American Politics

[Chris P]

I think this would fairly be considered an ad hominem argument -- not generally considered persuasive.

That sounds like something a guy in Leningrad would say. Maybe the same guy who writes the Millennium Report? No, wait, isn't that an American-published site? Could you clarify?

[Chris P]

You don't have a clue as to what it takes for some people to obtain an ID. Here's just a snapshot (link to socialist fake news site).

*sound of violins*.

If you care about voting, you can get a photo ID. Even if it does involve *gasp* going to the DMV. Georgia even offers them for free. If you don't care, you won't bother to get one. A lot of people don't. Let them be. Election integrity is far more important.

[Canada]

You bring up something to consider.

TrumpShit is responsible for not just the half million excessive deaths his mismanagement caused in the United States.

But by not taking reasonable, responsible actions in the United States, he helped spread the plague that will likely kill tens of millions.

Thanks for pointing that out.

USA deaths were on par with every country in the world. Thank god we had Trump to shut down Chinese from entering USA with even more cases. Biden called this racist. If Biden had been president with Covid he would have done the same thing he did with swine flu. Nothing and deaths would have been at least twice as bad. Trump pushed to get 3 vaccines in less than a year cancelling regulations that would have taken years of testing to develop. With Biden we would still be testing the vaccines on animals. Now Biden is letting thousands of Illegals with Covid into the country. Biden is trying to keep the Covid prospering. How many new cases will be result of immigration. Are the liberals counting all the new deaths as Biden deaths? Like it or not even the experts are acknowledging Trump great job on the vaccines. Even CNN.

Also just found out my residence is racist. A new study shows that trees are racist and unfortunately I have several trees on my property. Does anybody here really think the Republicans are pushing these racist claims?

[John Clayton]

Your previous post was idiotic but this has plumbed hitherto unforeseen depths. You are too moronic to bother with; it would be like trying to teach calculus to a goldfish.

I think this would fairly be considered an ad hominem argument -- not generally considered persuasive.

[Chris P]

The constitution provides for which authority reigns in precise matters between legislative, judicial, and executive branches.

These judicial decrees carried sufficient constitutional authority, that's why you were left to only cry about it.

The legislature has the power to overwrite any law or pronouncement that emerges as a result of any court ruling, even the Supreme Court.

It just might take decades to do it.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

[Paulie97]

The SCOTUS is the final arbiter of what is unconstitutional and laughed all the the way to the nearest K Street bar..

It's the ever so common Karpman Drama Triangle, Trump ever playing the victim, but this time no rescuers were in sight. Which is all good as this provides even more opportunities for him to play the victim, in response to the perceived betrayal of the SCOTUS and anyone else he believes is picking on him. This while he stews and plots revenge. It's a way of life, for him, as well as many of his followers.

[Paulie97]

Meanwhile smart normal American men are fleeing to Brazil to seek sex asylum from American liberals who want to lock us up for carrying guns.

Apply for a concealed carry permit. Should go well in most states if you aren't a criminal or a weirdo. There's also plenty of P4P here though it's illegal in all but a few places. And though divided on the issue, there's a good portion of feminists that support the rights of sex workers. Your bigger threat there is the Evangelicals the right is in bed with.

[Vagabundo1]

Meanwhile smart normal American men are fleeing to Brazil to seek sex asylum from American liberals who want to lock us up for carrying guns.

Of course there is space between. There are independents that are in the middle. You claim to not be a socialist but you like several others on this board think Biden, AOC and Bernie are great because they oppose everything Trump and America stands for.

In March border patrol processed 170,000 entering USA illegally. In March of 2020 is was about 20,000. An independent or Republican think it is Biden policy. Liberals all say this isn't a surge and the reason is that it went from 20,000 to 170,000 because of Trump policies. Of these 170,000 over 10% tested positive for Covid. These people are being let into USA without processing. You and all the socialists on this forum think this is great and that these people make citizens of USA life better. One idiot on this forum said they are all coming to pick vegetables because Citizens of USA won't do those jobs. Socialists believe that none of these people are criminals. Taxpayers are paying to feed these people and several are staying in hotels that we the taxpayer is paying for. I believe we need a secure border. I think this is a disaster for the USA and the taxpayer.

Trump had a good policy for a secure border similar to every other country in the world. I think it worked for the American people. You don't think the same. That makes you a socialist. Everything Trump did was not a success but this definitely was one. Biden is trying to reverse all the good things Trump did. Paris Accord reversed. Next it will be Iran deal..

[Canada]

Just curious.

I'm not a socialist. But I'm not an ultra either.


Or is there no space between your cohorts and socialists?

Of course there is space between. There are independents that are in the middle. You claim to not be a socialist but you like several others on this board think Biden, AOC and Bernie are great because they oppose everything Trump and America stands for.

In March border patrol processed 170,000 entering USA illegally. In March of 2020 is was about 20,000. An independent or Republican think it is Biden policy. Liberals all say this isn't a surge and the reason is that it went from 20,000 to 170,000 because of Trump policies. Of these 170,000 over 10% tested positive for Covid. These people are being let into USA without processing. You and all the socialists on this forum think this is great and that these people make citizens of USA life better. One idiot on this forum said they are all coming to pick vegetables because Citizens of USA won't do those jobs. Socialists believe that none of these people are criminals. Taxpayers are paying to feed these people and several are staying in hotels that we the taxpayer is paying for. I believe we need a secure border. I think this is a disaster for the USA and the taxpayer.

Trump had a good policy for a secure border similar to every other country in the world. I think it worked for the American people. You don't think the same. That makes you a socialist. Everything Trump did was not a success but this definitely was one. Biden is trying to reverse all the good things Trump did. Paris Accord reversed. Next it will be Iran deal.

And by the way I have a friend in El Centro, CA and I asked him if they had trouble getting workers to pick vegetables in California. He said 50% were local citizens and about 50% were documented workers from Mexico that came for planting and harvest. None of the illegals that have crossed the border were hired to pick vegetables. They never have a problem finding workers.

I believe the president should protect American jobs.

I think the president should keep America safe.

I know my report above is very extreme for a socialist to agree with so I expect you and several others will nit pick this and claim it totally false. That is why you are a socialist.

[PVMonger]

What's the big deal with an IDee? Isn't this something everyone has? Why are Democrats insisting there's no need to show identification to vote? I don't get it.

See, the "problem" is that you "assume" that (a) everybody has an ID or (b) IDs are easy to obtain.

You are wrong. You could do an internet search and read a bunch of articles. But you won't. Here's one that doesn't contain many big words. https://rewirenewsgroup.com/ablc/201...-id-just-vote/.

[PVMonger]

One side claims that blacks are incapable of carrying out basic functions like obtaining an ID, and that they are too lazy to wait in line to vote. The other side says that blacks are just as capable as other groups and should be treated equally. Which side is racist?

You don't understand very much about how courts work, do you? The courts didn't look at the evidence at all. That is because they refused to take the case, on the spurious ground of "lack of standing". As if 20 states of the Union (half the country) didn't have "standing" in a dispute over the unconstitutionality of the presidential election. If they don't have standing, who does? The answer, of course, is nobody except the media and deep state. Classic banana republic politicised "justice". Will not end well.

You don't have a clue as to what it takes for some people to obtain an ID. Here's just a snapshot https://rewirenewsgroup.com/ablc/201...id-just-vote/. But I don't expect you to understand nor do I expect you to open up your solidly-shut mind.

It seems as though the moderator removed the Mar-a-Lago phone number that I included for you. Have you called Donnie yet? Maybe he'll pay your expenses to present your overwhelming evidence.

As to what Donnie's lawyers can, and can't, do in court, maybe you ought to read this. You won't, of course. https://theconversation.com/why-trum...results-150505.

[ScatManDoo]

Right, because nobody died in the rest of the world.

You bring up something to consider.

TrumpShit is responsible for not just the half million excessive deaths his mismanagement caused in the United States.

But by not taking reasonable, responsible actions in the United States, he helped spread the plague that will likely kill tens of millions.

Thanks for pointing that out.

[ScatManDoo]

No, judicial decrees are not a constitutional manner

The constitution provides for which authority reigns in precise matters between legislative, judicial, and executive branches.

These judicial decrees carried sufficient constitutional authority, that's why you were left to only cry about it.

The legislature has the power to overwrite any law or pronouncement that emerges as a result of any court ruling, even the Supreme Court.

It just might take decades to do it.

[Chris P]

What's the big deal with an IDee? Isn't this something everyone has? Why are Democrats insisting there's no need to show identification to vote? I don't get it.

Because requiring ID and in person voting makes it much harder to commit election fraud. How else were they going to get that shuffling demented corpse and cackling, white-hating, fucked-her-way-up witch over the line?

[Chris P]

Judicial decrees are within the constitution.

Another ignoramus.

It was done via judicial decree, in a constitutional manner.

The election methods were altered, due to the pandemic, and prudently so.

No, judicial decrees are not a constitutional manner of altering electoral methods, The Constitution states specifically that the method of election must be set by the state legislatures. It actually goes into specific detail on this particular matter, because elections are so important.

This is not a judicial decree to remove a signpost somewhere; it is a matter of the integrity of the electoral system itself. It is not up to you, or some leftwing activist judge, to decide what is "prudent". It is up to the elected state legislatures. They decided it was not "prudent" to spam out tens of millions of mail-in ballots to whoever, wherever, and accept them back in whatever way, be it harvested by political operatives or hundreds of thousands showing up at 4 am in democrat cities of swing states, 96% for Biden.

That decision was for the state legislatures to make, as per the Constitution. They made the decision, and rejected the changes. The changes were therefore unconstitutional when forced through by executive order or judicial decree. The election was both fraudulent and unconstitutional, and Biden is an invalid "president" (in more ways than one).