Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 6,916 to 6,930 of 14422
-
03-24-22 19:41 #7507
Posts: 2579RIP globalization
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
https://www.rt.com/news/552552-joe-rogan-ukraine-turn/
https://www.newsmax.com/jennaellis/agenda-civil-rights-sex/2022/03/23/id/1062623/
https://nypost.com/2022/02/20/the-absurd-russiagate-pulitzer-of-the-ny-times-and-washington-post/
-
03-24-22 19:30 #7506
Posts: 2579Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
03-24-22 19:28 #7505
Posts: 1604Don't pee on me and tell me it is raining
Wingers who post here love to talk about how President Biden has dementia.
Please, wingers, tell me how the following statement is from someone who is in full command of their mental faculties: "Well, what I would do, is I would — we would — we have tremendous military capability and what we can do without planes, to be honest with you, without 44-year-old jets, what we can do is enormous. And we should be doing it and we should be helping them to survive and they're doing an amazing job."
And actual quote from the Orange Fruitcake from yesterday. Look it up!
-
03-24-22 18:12 #7504
Posts: 3240Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
And I would take a Biden with mild senility over a fully functional KH any day.
But his poor recall of words, which is often the first signs of dementia and what Reagan had in the late stages of his presidency, is evident. And if you look at the way he walks, he has a characteristic shuffling gait. And then you have the patterns with the lucidity and anger. Not all dementia is Alzheimer's, and this is not Alzheimer's. It is actually worse.
-
03-24-22 18:00 #7503
Posts: 3240Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
And while you dummies blamed Putin for Trump winning in 2016, who really caused you to lose? It was James Comey the head of the FBI when he said Hillary was still being investigated. And why did he do it? Because Hillary was so far ahead in the polls, he thought he could get away with it. He did not want to be labeled the Democratic hack that he truly was. Outside of appearance, there was no reason to re-open an investigation of Hillary. And the reason all you Dems have been quiet on him and the FBI is they are part of the DDOJ.
So you can take your obstruction of justice, vague campaign finance law violations, and criminal act of lying to the FBI, and put it where the sun does not shine. We do not care. We have seen how partisan the DDOJ is.
-
03-24-22 17:37 #7502
Posts: 3240Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by PVMonger [View Original Post]
-
03-24-22 17:31 #7501
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by CaliGuy [View Original Post]
-
03-24-22 17:00 #7500
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
While instead TrumpShit is the only one clearly demonstrating his advanced age and incompetence.
-
03-24-22 16:46 #7499
Posts: 1604Republicans are doing a great job of making themselves look like fools
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
But I won't bother to provide a link to that fact because the wingers on this board will just call it "fake newZ". But, they'll just call this post "fake news" anyway because, well, they're all expurts in federal sentencing guidelines and because winger media tells them what to think.
But their other hero, Sen. Ted Cruz is the one who really takes the cake.
While grilling Jackson on critical race theory Tuesday, Sen. Ted Cruz described a children's book called "Antiracist Baby. " he turned his steely gaze to Jackson and asked the Harvard-educated veteran jurist if she believes "that babies are racist. "
Some viewers wondered why a man who looks like he rubbed honey on his face then rolled on the floor of a barbershop would pose such a question. In fact, the collective eye roll was so intense the Earth briefly tilted off its axis.
But I stood and cheered the bold senator from Texas / Cancun. He was speaking truth to power and addressing an issue few Americans have ever been willing to face: Babies are incredibly racist. I don't mean just a little racist. I'm talking full-on, fontanel-having, seething bundles of hatred and racial animus. Swaddled little monsters is what they are.
I can already hear the cries of the baby apologists.
"Oh, that's ridiculous. They're so cute!
"Not possible, they've only been alive a few months!
Let me ask you this. When is the last time you heard a baby denounce racism? Hmmm?
Never. They're silent on the issue. If babies aren't racist, and if a clearly intelligent and serious USA Senator is out there floating a possible epidemic of infant racism, don't you think babies themselves would stand up, immediately fall down and then assure everyone they don't have a racist bone in their soft and pliable bodies?
That's Crisis Management 101, folks.
No, these suckers are coming out of the womb hating everyone who doesn't look like them.
Think about it. You often find them wrapped in white sheets. (Coo Cluck Klan?) And if you introduce a white baby to a person of color and then that person leaves the room, the baby acts as though that person no longer exists. Same happens if it's a Black baby meeting a white person. Some say: "Well, that's called object permanence, or the idea that people continue to exist when you don't see or hear them. Babies don't develop that until they're around eight months old. "
To which I say: "That's called a lame attempt to use science to excuse blatant baby racism, and you should be ashamed of your adult self. "
The undeniable reality of widespread, virulent racism among recently born humans is why it was so important that Cruz took precious moments of his and our lives and devoted that time – time none of us will ever get back – to ask a brilliant and widely respected judge about a 24-page, brightly colored children's book. The existence of a book called "Antiracist Baby" suggests it's possible for a baby to not be racist. But as I've proved so eloquently here, all babies are definitely racist. So how can we allow someone on the Supreme Court if she doesn't recognize "Antiracist Baby" as insidious baby-washing propaganda?
As this confirmation hearing continues, I hope Cruz and other sharp Republican senators will continue this important line of questioning. Are babies also racist against Whos, and does the book "Horton Hears a Who!" attempt to gloss over hostile infant Who hatred? Is "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" an allegory for the supremacy of one particular race over all others?
Yes on both counts, probably.
It's high time someone in this country had the courage to call out the vile, Machiavellian babies who have transformed our day cares into playpens of hate.
Before Judge Jackson is confirmed, she must meet what I'll call "the Cruz requirement. " She must stand up, face the American people and honestly declare: "Yes! All babies are racist! Thank you for asking such an important question. Did you all arrive in the same clown car or drive separately?
-
03-24-22 16:27 #7498
Posts: 1604Don't forget
Originally Posted by GDreams [View Original Post]
I mean, c'Mon! If somebody is uneducated, the only job they're going to be able to obtain is a low-skill, low-wage job. But Republicans say that every Republican has a good, high-paying job. They don't see the illogicalness of it all but, then again, they don't see the illogicalness of most Republican talking points.
-
03-24-22 07:26 #7497
Posts: 2579Hope springs eternal
Originally Posted by AxelHeyst [View Original Post]
https://amgreatness.com/2022/03/23/t...set-is-coming/
-
03-24-22 06:30 #7496
Posts: 5461The Resignation Clarified Along With A Tip For Other Career Criminals
The tip? Never leave a paper trail.
Trump was obviously the worst so-called potus of all time with the worst across the board results, one of the worst "businessmen" of all time losing historic record amounts of other people's money, those foolish enough to invest in his various cons, the worst "salesman" for America and democracy of all time in that nobody made both look worse and the dumbest fucking moron who was ever allowed to walk into the Oval Office in his total ignorance of history and contempt for the USA Constitution.
But as Head of the Trump Crime Family, he sure knew how best to dodge well deserved criminal indictment for the crimes he committed requiring tangible proof of "intent. "
Oh, it wasn't possible for him to erase the overwhelming and repeated evidence of his crimes. They happened.
But if he never allowed written notes, emails or recordings of his directives, he knew it would be very difficult to prove he "intended" to commit all those crimes. That way, other people, his lackies, would take the fall and do the time for him. Just like those suckers who lost serious money on his investment frauds cons and, of course, the American people.
"Donald Trump Guilty of 'Numerous Felonies,' Former New York Prosecutor Says" https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...-1691245?amp=1.
The criminal probe has already resulted in felony tax evasion charges against the Trump Organization and its former chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg. There is also an active parallel civil investigation into the Trump Organization and the former president by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
-
03-24-22 05:45 #7495
Posts: 1604Wow. Just wow.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Commenting on your posts is like playing chess with a pigeon. You knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut around like you've won.
I can think of plenty of reasons to vote for the Orange Fruitcake. If you were scared of Black people, brown people, yellow people or red people, you'd vote for the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy. If you were terrified of gays or lesbians you would have voted for Cheeto Tweeto. If you were horrified the transsexual people were allowed to live, you would have voted for the Mango Mussolini. If you thought that it was a good thing to die in order to 'own the libs', you voted for the Orange Fruitcake. If you thought that a bunch of uneducated Mexicans were invading the US in order to take your $300 per hour job, you voted for Hair Furor. If you wanted to go back to the 1850's, you would have voted for Cheeto Tweeto. If you thought that COVID was going to disappear with the warm weather, you'd have voted for the Mango Mussolini. If you wanted no healthcare, you would have voted for the Orange Fruitcake. If you thought that "My body, my choice" was Ok to say if you didn't want to wear a mask but horrible to say if you wanted an abortion, you voted for the Orange Menace. See, there are lots of reasons for voting for the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy. And I guarantee that every single one of the people who voted for Cheeto Tweeto identified with at least one of the above.
Am I offensive to Republican voters? Outstanding!
-
03-24-22 04:15 #7494
Posts: 690Originally Posted by ScatManDoo [View Original Post]
-
03-24-22 03:15 #7493
Posts: 5461How much does she love beer?
Originally Posted by AxelHeyst [View Original Post]
When was the last time a nominee was asked such as silly ass irrelevant question? Was she supposed to say, "A wonan has a pussy"? Then what on Earth would that have to do with transgender rights, discrimination or anything else the SCOTUS might some day rule on?
Waiting for the next Repub to accuse her of causing higher gas prices.
On the positive side, it has been suggested this appointee will rally greater support for Biden and other Dems from the critical, decisive black female demographic.
And on that count, could those idiotic Repubs asking her those ridiculous, condescending questions only to trip off on their Party's sucker social issues and lunatic QAnon conspiracy theory rants have possibly promoted and encouraged that result any more? LOL.
Brilliant chairing by Dem Durbin for letting the Repubs just blather on and on with that nonsense with very little interruption. LOL.