|
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by Franciscass
[View Original Post]
Sorry can't remember but was that before or after suggesting injecting disinfectant as a cure.
I think it was before.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by Sunlover2
[View Original Post]
I think they could be considered semi-pro's: meaning someone engaging in an activity for pay or gain but not as a full-time occupation. Not sure how you were able to determined that on sight, but YMMV.
Years ago I picked up an attractive little spinner on a Friday night on soi 4. She told me she worked in a toy factory during the week. When she took off her clothing she exposed the thickest Bush I had ever encountered. If I had a machete I could have put it to good use.
That is when I realized her story was probably true, as pro's tend to keep it neat and trim down there for hygienec reasons. And my belief was further enforced when she thanked me after her very obvious 'happy happy' moment.
SL.
I couldn't tell by sight, but these two told me their regular day jobs at the first meeting. They gave me their phone numbers and I saw the Tesco worker every Saturday for two months. She stopped taking my calls, and I assume she found a better job that didn't require her to freelance to make ends meet. The second one I actually saw her once when I went through the airport on a trip, and I had visited her room near the airport several times, so I know she had a regular job but was just making extra cash. As you found out, the non-pro girls really appreciate it when you give them an orgasm, and the girl who worked at the airport would grab my head in her hands and pull me down onto her when she climaxes. She was the only girl that did this. .
-
Senior Member
Posts: 286
If only.
Originally Posted by NicFrenchy
[View Original Post]
On a forum 99% dedicated to sex? Good luck trying to enforce that one.
99%? If only it were.
Mostly these days it seems to be American politics, pseudo-loony science, amateur medicine theories and flaky opinions on global politics and economics.
What happened to the discussions on overpaying or how good it was in the old days or even posts with lots of acronyms?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 4665
Originally Posted by ErsatzJulian
[View Original Post]
Leave the science to the people who actually understand it, and please keep your opinions to yourself.
On a forum 99% dedicated to sex? Good luck trying to enforce that one.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 632
Originally Posted by Franciscass
[View Original Post]
Sorry can't remember but was that before or after suggesting injecting disinfectant as a cure.
If memory serves me correctly then I believe it was before injecting yourself with Lysol. It was preventive first and if that didn't work then use the proven cure (which in theory should work if the Lysol didn't kill you first).
-
Senior Member
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by Achmmc
[View Original Post]
My wife is an attending physician in three large south bay area CA hospitals. Chloroquine cocktails were used extensively until it became a political issue. The libtards who run the three large county hospitals banned the use of Chloroquine. People died because of it.
Can you prove that "people died because of it?" Did the hospital and your wife keep detailed statistics of who had the chloroquine cocktail, and who didn't; and subsequently who acquired COVID19 at the hospital and how didn't? I would take the word of the CDC and the AMA over the anecdotal evidence of husband of some unknown county hospital doctor any day. Leave the science to the people who actually understand it, and please keep your opinions to yourself.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by ErsatzJulian
[View Original Post]
Did you get your misinformation from Rush Limbaugh? Why anyone listens to that man is a mystery to me. Here is a tweet from the AMA regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine for COViD19, https://twitter.com/amermedicalassn/...314370?lang=en, where it explicitly say their position with regards to hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID19 remains unchanged. As for your article from the NIH, read the title: it is a paper about the use of Chloroquine for SARS-CoV, a related but different virus.
My wife is an attending physician in three large south bay area CA hospitals. Chloroquine cocktails were used extensively until it became a political issue. The libtards who run the three large county hospitals banned the use of Chloroquine. People died because of it.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 784
Originally Posted by Explorer8939
[View Original Post]
Cherry-picking case studies is not useful. Rather, you should look at the scientific consensus which includes all case studies. HCQ has shown no benefit as a prophylactic. And, HCQ was often touted as a cure.
Your HCQ threshold seems to be high efficacy. Mine is mitigation, and credible studies have shown some net positive effect. I know multiple doctors who were taking HCQ as a preventative measure before the vaccines came along. You go with what you got.
SL.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1222
Originally Posted by Sharka
[View Original Post]
You left out President Trump as he was also a big believer. He even once said he took this every day as a prophylaxis for Covid.
Sorry can't remember but was that before or after suggesting injecting disinfectant as a cure.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 632
Originally Posted by Explorer8939
[View Original Post]
Cherry-picking case studies is not useful. Rather, you should look at the scientific consensus which includes all case studies. HCQ has shown no benefit as a prophylactic. And, HCQ was often touted as a cure.
The two countries that were pushing HCQ were Brazil and India. That didn't work out so well for them.
You left out President Trump as he was also a big believer. He even once said he took this every day as a prophylaxis for Covid.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3367
Cherry-picking case studies is not useful. Rather, you should look at the scientific consensus which includes all case studies. HCQ has shown no benefit as a prophylactic. And, HCQ was often touted as a cure.
The two countries that were pushing HCQ were Brazil and India. That didn't work out so well for them.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3367
Originally Posted by DannyDuck
[View Original Post]
The world would be a better place if it listened to Rush principles.
Biden letting Covid illegals Free into USA.
Why can't Thai say Bleep it and let's open up. LOL.
Covid really is just the Flu.
People who would have died due to flu died of C19 instead. Same same.
Wow. How many lies can fit into a single post?
COVID is not the flu. You can ask 550,000 Americans, except they are dead.
BTW, despite the earlier lies from Rush, smoking tobacco causes lung cancer. You could ask Rush about that, except he's dead.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 784
Originally Posted by ShiftTab
[View Original Post]
I used to get off the BTS early and walk toward Terminal 21 on Sukhumvit going back to my room and would see many freelancers. I usually chose the ones who were non-pros and just making extra cash for the rent. I had met one who worked at Tesco and was making extra money for rent, and another one who worked at a gift shop at the airport.
I think they could be considered semi-pro's: meaning someone engaging in an activity for pay or gain but not as a full-time occupation. Not sure how you were able to determined that on sight, but YMMV.
Years ago I picked up an attractive little spinner on a Friday night on soi 4. She told me she worked in a toy factory during the week. When she took off her clothing she exposed the thickest Bush I had ever encountered. If I had a machete I could have put it to good use.
That is when I realized her story was probably true, as pro's tend to keep it neat and trim down there for hygienec reasons. And my belief was further enforced when she thanked me after her very obvious 'happy happy' moment.
SL.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 411
Originally Posted by ShiftTab
[View Original Post]
Thanks for the information. It looks grim. I used to get off the BTS early and walk toward Terminal 21 on Sukhumvit going back to my room and would see many freelancers. I usually chose the ones who were non-pros and just making extra cash for the rent. I had met one who worked at Tesco and was making extra money for rent, and another one who worked at a gift shop at the airport. It's sad to hear only Thermae is the only place with girls.
About that place near Yaowarat, I used to go there after shopping at Chinatown and there would be one or two gems amoung the crowd. Sad to hear it's dead.
As for Lumpini park, I used to find clusters of girls on the east and west side of the park, and one of cutest freelancer I ever had was a dark skin slim girl at Lumpini.
Things in BKK don't sound good, but I hope it improves by next year.
A girl who has sex to pay rent is a Professional.
Now I know why I can't get good girls. LOL.
My definition is a bit off.
I'm not a guy who thinks paying 3,000 for a girls taxi is a non pay encounter. She really just likes my company. Okie Dokie.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by Crocodilexp
[View Original Post]
Finally, someone asking the good questions.
Streetwalker situation on lower Sukhumvit is dire. Apart from a handful of girls in front of Thermae, it's bad. Half are ladyboys, half are homeless types, very few passable girls left. Soi 15-21 still has an occasional, but much fewer than 4 months ago.
The local area south of Khaosan is still active, it may well be the only worthwhile place for streetwalkers in Bangkok that remains. Plenty of girls have moved there from Sukhumvit since there were just no customers. The going rate is 500, but that's better than nothing at all. Fortunately, daytime action is solid, I don't care much for that neighborhood at night. Not dangerous, but not pleasant for sure. You do have to look at women carefully, some real dragons and hard junkies among them, which might not be immediately obvious at night. Service is much worse than on Sukhumvit, even if you arrange a full-hour multi-pop session at a nicer place.
There's also a similar local area near Yaowarat towards the Wong Wian 22 traffic circle. Pretty dire in 2021, not even worth a look.
I don't recall streets around Lumpini ever being loaded (not in the last 10 years). The most I've ever seen is roughly two dozen girls in small groups, stretched along a huge distance around the park. Not great for browsing, and not all that good for partaking either. These days, it's not too active at all, sometimes you'd find zero girls.
If you're back in a year, much might be different by then. However, the industry has been in decline for many years, and it's possible it will never bounce back to pre-Covid levels.
Thanks for the information. It looks grim. I used to get off the BTS early and walk toward Terminal 21 on Sukhumvit going back to my room and would see many freelancers. I usually chose the ones who were non-pros and just making extra cash for the rent. I had met one who worked at Tesco and was making extra money for rent, and another one who worked at a gift shop at the airport. It's sad to hear only Thermae is the only place with girls.
About that place near Yaowarat, I used to go there after shopping at Chinatown and there would be one or two gems amoung the crowd. Sad to hear it's dead.
As for Lumpini park, I used to find clusters of girls on the east and west side of the park, and one of cutest freelancer I ever had was a dark skin slim girl at Lumpini.
Things in BKK don't sound good, but I hope it improves by next year.
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|