Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 1,051 to 1,065 of 14400
-
10-21-23 07:47 #13350
Posts: 1117Sexual abuse by ANY nun? Or just the "hot" nuns?
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
Is it so difficult for you find the words, to explain what you meant by your comments?
Here are several articles on minors being abused by nuns:
Women Sexually Abused By Catholic Nuns Speak Up: She Told Me ...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuns-...b0d3a48b563001
Sexual Abuse of Nuns: Longstanding Church Scandal Emerges From
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/w...buse-nuns.html
I stand by my statement w/r to the church as an equal opportunity offender.
Originally Posted by Spidy [View Original Post]
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/these...b0df9b093b7235
Not sure what you think is so "dumb" about my statement, but the above article by the Huffington post, substantiates my statement. Note, the alleged clergymen/priests weren't classified as either as "gay" or "straight", but simply "predator priests", abusing both "BOYS" and "GIRLS".
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
"Vulgarity is the effort of a weak mind to forcibly express itself" ---Unknown quote
"Profanity never indicates high station or a well bred person. It is an evidence of low breeding, of limited ideas and a weak mind." -Source: "Profanity," in Massachusetts Reformatory, Our Paper (November 24, 1906)
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]- Tip of the day: In truth, the ISG forum's "IGNORE button", really doesn't work that well in practice. But by all means, you're welcome to use it!
The real trick to "IGNORING" other ISGers (when they've hurt your itty-bitty feelings, shame you, belittle you or were being silly towards you, or just plain outwitted you), is to show some "will power" and "restraint" and use that the real "god-given" IGNORE button in your brains (assuming that is, you have all your faculties in check).
- Tip of the day: In truth, the ISG forum's "IGNORE button", really doesn't work that well in practice. But by all means, you're welcome to use it!
-
10-21-23 07:12 #13349
Posts: 1117Repub list of villainy?
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Was this a subconscious nod to Republican villainy?
-
10-21-23 00:59 #13348
Posts: 2579Seriously
"The greatest threat to the National Security of the USA is not Hamas, Russia, China, North Korea, Iran or any terrorist groups funded and supported by them. And, no, it is definitely not Joe Biden. LOL.
It is the USA electorate who carelessly and ignorantly votes in such a way that helps to put so much as a single Repub in a position of power.
Right now, ISIS at its height could not pose as much of a deadly risk to American life, limb, economy and National Security as just a tiny handful of Do Nothing, Know Nothing, Incompetent, Incapable of governing and uninterested in learning how Pink Tinkle Repubs in Congress.
Thank you for your vote. ".
Take your fucking meds bro!!
-
10-20-23 18:43 #13347
Posts: 5452Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
It is the USA electorate who carelessly and ignorantly votes in such a way that helps to put so much as a single Repub in a position of power.
Right now, ISIS at its height could not pose as much of a deadly risk to American life, limb, economy and National Security as just a tiny handful of Do Nothing, Know Nothing, Incompetent, Incapable of governing and uninterested in learning how Pink Tinkle Repubs in Congress.
Thank you for your vote.
-
10-20-23 13:16 #13346
Posts: 2579I have seen many really stoopid comments and posts on ISG
"BTW, use whatever words (or sexual abuse phases) that appeals to your ISG moniker's namesake, (ie. Fucked, sodomy, raped. Etc), but can we just agree it's really ALL just sexual abuse. Not trying to be a prude or anything, but if we're going to continue this discussion around minors, do we really need to get into specifics? But if you think, specifics helps your case, feel free.
So Catholic altar boy, aside (as a "deeper dive" might explain many things, but perhaps another time), I find your statement very disturbing and very troubling indeed. And I didn't get the impression you were joking either.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when you say suggests (or implies) you're condoning sexual abuse by the church on alter boys (minors), if the sexual abuse is inflected by its nunnery / convent?
So now I have to ask. Why would you be OK with this? Is it because, it.
Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation.
The church accommodates all combinations of sexual abuse, on minors, with which you care to present.
Nuns, that you want abusing you? Do alter boys even get a say in the matter, as to who abuses them?
But sincerest congratulations you qualified yourself as the dumbest mootherfucker on ISG, EVER!
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
Now you can go Seppuku away the shame!!
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec7rCsNFn30
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
"Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy / girl and the offender is a clergyman / woman with straight or gay sexual orientation. ".
I need to find the ignore button ASAP I suggest others do the same.
-
10-20-23 08:26 #13345
Posts: 1117Are you condoning sexual abuse by nuns?
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
So Catholic altar boy, aside (as a "deeper dive" might explain many things, but perhaps another time), I find your statement very disturbing and very troubling indeed. And I didn't get the impression you were joking either.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when you say"...I certainly would of been all over it", suggests (or implies) you're condoning sexual abuse by the church on alter boys (minors), if the sexual abuse is inflected by its nunnery/convent?
So now I have to ask...why would you be OK with this? Is it because, it's "STRAIGHT sex" with a minor? And if so, then by extension you would also condone clergymen/priesthood, sexually abusing the alter girls?
Should the alter girls, also be thrilled "...to certainly have been all over it", too?
As another BM was trying to impart on you, the church is an equal opportunity offender.Does not matter, whether the minor is an alter boy/girl and the offender is a clergyman/woman with straight or gay sexual orientation.
The church accommodates all combinations of sexual abuse, on minors, with which you care to present.
PS: BTW, is it ONLY with the "hot", nuns, that you want abusing you? Do alter boys even get a say in the matter, as to who abuses them?
-
10-20-23 08:20 #13344
Posts: 1117CONTEXT please...
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
Some CONTEXT please, IF YOU WANT READERS to understand your position on topics and subject matters being discussed.
Why...is your word usage of pedophile, different than the one in the Webster's dictionary?
-
10-20-23 08:06 #13343
Posts: 1117Circle-Back on this?
Originally Posted by Elvis 2008 [View Original Post]
My plate is full at the moment and I've kinda move on from this topic. But I'll see if I can circle-back at some point to give a REAL answer.
Originally Posted by Elvis 2008 [View Original Post]
Looks like and does seems to me you've answered your own question...kkkk!
It is true what they say, "Give a man enough rope and he'll hang himself". (as it were)
PS: BTW, Elvis, does this make you the "mystic from the West". Instead of a really cool shinny, glittering turban, would your head gear be a 20lbs gallon hat with pom poms? (...kkkk!).
-
10-20-23 07:53 #13342
Posts: 1117Initial Post Clarification
Originally Posted by Tiny 12 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Tiny 12 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Tiny 12 [View Original Post]
So yes, you are correct about this, with regards to these Democrats, being recent adopters of the coin idea. But let's not get this twisted. Again, NONE OF THEM, are the progenitor/creator of the coin idea.
Now I did already submitted a Huffington Post that article that states, [Jan 24th, 2023] "Democrats and Republicans Agree: Minting A $1 Trillion Coin Isn't A Serious Idea"
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mint-...b0c2b49ad81fc9. While neither see the coin as a serious idea, clearly the Dems are hanging on to this crazy notion, as a possible way, to combat the crazy notions by MAGA Repubs on the far right.
Good on you for pulling up my initial/original post, (http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...14#post2859614). Now since you've re-posted it, I will assume you've re-read it!!! (Although, that maybe a poor assumption on my part, since you clearly DID NOT properly read any of your own articles/links, where they clearly indicate Beowulf as a REPUBLICAN).
I'm assuming you've pulled it up to say what exactly??? What, that I said, "a republication is the progenitor/creator of the coin idea?" Unlike yourself, declaring (a couple of times) you'd found your "Democrat Patsy" as the progenitor/creator of the coin (as shown through ACTS 1 and ACTS 2), I did not make any such grandiose statements, until I knew for sure (in ACT 3). BTW, thanks again for providing the articles and links, prove my case.
Now naturally, when reading my original post about the coin idea, someone might get the impression and/or assume, that I thought the idea was a REPUBLICAN created idea. Note, for those BMs that read this political forum and know my posts, will acknowledge, I tend to post a lot of dumb things Repubs (mostly MAGA Repubs) say and do. So your conclusions to those assumptions would be warranted.
With that said, it's not a stretch of the imagination, Tiny 12 (also given your Democratic prejudices), for you to THINK that, in my initial post, I had said "a REPUBLICAN created idea". If you still think, I said that, then I ask again, please indicate where in that post I explicitly said, say, proclaim or state, "a REPUBLICAN is the creator/created the coin idea".
Tiny 12, perhaps it was a poor choice of words, but let's be honest here, what you really meant was that my initial post was "implying", that "a REPUBLICAN is the creator/created the coin idea". Which, as I said before, hadn't occurred to me until you open your mouth and proclaimed, it was the Democrats (on several occasions)! I know you don't believe me, but it's true, I wasn't thinking that, when I wrote the post.
So yes, you may think my post "implies" a Republican, is the coin idea's creator, but it DOES NOT specifically or explicitly, say so in the post.
-
10-20-23 05:43 #13341
Posts: 2579Watch yo ass out there
Sockpuppet Dirty Joe is not only corrupt hes also extremely incompetent.
That puts a target on all of our backs!!
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/st...19/id/1138996/
-
10-20-23 04:32 #13340
Posts: 2579He would win the White House 3 elections in a row
A feat no one has accomplished since the late great FDR.
https://amgreatness.com/2023/10/16/trump-is-surging/
-
10-20-23 03:24 #13339
Posts: 5452You might have inadvertently lurched into the truth there
Originally Posted by Tiny12 [View Original Post]
https://law.jrank.org/pages/12174/Bu...nnections.html
In fact, Bundy was the kind of Repub whose appearance, presentation and chosen candidates to support most directly would peg him as one of those "normal" Republicans.
Jeffrey Dahmer's political affiliation is more difficult to determine. However, his family's influence and life choices strongly suggest he was a typical, closeted, conservative, anti-science, bible-thumping Repub:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Dahmer#text=In%20 early%201982%2 see%20 he%20 found, money%20 his%20 grandmother%20 gave%20 him.
Shortly after completing his lengthy confessions in 1991, Dahmer had requested to Detective Murphy that he be given a copy of the Bible. This request was granted and Dahmer gradually devoted himself to Christianity and became a born-again Christian. On his father's urging, he also read creationist books from the Institute for Creation Research. In May 1994, Dahmer was baptized by Roy Ratcliff, a minister in the Church of Christ and a graduate of Oklahoma Christian University whom he had met on April 20. This service was conducted in the prison whirlpool.
-
10-20-23 02:25 #13338
Posts: 5452Gee, why do you suppose those Drunken Sailor Dems did that? LOL
Originally Posted by Tiny12 [View Original Post]
Just because they were Dems and, you know.
Dems simply "spend like drunken sailors"?
How about this; name the Dem POTUS who came into office in the midst of NO Depression, NO Recession, two back-to-back quarters of 7%+ GDP Growth, DECLINING Unemployment Rates, DECLINING Rates of Inflation, after historic job gains and NO Massive Job Losses, with America engaged in not even ONE ground war on foreign soil yet who still launched into his Party's favorite economic policies that tripled the national debt and increased deficit spending that would embarrass a drunken sailor.
I'll save you and Elvis the research time; NO incoming Dem has been handed such a set of positive conditions from an outgoing Repub going back as far as reliable records are kept.
None.
But I can readily recall at least one incoming Repub who did exactly that, all of it; Beloved Repub Icon and Template for all Repub Economic Philosophy, Agenda and Results, Teflon Ronnie Reagan.
With a great big honorable mention going to GW Bush as recipient of the second greatest handoff of all time whose favorite Repub policies shit all over the USA economy and financial prudence as soon as they were enacted.
Trump almost inherited all those positive kinds of conditions except for the ground war on foreign soil part that his immediate Repub predecessor totally unnecessarily plunged America into and was only one of at least two that his immediate Dem predecessor was handed and had to deal with on day one.
Still, no incoming Dem has been handed as good a set of conditions from an outgoing Repub as Trump was handed by Obama.
Least of all FDR, Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
And for about the past 100 years, no incoming Repub has been handed as crappy a set of conditions from an outgoing Dem as virtually every Dem has been handed by the outgoing Repub. Not even close.
Just an unbroken pattern of "wild coincidences" of course, right? LOL.
-
10-20-23 01:41 #13337
Posts: 2579GAY men love raping little boys!!
"Darn it desad. I'll join in the eternal pissing contest once more and go dark again after saying: if you think gay anal sex is disgusting just say so, instead of painting all gay men as predators of those under the age of consent. An for those he men who love carrying an engraved Glock, move to Compton and wear red or blue and report your activities on the American Politics thread. Maybe we will read about you in the news if you receive the "hand gun owner of the year award" for accidentally shooting youself in the groin. You might receive also the Darwin Award if you haven't yet procreated.
And I do like you since you came out as atheist. That's showing some common sense. ".
If I want to say something I say it, just ask the admin, I write it, you may never see it, like many of my posts, but I never play coy.
I say what I mean and mean what I say.
I am a true free speech absolutist.
Where did I say all gay men? You mentioned the age of consent? Ok where, what state what country.
That is a very very subjective thing, enforced willy nilly / capriciously in every of the 50 states and 3143 counties and 195 countries, ever see the movie with Jeremy Irons, Lolita?
What I did say is "GAY men love raping little boys!
And that is irrefutable!!
-
10-19-23 23:59 #13336
Posts: 690Church of no churches and no gods
Darn it desad. I'll join in the eternal pissing contest once more and go dark again after saying: if you think gay anal sex is disgusting just say so, instead of painting all gay men as predators of those under the age of consent. An for those he men who love carrying an engraved Glock, move to Compton and wear red or blue and report your activities on the American Politics thread. Maybe we will read about you in the news if you receive the "hand gun owner of the year award" for accidentally shooting youself in the groin. You might receive also the Darwin Award if you haven't yet procreated.
And I do like you since you came out as atheist. That's showing some common sense.