Thread: Identifying Transvestites
+
Add Report
Results 31 to 45 of 573
-
07-30-19 01:23 #543
Posts: 279Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Sometimes their demeanor talking to you can give hints. What is their experience? Tatoos, first sex at younger age, no strict religion, not from abused background and healthy relationship with Father, etc are indicators, but you never know for sure.
I thought I could separate the transvestites (ladyboys) from real women till I came to Philippines. Very difficult here, they are all small boned, no dead give sways and even have high voices.
And they LIE sometimes. Some of the ladyboys in San Francisco are also difficult to tell and some are actually female having had the complete surgery, but still cannot get pregnant, so technically not really female.
One poster studied them and concluded that ladyboys are mentally ill. Not sure about that.
Often it's the sleeper girl, the quiet one who does not dress sexy who is best in bed. The more hey show, often the less they GO. Hot, very attractive women are frequently spoiled and selfish both in bed and not. Older are frequently better than younger.
Re photos: They are frequently misleading or worthless. Get them on cam, to see the truth.
-
07-29-19 20:29 #542
Posts: 15918Originally Posted by Cons68 [View Original Post]
-
07-29-19 19:36 #541
Posts: 1192As I explained to a (very naive) colleague while working in London when he pointed to phone booth and the gorgeous pictures. "do you remember as a child when you opened the box of your Christmas gift and compared the toy inside with the tv ad?
Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
-
07-29-19 15:58 #540
Posts: 15918Originally Posted by Cons68 [View Original Post]
-
07-25-19 04:18 #539
Posts: 360Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
07-25-19 03:18 #538
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
To me, that illustrates once again how weak a still photo can be for determining the most important factors about a potential sex partner, a point I have probably made with regard to posted photos more than any other member here. My contention has always been that photos can mislead as often as they prove or confirm.
Those factors almost always include whether or not I and others would really be all that inspired to fuck the person in that photo once we have met them in person even when there is no question about her being a natural born female. Now I can reasonably state a still photo might not even be enough to accurately convince anyone viewing it which gender they are looking at.
That still photo clearly showed a bad boob job. And as I said in agreement with Natty, the bad implants were reason enough for me to take a pass anyway. But the light and shadows in the photo also suggested a bad chin implant and traces of an Adam's Apple, more than a mere trace of the latter in your eyes.
I think all of it put together was plenty to prevent any and every member who looked at that one still photo from publicly stating without a doubt that it was a natural born female. Most conspicuously missing for such a vote were the self-described , never fail specialists and experts in these matters.
And, in my oft stated opinion about posted photos, it still says nothing about how we would feel if we met the girl in a photo face to face and in person. Girls who look hot in a photo are sometimes the least fuckable in person and girls whose photos elicit derisive laughter might turn out to be some of the sexiest, most fuckable girls you've met in a month once you are in their presence. It is fun to see photos. But they don't necessarily prove much.
Any man with a minimal amount of experience choosing and meeting girls from the internet dating sites can attest to that fact. And vice versa. Lol
-
07-25-19 01:01 #537
Posts: 1575Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
MFS is someone who claims to have slept with over 2500 females and never once been duped, but, strangely, refuses to accept that anyone else who has been staying in or visiting Thailand for a long time is capable of the same. At best, someone seeking cheap thrills out of the arguments this generates. At worst, a harmless fool and nothing more.
-
07-24-19 22:06 #536
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by NattyBumpo [View Original Post]
-
07-24-19 21:37 #535
Posts: 15918Originally Posted by MongerForSex [View Original Post]
And as I have said before, trans used to fashion themselves to attempt to look like women. Now women are fashioning themselves to look like trans.
-
07-24-19 21:34 #534
Posts: 3040Originally Posted by Smoothy [View Original Post]
-
07-24-19 21:32 #533
Posts: 3040Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
07-24-19 21:30 #532
Posts: 3497It sounds like some of you guys are missing out on some extremely hot pussy thinking those chicks are too hot to be real girls.
-
07-24-19 21:15 #531
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by NattyBumpo [View Original Post]
However, Natty, I can't say that anyone ought to conclude the case is settled once and for all regarding that lady or ladyboy in the still photo. I mean, you "think" she is a natural born female? Playboy Thailand? LOL. I wouldn't take those shaky assurances as enough reason to sign an ironclad contract for real money to spend a night having sex with that person in the photo. A video clip might help. But based on just a still photo and those assurances, no.
-
07-24-19 20:59 #530
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
-
07-24-19 20:50 #529
Posts: 5447Originally Posted by MongerForSex [View Original Post]
I was just answering to play the game since it was of no real concern to me or threat to my perceived sexual preference to make a wrong guess. A risk I notice a couple of other genuine self-claimed experts declined to take. LOL.