Identifying Transvestites

[TurdyCurdyOne]

I think it is noteworthy that nobody came forward with a definite vote in favor of the girl in that photo being a female. Nobody.

To me, that illustrates once again how weak a still photo can be for determining the most important factors about a potential sex partner, a point I have probably made with regard to posted photos more than any other member here. My contention has always been that photoscan mislead as often as they prove or confirm.

Those factors almost always include whether or not I and others would really be all that inspired to fuck the person in that photo once we have met them in person even when there is no question about her being a natural born female. Now I can reasonably state a still photo might not even be enough to accurately convince anyone viewing it which gender they are looking at.

That still photo clearly showed a bad boob job. And as I said in agreement with Natty, the bad implants were reason enough for me to take a pass anyway. But the light and shadows in the photo also suggested a bad chin implant and traces of an Adam's Apple, more than a mere trace of the latter in your eyes.

Eih is right of course. It's very difficult to tell for certain which women will be good in bed.

Sometimes their demeanor talking to you can give hints. What is their experience? Tatoos, first sex at younger age, no strict religion, not from abused background and healthy relationship with Father, etc are indicators, but you never know for sure.

I thought I could separate the transvestites (ladyboys) from real women till I came to Philippines. Very difficult here, they are all small boned, no dead give sways and even have high voices.

And they LIE sometimes. Some of the ladyboys in San Francisco are also difficult to tell and some are actually female having had the complete surgery, but still cannot get pregnant, so technically not really female.

One poster studied them and concluded that ladyboys are mentally ill. Not sure about that.

Often it's the sleeper girl, the quiet one who does not dress sexy who is best in bed. The more hey show, often the less they GO. Hot, very attractive women are frequently spoiled and selfish both in bed and not. Older are frequently better than younger.

Re photos: They are frequently misleading or worthless. Get them on cam, to see the truth.

[Mr Enternational]

As I explained to a (very naive) colleague while working in London when he pointed to phone booth and the gorgeous pictures. "do you remember as a child when you opened the box of your Christmas gift and compared the toy inside with the tv ad?

LOL. I remember having to have Zips shoes when I was a kid. On the TV ad it made you think you would be able to run faster and jump higher. That was a bust. If they did something as simple as take the music and fast talking out of those ads then nobody would probably buy any of that shit.

[Cons68]

As I explained to a (very naive) colleague while working in London when he pointed to phone booth and the gorgeous pictures. "do you remember as a child when you opened the box of your Christmas gift and compared the toy inside with the tv ad?

That is the same with normal women and stars. If people saw them when they woke up in the morning versus all glammed up, it would be a different story on who is the bee's knees. I used to fuck with a chick in Brazil that made porn movies. She would have to go in for 8 hours and 4 of those hours would consist of getting her hair and makeup done.

[Mr Enternational]

The thing is we will be picking those with the best hairdresser and makeup, and better clothes.

That is the same with normal women and stars. If people saw them when they woke up in the morning versus all glammed up, it would be a different story on who is the bee's knees. I used to fuck with a chick in Brazil that made porn movies. She would have to go in for 8 hours and 4 of those hours would consist of getting her hair and makeup done.

[MongerForSex]

It was an amusing game. But you should have waited just a tad longer before the big reveal so MongerForSex could have weighed in with his guess. I mean, his never fail expert conclusion as a specialist in these matters. Actually, I guess he did have that opportunity to weigh in but took a pass on it. I suppose he just didn't want to spoil the game for the rest of us by giving the correct answer before you were ready to end the game.

I never pretended to be an expert from stupid pictures. I don't trust pictures as I said in all my posts. I don't need to play that stupid game. Don't forget I am not superman's son.. The stupid game is for you.

[EihTooms]

You can trust us for not mistaking a dude for a chick. Like the man said, if you have to pause and wonder if the chick is a dude, then why even attempt to go there.

And as I have said before, trans used to fashion themselves to attempt to look like women. Now women are fashioning themselves to look like trans.

I think it is noteworthy that nobody came forward with a definite vote in favor of the girl in that photo being a female. Nobody.

To me, that illustrates once again how weak a still photo can be for determining the most important factors about a potential sex partner, a point I have probably made with regard to posted photos more than any other member here. My contention has always been that photos can mislead as often as they prove or confirm.

Those factors almost always include whether or not I and others would really be all that inspired to fuck the person in that photo once we have met them in person even when there is no question about her being a natural born female. Now I can reasonably state a still photo might not even be enough to accurately convince anyone viewing it which gender they are looking at.

That still photo clearly showed a bad boob job. And as I said in agreement with Natty, the bad implants were reason enough for me to take a pass anyway. But the light and shadows in the photo also suggested a bad chin implant and traces of an Adam's Apple, more than a mere trace of the latter in your eyes.

I think all of it put together was plenty to prevent any and every member who looked at that one still photo from publicly stating without a doubt that it was a natural born female. Most conspicuously missing for such a vote were the self-described , never fail specialists and experts in these matters.

And, in my oft stated opinion about posted photos, it still says nothing about how we would feel if we met the girl in a photo face to face and in person. Girls who look hot in a photo are sometimes the least fuckable in person and girls whose photos elicit derisive laughter might turn out to be some of the sexiest, most fuckable girls you've met in a month once you are in their presence. It is fun to see photos. But they don't necessarily prove much.

Any man with a minimal amount of experience choosing and meeting girls from the internet dating sites can attest to that fact. And vice versa. Lol

[Blanquiceleste]

It was an amusing game. But you should have waited just a tad longer before the big reveal so MongerForSex could have weighed in with his guess. I mean, his never fail expert conclusion as a specialist in these matters. Actually, I guess he did have that opportunity to weigh in but took a pass on it. I suppose he just didn't want to spoil the game for the rest of us by giving the correct answer before you were ready to end the game.

Let me say what everyone has been thinking about.

MFS is someone who claims to have slept with over 2500 females and never once been duped, but, strangely, refuses to accept that anyone else who has been staying in or visiting Thailand for a long time is capable of the same. At best, someone seeking cheap thrills out of the arguments this generates. At worst, a harmless fool and nothing more.

[EihTooms]

It doesn't matter to me. I wouldn't take her regardless, but she has video clips on her instagram site and in them she appears to be a natural girl. I have seen them. But you are right; one still photo is the least accurate evidence to rely on. It is nothing like seeing someone in real life. This was just a little game for everyone's amusement. I wasn't trying to prove anything.

It was an amusing game. But you should have waited just a tad longer before the big reveal so MongerForSex could have weighed in with his guess. I mean, his never fail expert conclusion as a specialist in these matters. Actually, I guess he did have that opportunity to weigh in but took a pass on it. I suppose he just didn't want to spoil the game for the rest of us by giving the correct answer before you were ready to end the game.

[Mr Enternational]

All the specialists in shemales were wrong. LOL Mr Enternational so called specialist is wrong and tooms is wrong too. Can we trust them not to be duped by transexuals or transexual looking women? I have to find another expert for my trip in Thailand. LOL.

You can trust us for not mistaking a dude for a chick. Like the man said, if you have to pause and wonder if the chick is a dude, then why even attempt to go there.

And as I have said before, trans used to fashion themselves to attempt to look like women. Now women are fashioning themselves to look like trans.

[Member #4698]

It sounds like some of you guys are missing out on some extremely hot pussy thinking those chicks are too hot to be real girls.

I am trying to figure out where these girls go when they want to let loose and party. Like I said, I have a thing for Bunny EvaAva.

[Member #4698]

That is true, unless I really was fooled by a very convincing LB or LBs sometime along the way. It doesn't disturb me to allow that possibility.

However, Natty, I can't say that anyone ought to conclude the case is settled once and for all regarding that lady or ladyboy in the still photo. I mean, you "think" she is a natural born female? Thailand Playboy? LOL. I wouldn't take those shaky assurances as enough reason to sign an ironclad contract even for real money to spend a night having sex with that person in the photo. A video clip might help. But based on just a still photo and those assurances, no.

It doesn't matter to me. I wouldn't take her regardless, but she has video clips on her instagram site and in them she appears to be a natural girl. I have seen them. But you are right; one still photo is the least accurate evidence to rely on. It is nothing like seeing someone in real life. This was just a little game for everyone's amusement. I wasn't trying to prove anything.

[Smoothy]

It sounds like some of you guys are missing out on some extremely hot pussy thinking those chicks are too hot to be real girls.

[EihTooms]

Yes, but there is nothing wrong with making a type 1 error. It is the the type 2 error or false negative that you must be on the lookout for. The non-rejection of a false null hypothesis ie thinking a LB is a girl and moving forward on that erroneous assumption. On that critical level, I don't believe that Mr E or EihTooms have ever been mistaken. I know I haven't and I would admit it if I had.

That is true, unless I really was fooled by a very convincing LB or LBs sometime along the way. It doesn't disturb me to allow that possibility. But I really don't believe it ever happened.

However, Natty, I can't say that anyone ought to conclude the case is settled once and for all regarding that lady or ladyboy in the still photo. I mean, you "think" she is a natural born female? Playboy Thailand? LOL. I wouldn't take those shaky assurances as enough reason to sign an ironclad contract for real money to spend a night having sex with that person in the photo. A video clip might help. But based on just a still photo and those assurances, no.

[EihTooms]

...

Giraffe neck ass muthafucka! (Women have shorter necks in proportion than men as well.)
...

Really? I always thought a longer appearing neck was a more feminine feature.

[EihTooms]

All the specialists in shemales were wrong. LOL Mr Enternational so called specialist is wrong and tooms is wrong too. Can we trust them not to be duped by transexuals or transexual looking women? I have to find another expert for my trip in Thailand. LOL.

I never claimed to be a specialist or an expert, especially not based on a still photo. I have always said still photos are the worst ways to tell the difference and the easiest ways to be fooled. A video clip tells much more. An in person observation usually clinches it.

I was just answering to play the game since it was of no real concern to me or threat to my perceived sexual preference to make a wrong guess. A risk I notice a couple of other genuine self-claimed experts declined to take. LOL.