Bangkok Reports

[Gargano19]

Add to that the customer's mouth touching the provider's skin. Then a session will go like this: You both enter the room and disrobe. She gives you a CBJ and you better get hard with that for the only other activity allowed after would be CFS most likely in a safe position like doggy. That's it.

Haha it actually reminded me of an experience I had last year in warsaw. Yes, it was horrible LOL.

[Crocodilexp]

P4 P as we know it will not be the same for quite some time. The effects will dwarf that of HIV / AIDS. And I am referring to changes in laws, changes in providers attitudes and what they are willing to provide, and cultural attitudes towards P4P sex.

Indeed, the outlook is depressing. While physical danger will end when a Covid vaccine is developed and widely deployed (1-2 years away if we're lucky), the effect of changing laws and attitudes will stay for a long time.

In Thailand, this also presents the perfect opportunity for the authorities to completely kill off the visible prostitution industry. There's a conservative block that's been trying suppress it since the early 2000's, with some success.

[Goatscrot]

Add to that the customer's mouth touching the provider's skin. Then a session will go like this: You both enter the room and disrobe. She gives you a CBJ and you better get hard with that for the only other activity allowed after would be CFS most likely in a safe position like doggy. That's it.

Methinks you are right. I'll never pay for that.

[Turgid]

The most likely changes might be anything related to oral contact. I would not be surprised if DFK or any kissing at all, BBBJ even as mere oral foreplay, Rimming, Cat Bath and anything requiring a provider's mouth touching the customer's skin.............

Add to that the customer's mouth touching the provider's skin. Then a session will go like this: You both enter the room and disrobe. She gives you a CBJ and you better get hard with that for the only other activity allowed after would be CFS most likely in a safe position like doggy. That's it.

[Franciscass]

Might as well save the money and wank. Man, this is just awful.

Reminds me of the scene from Naked Gun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_BPDi8Ems

[Sam Sanuk]

How is what I posted about the aerosol version of transmission so different than what Fauci said about it in that video?

Your version seemed a bit apocalyptic compared to the doctor's. A lot of variables involved and I'm sure many which are not fully explored and vetted. The good doctor must rely on his knowledge / experience associated with similar viruses, since COVID 19 is a new one. Accordingly, some of his information must rest solely on that, while some may be pure speculation. I have noted that, when delivering his briefings, he does "footnote" some of his statements on occasion. But, to get back to your question a tab more directly, your inclusion of a "particle" being on a piece of furniture and then ending up in one's respiratory system seems (to me) to be nearly impossible. Maybe I read it incorrectly. If so, please disregard.

Thanks again for the link. I like the doctor's briefings; I find him "authentic" and "authoritative".

SS.

[Goatscrot]

The most likely changes might be anything related to oral contact. I would not be surprised if DFK or any kissing at all, BBBJ even as mere oral foreplay, Rimming, Cat Bath and anything requiring a provider's mouth touching the customer's skin to become the new great taboo, surpassing the issue of covered FS vs bareback FS.

In terms of Covid-19 risk, condom or no condom for fucking is irrelevant.

And all encounters while both people are wearing masks, I suppose, to somewhat reduce the aerosol transmission risk.

I would recommend everyone honing their upfront negotiation skills. There might be a whole bunch of new hurdles to overcome in store. And as many new itemized surcharge costs to iron out.

Might as well save the money and wank. Man, this is just awful.

[EihTooms]

Probably, mostly but interestingly, Dutch scientists have found, ". SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is often excreted in an infected person's stool. ". Not likely to be a primary means of infection, but detectable:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-in-dutch-city

Ah, that would definitely mean the end of Rim Jobs.

[John Clayton]

...In terms of Covid-19 risk, condom or no condom for fucking is irrelevant...

Probably, mostly but interestingly, Dutch scientists have found, ". SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is often excreted in an infected person's stool. ". Not likely to be a primary means of infection, but detectable:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-in-dutch-city

My point is, we don't know yet how the virus is shed or how people are infected. Cum could be part of it...
The important thing about infectivity that most epidemiologists ignore is viral load. A small exposure you can maybe fight off. but spending hours fucking, kissing, sweating, eating an infected person...!

[EihTooms]

P4 P as we know it will not be the same for quite some time. The effects will dwarf that of HIV / AIDS. And I am referring to changes in laws, changes in providers attitudes and what they are willing to provide, and cultural attitudes towards P4P sex.

The most likely changes might be anything related to oral contact. I would not be surprised if DFK or any kissing at all, BBBJ even as mere oral foreplay, Rimming, Cat Bath and anything requiring a provider's mouth touching the customer's skin to become the new great taboo, surpassing the issue of covered FS vs bareback FS.

In terms of Covid-19 risk, condom or no condom for fucking is irrelevant.

And all encounters while both people are wearing masks, I suppose, to somewhat reduce the aerosol transmission risk.

I would recommend everyone honing their upfront negotiation skills. There might be a whole bunch of new hurdles to overcome in store. And as many new itemized surcharge costs to iron out.

[Goatscrot]

It's not sexually transmitted strictly speaking, but it's fair to say that, if you have sex with a Covid-19 carrier (who may be asymptomatic or have mild symptoms), there's a very high probability of getting it unless you're wearing a high-grade protective gear throughout the entire encounter and disinfect yourself thoroughly afterwards. Of course you easily could get it without actual sex (just by, say, shaking hands), but that's beside the point. Therefore, sex workers are a vector, and a high risk one. Being in close contact with many people also increases the chance they are infected (compared to an average person), so there's that too.

P4 P as we know it will not be the same for quite some time. The effects will dwarf that of HIV / AIDS. And I am referring to changes in laws, changes in providers attitudes and what they are willing to provide, and cultural attitudes towards P4P sex.

[EihTooms]

Some interesting info, some of which has been "out there" for a bit of time and some new to me. Good source and glad to hear things aren't as apocalyptic as you made it seem. I can crawl out from under my bed now. LOL Thanks for the link.

SS.

How is what I posted about the aerosol version of transmission so different than what Fauci said about it in that video?

[Crocodilexp]

Are we somehow drifting into a mindset where Covid-19 is considered a sexually transmitted or related disease, which it is not?

It's not sexually transmitted strictly speaking, but it's fair to say that, if you have sex with a Covid-19 carrier (who may be asymptomatic or have mild symptoms), there's a very high probability of getting it unless you're wearing a high-grade protective gear throughout the entire encounter and disinfect yourself thoroughly afterwards. Of course you easily could get it without actual sex (just by, say, shaking hands), but that's beside the point. Therefore, sex workers are a vector, and a high risk one. Being in close contact with many people also increases the chance they are infected (compared to an average person), so there's that too.

[Sam Sanuk]

You can jump ahead to 2:45 where the actual questions and answers section begins. Dr. Fauci discusses the airborne/aerosol issue at 3:45. He does not dismiss it as a means of transmission at all. Instead, he allows it as a perfectly viable way for a virus like this to linger in the air and infect people, similar to but perhaps not as long lasting in the air as the measles virus.

https://youtu.be/F2YKKba6ps0

Some interesting info, some of which has been "out there" for a bit of time and some new to me. Good source and glad to hear things aren't as apocalyptic as you made it seem. I can crawl out from under my bed now. LOL Thanks for the link.

SS.

[EihTooms]

Please provide the source. Thanks.

SS.

You can jump ahead to 2:45 where the actual questions and answers section begins. Dr. Fauci discusses the airborne/aerosol issue at 3:45. He does not dismiss it as a means of transmission at all. Instead, he allows it as a perfectly viable way for a virus like this to linger in the air and infect people, similar to but perhaps not as long lasting in the air as the measles virus.

https://youtu.be/F2YKKba6ps0