American Politics

[Tiny 12]

Who's to say, it has to be big and black?

It could be a big white cock (or a tiny one...kkkk!).

The worst form of prejudice is making fun of people with Tiny penises. Stop or I'm going back to calling you Spider Monkey.

[Spidy]

I don't know, the thought of Don gagging on a big black cock in prison somehow makes me warm and fuzzy.

Who's to say, it has to be big and black?

It could be a big white cock (or a tiny one...kkkk!). Or any color for that matter, yellow, red or purple with polka-dots warts. I hear he like orange?

Even one that has all the gay-pride flag colors on it, for all anyone cares!


PS: Besides, that bespoke "presidential" section of prison, may not have any BBC to fit the bill (...kkkk), so then what?

[MarquisdeSade1]

"According to polls:

Sixty percent of Republicans support Trump, versus those who support other candidates or who are undecided. About 45% of voters are Republicans or lean Republican. And about 30% of Americans believe the 2020 election result was fraudulent.

Twenty-seven percent (0. 6 x 0. 45) to 30% alone isn't enough to win an election.

You are correct, only a single digit percentage of Americans are classical liberals, who believe as I do. However, on average we're smarter than other people.

https://reason.com/2014/06/13/are-co...than-liberals/".

Reason magazine lololol what a rag nobody reads Nick Gillespie hes a turd ala the Mittens Flake cabal.

I don't consider libertarians as conservative, rather they are some perversion of conservatism, libertarianism is a deception and an abomination.

Smarter than other people? Really do tell?

Did you steal that line from your top cuck in charge.

https://grabien.com/story.php?id=439323

Ever see the movie Thank you for smoking?

I'm guessing this has a cult following with the "wise wing" LMAO.

Please tell us, smarter than whom?

And did you know just thinking you're smarter than "others" doesn't make it so.

[MarquisdeSade1]

"Yes, Mike Johnson the new Speaker is just as hostile to our hobby as Kamala Harris and other Democratic Party feminists whose work helped lead to passage of FOSTA and SESTA.

If Democratic representatives had been wise, they would have told Jeffries to pigeon hole Emmer, who supports social liberties more than most Republicans, and to tell him Democrats wouldn't vote in the Speaker election. Emmer would be more inclined to work across the aisle with Democrats. But the bitter partisanship in the House and the Democrats' emphasis on winning the next election instead of doing what's best for America won out. Democrats figure they'll do better in the next election if Johnson's the speaker. "

You change your party registration and / or move to rural off the grid Mexico with Mittens, Jeff, Justin and Lizzy the lezzy et al and you can build an anti American community (free of burdensome taxes and regulations).

[EihTooms]

Yes, Mike Johnson the new Speaker is just as hostile to our hobby as Kamala Harris and other Democratic Party feminists whose work helped lead to passage of FOSTA and SESTA.

If Democratic representatives had been wise, they would have told Jeffries to pigeon hole Emmer, who supports social liberties more than most Republicans, and to tell him Democrats wouldn't vote in the Speaker election. Emmer would be more inclined to work across the aisle with Democrats. But the bitter partisanship in the House and the Democrats' emphasis on winning the next election instead of doing what's best for America won out. Democrats figure they'll do better in the next election if Johnson's the speaker.

I have no idea what Repub Bob Portman and other Repubs' FOSTA-SESTA bills have to do with Repubs getting closer than ever today to establishing a nationwide ban on Abortions, outlawing Sex For Pleasure, restricting sex to "for the purpose of procreation only", etc, but I think it is really cute that you have such a rosy, positive, little cupcake view of your beloved Trump Repubs that you actually believe Matt Getzakidpregnant, Marjorie Taylor Greenjewishlazerbeams and any one of dozens of other classic Repubs in the House would not stand up and demand a newly-elected Speaker be thrown out within 10 minutes if by whatever miracle he / she had been elected after getting even 1 Dem vote.

LOL. Really. So cute.

[Tiny 12]

For those who are not satisfied with their Repub, Third Party and Bothsider / Neithsider voting patterns merely producing mounting giant, unsustainable Repub economic and stewardship deficits every time, perhaps you can take solace in the knowledge that your beloved congressional Repubs also just voted unanimously to surge ahead in their Repub mission to outlaw Sex For Pleasure and only permit sex for the purpose of procreation:

New House Speaker Once Blamed Abortions for Social Security, Medicare Cuts.
Mike Johnson tried to justify Republican cuts to the social safety net in the most inane way.

https://newrepublic.com/post/176437/...-medicare-cuts

So, then you think, "Whew! At least those Bible-thumping Repubs crawling into my private life at every turn are not targeting the anal and oral sex pleasures I enjoy with my wife or girlfriend and, hey, those activities don't make babies we don't want to have and be saddled with supporting for the next 18 years"!

Think again:

https://abc7ny.com/how-new-house-spe...-gay/13972396/

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sodomy

No word yet on the Repub Party's legislative mission regarding masturbation. But stay tuned. I'm sure they are not happy about that activity not creating babies and expanding a low wage labor pool to make their wealthy political donors even wealthier.

Yes, Mike Johnson the new Speaker is just as hostile to our hobby as Kamala Harris and other Democratic Party feminists whose work helped lead to passage of FOSTA and SESTA.

If Democratic representatives had been wise, they would have told Jeffries to pigeon hole Emmer, who supports social liberties more than most Republicans, and to tell him Democrats wouldn't vote in the Speaker election. Emmer would be more inclined to work across the aisle with Democrats. But the bitter partisanship in the House and the Democrats' emphasis on winning the next election instead of doing what's best for America won out. Democrats figure they'll do better in the next election if Johnson's the speaker.

[Tiny 12]

"Trump and his merry band of election-denying RINOS can't control the Presidency, House or Senate on their own. They're only 1/3rd of the voting population. You cast people like me into the wilderness and you're looking at one party rule at the federal level. By increasingly progressive Democrats. It won't be a pretty picture.

Mitt Romney kicks ass, except he's a neocon. So does Jeff Flake. Justin Amash kicks double ass. Donald Trump should be kicked the hell out of the Republican Party. I liked some of his policies a lot, and I've given him credit for them, here and elsewhere. But he tried to overturn over 200 years of American democracy. ".

What % is the Libertarian crowd, low single digits?

https://amgreatness.com/2023/10/26/t...represents-me/

According to polls:

Sixty percent of Republicans support Trump, versus those who support other candidates or who are undecided. About 45% of voters are Republicans or lean Republican. And about 30% of Americans believe the 2020 election result was fraudulent.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...tion-7548.html
https://news.gallup.com/poll/467897/...shift-gop.aspx
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-pre...dule-rcna90145

Twenty-seven percent (0.6 x 0.45) to 30% alone isn't enough to win an election.

You are correct, only a single digit percentage of Americans are classical liberals, who believe as I do. However, on average we're smarter than other people.

https://reason.com/2014/06/13/are-co...than-liberals/

[MarquisdeSade1]

"Trump and his merry band of election-denying RINOS can't control the Presidency, House or Senate on their own. They're only 1/3rd of the voting population. You cast people like me into the wilderness and you're looking at one party rule at the federal level. By increasingly progressive Democrats. It won't be a pretty picture.

Mitt Romney kicks ass, except he's a neocon. So does Jeff Flake. Justin Amash kicks double ass. Donald Trump should be kicked the hell out of the Republican Party. I liked some of his policies a lot, and I've given him credit for them, here and elsewhere. But he tried to overturn over 200 years of American democracy. ".

What % is the Libertarian crowd, low single digits?

https://amgreatness.com/2023/10/26/t...represents-me/

[MarquisdeSade1]

Aka the House of Our Lord and Savior.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bi...25/id/1139684/

Thanks so much to Nutty Nancy for helping ditch McCarthy (she's even much much "dummer" than everyone thinks) even "dummer" than Hakeem, I want Nancy back as dem leader oh wait I think she still is LMMFAO.

Mike was worth the 3 week wait ROTFLMMFAO.

[MarquisdeSade1]

"]Fudging stuff to fit your narrative, is so on brand for MAGA Republicans. You guys are starting to sound like a cliche!

Did you even read frigging the article?

If so, please show me where in that article (or any article for that matter, reporting on this sex party), where are mentioned, like the ones, you state in your fictitious and scurrilous headline of, ". Large altar boy gangrape. ". ?

All articles I've read about this incident, most indicate the party as "sexual scandal", "sex party", "sex orgy" and a few as "gay orgy". From what I can tell so far, ONLY participants have been implicated in the "sex orgy".

So I ask again, where the fudge, are these supposed that appear in this "sex party" scandal, you're bloviating about?

Or is it just more misinformation and lies?

Google sarcasm and facetiousness.

Secondly I don't believe a word the pope says about anything.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/16/w...-election.html

If he says ADULT, according to whos definition.

Since GAY men love raping little boys.

ZERO credibility follows.

[GDreams]

Oh, I am with you and Tiny in not wanting your lord and savior Most Perfect Republican Party Leader Ever, Donald J. Trump, gagged.

I don't know, the thought of Don gagging on a big black cock in prison somehow makes me warm and fuzzy.

[Spidy]

https://www.aol.com/news/pope-accept...130448292.html

Fudging stuff to fit your narrative, is so on brand for MAGA Republicans. You guys are starting to sound like a cliche!

Did you even read frigging the article?

If so, please show me where in that article (or any article for that matter, reporting on this sex party), where "altar-boys" are mentioned, like the ones, you state in your fictitious and scurrilous headline of, "...large altar boy gangrape...".?.

All articles I've read about this incident, most indicate the party as "sexual scandal", "sex party", "sex orgy" and a few as "gay orgy". From what I can tell so far, ONLY adult participants have been implicated in the "sex orgy".

So I ask again, where the fudge, are these supposed "altar-boys" that appear in this "sex party" scandal, you're bloviating about?

Or is it just more misinformation and lies?

[MarquisdeSade1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiOUojVd6xQ

[EihTooms]

For those who are not satisfied with their Repub, Third Party and Bothsider / Neithsider voting patterns merely producing mounting giant, unsustainable Repub economic and stewardship deficits every time, perhaps you can take solace in the knowledge that your beloved congressional Repubs also just voted unanimously to surge ahead in their Repub mission to outlaw Sex For Pleasure and only permit sex for the purpose of procreation:

New House Speaker Once Blamed Abortions for Social Security, Medicare Cuts.
Mike Johnson tried to justify Republican cuts to the social safety net in the most inane way.

https://newrepublic.com/post/176437/...-medicare-cuts

Johnson has also co-sponsored at least three bills hoping to ban abortion at a nationwide level, including (see the list)

So, then you think, "Whew! At least those Bible-thumping Repubs crawling into my private life at every turn are not targeting the anal and oral sex pleasures I enjoy with my wife or girlfriend and, hey, those activities don't make babies we don't want to have and be saddled with supporting for the next 18 years"!

Think again:

https://abc7ny.com/how-new-house-spe...-gay/13972396/

"There is clearly no 'right to sodomy' in the Constitution," Johnson wrote in a 2003 column in a Louisiana newspaper. "And the right of 'privacy of the home' has never placed all activity with the home outside the bounds of the criminal law."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sodomy

sodomy
noun
sod​omy ˈs-də-mē
1
: anal or oral copulation with another person.

No word yet on the Repub Party's legislative mission regarding masturbation. But stay tuned. I'm sure they are not happy about that activity not creating babies and expanding a low wage labor pool to make their wealthy political donors even wealthier.

[EihTooms]

It turns out if it were not for typically horrific Repub economic stewardship ushering in "normal seeming" Repub GWBush's Great Recession, "obvious lunatic" Repub Trump's Trump's Pandemic and both of their beloved favorite Repub tax cuts for billionaires, we would not today have an economy with deficts far outpacing a growing economy and, yep, relatively lower spending.

Gee, who would have guessed that would happen? I mean, aside from the CBO and everyone who has voted Dem straight down their ballot in every election since at least 2000.

$10 Trillion In Added US Debt Since 2001 Shows 'Bush and Trump Tax Cuts Broke Our Modern Tax Structure'.
"In their blind loyalty to their mega-donors, Republicans' fixation on giant tax cuts for billionaires has created a revenue problem that is driving up our national debt," said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse in response to new Treasury Department figures.
Oct. 21, 2023

https://www.commondreams.org/news/tr...owing-deficits

"We have a revenue problem, due to tax cuts," said Kogan, pointing to the major tax laws enacted under the administrations of George W. Bush and Donald Trump. "The Bush and Trump tax cuts broke our modern tax structure. Revenue is significantly lower and no longer grows much with the economy."

(See chart)

"The point I want to make again and again and again is that, relative to the last time CBO was projecting stable debt/GDP, spending is down, not up," Kogan said in a tweet Friday night. "It's lower revenue that's 100% responsible for the change in debt projections. If you take away nothing else, leave with this point."