Thread: Thailand Politics
+
Add Report
Results 1,291 to 1,305 of 2344
-
01-23-09 18:00 #1054
Posts: 490Originally Posted by NicFrenchy
2. Those who do, clearly have other concepts of courtesy than I do. But what can you expect of savages.
Originally Posted by Daddy07
-
01-23-09 17:32 #1053
Posts: 3003Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
I'm sure though that you have already realized that, just because you have contributed financially and maybe physically to this country, does not mean that anyone, except perhaps your 'mates' at ISG, really do give a fuck.
-
01-23-09 12:33 #1052
Posts: 395It is very difficult to know what Thais really think about pretty much anything and about this hyper-touchy topic in particular. I gather there is a strict delimitation between the institution and the person. The august octogenarian has been around for son long that hardly anybody remembers what was before. Hardly anybody would criticise the current monarch, partly because of the long reign, partly because of the very many good deeds that have been so cleverly publicised, partly because of the personal dignity displayed by HM.
As time went, the revered figure started fading away, and other players appeared on the picture. They had been around for long, but nobody really paid much attention. Now it seems that there is nobody who can command enough respect and prestige to carry the monarchy into a new reign.
I suppose that many Thai citizens realise that the current huge divide of the Thai public opinion cannot be healed within the existing system, and the monarchy has worked so diligently to identify itself with the status quo that it will have to go. Many people remember that indeed HM succeeded his late brother (whose reign had barely begun when he died), but that before King Ananda there had been no king on the throne for more than a decade and that monarchy was restored as part of a deal between political factions of the time.
I think that more and more people are thinking that although for many reasons HM still commands respect, the monarchy, as an institution, is not inherently essential for the continuation of the Thai state.
-
01-23-09 10:16 #1051
Posts: 1641Depends on the Host...
Originally Posted by Daddy San
One needs to remember that what is presented as a universal part of Thai culture is partly just a media marketing campaign. True, it has been effective, and true, there is a good deal of real feeling in the simple, credulous populace, but, behind this facade, there is a lot of criticism going on. No doubt this is why the official myth must be backed up by the legal system.
-
01-22-09 03:50 #1050
Posts: 4665Originally Posted by Daddy San
-
01-22-09 02:06 #1049
Posts: 1391Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
I'm told the Bangkok Hilton is not girl friendly.
-
01-22-09 01:40 #1048
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Daddy San
-
01-21-09 18:36 #1047
Posts: 490Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
Live out your civil liberties at home, but don't offend your hosts!
-
01-21-09 16:13 #1046
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Seydlitz
-
01-21-09 14:34 #1045
Posts: 395oth,
it is too bad that on a web forum, one cannot see so readily that some comments are meant tongue firmly in cheek. i am well aware that the naked truth about thailand is nearly always very remote from the polished image, regrettably the only one the casual onlooker will see and remember. this being said, one will never be free to discuss this matter until some substantial change happens in the country.
admittedly, totalitarian regimes have a natural tendency to suppress free speech. however, it is very rare that the leaders would be so bold as to make speeches in which they openly say that it is great to oppress the people, to steal state resources for the sole benefit of a small clique and that they work exclusively to perpetuate the iron grip that their clan has on the hapless peasants. quite the contrary, they go on and on about virtues to be upheld, morality to be restored, democracy to be perfected, social values to be celebrated etc. it is quite simple to use their own words and to quote them chapter and verse to criticise actual political behaviours that inevitably do not conform to what is preached and forms the official gospel. in the aftermath of the death of chaiman mao, this tactique was used very effectively by those who opposed the power grab by the successors. they used the words of the deceased tyrant against his successors.
in a totalitarian regime, one cannot confront the men at the top openly. this is worth a bullet in the neck, or at least 15 years of labour camp. either you shut up, or you use the words of the regime against its own self. that way, you might pass for a simpleton who takes official words literally, but you might avoid the nasty consequences of being an enemy of the state.
-
01-21-09 04:10 #1044
Posts: 112Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
-
01-20-09 17:21 #1043
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Seydlitz
The reality is far more nasty and sinister than even this guy would dare whisper about.
BTW, a Thai academic was charged today with lese majeste...turned in by the bookstore of Chulalongkorn University, where he teaches. That a university, which is supposed to be a bastion of free-thought and opinion would do something like this is a disgrace. It's just another indication that the right-wing reactionaries have as firm a grip as ever on the throat of this country.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/breakingn...r-royal-insult
-
01-20-09 13:22 #1042
Posts: 395Why someone residing or being physically in Thailand would write anything that could fall under the lese-majesté law is beyond me.
There are many things that are very wrong in Thailand on which it is permissible to write about without getting the Royals involved. If this Australian dude wanted to do that he should have criticized all those filthy politicians for not following the wise teachings of His Majesty The King, who is The Guiding Light of Thailand. Who could jail him for that ?
-
01-20-09 02:55 #1041
Posts: 116No need to say bye bye...
No need to say bye bye to someone who has departed. Only question to The Departed should be: why are you here?
-
01-20-09 01:05 #1040
Posts: 4665Originally Posted by The Departed
got 3 years for insulting him in a book that slde seven copies. Too lenient, if you ask me.