Thread: Bangkok Reports
+
Add Report
Results 56,446 to 56,460 of 56796
-
10-25-07 02:54 #351
Posts: 275embassies again
Terrier, your response to my post is just plainly stupid. Of course my English is not prefect, as I am not a native English speaker. You may want to re-read your mail, as it’s not so hot either. I also did a quick check when did you last post to the Photo Gallery. Sorry, correct me here, I could not find any recent entries.
Now back to the embassy situation. Yes, of course many Thai P4P pros seek the social protection of western societies, as Thailand provides none. In that sense they are simply economic nomads. No different from thousands of Mexicans crossing the border to the US daily or Africans getting washed up on the shores of Malta. I.e. money for nothing...
I cannot see any reason why any government should let these people in. Truth is Thai sex pro's end up doing overseas exactly what they doing here, screwing for money.
However the presence of these girls at the embassies is disturbing, to an extend that a number of Thai's think twice of applying for visas. Recently I spend quiet some time at one particular embassy, hence my observation. I then talked to Thai friends and yes, they do confirm this.
JB
Originally Posted by Terry Terrier
-
10-25-07 00:57 #350
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Blunderer
-
10-24-07 15:52 #349
Posts: 231Originally Posted by GiottoLast edited by Blunderer; 10-24-07 at 15:53. Reason: Adjectives and nouns are not the same thing
-
10-24-07 15:48 #348
Posts: 231The focus of the reports from there seems to be on the time they spend horizontal....
Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
-
10-24-07 13:38 #347
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by AsiaTraveler2
True. I think most of his clientele walk upright. At least, that's what I've heard.
-
10-24-07 09:33 #346
Posts: 966Originally Posted by Giotto
Since you don't have any knuckle-draggers visiting Livingstone's, you don't need to worry!
AT2
-
10-24-07 05:48 #345
Posts: 4689Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
LOL. Let me first figure out how we can keep the part of the GDP coming to Livingstone's - then we can proceed with your strategy!
Giotto
-
10-24-07 02:27 #344
Posts: 1213Pegagus
Originally Posted by Juiceguy
I was a member for years and considered it the best money I spent in Thailand. Since I don't hang out in the tourist areas, I needed some place to go and relax and "monger" without attracting any attention and the little lady not finding out about my activities.
Plan dropping at least a hundred bucks per visit.
-
10-24-07 00:50 #343
Posts: 2102Originally Posted by Giotto
Gawd! G
I was trying to convince all the knuckle-draggers that they were insignificant so they'd stay home.
With this, you're encouraging even more to come.
-
10-23-07 21:02 #342
Posts: 4689Originally Posted by Blunderer
OTH is completely wrong reg. this issue.
Even Mr. Thaksin calculated the contribution of the Sex Tourism at around 2.3 % of Thailands GDP - and he downplayed it for political reasons. Some Hongkong newspapers came to much higher results.
Giotto
-
10-23-07 20:50 #341
Posts: 231Originally Posted by Old Thai Hand
The bulk of the prostitution has little or no effect on the macroeconomics of Thailand as you say, simply because it is Thai - Thai based and money is simply circulating around within the economy, no more is being put in and none is being taken out... so, for the purposes of Thai economics, we can ignore local prostitution (apart from some internal wealth redistribution).
Foreign prostitution was what I was talking about as it directly injects money into the Thai economy.
OK, onto the numbers, and before we start, let me warn you that numbers marked with a * are simply my wild speculation, the rest, I dug around for, then took an informal average - 65% of foreign visitors to Thailand are men, so 15% of visitors men are there sans partner.
Let's be generous and say only half of these are mongers - 7.5%*. Now, around 6% of the Thai economy is tourism. So, 7.5% of 6% is around half a percent.... but you are forgetting (I knew you'd forget!) that single men have a per capita spending capacity that is a lot higher than the average family traveling tourist - let's say double* which I think is conservative.
So, just from my deliberately conservative numbers, we've got almost 1% of the Thai GDP contributed by sex tourism (which is a fucking big number*).
But it doesn't stop there. What is impossible to calculate is:
How many regular couples come to Thailand for the sex industry (either to participate directly, or for that holiday sense of the risque by seeing a show), and how many of them would go somewhere else if the sex industry weren't there.
How much business is conducted in Thailand rather then elsewhere because men who can afford prostitutes, on the whole the only demographic with the financial authority to determine where what happens, because they have been here because of the naughty nightlife.
Last point... this 1% actually employs a much larger percentage of the population that other 1%s do (bear with me). Just about every other industry has a higher financial barrier to entry, so, people with money will 'create' the opportunities and syphon off money for themselves. Prostitution has no such barriers, so, every baht paid is directly to the employee with no middleman. More money paid directly to employees = more employees for lower cost.
So, all this 'significant/insignificant' part of the economy stuff comes down to your definition of significant. I'd consider a 1% increase in unemployment to be pretty massively significant. Given that my numbers are conservative and I could be waaaaay out, it might even be as much as 3% which is a HUGE number. Remember, none of this includes 'knock on' money for the advertising/exposure/whatever you call it that Thailand gets from the sex industry.
My figures do not include business travellers who play whilst away from home, nor expats - both of which are groups which would inflate the argument I am making even further.
-
10-23-07 19:13 #340
Posts: 147A Girls Condom Supply
Originally Posted by Juiceguy
You dont have any condoms? Thats kinda funny. Most of the local condoms are bad quality and often too small.
-
10-23-07 18:46 #339
Posts: 169Private Clubs in BKK
Does anyone know if any of the private clubs like Pegasus or Soprano House are worth it? A friend of mine is a member of the Soprano House and it is definitely a cool place to hang out. The girls are the hottest. However, I do not know if they are "available". Does anyone have any experience? Is it worth the 30,000 baht annual fee?
-
10-23-07 18:44 #338
Posts: 169Pattaya
Originally Posted by PlatformMonger
First I could not find a bar that I enjoyed and felt comfortable in, although I do like the Muai Tai Boxing going on outside of the some of the bars.
I found what I thought was a cutie at one bar. We walked back to my hotel and she was stumbling a little bit. I figured she just had a little too much to drink, no big deal. When we got back to the hotel, and better light, I realized that she was not nearly as pretty as I originally thought. We started playing around, she would not give a BJ at all! I turned over and figured I would nail it later. She fell alseep, woke up about an hour later and PUKED all over the bed! That sucked. I cleaned everything up, as she passed out again, but there was now way to get the smell out of the room.
The next morning she apologized, took a shower, and brushed her teeth. I jumped in the shower with her. Guess what, she did not have a condom! Wrote it all off to a very bad night, checked out of the hotel and went back to Bangkok. I tell people that Bangkok is like New York on crack and that Pattaya is like Bangkok on crack.
-
10-23-07 17:24 #337
Posts: 1719Originally Posted by Randy O