Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 1,051 to 1,065 of 14408
-
10-21-23 19:58 #13358
Posts: 2579Are you joking
Age and gender of children sexually abused by priests:
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/...fig3_247523934
Excerpt from New York Times Article, It Is Not a Closet. It Is a Cage. Gay Catholic Priests Speak Out.
The crisis over sexuality in the Catholic Church goes beyond abuse. It goes to the heart of the priesthood, into a closet that is trapping thousands of men.
Fewer than about 10 priests in the United States have dared to come out publicly. But gay men probably make up at least 30 to 40 percent of the American Catholic clergy, according to dozens of estimates from gay priests themselves and researchers. Some priests say the number is closer to 75 percent. One priest in Wisconsin said he assumed every priest was gay unless he knows for a fact he is not. A priest in Florida put it this way: A third are gay, a third are straight and a third don't know what the hell they are.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/17/u...speak-out.html
Regardless of whether it's a boy or a girl, or the sexual orientation of the perpetrator, it's sick. We all agree about that. ".
Here's a hypothetical question.
When you were in grammar school.
What do you think would have been the impact of some female teacher did something with you sexually?
https://people.com/crime/mary-kay-le...i-fualaau-now/
With lots of law enforcement men with my friends and family.
The joke is, prison is for ugly women and stoopid men.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20.../24/usa.gender
No one is locking up beautiful white women for having sex with their students, nor should they!!
-
10-21-23 19:53 #13357
Posts: 5454Interesting. But what you cited does not support your Bothsides contention
Originally Posted by TheCane [View Original Post]
Further, if we would be screwed if the USA Dollar were not the world's reserve currency, I am sure you must know there is only one side pulling every stunt in the book to lay the foundation for that to happen; the Repub Party.
BTW, has any incoming Dem POTUS squandered and shit all over a balanced budget or surplus handed to him by an outgoing Repub POTUS rather than the other way around? LOL.
Serious question. I have only seen Incoming Repubs do that with budgets balanced by Outgoing Dems in my lifetime.
-
10-21-23 19:43 #13356
Posts: 2579GAY men love raping little boys, and you know it
Surely, if my post was so "stoopid", a man of your "stature", "intellect" and "reasoning", can I never heard of any nuns fucking the other altar boys or, I certainly would of been all over it". Correct me if I wrong, but it sounds like your saying, you'd wouldn't have minded getting sexually abuse by nuns.
Is it so difficult for you find the words, to explain what you meant by your comments?
Here are several articles on minors being abused by nuns: Women Sexually Abused By Catholic Nuns Speak Up: She Told Me.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuns-...b0d3a48b563001
Sexual Abuse of Nuns: Longstanding Church Scandal Emerges From.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/w...buse-nuns.html
I stand by my statement w / are to the church as an opportunity offender.
These Are The Chilling Stories Of Abuse Covered Up By The Catholic Church.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/these...b0df9b093b7235
Not sure what you think is so "dumb" about my statement, but the above article by the Huffington post, substantiates my statement. Note, the alleged clergymen / priests weren't classified as either as "gay" or "straight", but simply "predator priests", abusing both "BOYS" and "GIRLS".
A few of may fav quotes on this subject matter:
"Vulgarity is the effort of a weak mind to forcibly express itself" -Unknown quote.
"Profanity never indicates high station or a well bred person. It is an evidence of low breeding, of limited ideas and a weak mind. " -Source: "Profanity," in Massachusetts Reformatory, Our Paper (November 24,1906).
In truth, the ISG forum's "IGNORE button", really doesn't work that well in practice. But by all means, you're welcome to use it!
The real trick to "IGNORING" other ISGers (when they've hurt your itty-bitty feelings, shame you, belittle you or were being silly towards you, or just plain outwitted you), is to show some "will power" and restraint" and use that the real "god-given" IGNORE button in your brains (assuming that is, you have all your faculties in check).
The lady doth protest too much me thinks.
Shame me? You are a vile (probably morbidly obese) creature taking offense to me calling Gay dudes that rape little boys rapists, your offense is extremely suspicious.
Out smart me? Doubtful, you sound like a garden variety dirtbag that's playing with the internet between prison stints.
I wonder if the courts allow registered sex offenders to use ISG, does your parole officer know you use this website?
Let me guess you're using the free wifi at McDonalds so your parole officer or your prison half way house doesn't see all your male child porn activity.
Lastly, where did you find your victims? The boy scouts? Church?
-
10-21-23 19:21 #13355
Posts: 5454Thanks
Originally Posted by Tiny12 [View Original Post]
Hmm. John Wayne Gacy might be one of the rare exceptions to the serial killer thing you suggested.
However, there is no exception to that consistent, beyond all possible matters of chance or coincidence atrocious Outgoing Repub handoff to the Incoming Dem vs the Far Superior Outgoing Dem handoff to the Incoming Repub historical pattern for the past century or so.
Now, if the lucky Incoming Repubs varied wildly in the kind of idiotic Repub economic and tax policies along with a general contempt and inattention to regulations and the enforcement of regulations they favored, proposed and were guided by before their typical Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession and / or Massive Repub Jobs Destruction inevitably kicked in, well, maybe we could chalk up most or some of those consistent Repub stewardship and policy results as "wild coincidences. ".
But they didn't and don't. That's why their historically disastrous results only vary by degree here and there.
-
10-21-23 17:59 #13354
Posts: 6422Both parties guilty!
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
10-21-23 16:14 #13353
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
10-21-23 15:52 #13352
Posts: 1807Age and gender of children sexually abused by priests:
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/...fig3_247523934
Excerpt from New York Times Article, It Is Not a Closet. It Is a Cage. Gay Catholic Priests Speak Out
The crisis over sexuality in the Catholic Church goes beyond abuse. It goes to the heart of the priesthood, into a closet that is trapping thousands of men.
Fewer than about 10 priests in the United States have dared to come out publicly. But gay men probably make up at least 30 to 40 percent of the American Catholic clergy, according to dozens of estimates from gay priests themselves and researchers. Some priests say the number is closer to 75 percent. One priest in Wisconsin said he assumed every priest was gay unless he knows for a fact he is not. A priest in Florida put it this way: A third are gay, a third are straight and a third dont know what the hell they are.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/17/u...speak-out.html
Regardless of whether it's a boy or a girl, or the sexual orientation of the perpetrator, it's sick. We all agree about that.
-
10-21-23 08:02 #13351
Posts: 1119Denial as a coping mechanism...
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
STRAIGHT clergymen and clergywomen have been abusing boys and girls in the Church for decades. Deny it all you want. There are literally hundreds if not thousands of cases out there.
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
BTW, the Catholic church is the worst offender of sexual abuse. This article paints a "bullseye" on the Catholic Church, as the "arch buggerers", they're well know as:
Originally Posted by Huffington Post
So according to your ignorant logic, if it's ONLY GAY MEN, that abuse "little boys", then that leaves "STRAIGHT" clergymen as the culprits, that "...raped, orally, vaginally and anally", the GIRLS in the article above.
Here below are a couple other cases of a clergyman sexually abusing girls, that YOU claim NEVER happens:
Oregon church leader jailed for sex abuse of girls in his congregation ...
https://www.bishop-accountability.or...on-police-say/
Former altar girl: I was abused for years at Brooklyn Catholic church
https://nypost.com/2018/12/10/teen-a...tholic-church/
FWIW, many cases of the sexual abuse victims, that went to Catholic Church, also experience trauma so deep they live in denial, their whole lives.
Ring a bell? No, well...True FACT! As a defense mechanism, many survivors of childhood sex abuse subconsciously block out the painful memories of what happened to them, as a copping mechanism.
But sincerely, I hope this helps with your denial, about ALL the variations of sexual abuse (even from "STRAIGHT MEN and WOMEN), that often took place in your Catholic Churches, going on for decades.
PS: Curious, was that Trump University?
-
10-21-23 07:47 #13350
Posts: 1119Sexual abuse by ANY nun? Or just the "hot" nuns?
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
Is it so difficult for you find the words, to explain what you meant by your comments?
Here are several articles on minors being abused by nuns:
Women Sexually Abused By Catholic Nuns Speak Up: She Told Me ...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuns-...b0d3a48b563001
Sexual Abuse of Nuns: Longstanding Church Scandal Emerges From
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/w...buse-nuns.html
I stand by my statement w/r to the church as an equal opportunity offender.
Originally Posted by Spidy [View Original Post]
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/these...b0df9b093b7235
Not sure what you think is so "dumb" about my statement, but the above article by the Huffington post, substantiates my statement. Note, the alleged clergymen/priests weren't classified as either as "gay" or "straight", but simply "predator priests", abusing both "BOYS" and "GIRLS".
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
"Vulgarity is the effort of a weak mind to forcibly express itself" ---Unknown quote
"Profanity never indicates high station or a well bred person. It is an evidence of low breeding, of limited ideas and a weak mind." -Source: "Profanity," in Massachusetts Reformatory, Our Paper (November 24, 1906)
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]- Tip of the day: In truth, the ISG forum's "IGNORE button", really doesn't work that well in practice. But by all means, you're welcome to use it!
The real trick to "IGNORING" other ISGers (when they've hurt your itty-bitty feelings, shame you, belittle you or were being silly towards you, or just plain outwitted you), is to show some "will power" and "restraint" and use that the real "god-given" IGNORE button in your brains (assuming that is, you have all your faculties in check).
- Tip of the day: In truth, the ISG forum's "IGNORE button", really doesn't work that well in practice. But by all means, you're welcome to use it!
-
10-21-23 07:12 #13349
Posts: 1119Repub list of villainy?
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Was this a subconscious nod to Republican villainy?
-
10-21-23 00:59 #13348
Posts: 2579Seriously
"The greatest threat to the National Security of the USA is not Hamas, Russia, China, North Korea, Iran or any terrorist groups funded and supported by them. And, no, it is definitely not Joe Biden. LOL.
It is the USA electorate who carelessly and ignorantly votes in such a way that helps to put so much as a single Repub in a position of power.
Right now, ISIS at its height could not pose as much of a deadly risk to American life, limb, economy and National Security as just a tiny handful of Do Nothing, Know Nothing, Incompetent, Incapable of governing and uninterested in learning how Pink Tinkle Repubs in Congress.
Thank you for your vote. ".
Take your fucking meds bro!!
-
10-20-23 18:43 #13347
Posts: 5454Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
It is the USA electorate who carelessly and ignorantly votes in such a way that helps to put so much as a single Repub in a position of power.
Right now, ISIS at its height could not pose as much of a deadly risk to American life, limb, economy and National Security as just a tiny handful of Do Nothing, Know Nothing, Incompetent, Incapable of governing and uninterested in learning how Pink Tinkle Repubs in Congress.
Thank you for your vote.
-
10-20-23 13:16 #13346
Posts: 2579I have seen many really stoopid comments and posts on ISG
"BTW, use whatever words (or sexual abuse phases) that appeals to your ISG moniker's namesake, (ie. Fucked, sodomy, raped. Etc), but can we just agree it's really ALL just sexual abuse. Not trying to be a prude or anything, but if we're going to continue this discussion around minors, do we really need to get into specifics? But if you think, specifics helps your case, feel free.
So Catholic altar boy, aside (as a "deeper dive" might explain many things, but perhaps another time), I find your statement very disturbing and very troubling indeed. And I didn't get the impression you were joking either.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when you say suggests (or implies) you're condoning sexual abuse by the church on alter boys (minors), if the sexual abuse is inflected by its nunnery / convent?
So now I have to ask. Why would you be OK with this? Is it because, it.
Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation.
The church accommodates all combinations of sexual abuse, on minors, with which you care to present.
Nuns, that you want abusing you? Do alter boys even get a say in the matter, as to who abuses them?
But sincerest congratulations you qualified yourself as the dumbest mootherfucker on ISG, EVER!
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
Now you can go Seppuku away the shame!!
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec7rCsNFn30
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
I need to find the ignore button ASAP I suggest others do the same.
-
10-20-23 08:26 #13345
Posts: 1119Are you condoning sexual abuse by nuns?
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
So Catholic altar boy, aside (as a "deeper dive" might explain many things, but perhaps another time), I find your statement very disturbing and very troubling indeed. And I didn't get the impression you were joking either.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when you say"...I certainly would of been all over it", suggests (or implies) you're condoning sexual abuse by the church on alter boys (minors), if the sexual abuse is inflected by its nunnery/convent?
So now I have to ask...why would you be OK with this? Is it because, it's "STRAIGHT sex" with a minor? And if so, then by extension you would also condone clergymen/priesthood, sexually abusing the alter girls?
Should the alter girls, also be thrilled "...to certainly have been all over it", too?
As another BM was trying to impart on you, the church is an equal opportunity offender.Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy/girl and the offender is a clergyman/woman with straight or gay sexual orientation.
The church accommodates all combinations of sexual abuse, on minors, with which you care to present.
PS: BTW, is it ONLY with the "hot", nuns, that you want abusing you? Do alter boys even get a say in the matter, as to who abuses them?
-
10-20-23 08:20 #13344
Posts: 1119CONTEXT please...
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
Some CONTEXT please, IF YOU WANT READERS to understand your position on topics and subject matters being discussed.
Why...is your word usage of pedophile, different than the one in the Webster's dictionary?