Thread: Sauna Club Golden Time - Bruggen
+
Add Report
Results 2,941 to 2,955 of 10037
-
06-29-17 06:53 #7097
Posts: 1492Originally Posted by HessenBub [View Original Post]
That makes things even worse, as only clients (male or female) but not the working girls are potentially exposed to fines when doing BBBJ, etc. It makes the blackmail position of the client even worse (and better for the WG). Let's see how long it lasts when the first girl will try to give BBBJ and then wil pretend you forced her to do this, and she will threat you, but is willing to let it go for a few hundred / thousands Euro (much less than the max fine for the client in this case). Of course this will not happen with most of the girls, especially not with the one you know, but enough golddiggers around who will give it a try. So small chance, but big impact if so.
-
06-28-17 04:16 #7096
Posts: 1312Originally Posted by Bfsie [View Original Post]
If you read the "Explanation" under Section 32 on the very web site that you linked to, the explanation is quite clear (not to mention the extensive news coverage thereof).
I'm surprised that you don't know about this as this has been the most hotly talked about topic here for the past 6 months.
In any case, it is important not to spread misinformation about this aspect of the law as to do otherwise undermines our interests.
But, in any case, Bravo to you sir for sticking to your guns even in the face of all of this evidence to the contrary. Impressive. Impressive indeed.
-
06-28-17 04:01 #7095
Posts: 435Originally Posted by HessenBub [View Original Post]Originally Posted by UltraHappy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Bfsie [View Original Post]
-
06-28-17 01:18 #7094
Posts: 1312Dear Bfsie,
I accept your apology.
Sincerely,
Ultrahappy.
-
06-27-17 22:25 #7093
Posts: 1517Originally Posted by Polyamorist [View Original Post]
Wow, you know some really nice girls, LOL.
-
06-27-17 21:53 #7092
Posts: 7121Originally Posted by Bfsie [View Original Post]
HB.
-
06-27-17 21:37 #7091
Posts: 435Originally Posted by XXL [View Original Post]
-
06-27-17 21:32 #7090
Posts: 2417Originally Posted by Bfsie [View Original Post]
Given the "Scandinavian" nature of this law, I surmise the only reason they have any penalties at all for prostitutes is to be able to put them under some pressure to incriminate clients/so-called pimps/business owners etc.
-
06-27-17 21:28 #7089
Posts: 435Originally Posted by XXL [View Original Post]
-
06-27-17 21:25 #7088
Posts: 2417Originally Posted by Bfsie [View Original Post]
-
06-27-17 21:21 #7087
Posts: 435Originally Posted by XXL [View Original Post]
-
06-27-17 21:18 #7086
Posts: 2417Originally Posted by Bfsie [View Original Post]
-
06-27-17 21:13 #7085
Posts: 435Originally Posted by XXL [View Original Post]
From what I understand from your text, the prostitutes still violate the law while clients are responsible for not wearing the condom, so the prostitutes are still punishable for 1000 euro for BBBJ.
-
06-27-17 21:04 #7084
Posts: 2417Originally Posted by HessenBub [View Original Post]
Verstoesse gegen die gesetzlichen Regelungen koennen fuer Prostituierte unter anderem mit einem Bussgeld jeweils bis 1. 000 Euros Geahndet werden.".
Translation (mine, not the goofy machine translation of the website):
"What penalties can prostitutes expect if they violate the PrstSchG?
If they violate the legal provisions, prostitutes can expect among other things: a fine up to 1000 Euro ".
Note the "among other things" ("unter anderem"). They could still get a slap on the wrist.
Regarding whether this applies to condoms, the following is interesting (my emphasis):
"Verstoesse gegen die Kondompflicht sind daher fuer Prostituierte nach diesem Gesetz nicht bussgeldbewehrt, jedoch fuer Kunden und Kundinnen".
Translation:
"Male and female clients, not prostitutes, can incur a fine if they violate the condom rule".
It seems they went to some length to uphold the pretence that this is not a gender-biased law.
-
06-27-17 20:59 #7083
Posts: 435Originally Posted by HessenBub [View Original Post]