American Politics

[MarquisdeSade1]

"Sure sure sure. Whatever you say.

So my actual link proving that your Repub Party talking point about the so-called 'Obamaphone', which was roundly and famously debunked since they first pitched that lie, had nothing to do with Obama and even began in 2008 under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents the year before Obama became President and launched into producing one of the most successful Great Dem Recoveries of all time from one of the most disastrous Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of all time was somehow miraculously refuted by your absolute zero link supporting no contention whatsoever other than that you were obviously either just making up shit on your own or left it up to your beloved Repub Party to provide all the shit you are delighted to carry for them?

Oh yes, of course. Even the casual reader can see that.

Lolol. ".

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/mobile/...e-most-n378741

Nbc calls them Obama fones dum dum jajajajajajajaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

I believe it was Reagan that started the subsidy program.

But Barry expanded it to include free fones, that's why they call them Obama FONES.

I know you're old, but maybe go back to school and learn to read.

Oh wait you can't you're in the 3rd world jajajaja and can't go back to California they kicked you out and their shitty public schools are the reason you can't comprehend anything you read in the first place.

[EihTooms]

"In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:

https://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.

Got anymore? LOL.

I don't know who started the program nor do I care, did I say who started it, slow down the keyboard diarrhea and learn how to read.

While I'm sure Barry added a few trillion to the program, if you live in the USA you might know what you're talking about but you want to debate American politics.

From 10000 miles away and you haven't even stepped foot on American soil in at least 12 yrs.

If you lived here you would know what they call Obama fones in the ghetto, they are called "Obama fones" dum dum.

Just like they still call food stamps "Obama bucks".

Ask blacks why they loved barry or if they still do, and they will tell you because he gave us new Obama fones and bumped up our food stamps therefore.

In gratitude theyve permanently named them "Obama bucks".

I see you didn't have any trouble finding the term Obama fones.

Yes, no problem at all finding utter Repub BS being debunked over and over again. And you still don't have any substantiation for any of your silliness. LOL. Do you call your Out-of-Order for 5 years smartphone an "Obamaphone" out of a sense of affection for him as well? The phone you had that stopped working years ago and apparently cannot be repaired had as much to do with Barack Obama as all of your other beloved Repub Party BS had to do with Bill Clinton and Reagan / GHW Bush's NAFTA, Bill Clinton and GW Bush's voting CCP into the WTO, Bill Clinton and GW Bush's Great Repub Financial Crisis 8 years after Clinton left office and handed that incoming Repub better economic conditions than any outgoing Repub ever handed an incoming Dem. As did Jimmy Carter. And Barack Obama. And every other Dem going back to at least FDR.

[EihTooms]

You had great timing Spidy. You posted this the day one of my manosphere heroes, Aaron Clarey published his book, "A world without men". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm5foiiRrv8.

I will save you the $15 and tell you that around 75% of our food and 80% of our "stuff" comes from men. You need a HR position filled then you get a woman. You need a car fixed or wiring in a home and you HAVE to get a man. In the 1950's there were no HR employees but there were mechanics and electricians. It is funny how that works. It is almost like jobs had to be made up for women.

And you are a traitor to your sex, Spidy? A soy boy? LOL. Well, you better be a thin one because that soy you are consuming was produced by men.

Man, I wish you libtards had to stay and live in the shitholes you created. Tooms the pretzel would have had to stay in California. PVmonger could not hightail it down to Mexico, and you would have your passport revoked. "I am sorry sir you can only have sex with women in blue states. " MLK had a dream, and that is mine.

Earliest known meeting of the Manosphere Founding Fathers:

https://youtu.be/0OTYdizres8?si=fDTtDHt7PmEkMihU

[EihTooms]

In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:

You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.

Got anymore? LOL.

I need to stop replying to your nonsense, "One does not bother debating anything with someone that won't concede even when they blatantly lose", I proved.

With every single issue you're clearly full of lies and full of Whoopi Goldberg diarrhea of the mouth with my links, and what do you do?

Of course, say I'm still wrong, you're a pathological liar, that should not be debated.

This is some weird ass game to you where you to try to Gaslight the fuck out of people, one cannot have a sane conversation with you.

Sure sure sure. Whatever you say.

So my actual link proving that your Repub Party talking point about the so-called 'Obamaphone', which was roundly and famously debunked since they first pitched that lie, had nothing to do with Obama and even began in 2008 under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents the year before Obama became President and launched into producing one of the most successful Great Dem Recoveries of all time from one of the most disastrous Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of all time was somehow miraculously refuted by your absolute zero link supporting no contention whatsoever other than that you were obviously either just making up shit on your own or left it up to your beloved Repub Party to provide all the shit you are delighted to carry for them?

Oh yes, of course. Even the casual reader can see that.

Lolol.

[MarquisdeSade1]

"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.

I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.

There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:

The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.

Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.

End of link.

Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.

That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.

Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".

2 out of three were illegitimate.

All three belong in prison.

Bubba.

Barry the foreign born muslim.

Biden.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/wa...litical-moment

[MarquisdeSade1]

"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.

I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.

There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:

The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.

Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.

End of link.

Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.

That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.

Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".

2 out of three were illegitimate.

All three belong in prison.

Bubba.

Barry the foreign born muslim.

Biden.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/wa...litical-moment

That helped destroy America, Bush 43.

[MarquisdeSade1]

"You had great timing Spidy. You posted this the day one of my manosphere heroes, Aaron Clarey published his book, "A world without men". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm5foiiRrv8..

I will save you the $15 and tell you that around 75% of our food and 80% of our "stuff" comes from men. You need a HR position filled then you get a woman. You need a car fixed or wiring in a home and you HAVE to get a man. In the 1950's there were no HR employees but there were mechanics and electricians. It is funny how that works. It is almost like jobs had to be made up for women.

And you are a traitor to your sex, Spidy? A soy boy? LOL. Well, you better be a thin one because that soy you are consuming was produced by men.

Man, I wish you libtards had to stay and live in the shitholes you created. Tooms the pretzel would have had to stay in California. PVmonger could not hightail it down to Mexico, and you would have your passport revoked. "I am sorry sir you can only have sex with women in blue states. " MLK had a dream, and that is mine. ".

WOMEN CAN DO ANYTHING MEN CAN DO.

JUST NOT VERY GOOD.

[MarquisdeSade1]

https://www.breitbart.com/middle-eas...rotest-dnc-hq/

Will there be more kangaroo courts, show trials with outrageous sentences and sham select congressional committees?

TRUMP President for Life!!

[MarquisdeSade1]

"I said Republican primaries are less rigged not that they were totally pure. The media has been rigging them for years when they do this front runner bullshit. Jeb Bush as front runner in 2016? Somehow the media had a comeback in 2020 when they pushed the corpse of Joe Biden to be president and with a little help from the AA communities, he "won".

Actually, Trump completely hoodwinked the media in 2016 to cover him. He got more free media coverage than anyone and instead of the media, which rigs elections, making him look foolish, Trump made the media look dumb. The media were all crying in their La Croix water when Trump got elected and said, "Why did we give this guy so much coverage?

Even now, you have many people running in the more fair Republican primaries and viable challengers like RFK JR (guess he too is not a Democrat like Bernie) bailing ship and running as independent. The Democratic primaries are so rigged the majority of Democratic voters don't want Biden as president but they have no choice but to accept him. Hel, you even have Bill Maher begging Biden not to run.

We are running out of ingredients Mr. Pretzel. Salt, nacho cheese are gone. All that is left is a side of mustard. Man, I get it. It is hard being a Democrat these days. Things were so much easier when Black Jesus was around. ".

There are reasons women have jobs, wall street wants to drive up GDP, how? By making both husband and wife work, you can pay the man less, because now they have 2 incomes to get by, but need 2 cars now and clothes for work etc but they can drive up the GDP.

And there is what's called ADULT DAY CARE.

I go into the Chase Tower in downtown Chicago regularly and see lots of ADULT DAY CARE.

You will go by an office with several 20 something women sitting in there playing with their fones and hair etc.

I guess they are having a MEETING LMAO.

Travel around most of the world and you will see most of these women selling pussy.

But in the west they don't want men getting easy pussy.

They want men to have to fight over crumbs and work your ass off for a beach with a horrible entitled attitude.

Travel around Asia or Latin America or Eastern Europe and see what kind of ADULT DAY CARE is available? NONE.

The wall street dirtbags and The WEF crowd want females working 9 to 5 for them.

Even if its just ADULT DAY CARE.

I hope next time one of these ISG losers have cancer or need brain surgery they make sure to goto a female physician LMAO.

https://www.amazon.com/-/he/Martin-L.../dp/0380973197

https://www.foxnews.com/media/passpo...women-overseas

Just look around America? How many street hookers do you see? Not many they rather be working at Chase for ADULT DAY CARE.

Just look and see how many men are homeless including veterans? How many women are homeless??

Its because of dirtbags with the same attitude as spidy.

Be nice to the pigs, lick their dirty buttholes, maybe theyll give you sum pussy!

[MarquisdeSade1]

"In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:

https://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.

Got anymore? LOL.

I don't know who started the program nor do I care, did I say who started it, slow down the keyboard diarrhea and learn how to read.

While I'm sure Barry added a few trillion to the program, if you live in the USA you might know what you're talking about but you want to debate American politics.

From 10000 miles away and you haven't even stepped foot on American soil in at least 12 yrs.

If you lived here you would know what they call Obama fones in the ghetto, they are called "Obama fones" dum dum.

Just like they still call food stamps "Obama bucks".

Ask blacks why they loved barry or if they still do, and they will tell you because he gave us new Obama fones and bumped up our food stamps therefore.

In gratitude theyve permanently named them "Obama bucks".

I see you didn't have any trouble finding the term Obama fones.

[EihTooms]

While Bill Maher continues his years long weekly Republican Party Campaign Rallies and calculates which third candidate on a future ballot to endorse in order to ensure a Republican candidate win, it might be useful to recap a few recent Bill Maher Republican Party Campaign Rally expert analysis and predictions vs real world outcomes:

Bill Maher predicts GOP will win big in midterms because of 'woke culture' and says America is now the 'Titanic right after the iceberg hit': Compares democracy to a McRib - 'it's here now... so enjoy it while you can'
Nov. 5, 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-culture.html

The Real Time host, 66, didn't seem too positive about the 2022 Midterm Elections on Tuesday, and says 'woke culture is just one reason why the Republicans are going to do so well in this election.'
....
He went on to say that the 'left has gone super crazy with lots of s**t that the average American just never voted for,' such as gender identity and homelessness.
....
is predicted that the Republican Party will rule the Senate and the House after Tuesday's election.

'Things are going to change fundamentally in this country after this election,' Maher said on Thursday. 'Theyre definitely going to win.'
....
The self-proclaimed 'traditional liberal' channeled the same energy on his Friday night show on HBO, where he again declared that 'democracy will lose' and Trump's 'election-deniers' will prevail on Tuesday.

He said on his show that the former president's election deniers will carve out seats for themselves and Americans 'won't even care after it happens.'

Vs:

How Democrats won the midterms.
Dec. 12, 2022

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...-the-midterms/

Democrats defied expectations up and down the ballot in 2022 despite facing historic headwinds and other challenges going into the midterms.

However, Democrats were able to grow their majority in the Senate, retain and win a number of gubernatorial and state-level races, and temper their losses in the House.

Oh, and there is this, Bill:

The Democrats Lost the House by Just 6,675 Votes. What Went Wrong?
At first glance, Democratic performance in last years House races was great. But a close look under the hood reveals that, with a few smarter moves and a little more luck, wed have Speaker Jeffries.
Feb. 9, 2923

https://newrepublic.com/article/1702...ction-mistakes#text=Even%20 by%20 the%20 standards%20 of, changed%20 that%20 number%20 to%206%2 C675).

Although almost no one realized it at the time, the 2022 elections for the House were the Capitol Hill version of George W. Bush versus Al Gore. Even by the standards of close elections, 2022 was off the charts. An analysis by Jacob Rubashkin in early December for the political tip sheet Inside Elections found that just 6,670 votes spread over five House districts would have kept the Democrats in the majority. (Final counts have changed that number to 6,675). For math mavens, that works out to be 0.006 percent of the more than 107 million votes cast in House races. According to Rubashkins tally, 22,378 of these votes in the right places would have prevented the Republicans from picking up a single seat in the House. So we are not talking about a normal electionthis was the Democrats losing on a wild pitch in the tenth inning of the seventh game of the World Series.

Mind you, that would include Mini Trump George Santos' "win" in New York based on what is turning out to be 100% lies about everything and at least a couple of over-creatively magic-marker Repub Governor-"redrawn" districts similar to the ones for which those so-called Governors have been spanked by Federal Judges.

But it didn't stop there:

Democrats have been winning big in special elections.
That could bode well for them in the 2024 election.
Sept. 20, 2023

https://abcnews.go.com/538/democrats...y?id=103315703

How the final vote-share margins in congressional and state legislative special elections in 2023 compare with the seats base partisanship, as of Sept. 20, 2023
(See Chart)

And let's not forget this:

Democrats are celebrating major victories in Tuesday's elections.
Nov. 8, 2023

https://www.npr.org/2023/11/08/12114...days-elections

You know, I'm beginning to suspect Bill Maher's pro Repub Bothsiderism election analysis and predictions are quite full of shit, especially with regard to his continually campaigning for Repubs on their idiotic "War on Woke" nothingness for lack of anything else to run on that they have ever accomplished for the American people over the past 100 years or so.

[MarquisdeSade1]

In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:

You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.

Got anymore? LOL.

I need to stop replying to your nonsense, "One does not bother debating anything with someone that won't concede even when they blatantly lose", I proved.

With every single issue you're clearly full of lies and full of Whoopi Goldberg diarrhea of the mouth with my links, and what do you do?

Of course, say I'm still wrong, you're a pathological liar, that should not be debated.

This is some weird ass game to you where you to try to Gaslight the fuck out of people, one cannot have a sane conversation with you.

[Elvis 2008]

With Beyonc, Taylor Swift and Barbenheimer (Barbie and Oppenheimer movies), adding $8.5 billion to the US economy, has definitely showed us, that women and women's movements have been quite the tour de force in Q3.

Perhaps as a cautionary tale, Republicans should stop trying to control, "box up/box-in" and/or ban women's rights to abortion and instead realized and focus on women's freedoms that are a "box office" boom to the US economy and overall welfare of the country.

"Run the World" ...Girls! (...kkkk!) It would seem, Beyonc has a point!!! Well, at least for Q3, 2023, anyway.

Beyonc, Taylor Swift, Barbenheimer To Add $8.5 Billion to US Economy
https://www.investopedia.com/beyonce...ending-7964698

But there are those that are still saying (since Biden took office ) that, winter is coming?

The $8.5 billion Barbenheimer, Beyonc, and Taylor Swift bonanza is fading, ... giving way to a winter ...
https://fortune.com/2023/08/31/reces...-taylor-swift/

You had great timing Spidy. You posted this the day one of my manosphere heroes, Aaron Clarey published his book, "A world without men". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm5foiiRrv8.

I will save you the $15 and tell you that around 75% of our food and 80% of our "stuff" comes from men. You need a HR position filled then you get a woman. You need a car fixed or wiring in a home and you HAVE to get a man. In the 1950's there were no HR employees but there were mechanics and electricians. It is funny how that works. It is almost like jobs had to be made up for women.

And you are a traitor to your sex, Spidy? A soy boy? LOL. Well, you better be a thin one because that soy you are consuming was produced by men.

Man, I wish you libtards had to stay and live in the shitholes you created. Tooms the pretzel would have had to stay in California. PVmonger could not hightail it down to Mexico, and you would have your passport revoked. "I am sorry sir you can only have sex with women in blue states. " MLK had a dream, and that is mine.

[EihTooms]

I said Republican primaries are less rigged not that they were totally pure. The media has been rigging them for years when they do this front runner bullshit. Jeb Bush as front runner in 2016? Somehow the media had a comeback in 2020 when they pushed the corpse of Joe Biden to be president and with a little help from the AA communities, he "won".

Actually, Trump completely hoodwinked the media in 2016 to cover him. He got more free media coverage than anyone and instead of the media, which rigs elections, making him look foolish, Trump made the media look dumb. The media were all crying in their La Croix water when Trump got elected and said, "Why did we give this guy so much coverage?

Even now, you have many people running in the more fair Republican primaries and viable challengers like RFK JR (guess he too is not a Democrat like Bernie) bailing ship and running as independent. The Democratic primaries are so rigged the majority of Democratic voters don't want Biden as president but they have no choice but to accept him. Hel, you even have Bill Maher begging Biden not to run.

We are running out of ingredients Mr. Pretzel. Salt, nacho cheese are gone. All that is left is a side of mustard. Man, I get it. It is hard being a Democrat these days. Things were so much easier when Black Jesus was around.

I won't hold my breath waiting for the RNC to blow millions, run tv ads and schedule debates featuring a 'Repubican-Socialist' who suddenly claimed to be a member of the Republican Party at 2:15 pm the day before the first debate and damn well might revert right back to self-identify as a 'Republican-Socialist' the instant the RNC is dumb enough to help him win the nomination and we'll before the general election. LOL.

If you think the Olympic Gold Medal level of Pretzel Twisting you have been engaged in up to now has been challenging, imagine what new twists, turns and knots you'd tie yourself into trying to explain how your beloved RNC belly-flopped into something that politically stupid.

Then again, your Party loves to commit crimes against America, overthrow or at least threaten to shut down the American government over and over again. So backing a 'Republican-Socialist' shouldn't bother them or their base very much as long as he espouses violence against America, overturning free and fair elections and overthrowing democracy. You know, the clever way Trump gets Mainstream Media to pay attention to him, love him and help him win elections even as he recognizes and asserts that his Repub Party rigs elections from beginning to end.

[MarquisdeSade1]

https://www.breitbart.com/middle-eas...rotest-dnc-hq/