words mean? Does that not depend on what your definition of is is?
-
08-02-22 02:16 #9377
Posts: 1680Well
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Watch Dr. Birx's reaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d57zJr82dhQ
-
08-01-22 22:49 #9376
Posts: 1680Great News
Keep bringing the traitors before the bench.
"USA District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich condemned Reffitt's conduct in handing down an 87-month sentence, saying in a nearly six-hour-long hearing that his views espousing political violence were 'absurd,' 'delusional' and "way outside of the mainstream. What Reffitt and others did at the Capitol 'is the antithesis of patriotism,' Friedrich said, adding: "Not only are they not patriots, they are a direct threat to our democracy, and will be punished as such. ".
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md...sentence-jan6/